Skip to main content
Log in

Time-dependent ground movements induced by shield tunneling in soft clay: a parametric study

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this work, the effects of coupled hydromechanical (consolidation) processes associated with shield tunneling excavation in soft clays are investigated with particular attention to the prediction of ground movements at the ground surface. A series of 2d FE analyses have been carried out in parametric form in order to investigate the effects of tunnel excavation velocity relative to the soil consolidation rate and the hydraulic boundary conditions at the tunnel boundary. The shield advancement process has been simulated with a simplified procedure incorporating both volume loss and ovalization of the tunnel section. In order to investigate the relative importance of soil consolidation during the excavation process, different characteristic times for the tunnel face advancement and for the consolidation process around the tunnel have been considered, for the two limiting conditions of fully permeable liner and impervious liner. The potential damage induced by the tunnel excavation on existing structures, based on computed ground surface distortions and horizontal deformations, has been found to vary significantly with time during the consolidation process. The results of the simulations allowed to obtain useful information on the minimum tunnel face advancement speed for which the assumption of fully undrained conditions for the soil during the excavations is acceptable, as well as on the speed range for which solving the fully coupled hydromechanical problem is necessary.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Addenbrooke TI (1996) Numerical analysis of tunneling in stiff clay. Ph.D. thesis, University of London, Imperial College

  2. Anagnostou G (1995) The influence of tunnel excavation on the hydraulic head. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 19(10):725–746

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  3. Anagnostou G (2007) The one-step solution of the advancing tunnel heading problem. In: ECCOMAS thematic conference on computational methods in tunnelling, EURO:TUN 2007. Vienna University of Technology, Vienna, p 90

  4. Anagnostou G, Kovári K (2007) Tunnelling through geological fault zones. International symposium on design, vol 1, construction and operation of long tunnels, TaipeiChinese Taipei Tunnelling Association, Taipei, pp 509–520

  5. Augarde CE, Burd HJ (2001) Three-dimensional finite element analysis of lined tunnels. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 25:243–262

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Boscardin MD, Cording EJ (1989) Building response to excavation-induced settlements. J Geotech Eng ASCE 115(1):1–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Burland J (1990) On the compressibility and shear strength of natural clays. Géotechnique 40(3):329–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Callari C, Casini S (2005) Tunnels in saturated elasto-plastic soils: three-dimensional validation of a plane simulation procedure. In: Mechanical modelling and computational issues in civil engineering. Springer, pp 143–164

  9. Clough GW, Sweeney BP, Finno RJ (1983) Measured soil response to EPB shield tunnelling. J Geotech Eng ASCE 109(2):131–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Do NA, Dias D, Oreste P, Djeran-Maigre I (2014) Three-dimensional numerical simulation for mechanized tunnelling in soft ground: the influence of the joint pattern. Acta Geotech 9(4):673–694

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Finno RJ, Clough GW (1985) Evaluation of soil response to EPB shield tunnelling. J Geotech Eng ASCE 111:155–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Galli G, Grimaldi A, Leonardi A (2004) Three-dimensional modelling of tunnel excavation and lining. Comput Geotech 31:171–183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gens A, Potts DM (1988) Critical state models in computational geomechanics. Eng Comput 5(3):178–197

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. González C, Sagaseta C (2001) Patterns of soil deformations around tunnels. Application to the extension of Madrid Metro. Comput Geotech 28:445–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Hibbitt Karlsson (2002) Sorensen: ABAQUS: theory manual. Karlsson & Sorensen, Hibbitt

    Google Scholar 

  16. Jaky J (1944) The coefficient of earth pressure at rest. J Soc Hung Archit Eng 78(22):355–358

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kasper T, Meschke G (2006) A numerical study of the effect of soil and grout material properties and cover depth in shield tunnelling. Comput Geotech 33(4):234–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Komiya K, Soga K, Akagi H, Hagiwara T, Bolton MD (1999) Finite element modelling of excavation advancement process of a shield tunnelling machine. Soils Found 39(3):37–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kuesel TR (1972) Soft ground tunnels for the BART project. In: Lane KS, Garfield LA (eds) Proceedings of the North American rapid excavation and tunneling conference, Chicago, I (1972), pp 287–313

