Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bioclogging and biocementation can be used to improve the geotechnical properties of sand. These processes can be performed by adsorption of urease-producing bacterial cells on the sand grain surfaces, which is followed by crystallization of calcite produced from the calcium salt and urea solution due to bacterial hydrolysis of urea. In this paper, the effect of intact cell suspension of Bacillus sp. strain VS1, suspension of the washed bacterial cells, and culture liquid without bacterial cells on microbially induced calcite precipitation in sand was studied. The test results showed that adsorption/retention of urease activity on sand treated with washed cells of Bacillus sp. strain VS1 was 5–8 times higher than that treated with culture liquid. The unconfined compressive strength of sand treated with the suspension of washed cells was 1.7 times higher than that treated with culture liquid. This difference could be due to fast inactivation of urease by protease which was present in the culture liquid. The adsorption of bacterial cells on sand pretreated with calcium, aluminum, or ferric salts was 29–37 % higher as compared with that without pretreatment. The permeability of sand varied with the content of precipitated calcium. For bioclogging of sand, the content of precipitated calcium had to be 1.3 % (w/w) or higher. The shear strength of biotreated sand was also dependent on the content of precipitated calcium. To achieve an unconfined compressive strength of 1.5 MPa or higher, the content of precipitated calcium in the treated sand had to be 4.2 % (w/w) or higher. These data can be used as the reference values for geotechnical applications such as bioclogging for reducing the permeability of sand and biocementation for increasing the shear strength of soil.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ajorloo AM, Mroueh H, Lancelot L (2012) Experimental investigation of cement treated sand behavior under triaxial test. Geotech Geol Eng 30:129–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Al-Thawadi SM (2011) Ureolytic bacteria and calcium carbonate formation as a mechanism of strength enhancement of sand. J Adv Sci Eng Res 1:98–114

    Google Scholar 

  3. American Public Health Association (APHA) (1999) Standard methods for the analysis of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  4. Burbank MB, Weaver TJ, Green T, Williams BC, Crawford RL (2011) Precipitation of calcite by indigenous microorganisms to strengthen liquefiable soil. Geomicrobiol J 28:301–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Burbank MB, Weaver TJ, Williams BC, Crawford RL (2012) Urease activity of ureolytic bacteria isolated from six soils in which calcite was precipitated by indigenous bacteria. Geomicrobiol J 29:389–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Cacchio P, Ercole C, Cappuccio G, Lepidi A (2003) Calcium carbonate precipitation by bacterial strains isolated from a limestone cave and from a loamy soil. Geomicrobiol J 20:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chou CW, Seagren EA, Aydilek AH, Lai M (2011) Biocalcification of sand through ureolysis. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 137:1179–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Chu J, Varaksin, S, Klotz, U, Menge, P (2009) State of the art report: construction processes. In: Proceedings of 17th international conference on soil mechanics and geotechnical engineering, M. Hamza et al. (eds), vol 4, pp 3006–3135

  9. Chu J, Ivanov V, Stabnikov V (2012) Microbially induced calcium carbonate precipitation on surface or in the bulk of soil. Geomicrobiol J 29:544–549

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Cupp-Enyard C (2008) Sigma’s non-specific protease activity assay-casein as a substrate. J Visual Exper 19:899–910

    Google Scholar 

  11. De Muynck W, De Belie N, Verstraete W (2010) Microbial carbonate precipitation in construction materials: a review. Ecol Eng 36(2):118–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Degens BP (1997) Macro-aggregation of soils by biological bonding and binding mechanisms and the factors affecting these: a review. Aust J Soil Res 35:431–459

