Skip to main content
Log in

The effect of annealing treatment on the performance of bulk heterojunction solar cells with donor and acceptor different weight ratios

  • Published:
Science in China Series G: Physics, Mechanics and Astronomy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bulk heterojunction organic solar cells (OSCs) based on the blend of poly(2-methoxy-5(2′-ethyl-hexyloxy)-1,4-phenylenevinylene (MEH-PPV) and [6,6]-phenyl C61 butyric acid methyl ester (PCBM) with different weight ratios (from 1:3 to 1:5) have been fabricated and the effect of annealing treatment on the performance of OSCs has also been studied. Experimental results point to the best optimized doping concentration 1:4 for MEH-PPV:PCBM. Furthermore, it is found that the devices with annealing treatment at 150°C with 8 min show better performance compared with the devices without treatment. The series resistance (R s) is decreased, while the shunt resistance (R sh) increased by nearly 1.5 times. The short-circuit current density (J sc) and fill factor (FF) are improved by annealing treatment. As a result, the power conversion efficiency (PCE) of the devices increases from 0.49 % to 1.21 % with the ratio of 1:3 and from 1.09% to 1.42% with the ratio of 1:4.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brabec C J, Sariciftci N S, Hummelen J C. Plastic solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2001, 11: 15–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Coakley K M, McGehee M D. Conjugated polymer photovoltaic cells. Chem Mater, 2004, 16: 4533–4542

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Brabec C J. Sol energy mater sol cells. Organic Photovoltaics: Technol Market, 2004, 83: 273–292

    Google Scholar 

  4. Tao H, Zhang F J, Xu Z. Effect of UV-ozone treatment on ITO and post-annealing on the performance of organic solar cells. Synthetic Met, 2009, 159: 754–756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Shaheen S E. 2.5% efficient organic plastic solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 2001, 78: 841–843

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Padinger F, Rittberger R S, Sariciftci N S. Effects of postproduction treatment on plastic solar cells. Adv Funct Mater, 2003, 13: 85–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Walduf C, Schilinsky P, Hauch J, et al. Polymer photovoltaic detectors: Progress and recent developments. Thin Solid Films, 2004, 451–452: 105–108

    Google Scholar 

  8. Yu G, Gao J, Hummelen J C, et al. Polymer photovoltaic cells: Enhanced efficiencies via a network of internal donor-acceptor heterojunctions. Science, 1995, 270: 1789–1791

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sariciftci N S, Smilowitz L, Heeger A J, et al. Photoinduced electron transfer from a conducting polymer to buckminsterfullerene. Science, 1992, 258: 1474–1476

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kim H, Kim J Y, Lee K, et al. Organic photovoltaic cells based on conjugated polymer/fullerene composites. Curr Appl Phys, 2001, 1: 139–143

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Yang F, Shtein M, Forrest S R. Controlled growth of a molecular bulk heterojunction photovoltaic cell. Nat Mater, 2005, 4: 37–41

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Green M A, Emery K, Hisikawa Y, et al. Short communication solar cell efficiency tables (version 30). Prog Photovolt-Res Appl, 2007, 15: 425–430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch N. Organic electronic devices and their functional interfaces. Chem Phys Chem, 2007, 8: 1438–1455

    Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang F J, Aollmer A, Zhang J, et al. Energy level alignment and morphology of interfaces between molecular and polymeric organic semiconductors. Org Electron, 2007, 8: 606–614

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zhang F J, Zhao S L, Xu Z, et al. Transient demonstration of exciton behaviours in solid state cathodoluminescence under different driving voltage. Chin Phys, 2007, 16: 1464–1466

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Reyes-Reyes M, Kim K, Carroll D L. High-efficiency photovoltaic devices based on annealed poly(3-hexylthiophene) and 1-(3-methoxycarbonyl)-propyl-1-phenyl-(6,6)C61 blends. Appl Phys Lett, 2005, 87: 083506

    Google Scholar 

  17. Chu C W, Yang H C, Hou W J, et al. Control of the nanoscale crystallinity and phase separation in polymer solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 2008, 92: 103306

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Ma W L, Yang C Y, Gong X, et al. Thermally stable, efficient polymer solar cells with nanoscale control of the interpenetrating network morphology. Adv Funct Mater, 2005, 15: 1617–1622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhang G, Li W L, Chu B, et al. Cascade-energy-level alignment based organic photovoltaic cells by utilizing copper phthalocyanine as bipolar carrier transporting layer. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 94: 143302

    Google Scholar 

  20. Krebs F C, Bagger N C, Anderson M, et al. Lifetimes of organic photovoltaics: Photochemistry, atmosphere effects and barrier layers in ITO-MEHPPV:PCBM-aluminium devices. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2005, 86: 499–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Bundgaard E, Krebs F C. Large-area photovoltaics based on low band gap copolymers of thiophene and benzothiadiazole or benzo-bis (thiadiazole). Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, 2007, 91: 1019–1025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Koch N, Elschner A, Rabe J P, et al. Work function independent hole-injection barriers between pentacene and conducting polymers. Adv Mater, 2005, 17: 330–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Dmour H, Taylor D M. Revisiting the origin of open circuit voltage in nanocrystalline-TiO2/polymer heterojunction solar cells. Appl Phys Lett, 2009, 94: 223309

    Google Scholar 

  24. Aernouts T, Geens W, Poortmans J, et al. Extraction of bulk and contact components of the series resistance in organic bulk donor-acceptor-heterojunctions. Thin Solid Films, 2002, 403–404: 297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Zheng Xu or YongSheng Wang.

Additional information

Supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Nos. 10774013 and 10804006), the National Natural Science Funds for Distinguished Young Scholar (Grant No. 60825407), the Major State Basic Research Development Program of China (Grant No. 2010CB327705), the Beijing Jiaotong University (Grant No. 2007RC065), the Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant No. 20070004024), the Research Fund for the Youth Scholars of the Doctoral Program of Higher Education (Grant No. 20070004031), and the 111 Project (Grant No. B08002)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Song, J., Xu, Z., Zhang, F. et al. The effect of annealing treatment on the performance of bulk heterojunction solar cells with donor and acceptor different weight ratios. Sci. China Ser. G-Phys. Mech. Astron. 52, 1606–1610 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0220-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11433-009-0220-0

Keywords

Navigation