Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Stichwort: Schuleffektivitätskriterien in der internationalen empirischen Forschung

Keyword: Criteria of School Effectiveness in International Empirical Research

  • Schwerpunkt
  • Published:
Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Zusammenfassung

Dieser Beitrag fasst den internationalen Forschungsstand zu Schuleffektivitätskriterien zusammen. Grundlage sind empirische Studien aus den Jahren 1995–2004, die 2005 im Rahmen der Evaluation des Kriterienkatalogs effektiver Schulen für das niederländische Schulinspektorat ausgewertet worden sind. Die Daten wurden für diesen Beitrag neu analysiert. Im ersten Abschnitt werden Effektivitätskriterien vor dem Hintergrund von Modellen für Schuleffektivität beleuchtet. Im zweiten Abschnitt erfolgt die Zusammenfassung der internationalen Studien zwischen 1995 und 2004, die sich auf den Ebenen der Schule und des Unterrichts mit Schuleffektivität befasst haben. Dabei zeigt sich, dass das Spektrum an untersuchten Effektivitätskriterien schmal ist. Vor allem im Bereich der Untersuchung von Schulfaktoren gibt es eine Tendenz zur Verwendung von Leistungen in Schulfächern als Kriterien für Schuleffektivität. Schulmerkmale werden vor allem im Rahmen national oder regional angelegter Survey-Studien untersucht. Im dritten Abschnitt werden Forschungsperspektiven aufgezeigt und es wird dafür plädiert, ein breiteres Spektrum an Schuleffektivitätskriterien zu berücksichtigen.

Abstract

This review summarizes international empirical studies on criteria for school effectiveness between 1995-2004. The data comes from a special study on this topic for the Dutch school inspectorate and has been re-analyzed for this contribution. In the first section of the paper, effectiveness criteria are reviewed with regard to their role in theoretical models of school effectiveness research. In the second section, empirical studies concerned with school and classroom effectiveness are reviewed with a focus on the effectiveness criteria, which are applied. The results show that the range of criteria is small. Especially regarding school effectiveness there is a tendency towards using pupils’ achievement in school subjects as effectiveness criteria. School factors were mainly investigated using national or regional survey data. The third section of the paper deals with perspectives for future research on school effectiveness, suggesting a broader set of effectiveness criteria.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Abbildung 1
Abbildung 2

Notes

  1. Für die Literaturrecherche wurden die Datenbanken Web of Science, ERIC und ERA unter Verwendung der Stichwörter effectiveness, effective teaching, effective instruction, instructional effectiveness, teacher effectiveness, educational effectiveness, school effectiveness, mathematics instruction, reading instruction, science instruction, classrooms, mathematics teaching, reading teaching, science teaching, student achievement, achievement, competencies, interest, motivation, engagement, attainment durchsucht.

Literatur

  • Alexander et al. 2002 = Alexander, P. A./Fives, H./Buehl, M. M./Mulhern, J. (2002): Teaching as persuasion. In: Teaching and Teacher Education, 18(7), pp. 795–813.

    Google Scholar 

  • Allsopp, D. H. (1997): Using classwide peer tutoring to teach beginning algebra problem-solving skills in heterogeneous classrooms. In: Remedial and Special Education, Vol. 18(6), pp. 367–379.

    Google Scholar 

  • Anderman et al. 2001 = Anderman, E. M./Eccles, J. S./Yoon, K. S./Roeser, R./Wigfield, A./Blumenfeld, P. (2001): Learning to value mathematics and reading: Relations to mastery and performance-oriented instructional practices. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 26(1), pp.76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Applebee et al. 2003 = Applebee, A. N./Langer, J. A./Nystrand, M./Gamoran, A. (2003): Discussion-based approaches to developing understanding: Classroom instruction and student performance in middle and high school English. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40(3), pp. 685–730.

    Google Scholar 

  • Arnold et al. 2002 = Arnold, D. H./Fisher, P. H./Doctoroff, G. L./Dobbs, J. (2002): Accelerating math development in head start classrooms. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(4), pp. 762–770.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ashman, A. F./Gillies, R. M. (1997): Children’s cooperative behavior and interactions in trained and untrained work groups in regular classrooms. In: Journal of School Psychology, Vol. 35(3), pp. 261–279.

    Google Scholar 

  • Baumann et al. 2003 = Baumann, J. F./Edwards, E. C./Boland, E. M./Olejnik, S./Kame’enui, E. J. (2003): Vocabulary tricks: Effects of instruction in morphology and context on fifth-grade students’ ability to derive and infer word meanings. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40(2), pp. 447–494.

