Skip to main content
Erschienen in: TechTrends 1/2018

04.10.2017 | Original Paper

How Useful are our Models? Pre-Service and Practicing Teacher Evaluations of Technology Integration Models

verfasst von: Royce Kimmons, Cassidy Hall

Erschienen in: TechTrends | Ausgabe 1/2018

Einloggen, um Zugang zu erhalten

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

We report on a survey of K-12 teachers and teacher candidates wherein participants evaluated known models (e.g., TPACK, SAMR, RAT, TIP) and provided insight on what makes a model valuable for them in the classroom. Results indicated that: (1) technology integration should be coupled with good theory to be effective, (2) classroom experience did not generally influence teacher values and beliefs related to technology integration, (3) some models may be more useful to teachers than others, (4) the widespread use of a model does not necessarily reflect usefulness, (5) useful models for teachers should engender real-world, concrete application, and (6) visual appeal of a model is largely subjective, but some visual representations might convey notions of practicality. Conclusions should be used to help researchers and practitioners understand the practical application value of technology integration models in real-world settings.
Anhänge
Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich
Literatur
Zurück zum Zitat Archambault, L., & Barnett, J. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662.CrossRef Archambault, L., & Barnett, J. (2010). Revisiting technological pedagogical content knowledge: Exploring the TPACK framework. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1656–1662.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88. Archambault, L., & Crippen, K. (2009). Examining TPACK among K-12 online distance educators in the United States. Contemporary Issues in Technology and Teacher Education, 9(1), 71–88.
Zurück zum Zitat Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–63.CrossRef Bebell, D., Russell, M., & O’Dwyer, L. (2004). Measuring teachers’ technology uses: why multiple-measures are more revealing. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 37(1), 45–63.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Becker, H. J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: children’s access to and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44–75. Becker, H. J. (2000). Who’s wired and who’s not: children’s access to and use of computer technology. Children and Computer Technology, 10(2), 44–75.
Zurück zum Zitat Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: is the construct ‘just right?’. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128.CrossRef Brantley-Dias, L., & Ertmer, P. A. (2013). Goldilocks and TPACK: is the construct ‘just right?’. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 46(2), 103–128.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.CrossRef Burkhardt, H., & Schoenfeld, A. H. (2003). Improving educational research: toward a more useful, more influential, and better-funded enterprise. Educational Researcher, 32(9), 3–14.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.CrossRef Clark, R. E. (1983). Reconsidering research on learning from media. Review of Educational Research, 53(4), 445–459.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 85–105). Berkeley: McCutchan. Cuban, L. (1988). Constancy and change in schools (1880s to the present). In P. W. Jackson (Ed.), Contributing to educational change: Perspectives on research and practice (pp. 85–105). Berkeley: McCutchan.
Zurück zum Zitat Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books. Feyerabend, P. K. (1975). Against method: outline of an anarchistic theory of knowledge. London: New Left Books.
Zurück zum Zitat Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.CrossRef Graham, C. R. (2011). Theoretical considerations for understanding technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPACK). Computers & Education, 57(3), 1953–1960.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302. Hughes, J. (2005). The role of teacher knowledge and learning experiences in forming technology-integrated pedagogy. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 13(2), 277–302.
Zurück zum Zitat Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.CrossRef Kagan, D. (1992). Professional growth among preservice and beginning teachers. Review of Educational Research, 62, 129–169.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmons, R. (2015). Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 53–77. Kimmons, R. (2015). Examining TPACK’s theoretical future. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 23(1), 53–77.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016a). Emerging technology integration models. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press. Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016a). Emerging technology integration models. In G. Veletsianos (Ed.), Emergence and innovation in digital learning: Foundations and applications. Edmonton: Athabasca University Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016b). Toward a broader understanding of teacher technology integration beliefs and values. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 309–335. Kimmons, R., & Hall, C. (2016b). Toward a broader understanding of teacher technology integration beliefs and values. Journal of Technology and Teacher Education, 24(3), 309–335.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (Third ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press. Kuhn, T. S. (1996). The structure of scientific revolutions (Third ed.). Chicago, IL: The University of Chicago Press.
Zurück zum Zitat Kuhn, T. (2013). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In A. Bird & J. Ladyman (Eds.), Arguing About Science (pp. 74–86). New York: Routledge. Kuhn, T. (2013). Objectivity, value judgment, and theory choice. In A. Bird & J. Ladyman (Eds.), Arguing About Science (pp. 74–86). New York: Routledge.
Zurück zum Zitat Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake: AACE. Mishra, P., & Koehler, M. J. (2007). Technological pedagogical content knowledge (TPCK): confronting the wicked problems of teaching with technology. In R. Carlsen et al. (Eds.), Proceedings of Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference 2007 (pp. 2214–2226). Chesapeake: AACE.
Zurück zum Zitat Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRef Pajares, M. F. (1992). Teachers’ beliefs and educational research: cleaning up a messy construct. Review of Educational Research, 62(3), 307–332.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.CrossRef Pea, R. D. (1985). Beyond amplification: using the computer to reorganize mental functioning. Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 167–182.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson. Roblyer, M. D., & Doering, A. H. (2013). Integrating educational technology into teaching (6th ed.). Boston: Pearson.
Zurück zum Zitat Smarkola, C. (2008). Efficacy of a planned behavior model: Beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1196–1215.CrossRef Smarkola, C. (2008). Efficacy of a planned behavior model: Beliefs that contribute to computer usage intentions of student teachers and experienced teachers. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 1196–1215.CrossRef
Zurück zum Zitat Willingham, D. T. (2012). When can you trust the experts? How to tell good science from bad in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass. Willingham, D. T. (2012). When can you trust the experts? How to tell good science from bad in education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
Metadaten
Titel
How Useful are our Models? Pre-Service and Practicing Teacher Evaluations of Technology Integration Models
verfasst von
Royce Kimmons
Cassidy Hall
Publikationsdatum
04.10.2017
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
TechTrends / Ausgabe 1/2018
Print ISSN: 8756-3894
Elektronische ISSN: 1559-7075
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11528-017-0227-8

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2018

TechTrends 1/2018 Zur Ausgabe

Column: Professional Ethics

Sunny Side Up

Column: Rethinking Technology & Creativity in the 21st Century

A Cybernetic Perspective on Design and Creativity: a Conversation with Dr. Paul Pangaro

Editor’s Notes

Editor’s Notes