Skip to main content
Log in

2D sparse signal recovery via 2D orthogonal matching pursuit

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Science China Information Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recovery algorithms play a key role in compressive sampling (CS). Most of current CS recovery algorithms are originally designed for one-dimensional (1D) signal, while many practical signals are two-dimensional (2D). By utilizing 2D separable sampling, 2D signal recovery problem can be converted into 1D signal recovery problem so that ordinary 1D recovery algorithms, e.g. orthogonal matching pursuit (OMP), can be applied directly. However, even with 2D separable sampling, the memory usage and complexity at the decoder are still high. This paper develops a novel recovery algorithm called 2D-OMP, which is an extension of 1D-OMP. In the 2D-OMP, each atom in the dictionary is a matrix. At each iteration, the decoder projects the sample matrix onto 2D atoms to select the best matched atom, and then renews the weights for all the already selected atoms via the least squares. We show that 2D-OMP is in fact equivalent to 1D-OMP, but it reduces recovery complexity and memory usage significantly. What’s more important, by utilizing the same methodology used in this paper, one can even obtain higher dimensional OMP (say 3D-OMP, etc.) with ease.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Candes E, Romberg J, Tao T. Robust uncertainty principles: Exact signal reconstruction from highly incomplete frequency information. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52: 489–509

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Candes E, Tao T. Near optimal signal recovery from random projections: universal encoding strategies. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52: 5406–5425

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  3. Donoho D. Compressed sensing. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2006, 52: 1289–1306

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  4. Candes E, Tao T. Decoding by linear programming. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2005, 51: 4203–4215

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Tropp J, Gilbert A. Signal recovery from random measurements via orthogonal matching pursuit. IEEE Trans Inform Theory, 2007, 53: 4655–4666

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Pope G. Compressive sensing: a summary of reconstruction algorithms. Master thesis. Zürich: Eidgenössische Technische Hochschule. 2009

    Google Scholar 

  7. Rivenson Y, Stern A. Compressed imaging with a separable sensing operator. IEEE Signal Process Lett, 2009, 16: 449–452

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ghaffari A, Babaie-Zadeh M, Jutten C. Sparse decomposition of two dimensional signals. In: IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing, ICASSP, Taipei, 2009. 3157–3160

  9. Liu Y, Wu M Y, Wu S J. Fast OMP algorithm for 2D angle estimation in MIMO radar. IET Electronics Lett, 2010, 46: 444–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yong Fang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fang, Y., Wu, J. & Huang, B. 2D sparse signal recovery via 2D orthogonal matching pursuit. Sci. China Inf. Sci. 55, 889–897 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4551-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11432-012-4551-5

Keywords

Navigation