Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of convolutional neural network

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Japanese Journal of Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To test if the proposed deep learning based denoising method denoising convolutional neural networks (DnCNN) with residual learning and multi-channel strategy can denoise three dimensional MR images with Rician noise robustly.

Materials and methods

Multi-channel DnCNN (MCDnCNN) method with two training strategies was developed to denoise MR images with and without a specific noise level, respectively. To evaluate our method, three datasets from two public data sources of IXI dataset and Brainweb, including T1 weighted MR images acquired at 1.5 and 3 T as well as MR images simulated with a widely used MR simulator, were randomly selected and artificially added with different noise levels ranging from 1 to 15%. For comparison, four other state-of-the-art denoising methods were also tested using these datasets.

Results

In terms of the highest peak-signal-to-noise-ratio and global of structure similarity index, our proposed MCDnCNN model for a specific noise level showed the most robust denoising performance in all three datasets. Next to that, our general noise-applicable model also performed better than the rest four methods in two datasets. Furthermore, our training model showed good general applicability.

Conclusion

Our proposed MCDnCNN model has been demonstrated to robustly denoise three dimensional MR images with Rician noise.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Martin-Fernandez M, Villullas S. The EM method in a probabilistic wavelet-based MRI denoising. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:182659.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Chang L, ChaoBang G, Xi Y. A MRI denoising method based on 3D nonlocal means and multidimensional PCA. Comput Math Methods Med. 2015;2015:232389.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Zhang X, Xu Z, Jia N, et al. Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images by using higher-order singular value decomposition. Med Image Anal. 2015;19(1):75–86.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Manjon JV, Coupe P, Buades A. MRI noise estimation and denoising using non-local PCA. Med Image Anal. 2015;22(1):35–47.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Baselice F, Ferraioli G, Pascazio V. A 3d MRI denoising algorithm based on Bayesian theory. Biomed Eng Online. 2017;16(1):25.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Bhujle HV, Chaudhuri S. Laplacian based non-local means denoising of MR images with rician noise. Magn Reson Imaging. 2013;31(9):1599–610.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chang YN, Chang HH. Automatic brain MR image denoising based on texture feature-based artificial neural networks. Biomed Mater Eng. 2015;26(Suppl 1):S1275–82.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Golshan HM, Hasanzadeh RP. An optimized LMMSE based method for 3D MRI denoising. IEEE ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform. 2015;12(4):861–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Varadarajan D, Haldar JP. A majorize-minimize framework for Rician and non-central chi MR images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015;34(10):2191–202.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang K, Zuo W, Chen Y, Meng D, Zhang L. Beyond a Gaussian denoiser: residual learning of deep CNN for image denoising. IEEE Trans Image Process. 2017;26(7):3142–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. He K, Zhang X, Ren S, Sun J. Deep residual learning for image recognition; 2015. arXiv:1512.03385.

  12. Coupe P, Yger P, Prima S, Hellier P, Kervrann C, Barillot C. An optimized blockwise nonlocal means denoising filter for 3D magnetic resonance images. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2008;27(4):425–41.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Coupe P, Hellier P, Prima S, Kervrann C, Barillot C. 3D wavelet subbands mixing for image denoising. Int J Biomed Imaging. 2008;2008:590183.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Manjon JV, Coupe P, Buades A, Louis Collins D, Robles M. New methods for MRI denoising based on sparseness and self-similarity. Med Image Anal. 2012;16(1):18–27.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Wu X, Yang Z, Peng J, Zhou J. Global denoising for 3D MRI. Biomed Eng Online. 2016;15(1):54.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang X, Hou G, Ma J, et al. Denoising MR images using non-local means filter with combined patch and pixel similarity. PLoS One. 2014;9(6):e100240.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Aksam Iftikhar M, Jalil A, Rathore S, Hussain M. Robust brain mri denoising and segmentation using enhanced non-local means algorithm. Int J Imaging Syst Technol. 2014;24(1):52–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gudbjartsson H, Patz S. The Rician distribution of noisy MRI data. Magn Reson Med. 1995;34(6):910–4 [Erratum in: Magn Reson Med 1996;36(2):332].

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Konishi Y, Kanazawa Y, Usuda T, Matsumoto Y, Hayashi H, Matsuda T, Ueno J, Harada M. Simple noise reduction for diffusion weighted images. Radiol Phys Technol. 2016;9(2):221–6.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Denton EL, Chintala S, Fergus R, et al. Deep generative image models using a laplacian pyramid of adversarial networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2015:1486–94. https://arxiv.org/abs/1506.05751.

  21. Goodfellow I, Pouget-Abadie J, Mirza M, et al. Generative adversarial nets. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst. 2014:2672–80. https://arxiv.org/abs/1406.2661.

Download references

Funding

This project is not funded by any Grants.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tao Tan.

Ethics declarations

Ethical approval

The local ethics committee waived the need for review board approval and written informed consent, considering the retrospective character of this study.

Conflict of interest

There is no conflict of interest.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jiang, D., Dou, W., Vosters, L. et al. Denoising of 3D magnetic resonance images with multi-channel residual learning of convolutional neural network. Jpn J Radiol 36, 566–574 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0758-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11604-018-0758-8

Keywords

Navigation