    Google Scholar 

  • Behets, C. (2001): Comparison of more and less effective teaching behaviors in secondary physical education. In: Teaching and Teacher Education, Vol. 13(2), pp. 215–224.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bennacer, H. (2000): How the socioecological characteristics of the classroom affect academic achievement. In: European Journal of Psychology of Education, Vol. 15(2), pp. 173–189.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berry, C. (2001): Achievement effects of multigrade and monograde primary schools in the Turks and Caicos Islands. In: International Journal of Educational Development, Vol. 21(6), pp. 537–552.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bianchini, J. A. (1997): Where knowledge construction, equity, and context intersect: student learning of science in small groups. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 34(10), pp. 1039–1065.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borsch, F./Jurgen-Lohmann, J./Giesen, H. (2002): Cooperative learning in elementary schools: Effects of the jigsaw method on student achievement in science. In: Psychologie in Erziehung und Unterricht, 49(3), S. 172–183.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brush, T. A. (1997): The effects on student achievement and attitudes when using integrated learning systems with cooperative pairs. In: ETR&D – Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 45(1), pp. 51–64.

    Google Scholar 

  • Burns, R. B./Mason, D. A. (2002): Class composition and student achievement in elementary schools. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 39(1), pp. 207–233.

    Google Scholar 

  • Byrne, B./Fieldingbarnsley, R. (1995): Evaluation of a program to teach phonemic awareness to young-children – a 2-year and 3-year follow-up and a new preschool trial. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 87(3), pp. 488–503.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cantrell, S. C. (1999): The effects of literacy instruction on primary students’ reading and writing achievement. In: Reading Research and Instruction, Vol. 39(1), pp. 3–26.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caroll, J. (1963): A model for school learning. In: Teachers College Record, Vol. 64, pp. 723–733.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. Y. (2002): The impact of different forms of multimedia CAI on students’ science achievement. In: Innovations in Education and Teaching International, Vol. 39(4), pp. 280–288.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. Y./Barufaldi, J. P. (1999): The use of a problem-solving-based instructional model in initiating change in students’ achievement and alternative frameworks. In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 21(4), pp. 373–388.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chinn, C. A./Anderson, R. C./Waggoner, M. A. (2001): Patterns of discourse in two kinds of literature discussion. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 36(4), pp. 378–411.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chularut, P./DeBacker, T. K. (2004): The influence of concept mapping on achievement, self-regulation, and self-efficacy in students of English as a second language. In: Contemporary Educational Psychology, Vol. 29(3), pp. 248–263.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coe, R./Fitz-Gibbon, C. T. (1998): School effectiveness research: Criticisms and recommendations. In: Oxford Review of Education, Vol. 24(4), pp. 421–438.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cooper et al. 1998 = Cooper, H./Lindsay, J. J./Nye, B./Greathouse, S. (1998): Relationships among attitudes about homework, amount of homework assigned and completed, and student achievement. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(1), pp. 70–83.

    Google Scholar 

  • Creemers, B. P. M. (1994): The Effective Classroom. – London.

  • Creemers, B. P. M./Werf, G. v. d. (2000): Economic viewpoints in educational effectiveness: Cost-effectiveness analysis of an educational improvement project. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(2), pp. 197–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • Crinjen, A. A. M./Feehan, M. (1998): The course and malleability of a reading achievement in elementary school: The application of growth curve modeling in the evaluation of a mastery learning intervention. In: Learning and Individual Differences, Vol. 10(2), pp. 137.

    Google Scholar 

  • D’Agostino, J. V. (2000): Instructional and school effects on students’ longitudinal reading and mathematics achievements. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(2), pp. 197–235.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Fraine et al. 2003 = De Fraine, B./Van Damme, J./Van Landeghem, G./Opdenakker, M. C./Onghena, P. (2003): The effect of schools and classes on language achievement. In: British Educational Research Journal, 29(6), S. 841–859.

    Google Scholar 

  • De Jong, R/Westerhof, K. J./Kruiter, J. H. (2004): Empirical evidence of a comprehensive model of school effectiveness: A multilevel study in mathematics in the 1st year of junior general education in the Netherlands. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 15(1), pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, H. (2000): Qualitätskontrolle und Qualitätssicherung in Schule und Unterricht. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41. Beiheft, S. 73–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ditton, H. (2007): Schulqualität – Modelle zwischen Konstruktion, empirischen Befunden und Implementierung. In: Buer, J. van/Wagner, C. (Hrsg.): Qualität von Schule. – Frankfurt a. M., S. 83–92.

