Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal mean–variance selling strategies

  • Published:
Mathematics and Financial Economics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Assuming that the stock price X follows a geometric Brownian motion with drift \(\mu \in \mathbb {R}\) and volatility \(\sigma >0\), and letting \(\mathsf {P}_{\!x}\) denote a probability measure under which X starts at \(x>0\), we study the dynamic version of the nonlinear mean–variance optimal stopping problem

$$\begin{aligned} \sup _\tau \Big [ \mathsf {E}\,\!_{X_t}(X_\tau ) - c\, \mathsf {V}ar\,\!_{\!X_t}(X_\tau ) \Big ] \end{aligned}$$

where t runs from 0 onwards, the supremum is taken over stopping times \(\tau \) of X, and \(c>0\) is a given and fixed constant. Using direct martingale arguments we first show that when \(\mu \le 0\) it is optimal to stop at once and when \(\mu \ge \sigma ^2\!/2\) it is optimal not to stop at all. By employing the method of Lagrange multipliers we then show that the nonlinear problem for \(0 < \mu < \sigma ^2\!/2\) can be reduced to a family of linear problems. Solving the latter using a free-boundary approach we find that the optimal stopping time is given by

$$\begin{aligned} \tau _* = \inf \,\! \left\{ \, t \ge 0\; \vert \; X_t \ge \tfrac{\gamma }{c(1-\gamma )}\, \right\} \end{aligned}$$

where \(\gamma = \mu /(\sigma ^2\!/2)\). The dynamic formulation of the problem and the method of solution are applied to the constrained problems of maximising/minimising the mean/variance subject to the upper/lower bound on the variance/mean from which the nonlinear problem above is obtained by optimising the Lagrangian itself.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We are indebted to Sven Rady for pointing out possible connections with the economics literature after seeing the results on the static and dynamic optimality exposed in Theorem 3 above.

References

  1. Basak, S., Chabakauri, G.: Dynamic mean–variance asset allocation. Rev. Financ. Stud. 23, 2970–3016 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Björk, T., Murgoci, A.: A general theory of Markovian time inconsistent stochastic control problems. Preprint SSRN (2010)

  3. Czichowsky, C.: Time-consistent mean-variance portfolio selection in discrete and continuous time. Financ. Stoch. 17, 227–271 (2013)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  4. Doob, J.L.: Heuristic approach to the Kolmogorov–Smirnov theorems. Ann. Math. Stat. 20, 393–403 (1948)

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Du Toit, J., Peskir, G.: Selling a stock at the ultimate maximum. Ann. Appl. Prob. 19, 983–1014 (2009)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Ekeland, I., Pirvu, T.A.: Investement and consumption without commitment. Math. Financ. Econ. 2, 57–86 (2008)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  7. Frederick, S., Loewenstein, G., O’Donoghue, T.: Time discounting and time preferences: a critical review. J. Econ. Lit. 40, 351–401 (2002)

  8. Goldman, S.M.: Consistent plans. Rev. Econ. Stud. 47, 533–537 (1980)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. Li, D., Ng, W.L.: Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: multiperiod mean-variance formulation. Math. Financ. 10, 387–406 (2000)

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Markowitz, H.M.: Portfolio selection. J. Financ. 7, 77–91 (1952)

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pedersen, J.L.: Explicit solutions to some optimal variance stopping problems. Stochastics 83, 505–518 (2011)

    MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Peleg, B., Yaari, M.E.: On the existence of a consistent course of action when tastes are changing. Rev. Econ. Stud. 40, 391–401 (1973)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Peskir, G., Shiryaev, A.N.: Optimal Stopping and Free-Boundary Problems. Lectures in Mathematics. ETH Zürich, Birkhäuser, Zürich (2006)

  14. Pollak, R.A.: Consistent planning. Rev. Econ. Stud. 35, 201–208 (1968)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Richardson, H.R.: A minimum variance result in continuous trading portfolio optimization. Manag. Sci. 35, 1045–1055 (1989)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  16. Samuelson, P.: A note on measurement of utility. Rev. Econ. Stud. 4, 155–161 (1937)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Strotz, R.H.: Myopia and inconsistency in dynamic utility maximization. Rev. Econ. Stud. 23, 165–180 (1956)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The second named author gratefully acknowledges financial support and hospitality from the Hausdorff Research Institute for Mathematics at the University of Bonn under the Trimester Programme entitled Stochastic Dynamics in Economics and Finance where the present research was exposed and further developed (June 2013).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Peskir.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pedersen, J.L., Peskir, G. Optimal mean–variance selling strategies. Math Finan Econ 10, 203–220 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-015-0156-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11579-015-0156-2

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation