Skip to main content
Log in

A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Educational Technology Research and Development Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, a one-year program was conducted to investigate the relationships between students’ perceptions of mobile learning and their tendencies of peer interaction and higher-order thinking in issue-based mobile learning activities. To achieve the research objective, a survey consisting of eight scales, namely, usability, continuity, adaptive content, collaboration, communication, problem-solving, critical thinking and creativity, was developed. A total of 658 students from 38 high schools in Taiwan filled in the questionnaire after experiencing issue-based mobile learning activities. From the exploratory and confirmatory factor analyses, it was found that the questionnaire had high reliability and validity. The structural equation model further revealed that the provision of adaptive content in the mobile learning had positive impacts on the students’ tendency to interact with peers (i.e., collaboration and communication), which further affected their tendency to engage in higher-order thinking (i.e., problem-solving, critical thinking, and creativity). The findings of this study provide a good reference for researchers and school teachers who intend to promote mobile learning in school settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Al-Samarraie, H., Teo, T., & Abbas, M. (2013). Can structured representation enhance students’ thinking skills for better understanding of E-learning content? Computers & Education, 69, 463–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, L. W., & Krathwohl, D. R. (2001). A taxonomy for learning, teaching, and assessing: A revision of Bloom’s educational objectives. New York: Longamn.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bellanca, J., & Brandt, R. (2010). 21st Century skills: Rethinking how students learn. Indiana, IN: Solution Tree.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107, 238–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boyce, C. J., Mishra, C., Halverson, K. L., & Thomas, A. K. (2014). Getting students outside: Using technology as a way to stimulate engagement. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 23(6), 815–826.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. Sage Focus Editions, 154, 136.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carbonaro, M., Szafron, D., Cutumisu, M., & Schaeffer, J. (2010). Computer-game construction: A gender-neutral attractor to computing science. Computers & Education, 55(3), 1098–1111.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. S., Chen, T. S., & Hsu, W. H. (2011). The study on integrating WebQuest with mobile learning for environmental education. Computers & Education, 57(1), 1228–1239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang, K. E., Lan, Y. J., Chang, C. M., & Sung, Y. T. (2010). Mobile-device-supported strategy for Chinese reading comprehension. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 47(1), 69–84.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen, C. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2016). Employing intergroup competition in multitouch design-based learning to foster student engagement, learning achievement, and creativity. Computers & Education, 103, 99–113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, P. C., & Lau, S. (2013). A tale of two generations: Creativity growth and gender differences over a period of education and curriculum reforms. Creativity Research Journal, 25(4), 463–471.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chu, H. C. (2014). Potential negative effects of mobile learning on students’ learning achievement and cognitive load -a format assessment perspective. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 332–344.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chuang, P. J., Chiang, M. C., Yang, C. S., & Tsai, C. W. (2012). Social networks-based adaptive pairing strategy for cooperative learning. Educational Technology & Society, 15(3), 226–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Duran, R. L. (1992). Communicative adaptability: A review of conceptualization and measurement. Communication Quarterly, 40(3), 253–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Field, A. (2000). Discovering statistics using SPSS for Windows: Advanced techniques for the beginner. London, England: Sage publications Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier, K., & Reynolds, E. (2012). Power up your creative mind. Marion, Israel: Pieces of Learning.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gan, C. L., & Balakrishnan, V. (2014). Determinants of mobile wireless technology for promoting interactivity in lecture sessions: An empirical analysis. Journal of Computing in Higher Education, 26(2), 159–181.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • González-Marcos, A., Alba-Elías, F., Navaridas-Nalda, F., & Ordieres-Meré, J. (2016). Student evaluation of a virtual experience for project management learning: An empirical study for learning improvement. Computers & Education, 102, 172–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guerrero, L., Ochoa, S., Pino, J., & Collazos, C. (2006). Selecting computing devices to support mobile collaboration. Group Decision and Negotiation, 15(3), 243–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsiao, H. S., Lin, C. C., Feng, R. T., & Li, K. J. (2010). Location based services for outdoor ecological learning system: Design and implementation. Educational Technology & Society, 13(4), 98–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Hung, P. H., Chen, N. S., & Liu, G. Z. (2014). Mindtool-assisted in-field learning (MAIL): An advanced ubiquitous learning project in Taiwan. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 4–16.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., Chu, H. C., Kinshuk, K., & Chen, C. Y. (2012). A context-aware ubiquitous learning approach to conducting scientific inquiry activities in a science park. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 28(5), 931–947.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Yang, S. J. H. (2008). Criteria, strategies and research issues of context-aware ubiquitous learning. Educational Technology & Society, 11(2), 81–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis, C. H., Dickie, J., & Brown, G. (2013). Going mobile: Perspectives on aligning learning and teaching in geography. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 37(1), 76–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jeng, J. H., & Tang, T. I. (2004). A model of knowledge integration capability. Journal of Information, Technology and Society, 4(1), 13–45.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. C., Scanlon, E., & Clough, G. (2013). Mobile learning: Two case studies of supporting inquiry learning in informal and semiformal settings. Computers & Education, 61, 21–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jöreskog, K. G., & Sörbom, D. (1993). LISREL 8: Structural equation modeling with the SIMPLIS command language. Lincolnwood, IL: Scientific Software International.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kamarainen, A. M., Metcalf, S., Grotzer, T., Browne, A., Mazzuca, D., Tutwiler, M. S., et al. (2013). EcoMOBILE: Integrating augmented reality and probeware with environmental education field trips. Computers & Education, 68, 545–556.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelloway, E. K. (1998). Using LISREL for structural equation modeling: A researcher’s guide. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Lee, M., & Kim, M. (2014). Effects of mobile instant messaging on collaborative learning processes and outcomes: The case of South Korea. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 31–42.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, P., Suh, E., & Song, D. (2015). Development of a design-based learning curriculum through design-based research for a technology-enabled science classroom. Educational Technology Research and Development, 63(4), 575–602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C. (2014). Developing information literacy and critical thinking skills through domain knowledge learning in digital classrooms: An experience of practicing flipped classroom strategy. Computers & Education, 78, 160–173.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., Chan, T. W., Griffin, P., Hoppe, U., Huang, R. H., Kinshuk, et al. (2014). E-learning in school education in the coming 10 years for developing 21st century skills: Critical research issues and policy implications. Educational Technology & Society, 17(1), 70–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kong, S. C., & Song, Y. J. (2014). The impact of a principle-based pedagogical design on inquiry-based learning in a seamless learning environment in Hong Kong. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 127–141.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kozma, R. B., & Voogt, J. (2003). Technology, innovation, and educational change: A global perspective. Washington, DC: International Society for Technology in Education.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. L., & Hwang, G. J. (2014). Effects of mobile learning time on students’ conception of collaboration, communication, complex problem-solving, meta-cognitive awareness and creativity. International Journal of Mobile Learning and Organisation, 8(3), 276–291.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lai, C. Y., & Wu, C. C. (2012). Supporting nursing students’ critical thinking with a mobile web learning environment. Nurse Educator, 37(6), 235–236.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lan, Y. F., Tsai, P. W., Yang, S. H., & Hung, C. L. (2012). Comparing the social knowledge construction behavioral patterns of problem-based online asynchronous discussion in e/m-learning environments. Computers & Education, 59(4), 1122–1135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazakidou, G., & Retalis, S. (2010). Using computer supported collaborative learning strategies for helping students acquire self-regulated problem-solving skills in mathematics. Computers & Education, 54(1), 3–13.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, S., & Kim, B. G. (2015). Users’ preferential factors in Web-based e-learning systems for ease of workplace learning in Korea. Learning and Individual Differences, 39, 96–104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H. T., & Wang, M. J. (1994). Creativity assessment packet. Taipei: Psychological Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Y., Bui, E. N., Chang, C. H., & Lossman, H. G. (2010). PBL-GIS in secondary geography education: Does it result in higher-order learning outcomes? Journal of Geography, 109(4), 150–158.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., So, H. J., Toh, Y., & Chen, W. (2011). The Singapore experience: Synergy of national policy, classroom practice and design research. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 6(1), 9–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., Sun, D., Wu, L., Seow, P., Chia, G., Wong, L. H., et al. (2014). Implementing mobile learning curricula in a grade level: Empirical study of learning effectiveness at scale. Computers & Education, 77, 101–115.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Looi, C. K., & Wong, L. H. (2014). Implementing mobile learning curricula in schools: A programme of research from innovation to scaling. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 72–84.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ministry of Education, Singapore. (2010). MOE to enhance learning of 21st century competencies and strengthen art, music and physical education. Retrieved March 26, 2014, from http://www.moe.gov.sg/media/press/2010/03/moe-to-enhance-learning-of-21s.php

  • Morrison, G. R., Morrison, G. R., & Lowther, D. L. (2009). Integrating computer technology in to the classroom: Skills for the 21st century. London, United Kingdom: Pearson.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mouza, C., & Barrett-Greenly, T. (2015). Bridging the app gap: An examination of a professional development initiative on mobile learning in urban schools. Computers & Education, 88, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nova, N., Girardin, F., & Dillenbourg, P. (2005). ‘Location is not enough!’: An empirical study of location-awareness in mobile collaboration. Paper presented at the IEEE International Workshop on Wireless and Mobile Technologies in Education (WMTE’05).

  • OECD. (2008). Innovating to learn, learning to innovate. Paris, France: OECD Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Osman, G., Duffy, T. M., Chang, J. Y., & Lee, J. (2011). Learning through collaboration: Student perspectives. Asia Pacific Education Review, 12(4), 547–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ozdamli, F., & Uzunboylu, H. (2014). M-learning adequacy and perceptions of students and teachers in secondary schools. British Journal of Educational Technology, 46(1), 159–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pan, I. Y. (2001). A study on the effects of the play-based elementary science teaching (Master). Taipei Municipal University of Education, Taiwan.

  • Partnership for 21st century skills. (2009). Museums, libraries, and 21st century skills. Washington, DC: Institute of Museum and Library Services.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez-Sanagustín, M., Santos, P., Hernández-Leo, D., & Blat, J. (2012). 4SPPIces: A case study of factors in a scripted collaborative-learning blended course across spatial locations. International Journal of Computer-Supported Collaborative Learning, 7(3), 443–465.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruchter, M., Klar, B., & Geiger, W. (2010). Comparing the effects of mobile computers and traditional approaches in environmental education. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1054–1067.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schraw, G., & Dennison, R. S. (1994). Assessing metacognitive awareness. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 19(4), 460–475.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples, M. (2015). Seamless learning despite context. In L.-H. Wong, M. Milrad, & M. Specht (Eds.), Seamless learning in the age of mobile connectivity (pp. 41–55). Singapore: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Song, Y. J. (2014). “Bring Your Own Device (BYOD)” for seamless science inquiry in a primary school. Computers & Education, 74, 50–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spikol, D., & Otero, N. (2012). Designing better mobile collaborative laboratories for ecology field work for upper secondary schools. Paper presented at the Wireless, Mobile and Ubiquitous Technology in Education (WMUTE), 2012 IEEE Seventh International Conference on.

  • Swallow, M. (2015). The year-two decline: Exploring the incremental experiences of a 1:1 technology initiative. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 47(2), 122–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toh, Y., So, H. J., Seow, P., Chen, W. L., & Looi, C. K. (2013). Seamless learning in the mobile age: A theoretical and methodological discussion on using cooperative inquiry to study digital kids on-the-move. Learning Media and Technology, 38(3), 301–318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, C. C. (2005). Preferences toward Internet-based learning environments: High school students’ perspectives for science learning. Educational Technology & Society, 8(2), 203–213.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai, P. S., Tsai, C. C., & Hwang, G. J. (2012). Developing a survey for assessing preferences in constructivist context-aware ubiquitous learning environments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 28(3), 250–264.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Education. (2012). 21st century skills: A global imperative. Retrieved March 26, 2014, from http://www.ed.gov/blog/2012/03/21st-century-skills-a-global-imperative/

  • Vogel, B., Kurti, A., Milrad, M., Johansson, E., & Muller, M. (2014). Mobile inquiry learning in Sweden: Development insights on interoperability, extensibility and sustainability of the LETS GO software system. Educational Technology & Society, 17(2), 43–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walker, S. L., & Fraser, B. J. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument for assessing distance education learning environments in higher education: The distance education learning environments survey (DELES). Learning Environments Research, 8(3), 289–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Y., & Chiew, V. (2010). On the cognitive process of human problem solving. Cognitive Systems Research, 11(1), 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, S. L., & Wu, P. Y. (2008). The role of feedback and self-efficacy on web-based learning: The social cognitive perspective. Computers & Education, 51(4), 1589–1598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Washor, E., Mojkowski, C., & Robinson, S. K. (2013). Leaving to learn: How out-of-school learning increases student engagement and reduces dropout rates. New Hampshire, USA: Heinemann Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wiley, J. (1998). Expertise as mental set: The effects of domain knowledge in creative problem solving. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 716–730.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wong, L. H., Chai, C. S., Aw, G. P., & King, R. B. (2015). Enculturating seamless language learning through artifact creation and social interaction process. Interactive Learning Environments, 23(2), 130–157.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, H. L., & Cheng, H. H. (2010). Creativity of student information system projects: From the perspective of network embeddedness. Computers & Education, 54(1), 209–221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. T. C., Gamble, J. H., Hung, Y. W., & Lin, T. Y. (2014). An online adaptive learning environment for critical-thinking-infused English literacy instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 45(4), 723–747.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang, Y. T. C., & Wu, W. C. I. (2012). Digital storytelling for enhancing student academic achievement, critical thinking, and learning motivation: A year-long experimental study. Computers & Education, 59(2), 339–352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zeng, L., Proctor, R. W., & Salvendy, G. (2011). Can traditional divergent thinking tests be trusted in measuring and predicting real-world creativity? Creativity Research Journal, 23(1), 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, C. (2013). Students’ and teachers’ thinking styles and preferred teacher interpersonal behavior. Journal of Educational Research, 106(5), 399–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zydney, J. M., & Warner, Z. (2016). Mobile apps for science learning: Review of research. Computers & Education, 94, 1–17.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This study is supported in part by the Ministry of Science and Technology of the Republic of China under contract numbers MOST-105-2511-S-011-008-MY3 and MOST 106-2511-S-011-005-MY3.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Chiu-Lin Lai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hwang, GJ., Lai, CL., Liang, JC. et al. A long-term experiment to investigate the relationships between high school students’ perceptions of mobile learning and peer interaction and higher-order thinking tendencies. Education Tech Research Dev 66, 75–93 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11423-017-9540-3

Keywords

Navigation