  • Driessen, G./Sleegers, P. (2000): Consistency of teaching approach and student achievement: An empirical test. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(1), pp. 57–79.

  • Einsiedler, W./Treinies, G. (1997): Effects of teaching methods, class effects, and patterns of cognitive teacher-pupil interactions in an experimental study in primary school classes. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 8(3), pp. 327–353.

  • Fend, H. (1998): Qualität im Bildungswesen. Schulforschung zu Systembedingungen, Schulprofilen und Lehrerleistung. – Weinheim.

    Google Scholar 

  • Foorman et al. 1998 = Foorman, B. R./Francis, D. J./Fletcher, J. M./Schatschneider, C./Mehta, P. (1998): The role of instruction in learning to read: Preventing reading failure in at-risk children. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(1), pp. 37–55.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freedman, M. P. (1997): Relationship among laboratory instruction, attitude toward science, and achievement in science knowledge. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 34(4), pp. 343–357.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuchs et al. 1997 = Fuchs, D./Fuchs, L. S./Mathes, P. G./Simmons, D. C. (1997): Peer-assisted learning strategies: Making classrooms more responsive to diversity. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34(1), pp. 174–206.

    Google Scholar 

  • George, R./Kaplan, D. (1998): A structural model of parent and teacher influences on science attitudes of eighth graders: Evidence from NELS: 88. In: Science Education, Vol. 82(1), pp. 93–109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginsburg-Block, M. D./Fantuzzo, J. W. (1998): An evaluation of the relative effectiveness of NCTM standards-based interventions for low-achieving urban elementary students. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(3), pp. 560–569.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffith, J. (2003): Schools as organizational models: Implications for examining school effectiveness. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 104(1), pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Grift, W. v. d./Houtveen, A. A. M. (1999): Educational leadership and pupil achievement in primary education. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 10(4), pp. 29–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gruehn, S. (1995): Vereinbarkeit kognitiver und nichtkognitiver Ziele im Unterricht. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogik, 41. Jg., S. 531–553.

  • Guthrie et al. 1998 = Guthrie, J. T./Van Meter, P./Hancock, G. R./Alao, S./Anderson, E./McCann, A. (1998): Does concept-oriented reading instruction increase strategy use and conceptual learning from text? In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(2), pp. 261–278.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hallinger, P./Brickman, L./Davis, K. (1996): School context, principal leadership, and student reading achievement. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 96(5), pp. 527–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton et al. 1995 = Hamilton, L. S./Nussbaum, E. M./Kupermintz, H./Kerkhoven, J. I. M./Snow, R. E. (1995): Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32(3), pp. 555–581.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hardre, P. L./Reeve, J. (2003): A motivational model of rural students’ intentions to persist in, versus drop out of high school. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 95(2), pp. 347–356.

    Google Scholar 

  • Heck, R. H./Marcoulides, G. A. (1996): School culture and performance: Testing the invariance of an organizational model. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 7(1), pp. 76–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henderson, R. W./Landesman, E. M. (1995): Effects of thematically integrated mathematics instruction on students of Mexican descent. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 88(5), pp. 290–300.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hill, P. W./Rowe, K. J. (1998): Modeling student progress in studies of educational effectiveness. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 9(3), pp. 310–333.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hogan, K. (1999): Thinking aloud together: A test of an intervention to foster students’ collaborative scientific reasoning. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 36(10), pp. 1085–1109.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hopkins, K. B./McGillicuddy-DeLisi, A. V./DeLisi, R. (1997): Student gender and teaching methods as sources of variability in children’s computational arithmetic performance. In: Journal of Genetic Psychology, Vol. 158(3), pp. 333–345.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houghton, S./Litwin, M./Carroll, A. (1995): Peer mediated intervention in reading instruction using pause, prompt and praise. In: Educational Studies, Vol. 21(3), pp. 361–377.

