Skip to main content
Log in

Eco-compensation effects of the wetland recovery in Dongting Lake area

  • Published:
Journal of Geographical Sciences Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Eco-compensation is an environmental economic instrument for internalization of external cost. Returning farmland to lake is one of the important parts of restoring wetland ecosystem function in the Yangtze River Valley of China. Whether the project of lake recovery can be successful depends on the compensation to the farmers who have lost their original benefits and contributed to the wetland ecosystem recovery by returning farmland to lake. Aiming at the wetland recovery of the Dongting Lake, the practical implementation of programs of the lake recovery and flood control in this area has been challenged by the heavy task of population resettlement, so it is an ideal area for case studies to reach the academic objectives proposed as the above. Based on field survey and experimentation, this research evaluated the benefit losses of the resettled farmers and the increased values of ecosystem service functions caused by wetland recovery, and furthermore, the value of eco-compensation for relocated farmers was calculated by considering the combination of the farmers’ compensation appeal. The value of eco-compensation for relocated farmers in the Dongting Lake area was 6084.5 yuan per household by synthetic analysis of the effects on wetland ecosystem restoration. Moreover, this article took Dongting Lake area as a case to study and explore the basic issues of the eco-compensation by returning farmland to lake, that was who should pay, who should be paid, how much the payment was and what the payment means was, which sought the mechanisms of wetland restoration eco-compensation and prompted the people℉s enthusiasms for ecological restoration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen O A, Feddema J J, 1996. Wetland loss and substitution by the Section 404 Permit Program in Southern California. Environmental Management, 20(2): 263–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aschwanden J, Birrer S, Jenni L, 2005. Are ecological compensation areas attractive hunting sites for common kestrels (Falco tinnunculus) and long-eared owls (Asio otus)? J. Ornithol., 146: 279–286.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Atinson R B, Perry J E, Smith E, Cairns J J, 1993. Use of created wetland delineation and weighted averages as a component of assessment. Wetlands, 13(3): 185–193.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Becker N, 1999. A comparative analysis of water price support versus drought compensation scheme. Agricultural Economics, 21(1): 81–92.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Blaine T W, Lichtkoppler F R, Jones K R et al. 2005.An assessment of household willingness to pay for curbside recycling: A comparison of payment card and referendum approaches. Journal of Environmental Management, 76: 15–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bu Y X, Lu Q G, Tan J G, 2001. The condition and evaluation of water population in Dongting Lake. Yangtze River, 32(2): 40–43. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Carsten D, 2000. Regulations, methods and experiences of land reclamation in German opencast mines. Addressed to Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration for 21st Century. Beijing International Symposium on Land Reclamation, 11–21.

  • Coles B J, 1995. Archaeology and wetland restoration. In: Wheeler B D, Shaw S C, Fojt W J et al. Restoration of Temperate Wetlands. Chichester: John Wiley & Sons, 19–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, d’Arge R, de Groot R et al. 1998. The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural capital. Ecological Economics, 25(1): 3–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui B S, Liu X T, 1999. Review of wetland restoration studies. Advance in Earth Sciences, 14(4): 358–364. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuperus R, Bakermans M M, De H H et al. 2001. Ecological compensation in Dutch highway planning. Environmental Management, 27(1): 75–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuperus R, Canters K J et al. 1999. Guidelines for ecological compensation associated with highways. Biological Conservation, 90: 41–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deng R, 2005. Brief talk on ecological compensation system when protecting rain forests in Xishuangbanna. Yunnan Environmental Sciences, 24: 65–67. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ding C X, 2002. Exploration of ecology environmental compensation institution. Environmental Monitoring in China, 18(5): 8–9. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Du S K, 2001. Environment Economics: Theory Discussion and Demonstration Research. Beijing: China Cyclopaedia Press, 79–120. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Hashisaki S, 1996. Functional wetland restoration: An ecosystem approach. Science, 70(4): 348–351.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henry C P, Amoros C, 1995. Restoration ecology of riverine wetland (I): A scientific case. Environmental Management, 19(6): 891–902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry S F, 2000. The evolution of derelict land reclamation within the United Kingdom: A local government perspective. Addressed to Mine Land Reclamation and Ecological Restoration for 21 Century. Beijing International Symposium on Land Reclamation, 7–10.

  • Herzog F, Dreier S, Hofer D, Marfurt C, 2005. Effect of ecological compensation areas on floristic and breeding bird diversity in Swiss agricultural landscapes. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 108: 189–204.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hong S Q, Ma P J, Guo H G, 2001.Discussion on ecological compensation system. Environmental Science & Technology, (5): 40–45. (in Chinese)

  • Karin J, Martin D, Frank W, 2002. An ecological economic modeling procedure to design compensation payments for the efficient spatiotemporal allocation of species protection measures. Ecological Economics, 41(1): 37–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keller M, Kollmann J, 1999. Effects of seed provenance on germination of herbs for agricultural compensation sites. Agriculture, Ecosystems and Environment, 72: 87–99.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleijn D, Berendse F, Smit R et al. 2004. Ecological effectiveness of agri-environment schemes in different agricultural landscapes in The Netherlands. Biological Conservation, 18: 775–786.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larson J S, 1994. Rapid assessment of wetlands: History and application to management. In: Mitsch (ed.). Global Wetlands: Old World and New. Elsevier, 623–636.

  • Li H, Pang X M, Fu H, 2002. Social economic effect of lake recovery and population relocation in Dongting Lake area. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 11(3): 105–110. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li J B, Zhu X, Cai B H, 2001. Eco-agricultural patterns for disaster prevention in wetland restoration area of Dongting Lake. Journal of Natural Disasters, 10(4): 108–112. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu D L, 2003. The current study on forest ecological benefits compensation. Jilin Forestry Science and Technology, 32(1): 22–25. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu G H, Zhang H Y, Wan J et al. 2006. Drainage area’s ecological compensation mechanism discussion on the north of Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Province. China Population, Resources and Environment, 16(4): 120–124. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lu H W, Zeng G M, Xie G X et al. 2003. The regional ecological risk assessment of the Dongting Lake watershed. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 23(12): 2520–2529. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Luis G, 2002. Outline for Presentation: The Use of Market Instruments for Environmental Services in Costa Rica. Workshop on Payment Schemes for Environmental Service, Apr.: 22–23.

  • Mao X Q, Zhong Y, Zhang S, 2002. Conception, theory and mechanism of eco-compensation. China Population, Resources and Environment, 12(4): 38–41. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch K J, Wu X Y, Robert W et al. 1998. Creating and restoring wetland. Biological Science, 48(12): 1019–1030.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitsch W J, Wilson R F, 1996. Improving the success of wetland creation and restoration with know-how, time, and self-design. Eco. Appl., 6(1): 77–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ni X M, Chen L, Zhou Y J et al., 1995. Study on the restoration and control technique of plants in Dong Lake. In: Chen Y Y. Study of Wetland in China. Changchun: Jilin Science and Technology Press, 211–221. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin L J, Qiu H, 2005. Study on water resources compensation in Songliao River Basin. Journal of Natural Resources, 20(1): 14–20. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sierra R, Russmana E, 2006. On the efficiency of environmental service payments: A forest conservation assessment in the Osa Peninsula, Costa Rica. Ecological Economics, 59(1): 131–141.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skarback E, 2007. Urban forests as compensation measures for infrastructure development. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 6(4): 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sun X Z, Xie G D, Zhang Q Z et al. 2006. Ecological compensation practice and policy orientation in China. Resources Science, 28(4): 25–30.

    Google Scholar 

  • Torok L S, Lockwood S, Fanz D, 1996. Review and comparison of wetland impacts and mitigation requirements between New Jersey, USA, Fresh Water Wetlands Protection Act and Section 404 of the Clean Water Act. Environmental Management, 20(5): 741–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang J L, Ma W M, 2002. Study of valley ecology compensation question. Journal of Soil Water Conservation, 16(6): 82–83. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang L M, Yang Y F, Wu Q F, 2001. Environment emigration stress of slope farmland in the three gorges area. Acta Geographica Sinica, 56(6): 649–656. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wilson R F, Mitsch W J, 1996. Functional assessment of five wetlands constructed to mitigate wetland loss in Ohio, USA. Wetlands, 16(4): 436–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S R, Ma T L, Zhao W, 2001.The development of forest eco-benefit compensation policy and economic analysis. Forest Economics, (4): 20–23. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu X Q, Tuo Z Y, Yang C M et al. 2003. A probe into ecological compensation mechanism in conservation areas of China. Resources and Environment in the Yangtze Basin, 19(2): 18–21. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xin K, Xiao D N, 2002. Wetland ecosystem service valuation: A case researches on Panjin area. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 22(8): 1345–1349. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Wang K L, Li H, 2002. Patterns of population relocation in the Dongting Lake area. Tropical Geography, 22(4): 320–324. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu Z M, Zhang Z Q, Cheng G D et al. 2002. Measuring the total economic value of restoring Ejina Banner’s ecosystem services. Acta Geographica Sinica, 57(1): 107–116. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Ye W H, Wei B, Tong C, 1998, Measurement and application of urban ecological compensation. China Environmental Science, 18(4): 298–301. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu X B, Han Y J, Lei G C, 1999. The bulletin of bank-yard economic and eco-environment questionnaire investigate in the middle of Yangtze River. In: Bulletin of Yangtze River Project (WWF), 36–40. (in Chinese)

  • Zedler J B, Williams G D, Desmond J S, 1997. Wetland mitigation: Can fishes distinguish between natural and constructed wetland? Fisheries, 22(3): 26–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang C L, Ruan B Q, 2003. The economy analysis on water resources restoration and compensation. Water Conservancy Science and Technology and Economy, 9(1): 3–5. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang G G, 2002. Effect of re-submerging particular polders on the ecological environment of Dongting Lake. Yangtze River, 33(5): 39–41. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhao J K, Zhu M M, 1991. Land management and its reclamation of America open-pit mine. China Land Science, (1): 31–33. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhen L, Min Q W, Li W H et al., 2006. Socio-economic impact and eco-compensation mechanism in natural reserves of Hainan Province. Resources Science, 28(6): 10–19. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhong Y, Zhang S, Mao X Q, 2002. Study on eco-compensation of returning land to lake. China Population, Resources and Environment, 12(4): 46–50. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhuang D C, Ou W X, Ding D S, 2003. Evaluation of the lake recovery area eco-economy benefit in Dongting wetland. Journal of Natural Resources, 18(5): 536–543. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying Xiong.

Additional information

Foundation: Social Science Foundation of Hunan Province, No.09YBA003; Science & Technology Research Project of Hunan Province, No.2009JT3005; Knowledge Innovation Project of CAS, No.KZCX2-SW-415; Foundation of Key Laboratory for Agro-ecological Processes in Subtropical Region; Wetland Project of WWF

Author: Xiong Ying (1977–), Ph.D and Associate Professor, specialized in the study of regional ecology and land use/land cover change.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiong, Y., Wang, K. Eco-compensation effects of the wetland recovery in Dongting Lake area. J. Geogr. Sci. 20, 389–405 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-010-0389-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11442-010-0389-1

Keywords

Navigation