Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Fully coupled hydro-mechanical numerical manifold modeling of porous rock with dominant fractures

  • Research Paper
  • Published:
Acta Geotechnica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Coupled hydro-mechanical (HM) processes are significant in geological engineering such as oil and gas extraction, geothermal energy, nuclear waste disposal and for the safety assessment of dam foundations and rock slopes, where the geological media usually consist of fractured rock masses. In this study, we developed a model for the analysis of coupled hydro-mechanical processes in porous rock containing dominant fractures, by using the numerical manifold method (NMM). In the current model, the fractures are regarded as different material domains from surrounding rock, i.e., finite-thickness fracture zones as porous media. Compared with the rock matrix, these fractured porous media are characterized with nonlinear behavior of hydraulic and mechanical properties, involving not only direct (poroelastic) coupling but also indirect (property change) coupling. By combining the potential energy associated with mechanical responses, fluid flow and solid–fluid interactions, a new formulation for direct HM coupling in porous media is established. For indirect coupling associated with fracture opening/closure, we developed a new approach implicitly considering the nonlinear properties by directly assembling the corresponding strain energy. Compared with traditional methods with approximation of the nonlinear constitutive equations, this new formulation achieves a more accurate representation of the nonlinear behavior. We implemented the new model for coupled HM analysis in NMM, which has fixed mathematical grid and accurate integration, and developed a new computer code. We tested the code for direct coupling on two classical poroelastic problems with coarse mesh and compared the results with the analytical solutions, achieving excellent agreement, respectively. Finally, we tested for indirect coupling on models with a single dominant fracture and obtained reasonable results. The current poroelastic NNM model with a continuous finite-thickness fracture zone will be further developed considering thin fractures in a discontinuous approach for a comprehensive model for HM analysis in fractured porous rock masses.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. An XM, Li LX, Ma GW, Zhang HH (2011) Prediction of rank deficiency in partition of unity-based methods with plane triangular or quadrilateral meshes. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 200:665–674

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  2. Bandis S, Lunsden AC, Barton NR (1983) Fundamentals of rock joint deformation. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 29:249–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Biot MA (1941) General theory of three dimensional consolidation. J Appl Phys 12:155–164

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Bower KM, Zyvoloski G (1997) A numerical model for thermo-hydro-mechanical coupling in fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 34:1201–1211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen GQ, Ohnishi Y, Ito T (1998) Development of high-order manifold method. Int J Numer Methods Eng 43:685–712

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Duncan JM, Chang CY (1970) Nonlinear analysis of stress– strain in soils. J Soil Mech Found Div ASCE 96(SM5):1629–1653

    Google Scholar 

  7. Goodman RE (1974) The mechanical properties of joints. In: Advances in rock mechanics: proceedings of the third congress of the international society for rock mechanics, pp. 127–140

  8. Goodman RE (1976) Methods of geological engineering in discontinuous rocks. West Publishing, New York

    Google Scholar 

  9. Guvanasen V, Chan T (1995) A new three-dimensional finite-element analysis of hysteresis thermohydromechanical deformation of fractured rock mass with dilatance in fractures. In: Proceedings of the second conference on mechanics of jointed and faulted rocks. Vienna April 10–14, pp. 347–442

  10. Hu M, Wang Y, Rutqvist J (2015) On continuous and discontinuous approaches for modeling groundwater flow in heterogeneous media using the numerical manifold method: model development and comparison. Adv Water Resour 80:17–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Itasca Consulting Group (2011) UDEC Manual: Universal Distinct Element Code version 5.0 Minneapolis, MN, USA

  12. Itasca Consulting Group (2013) 3DEC (Advanced, Three Dimensional Distinct Element Code), Version 5.0, Minneapolis, MN, USA

  13. Jing LR, Ma Y, Fang ZL (2001) Modeling of fluid flow and solid deformation for fractured rocks with discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) method. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(3):343–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kim Y, Amadei B, Pan E (1999) Modeling the effect of water, excavation sequence and rock reinforcement with discontinuous deformation analysis. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 36(7):949–970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kohl T, Hopkirk RJ (1995) The finite element program “FRACTure” for the simulation of hot dry rock reservoir behavior. Geothermics 24:345–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Ling SD, Ye M (2005) Manifold element method for Biot’s plane consolidation analysis. Chin J Comput Mech 22(3):274–280

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ma GW, An XM, He L (2010) The numerical manifold method: a review. Int J Comput Methods 7(1):1–32

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. McNamee J, Gibson RE (1960) Plane strain and axially symmetric problems of the consolidation of a semi-infinite clay stratum. Q J Mech Appl Math 13:210–227

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Nguyen TS (1996) Description of the computer code FRACON. In: Stephansson O, Jing L, Tsang C-F (eds) Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical processes of fractured media, vol 79. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 539–544 (Developments in Geotechnical Engineering)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  20. Nguyen TS, Selvadurai APS (1995) Coupled thermal-hydrological- mechanical processes in sparsely fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 32:465–480

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Noorishad J, Ayatollahi MS, Witherspoon PA (1982) Coupled stress and fluid flow analysis of fractured rock. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 19:185–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Noorishad J, Tsang CF, Witherspoon PA (1992) Theoretical and field studies of coupled hydromechanical behavior of fractured rock–1. Development and verification of a numerical simulator. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 29(4):401–409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Ohnishi Y, Kobayashi A (1996) THAMES. In: Stephansson O, Jing L, Tsang C-F (eds) Coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical processes of fractured media, vol 79. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 545–549 (Developments in Geotechnical Engineering)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohnishi Y, Shibata H, Kobayashi A (1987) Development of finite element code for the analysis of coupled thermo-hydro-mechanical behavior of a saturated-unsaturated medium. In: Tsang C-F (ed) Coupled processes associated with nuclear waste repositories. Academic Press, Orlando, pp 679–696

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  25. Pine RJ, Cundall PA (1985) Application of the fluid rock interaction program (FRIP) to the modeling of hot dry rock geothermal energy systems. In: Stephansson O (ed) Proceedings of the international symposium on fundamentals of rock joints. Centek Publishers, Lulea, pp 293–302

    Google Scholar 

  26. Rutqvist J, Stephansson O (2003) The role of hydromechanical coupling in fractured rock engineering. Hydrogeol J 11(1):7–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Rutqvist J, Noorishad J, Tsang CF (1998) Determination of fracture storativity in hard rocks using high-pressure injection testing. Water Resour Res 34(10):2551–2560

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Rutqvist J, Tsang CF, Stephansson O (2000) Uncertainty in the maximum principal stress estimated from hydraulic fracturing measurements due to the presence of the induced fracture. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 37:107–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Rutqvist J, Borgesson L, Chijimatsu M, Jing L, Nguyen ST, Noorishad J, Tsang C-F (2001) Thermohydromechanics of partially saturated geological media: governing equations and formulation of four finite element models. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 38(1):105–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Shi GH (1992) Manifold method of material analysis. In: Transaction of the 9th army conference on applied mathematics and computing, U.S. Army Research Office

  31. Shi GH (1996) Simplex integration for manifold method, FEM, DDA and analytical analysis. In: Salami MR, Bank D (eds) Discontinuous deformation analysis (DDA) and simulations of discontinuous media. TSI press, Albuquerque, pp 205–262

    Google Scholar 

  32. Silvestre JR, Vargas EA, Vaz LE, Soares AC (2015) Modelling of coupled fluid-mechanical problems in fractured geological media using enriched finite elements. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 39:1104–1140

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Swenson DV, DuTeau R, Sprecker T (1997) A coupled model of fluid flow in jointed rock applied to simulation of a hot dry rock reservoir. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci Geomech Abstr 34:308

    Google Scholar 

  34. Wang Y (1995) Seepage flow analysis and seepage-stress coupled analysis of fissured rock masses. Ph.D. Dissertation, Hohai University

  35. Wang HF (2000) Theory of linear poroelasticity. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  36. Wang Y, Su BY, Xu ZY (1998) Coupling analysis of seepage and stress in multi-fractured rock masses. J Hohai Univ 26(2):26–30

    Google Scholar 

  37. Wang Y, Xu ZY, Su BY (1998) Four- freedom complete method for the seepage-stress coupled analysis in fissured rock masses. Hydraul J 7:55–59

    Google Scholar 

  38. Wang Y, Hu M, Zhou Q, Rutqvist J (2014) Energy-work-based numerical manifold seepage analysis with an efficient scheme to locate the phreatic surface. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 38:1633–1650

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Witherspoon PA, Wang JSY, Iwai K, Gale JE (1980) Validity of the cubic law for fluid flow in a deformable fracture. Water Resour Res 16:1016–1024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang HW, Zhou L (2006) Numerical manifold method for dynamic nonlinear analysis of saturated porous media. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 30:927–951

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  41. Zienkiewicz OC, Qu S, Taylor RL, Nakazawa S (1986) The patch test for mixed formulation. Int J Numer Methods Eng 23:1873–1883

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Zienkiewicz OC, Huang MS, Wu SM (1993) A new algorithm for the coupled soil-pore fluid problem. Shock Vib 1(1):3–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation (No. 51179060) and the Education Ministry Foundation of China (No. 20110094130002) and, in part, by the US Department of Energy to LBNL under contract No. DE-AC02-05CH11231.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Wang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hu, M., Wang, Y. & Rutqvist, J. Fully coupled hydro-mechanical numerical manifold modeling of porous rock with dominant fractures. Acta Geotech. 12, 231–252 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0495-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11440-016-0495-z

Keywords

Navigation