    Google Scholar 

  • Houtveen et al. 1999 = Houtveen, A. A. M./Booij, N./Jong, R. de/Grift, W. van de(1999): Adaptive instruction and pupil achievement. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 10(2), pp. 172–192.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacob, B. A./Lefgren, L. (2004): The impact of teacher training on student achievement – Quasi-experimental evidence from school reform efforts in Chicago. In: Journal of Human Resources, Vol. 39(1), pp. 50–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobson, C./Lehrer, R. (2000): Teacher appropriation and student learning of geometry through design. In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 31(1), pp. 71–88.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jovanovic, J./King, S. S. (1998): Boys and girls in the performance-based science classroom: Who’s doing the performing? In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 35(3), pp. 477–496.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kramarski, B./Mevarech, Z. R. (1997): Cognitive-metacognitive training within a problem-solving based Logo environment. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 425–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kroesbergen, E. H./Van Luit, J. E. H./Maas, C. J. M. (2004): Effectiveness of explicit and constructivist mathematics instruction for low-achieving students in the Netherlands. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 104(3), pp. 233–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuklinski, M. R./Weinstein, R. S. (2001): Classroom and developmental differences in a path model of teacher expectancy effects. In: Child Development, Vol. 72(5), pp. 1554–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kupermintz et al. 1995 = Kupermintz, H./Ennis, M. M./Hamilton, L. S./Talbert, J. E./Snow, R. E. (1995): Enhancing the validity and usefulness of large-scale educational assessments. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 32(3), pp. 525–554.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kyriakides, L./Campbell, R. J./Gagatsis, A. (2000): The significance of the classroom effect in primary schools: An application of Creemers’ comprehensive model of educational effectiveness. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(4), pp. 501–529.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazarowitz, R./Baird, J. H./Bowlden, V. (1996): Teaching biology in a group mastery learning mode: high school students’ academic achievement and affective outcomes. In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 18(4), pp. 447–462.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, V. E./Loeb, S. (2000): School size in Chicago elementary schools: Effects on teachers’ attitudes and students’ achievement. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37(1), pp. 3–31.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leithwood, K./Jantzi, D. (2000): Principal and teacher leadership effects: A replication. In: School Leadership and Management, Vol. 30(4), pp. 415–434.

    Google Scholar 

  • Luyten, H./de Jong, R. (1998): Parallel classes: Differences and similarities. Teacher effects and school effects in secondary schools. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 9(4), pp. 437–473.

    Google Scholar 

  • Marks, H. M. (2000): Student engagement in instructional activity: Patterns in the elementary, middle, and high school years. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 37(1), pp. 153–184.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathes et al. 1998 = Mathes, P. G./Howard, J. K./Allen, S. H./Fuchs, D. (1998): Peer-assisted learning strategies for first-grade readers: Responding to the needs of diverse learners. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 33(1), pp. 62–94.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGuinness, D./McGuinness, C./Donohue, J. (1995): Phonological training and the alphabet principle – Evidence for reciprocal causality. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 30(4), pp. 830–852.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mevarech, Z. R. (1999): Effects of metacognitive training embedded in cooperative settings on mathematical problem solving. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 92(4), pp. 195–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller, S. D./Meece, J. L. (1997): Enhancing elementary students’ motivation to read and write: A classroom intervention study. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 90(5), pp. 286–299.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D./Reynolds, D. (2000): School effectiveness and teacher effectiveness in mathematics: Some preliminary findings from the evaluation of the mathematics enhancement programme (primary). In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 11(3), pp. 273–303.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muijs, D./Reynolds, D. (2003): The effectiveness of the use of learning support assistants in improving the mathematics achievement of low achieving pupils in primary school. In: Educational Research, Vol. 45(3), pp. 219–230.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muthukrishna, N./Borkowski, J. G. (1995): How learning contexts facilitate strategy transfer. In: Applied Cognitive Psychology, Vol. 9(5), pp. 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nolen, S. B. (2003): Learning environment, motivation, and achievement in high school science. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 40(4), pp. 347–368.

    Google Scholar 

  • Okpala, C. O./Okpala, A. O./Smith, F. E. (2001): Parental involvement, instructional expenditures, family socioeconomic attributes, and student achievement. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 95(2), pp. 110–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olina, Z./Sullivan, H. J. (2002): Effects of classroom evaluation strategies on student achievement and attitudes. In: ETR&D – Educational Technology Research and Development, Vol. 50(3), pp. 61–75.

    Google Scholar 

  • Opdenakker, M. C./Damme, J. v. (2001): Relationship between school composition and characteristics of school process and their effect on mathematics achievement. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 27(4), pp. 407–432.