  20. Langhaar HL (1987) Dimensional analysis and theory of models. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Lee KM, Rowe KR, Lo KY (1992) Subsidence owing to tunnelling. I. Estimating the gap parameter. Can Geotech J 29:929–940

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Liu H, Small J, Carter J (2008) Full 3d modelling for effects of tunnelling on existing support systems in the Sydney region. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23(4):399–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Mašín D (2009) 3D modeling of an NATM tunnel in high K0 clay using two different constitutive models. J Geotech Geoenviron Eng 1326–1335. doi:10.1061/(ASCE)GT.1943-5606.0000017

  24. Miriano C (2008) Modellazione numerica dei movimenti indotti dallo scavo di gallerie superficiali in terreni a grana fine. Ph.D. thesis, Università degli Studi di Perugia, Dottorato in Ingegneria Civile

  25. Miriano C, Tamagnini C (2010) On the effects of modelling gap closure and assumed soil behavior on the fe predictions of ground movements induced by tunneling in soft clay. In: Proceedings of NUMGE 2010, Trondheim

  26. Mroueh M, Shahrour I (2003) A full 3-D finite element analysis of tunneling–adjacent structures interaction. Comput Geotech 30:245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. O’reilly M, New B (1982) Settlements above tunnels in the United Kingdom—their magnitude and prediction. In: Proceedings of III international symposium tunnelling, vol 82, pp 173–181. Institution of Mining and Metallurgy

  28. Ramoni M, Anagnostou G (2007) The effect of advance rate on shield loading in squeezing ground. In: Underground space–the 4th dimension of metropolises, ITA world tunnel congress, pp 673–677

  29. Ramoni M, Anagnostou G (2011) The effect of consolidation on tbm shield loading in water-bearing squeezing ground. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:63–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Roscoe KH, Burland JB (1968) On the generalised stress-strain behaviour of ‘wet’ clay. In: Heyman J, Leckie FA (eds) Engineering plasticity. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 535–609

    Google Scholar 

  31. Rowe RK, Lo KY, Kack GJ (1983) A method of estimating surface settlements above tunnels constructed in soft ground. Can Geotech J 20(8):11–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Sagaseta C (1998) On the role of analytical solutions for the evaluation of soil deformations around tunnels. In: Cividini A (ed) Application of numerical methods to geotechnical problems. CISM courses and lectures no. 397. Springer, Wien, pp 3–24

    Google Scholar 

  33. Shin J, Potts D, Zdravkovic L (2005) The effect of pore-water pressure on natm tunnel linings in decomposed granite soil. Can Geotech J 2(6):1585–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Shin JH, Addenbrooke TI, Potts DM (2002) A numerical study of the effect of groundwater movement on long term tunnel behaviour. Géotechnique 52(6):391–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Swoboda G, Abu-Krisha A (1999) Three-dimensional numerical modelling for TBM tunnelling in consolidated clay. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 14(3):327–333

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tamagnini C, Miriano C, Sellari E, Cipollone N (2005) Two-dimensional FE analysis of ground movements induced by shield tunnelling: the role of tunnel ovalization. Riv Ital Geotec 1:11–33

    Google Scholar 

  37. Stallebrass SE, Taylor RN (1997) The development and evaluation of a constitutive model for the prediction of ground movements in overconsolidated clay. Géotechnique 47(2):235–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Wongsaroj J, Soga K, Mair R (2013) Tunnelling-induced consolidation settlements in london clay. Géotechnique 63(13):1103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Yi X, Rowe RK, Lee KM (1993) Observed and calculated pore pressures and deformations induced by an earth balance shield. Can Geotech J 30(3):476–490

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank the two anonymous reviewers for their useful comments and suggestions.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Claudio Tamagnini.

Additional information

Chiara Miriano—Professional Engineer, formerly at University of Perugia.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cattoni, E., Miriano, C., Boco, L. et al. Time-dependent ground movements induced by shield tunneling in soft clay: a parametric study. Acta Geotech. 11, 1385–1399 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0452-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0452-x

Keywords

Navigation