Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Age and Socio-Cultural Factors on Self-Rated Well-Being and Metacognitive and Mnestic Efficiency Among Healthy Elderly People

  • Published:
Applied Research in Quality of Life Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The aim of the present research was to investigate the effect of cross-cultural and age-related factors on self-referent metacognitive efficiency, psychological well-being, and mnestic performance in late adulthood. Ninety-three healthy adults recruited in individualistic northwest Italian and collectivistic Sardinian contexts were respectively assigned to the Old (i.e., 65–74 years) and Very Old (i.e., ≥ 75 years) groups and were individually administered a battery of well-being and metacognitive measures and working memory tasks. A series of MANOVAs was carried out on well-being and metacognitive measures and working memory tasks. Sardinians showed greater levels of perceived well-being, less marked psychological distress, and more preserved mnestic functions than the controls from the northwest Italian context. Moreover, participants from the Old group self-referred more coping strategies, emotional competencies, and personal satisfaction, and less depressive symptoms. Then, a hierarchical linear regressions where different socio-demographic, working memory metacognitive and social desirability measures were used as predictors of general psychological well-being shows that socio cultural context, social desirability, visuo-spatial sequential working memory and metamemory measures predict perceived well-being. Socio-cultural contexts emphasizing the positive social role of the elderly seem to promote psychological well-being, that is, life quality in late adulthood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Baddeley, A. D. (1986). Working memory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bandura, A. (1989). Regulation of cognitive processes through perceived self-efficacy. Developmental Psychology, 25, 729–735. doi:10.1037/0012-1649.25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Broadbent, D. E., Cooper, P. F., Fitzgerald, P., & Parkes, K. R. (1982). The Cognitive Failure Questionnaire (CFQ) and its correlates. British Journal of Clinical Psychology, 21, 1–16. doi:10.1111/j.2044-8260.1982.tb01421.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carpiniello, B., Carta, M. G., & Rudas, N. (1989). Depression among elderly. Acta Psychiatrica Scandinavica, 5, 445–450. doi:10.1111/j.1600-0447.1989.tb03004.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cornoldi, C., & De Beni, R. (2003). Leopardisti. Gli amanti della memoria [Leopardists. Memory lovers]. Psicologia Contemporanea, 1, 4–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crowne, D. P., & Marlowe, D. (1960). A new scale of social desirability independent of psychopathology. Journal of Consulting Psychology, 24, 349–354. doi:10.1037/h0047358.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Beni, R., Borella, E., Carretti, B., Marigo, C., & Nava, L. A. (2007). BAC: Benessere e Abilità Cognitive nell’età Adulta e Avanzata. [BAC: Wellness and Cognitive Abilities in the Advanced and Adult Age]. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.

    Google Scholar 

  • Della Sala, S., Gray, C., Baddeley, A. D., & Wilson, L. (1997). Visual pattern test. Bury St. Edmunds: Thames Valley Test Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dunlosky, J., & Bjork, R. A. (2008). The integrated nature of metamemory and memory. In J. Dunlosky & R. A. Bjork (Eds.), Handbook of metamemory and memory (pp. 11–28). New York: Psychology Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eller, C. (2011). The myth of a matriarchal prehistory. Boston: Beacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fastame, M. C., & Cavallini, E. (2011). Working memory functions in the healthy elderly people: the impact of institutionalization and advancing age on mnestic efficiency. Clinical Gerontologist, 34(3), 207–219. doi:10.1080/07317115.2011.555909.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastame, M. C., & Penna, M. P. (2012). Does social desirability confound the assessment of self-reported measures of wellness and metacognitive efficiency in young and older adults? Clinical Gerontologist, 35(3), 239–256. doi:10.1080/07317115.2012.660411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fastame, M. C., Cavallini, E., & Vecchi, T. (2002). The evaluation of processing functions in working memory. In S. P. Shohov (Ed.), Advances in psychology research (pp. 3–27). New York: Nova Science Publishers, Inc.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fastame, M. C., Mammarella, I. C., Carretti, B., & Meneghetti, C. (2008). The continuous architecture of working memory: Evidence from learning disabilities and genetic syndromes. In N. B. Johansen (Ed.), New research on short-term memory (pp. 283–313). Hauppauge (NY): Nova Science Publishers Inc. Huntinghton.

  • Fastame, M. C., Penna, Leone, B., & Puddu, C. (2011). The role of social desirability in the assessment of mnestic and metacognitive efficiencies in adulthood: a preliminary study. European Psychiatry, 26(Suppl. 1), 1175. doi:10.1016/S0924-9338(11)72880-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fava, G. A. (1983). Assessing depressive symptoms across cultures: Italian validation of the CES-D self-rating scale. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 39, 249–251. doi:10.1002/1097-4679(198303)39:2<249:AID-JCLP2270390218>3.0.CO;2-Y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. E., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). Mini-mental state. A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189–198. doi:10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hertzog, C., Dixon, R. A., & Hultsch, D. F. (1990). Relationships between metamemory, memory predictions, and memory task performance in adults. Psychology and Aging, 5, 215–227. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.5.2.215.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larrabee, G. J., & Levin, H. S. (1986). Memory self-ratings and objective test performance in a normal elderly sample. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 8, 275–284. doi:10.1080/01688638608401318.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martella, D., & Maass, A. (2000). Unemployment and life satisfaction: the moderating role of time structure and collectivism. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 30, 1095–1108. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.2000.tb02512.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Milner, B. (1971). Interhemispheric differences in the localization of psychological processes in man. British Medical Bulletin, 27, 272–277.

    Google Scholar 

  • Paulhus, D. L. (1984). Two-component models of socially desirable responding. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 598–609. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.46.3.598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Poon, L. W., & Cohen-Mansfield, J. (2011). Understanding well-being in the oldest-old. Cambridge: University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Radloff, L. S. (1977). The CES-D Scale: a self-report depression scale for research in the general population. Applied Psychological Measurement, 1, 385–401. doi:10.1177/014662167700100306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, J. W., & Kahn, R. L. (1998). Successful aging. New York: Pantheon/Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Valentijn, S. A. M., Hill, R. D., Van Hooren, S. A. H., Bosma, H., Van Boxtel, M. P. J., Jolles, J., et al. (2006). Memory self-efficacy predicts memory performance: results from a 6-year follow-up study. Psychology and Aging, 21(2), 165–172. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.2.165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vecchi, T., & Richardson, J. T. E. (2000). Active processing in visuo-spatial working memory. Cahiers de Psychologie Cognitive, 19, 3–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Walter-Ginzburg, A., Shmotkin, Eyal, N., & Guralnik, J. M. (2008). Can cognitive vitality reduce incident disability? Evidence from the Cross-Sectional and Longitudinal Aging Study (CALAS) of old-old Israelis. Unpublished manuscript

  • Yoon, C., Hasher, L., Feinberg, F., Rahhal, T. A., & Winocur, G. (2000). Cross-cultural differences in memory: the role of culture-based stereotypes about aging. Psychology and Aging, 15, 694–704. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.15.4.694.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Maria Chiara Fastame.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Fastame, M.C., Penna, M.P., Rossetti, E.S. et al. The Effect of Age and Socio-Cultural Factors on Self-Rated Well-Being and Metacognitive and Mnestic Efficiency Among Healthy Elderly People. Applied Research Quality Life 9, 325–334 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9238-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11482-013-9238-6

Keywords

Navigation