    Google Scholar 

  • Perry, N. E. (1998): Young children’s self-regulated learning and contexts that support it. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 90(4), pp. 715–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, M. (1997): What makes schools effective? A comparison of the relationships of communitarian climate and academic climate to mathematics achievement and attendance during middle school. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 34(4), pp. 633–662.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ramsden, J. M. (1997): How does a context-based approach influence understanding of key chemical ideas at 16+? In: International Journal of Science Education, Vol. 19(6), pp. 697–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Robert Bosch Stiftung (2007): Der Deutsche Schulpreis. – URL: http://schulpreis.bosch-stiftung.de (Download: 21.1.2008).

  • Roby, D. E. (2004): Research on school attendance and student achievement: A study of Ohio schools. In: Educational Research Quarterly, Vol. 28(1), pp. 3–14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rowe, K. K. J./Hill, P. W. (1998): Modeling educational effectiveness in classrooms: The use of multi-level structural equations to model students’ progress. In: Educational Research and Evaluation, Vol. 4(4), pp. 307–347.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sammons, P. (1999): School effectiveness: coming of age in the 21st century. – Lisse.

  • Sammons, P./Hillman, J./Mortimore, P. (1995): Key characteristics of effective schools: a review of school effectiveness research. – London.

  • Scheerens, J. (2000): Improving school effectiveness. – Paris.

  • Scheerens, J./Bosker, R. J. (1997): The foundations of educational effectiveness. – Oxford.

  • Scheerens et al. 2005 = Scheerens, J./Seidel, T./Witziers, B./Hendriks, M./Doornekamp, G. (2005): Positioning the supervision frameworks for primary and secondary education of the Dutch Educational Inspectorate in current educational discourse and validating core indicators against the knowledge base of educational effectiveness research. – Enschede/Kiel: University of Twente/Institute for Science Education (IPN).

  • Seidel, T./Rimmele, R./Prenzel, M. (2005): Clarity and Coherence of Lesson Goals as a Scaffold for Student Learning. In: Learning and Instruction, Vol. 15(6), pp. 539–556.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seidel, T./Shavelson, R. J. (2007): Teaching effectiveness research in the last decade: Role of theory and research design in disentangling meta-analysis results. In: Review of Educational Research, Vol. 77, pp. 454–499.

    Google Scholar 

  • Self-Brown, S. R./Mathews, S. (2003): Effects of classroom structure on student achievement goal orientation. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 97(2), pp. 106–111.

    Google Scholar 

  • She, H. C./Fisher, D. (2002): Teacher communication behavior and its association with students’ cognitive and attitudinal outcomes in science in Taiwan. In: Journal of Research in Science Teaching, Vol. 39(1), pp. 63–78.

    Google Scholar 

  • Silins, H./Mulford, B. (2002): Schools as learning organisations: The case for system, teacher and student learning. In: Journal of Educational Administration, Vol. 40(5), pp. 425–446.

    Google Scholar 

  • Smyth, E. (1999): Pupil performance, absenteeism and school drop-out: A multi-dimensional analysis. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 10(4), pp. 480–502.

    Google Scholar 

  • Snow, R. E./Frederico, P.-A./Montague, W. E. (Eds.) (1980): Aptitude, Learning, and Instruction. – Hillsdale.

  • Stanat, P./Watermann, R./Baumert, J. (Hrsg.). (2006). Herkunftsbedingte Disparitäten im Bildungswesen. Differenzielle Bildungsprozesse und Probleme der Verteilungsgerechtigkeit. – Wiesbaden.

  • Staub, F. C./Stern, E. (2002): The nature of teachers’ pedagogical content beliefs matters for students’ achievement gains: Quasi-experimental evidence from elementary mathematics. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(2), pp. 344–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stevens, R. J./Slavin, R. E. (1995): Effects of a cooperative learning approach in reading and writing on academically handicapped and nonhandicapped students. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 95(3), pp. 241–262.

    Google Scholar 

  • Stipek et al. 1998 = Stipek, D./Salmon, J. M./Givvin, K. B./Kazemi, E./Saxe, G./MacGyvers, V. L. (1998): The value (and convergence) of practices suggested by motivation research and promoted by mathematics education reformers. In: Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, Vol. 29(4), pp. 465–488.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sweetland, S. R./Hoy, W. K. (2000): School characteristics and educational outcomes: Toward and organizational model of student achievement in middle schools. In: Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 36(5), pp. 703–729.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor et al. 2003 = Taylor, B. M./Pearson, P. D./Peterson, D. S./Rodriguez, M. C. (2003): Reading growth in high-poverty classrooms: The influence of teacher practices that encourage cognitive engagement in literacy learning. In: Elementary School Journal, Vol. 104(1), pp. 3–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiedemann, J./Billmann-Mahecha, E. (2004): Kontextfaktoren der Schulleistung im Grundschulalter. Ergebnisse aus der Hannoverschen Grundschulstudie. In: Zeitschrift für Pädagogische Psychologie, Bd. 18(2), S. 113–124.