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. DeJong JT, Mortensen BM, Martinez BC, Nelson DC (2010) Bio-mediated soil improvement. Ecol Eng Res 36:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Forster SM (1990) The role of microorganisms in aggregate formation and soil stabilization: types of aggregation. Arid Soil Res Manag 4:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Frankel RB, Bazylinski DA (2003) Biologically induced mineralization by bacteria. Rev Mineral Geochem 54:95–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Gollapudi UK, Knutson CL, Bang SS, Islam MR (1995) A new method for controlling leaching through permeable channels. Chemosphere 30:695–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hammes F, Boon N, De Villiers J, Verstraete W, Siciliano SD (2003) Strain-specific ureolytic microbial calcium carbonate precipitation. Appl Environ Microbiol 69:4901–4909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Harkes MP, van Paassen LA, Booster JL, Whiffin VS, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Fixation and distribution of bacterial activity in sand to induce carbonate precipitation for ground reinforcement. Ecol Eng 36:112–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hendricks DW, Post FJ, Khairnar DR (1979) Adsorption of bacteria on soils: experiments, thermodynamic rationale, and application. Water Air Soil Poll 12:219–232

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Ivanov V (2010) Environmental microbiology for engineers. CRC Press, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  21. Ivanov V, Chu J (2008) Applications of microorganisms to geotechnical engineering for bioclogging and biocementation of soil in situ. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:39–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jacobs A, Lafolie F, Herry JM, Debroux M (2007) Kinetic adhesion of bacterial cells to sand: cell surface properties and adhesion rate. Colloids Surf B 59:35–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Jiang G, Noonan MJ, Buchan GD, Smith N (2007) Transport of Escherichia coli through variably saturated sand columns and modeling approaches. J Contam Hydrol 93:2–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Karol RH (2003) Chemical grouting and soil stabilization, 3rd edn. M Dekker, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  25. Krauskopf KB, Bird DK (1995) Introduction to geochemistry, 3rd edn. McGraw-Hill Inc., New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lukasik J, Cheng YF, Lu F, Tamplin M, Farrah SR (1999) Removal of microorganisms from water by columns containing sand coated with ferric and aluminum hydroxides. Water Res 33:769–777

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Mitchell JK, Santamarina JC (2005) Biological considerations in geotechnical engineering. ASCE J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 131:1222–1233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Nemati M, Voordouw G (2003) Modification of porous media permeability, using calcium carbonate produced enzymatically in situ. Enzyme Microb Technol 33:635–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Qian C, Wang J, Wang RW, Cheng L (2009) Corrosion protection of cement-based building materials by surface deposition of CaCO3 by Bacillus pasteurii. Mater Sci Eng 29:1273–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Rivadeneyra MA, Perez-Garcia I, Salmeron V, Ramos-Cormenzana A (1985) Bacterial precipitation of calcium carbonate in presence of phosphate. Soil Biol Biochem 17:171–172

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Rong H, Qian CX, Li LZ (2012) Influence of molding process on mechanical properties of sandstone cemented by microbe cement. Constr Build Mater 28:238–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Stabnikov V, Naemi M, Ivanov V, Chu J (2011) Formation of water-impermeable crust on sand surface using biocement. Cement Concrete Res 41:1143–1149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Stocks-Fischer S, Galinat JK, Bang SS (1999) Microbiological precipitation of CaCO3. Soil Biol Biochem 31:1563–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Tan Y, Bond W, Rovira AD, Brisbane PG, Griffin DM (1991) Movement through soil of a biological control agent, Pseudomonas fluorescens. Soil Biol Biochem 23:821–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. van Paassen LA, Ghose R, van der Linden TJM, van der Star WRL, van Loosdrecht MCM (2010) Quantifying biomediated ground improvement by ureolysis: large-scale biogrout experiment. J Geotechn Geoenviron Eng 36:1721–1728

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vasarhelyi B, Van P (2006) Influence of water content on the strength of rock. Eng Geol 84:70–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Whiffin VS, van Paassen LA, Harkes MP (2007) Microbial carbonate precipitation as a soil improvement technique. Geomicrobiol J 24:417–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Part of the study presented in this paper was supported by the SERC Grant No. 0921420043 from the Agency for Science, Technology and Research, Singapore. Part of study also formed part of a collaborative program with Hohai University, China, under the University Characteristics Project of the Ministry of Education, People Republic of China, Grant No. Ts2012HHDX029.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jian Chu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Chu, J., Ivanov, V., Naeimi, M. et al. Optimization of calcium-based bioclogging and biocementation of sand. Acta Geotech. 9, 277–285 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0278-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-013-0278-8

Keywords

Navigation