Skip to main content
Log in

Impact of bitumen and aggregate composition on stripping in bituminous mixtures

  • Published:
Materials and Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The impact of bitumen and aggregate composition on stripping was investigated using four bitumens and four aggregates. Moisture sensitivity was assessed based on retained resilient modulus and tensile strength ratio (MRR and TSR, respectively). The results indicate that mixtures from the bitumen with a high acid number exhibited high resilient modulus and tensile strength in the dry condition for all the aggregates. In wet condition, this conclusion did also hold except for one aggregate. Regarding penetration grade, mixtures made with lower penetration grade bitumen exhibited higher resilient modulus and tensile strength, in dry and wet conditions, than those of higher penetration grade. Bitumen characteristics like acid number, penetration grade and molecular size distribution did not influence moisture sensitivity. Mixtures with aggregates containing alkali metals (sodium and potassium) exhibited relatively high moisture sensitivity, regardless of the bitumen used. In contrast, indications of moisture sensitivity were not apparent in mixtures made with aggregates containing calcium, magnesium and iron. Data analysis revealed that variability in moisture sensitivity is attributed to aggregate rather than bitumen. No significant interaction effect between bitumen and aggregate was found on moisture sensitivity. The results indicated good correlation between MRR and TSR in ranking mixtures for stripping.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cebon D (2000) Handbook of vehicle-road interaction. Swets & Zeitlinger Publishers B. V., Lisse, Netherlands.

    Google Scholar 

  2. Tarrer AR, Wagh V (1991) The effect of physical and chemical characteristics of the aggregate on bonding. SHRP-A / UIR-91–507.

  3. Fromm HJ (1974) The mechanism of asphalt stripping from aggregate surfaces in Asphalt Paving Technology. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 43:191–223.

  4. Petersen JC, Ensley EK, Barbour FA (1974) Molecular Interactions of Asphalt in the Asphalt-Aggregate Interface Region. Transport Research Record 515:67–78.

  5. Plancher H, Dorrence SM, Petersen JC (1977) Identification of chemical types in asphalts strongly adsorbed at the asphalt-aggregate interface and their relative displacement by water in Asphalt Paving Technology. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 46:151–175.

  6. Curtis CW, Baik J, Jeon YW (1990) Adsorption of asphalt and asphalt functionalities onto aggregates pre-coated with antistripping agents. Transport Research Record 1269:48–55.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Petersen JC, Plancher H (1998) Model studies and interpretive review of competitive adsorption and water displacement of petroleum asphalt chemical functionalities on mineral aggregate surfaces. Petroleum Science and Technology 89–131.

  8. Petersen JC, Plancher H, Ensley EK, Venable RL, Miyake G (1982) Chemistry of asphalt-aggregate interaction: relationship with pavement moisture-damage prediction test. Transport Research Record 843:95–104.

  9. Curtis CW, Ensley K, Epps J (1993) Fundamental Properties of Asphalt-Aggregate Interactions Including Adhesion and Absorption. SHRP A–341.

  10. Bagampadde U, Isacsson U, Kiggundu BM (2004) Classical and contemporary aspects of stripping in bituminous mixtures. Int. Journal of Road Materials & Pavement Design 5 (1):7–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Birgisson B, Roque R, Page CG (2003) Evaluation of water damage using hot mix asphalt fracture mechanics in Asphalt Paving Technology. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 72:424–457.

  12. Rice JM (1958) Relationship of Aggregate Characteristics to the Effect of Water on Bituminous Paving Mixtures. ASTM STP 240.

  13. Strekeisen J (1978) Rock Petrography. John Winter, Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lottman RP (1978) Predicting Moisture-Induced Damage to Asphaltic Concrete. (NCHRP Report No. 192, TRB).

  15. Tunnicliff DG, Root RE (1982) Additives in asphalt concrete: state-of-the-art in ‘Asphalt Paving Technology. Proceedings of the Association of Asphalt Paving Technologists 51:265–289.

  16. Petersen JC (1986) Quantitative functional group analysis of asphalts using differential infrared spectrometry and selective chemical reactions. Transport Research Record 1096:1–11.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Tukey JW (1949) Comparing individual means in the analysis of variance. Biometrics 5, 99–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bagampadde, U., Isacsson, U. & Kiggundu, B.M. Impact of bitumen and aggregate composition on stripping in bituminous mixtures. Mater Struct 39, 303–315 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11527-005-9040-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11527-005-9040-5

Keywords

Navigation