    Google Scholar 

  • Townsend, M. A. R./Hicks, L. (1997): Classroom goal structures, social satisfaction and the perceived value of academic tasks. In: British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 67, pp. 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  • Trautwein et al. 2002 = Trautwein, U./Köller, O./Schmitz, B./Baumert, J. (2002): Do homework assignments enhance achievement? A multilevel analysis in 7th-grade mathematics. Contemporary. In: Educational Psychology, Vol. 27(1), pp. 26–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner, J. C. (1995): The influence of classroom contexts on young children’s motivation for literacy. In: Reading Research Quarterly, Vol. 30(3), pp. 410–441.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner et al. 2002 = Turner, J. C./Midgley, C./Meyer, D. K./Gheen, M./Anderman, E. M./Kang, Y./Patrick, H. (2002): The classroom environment and students’ reports of avoidance strategies in mathematics: A multimethod study. In: Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 94(1), pp. 88–106.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uline, C. L./Miller, D. M./Tschannen-Moran, M. (1998): School effectiveness: The underlying dimensions. In: Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 34(4), pp. 462–483.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van de Gaer et al. 2004 = Van de Gaer, E./Pustjens, H./Damme, J. v./Munter, A. d. (2004): Effects of single-sex versus co-educational classes and schools on gender differences in progress in language and mathematics achievement. In: British Journal of Sociology of Education, Vol. 25(3), pp. 307–322.

    Google Scholar 

  • Van Horn, M. L./Ramey, S. L. (2003): The effects of Developmentally Appropriate Practices on academic outcomes among former head start students and classmates, Grades 1-3. In: American Educational Research Journal, Vol. 40(4), pp. 961–990.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wenglinsky, H. (2002): The link between teacher classroom practices and student academic performance. In: Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, Vol. 10(12). – URL: http://epaa.asu.edu/epaa/v10n12/ (Download: 22.07.2008).

  • Werf, G. v. d. (1997): Differences in school and instruction characteristics between high-, average-, and low-effective schools. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 8(4), pp. 430–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Werf et al. 2000 = Werf, G. v. d./Creemers, B. P. M./Jong, R./Klaver, E. (2000): Evaluation of school improvement through an educational effectiveness model: The case of Indonesia’s PEQIP project. In: Comparative Education Review, Vol. 44(3), pp. 329–355.

    Google Scholar 

  • White, B. Y./Frederiksen, J. R. (1998): Inquiry, modeling, and metacognition: Making science accessible to all students. In: Cognition and Instruction, Vol. 16(1), pp. 3–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wigfield et al. 2004 = Wigfield, A./Guthrie, J. T./Tonks, S./Perencevich, K. C. (2004): Children’s motivation for reading: domain specificity and instructional influences. In: Journal of Educational Research, Vol. 97(6), pp. 299–309.

    Google Scholar 

  • Willms, J. D./Somers, M. A. (2001): Family, classroom, and school effects on children’s educational outcomes in Latin America. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 12(4), pp. 409–445.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wong, K. C./Lam, Y. R./Ho, L. M. (2002): The effects of schooling on gender differences. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 28(6), pp. 827–843.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yair, G. (2000): Reforming motivation: how the structure of instruction affects students’ learning experiences. In: British Educational Research Journal, Vol. 26(2), pp.191–210.

    Google Scholar 

  • Young, D. Y. (1998): Rural and urban differences in student achievement in science and mathematics: A multilevel analysis. In: School Effectiveness and School Improvement, Vol. 9(4), pp. 386–418.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Friedrich-Schiller-Universität Jena, Institut für Erziehungswissenschaft, Am Planetarium 4, D-07737, Jena, Deutschland

    Tina Seidel

Authors
  1. Tina Seidel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tina Seidel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Seidel, T. Stichwort: Schuleffektivitätskriterien in der internationalen empirischen Forschung. ZfE 11, 348–367 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-008-0032-4

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11618-008-0032-4

Schlüsselwörter

Keywords

Search

Navigation