Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Comparison of extension and compression triaxial tests for dense sand and sandstone

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

It is generally observed that for a given confining pressure the friction angle at peak strength of dense sand deduced from triaxial compression test is smaller than the one obtained from extension tests. In fact, this conclusion depends essentially on the way one takes into account the global confinement condition. In this paper, we show that when there is no significant grain crushing, the dependence of the maximum friction angle with the average of minor and major principal effective stress is similar for compression and extension tests. A similar result is obtained for sandstones when the failure mode involves a shear failure plane.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

References

  1. Bésuelle P (1999) Déformation et rupture dans les roches tendres et les sols indurés: comportement homogène et localisation, thèse de l’Université Joseph Fourier, Grenoble.

  2. Bésuelle P, Desrues J, Raynaud S (2000) Experimental characterisation of the localisation phenomenon inside a Vosges sandstone in a triaxial cell. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:1223–1237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Desrues J, Chambon R (2002) Shear band analysis and shear moduli calibration. Int J Sol Struct 39:3757–3776

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Gajo A, Muir Wood D, Bigoni D (2007) On certain critical material and testing characteristics affecting shear band development in sand. Géotechnique 57(5):449–461

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Haimson B (2006) True triaxial stresses and the brittle fracture of rock. Pure Appl Geophys 163:1101–1130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Kolymbas D, Wu W (1989) A device for lateral strain measurement in triaxial tests with unsaturated specimens. Geotech Test J 12:227–229

    Google Scholar 

  7. Kolymbas D, Wu W (1990) Recent results of triaxial tests with granular materials. Powder Technol 60:99–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Lade PV, Bopp PA (2005) Relative density effects on drained sand behavior at high pressures. Soils Found 45:1–13

    Google Scholar 

  9. Lade PV, Yamamuro JA, Skyers BD (1996) Effects of shear band formation in triaxial extension tests. Geotech Test J 19:398–410

    Google Scholar 

  10. Lade PV (2006) Assessment of test data for selection of 3-D failure criterion for sand. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 30:307–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Papamichos E, Tronvoll J, Vardoulakis I, Labuz JF, Skjærstein A, Unander TE, Sulem J (2000) Constitutive testing of Red Wildmoor sandstone. Mech Cohes Frict Mater 5:1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Sulem J, Vardoulakis I, Papamichos E, Oulahna A, Tronvoll J (1999) Elasto-plastic modelling of Red Wildmoor sandstone. Mech cohes frict Materials 4:215–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Suzuki K, Yamada T (2006) Double strain softening and diagonally crossing shear bands of sand in drained triaxial tests. Int J Geomech 6:440–446

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Vardoulakis I (1980) Shear band inclination and shear modulus of sand in biaxial test. Int J Num Anal Meth Geomech 4:103–119

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Vardoulakis I, Sulem J (1995) Bifurcation analysis in geomechanics, Chapman and Hall, New York

  16. Wang Q, Lade PV (2001) Shear banding in true triaxial tests and its effect on failure on sand. J Eng Mech 127:754–761

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Wu W, Kolymbas D (1991) On some issues in triaxial extension tests. Geotech Test J 14:276–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (1995) Strain localization in extension tests on granular materials. J Eng Mech 121:828–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yamamuro JA, Lade PV (1996) Drained sand behavior in axisymmetric tests at high pressure. J Geotech Eng 122:109–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors wish to thank Prof. Dimitrios Kolymbas for fruitful discussions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Université Paris-Est, UR Navier, CERMES, Ecole Nationale des Ponts et Chaussées, 6 et 8 avenue Blaise Pascal, 77455, Marne-la-Vallée, France

    A. Corfdir & J. Sulem

Authors
  1. A. Corfdir
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. Sulem
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Corfdir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Corfdir, A., Sulem, J. Comparison of extension and compression triaxial tests for dense sand and sandstone. Acta Geotech. 3, 241–246 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-008-0068-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-008-0068-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation