Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Agroforestry in the Western Ghats of peninsular India and the satoyama landscapes of Japan: a comparison of two sustainable land use systems

  • Overview Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Agroforestry in the Western Ghats (WG) of peninsular India and satoyama in rural Japan are traditional land-use systems with similar evolutionary trajectories. Some of their relevance was lost by the middle of the twentieth century, when modern agricultural technologies and urbanisation engineered shifts in emphasis towards maximising crop production. There has been, however, a resurgence of interest in traditional land-use systems recently, in view of their ability to provide ecosystem services. Both agroforestry and satoyama are thought to be harbingers of biological diversity and have the potential to serve as “carbon forests.” Carbon (C) stock estimates of the sampled homegardens in WG ranged from 16 to 36 Mg ha−1. Satoyama woodlands owing to variations in tree stocking and management conditions indicated widely varying C stocks (2–279 Mg ha−1). Agroforestry and satoyama also differ in nature, complexity, and objectives. While agroforestry involves key productive and protective functions, and adopts ‘intensive management’, the satoyama woodlands are extensively managed; understorey production is seldom a consideration. Differences in canopy architecture (multi-tiered structure of agroforestry vs. the more or less unitary canopy of satoayama) and land ownership pattern (privately owned/managed agroforestry holdings vs. community or local government or privately owned and mostly abandoned satoyamas) pose other challenges in the transfer and application of knowledge gained in one system to the other. Nonetheless, lessons learnt from satoyama conservation may be suitable for common pool resource management elsewhere in Asia, and aspects relating to understorey production in agroforestry may be relevant for satoyama under certain scenarios.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Simpson’s diversity index measures the probability that two individuals randomly selected from a sample will belong to different species and ranges between 0 and 1. The Shannon-Wiener index (Shannon’s index) accounts for abundance and evenness of the species present. The proportion of species i relative to the total number of species (pi) is calculated, and then multiplied by the natural logarithm of this proportion (ln pi). Shannon’s equitability (E) can be calculated by dividing H′ by H max (H max = ln S where S is the number of species). Equitability assumes a value between 0 and 1 with 1 being complete evenness.

References

  • Amano T, Kusumoto Y, Tokuoka Y, Yamada S, Kim E-Y, Yamamoto S (2008) Spatial and temporal variations in the use of rice-paddy dominated landscapes by birds in Japan. Biol Conserv 141:171–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ando T, Chiba K, Nishimura T, Tanimoto T (1977) Temperate fir and hemlock forest in Shikoku. In: Sheidi T, Kira T (eds) Primary productivity of Japanese forests—productivity of terrestrial communities. JIPB synthesis. University of Tokyo Press, Tokyo, pp 213–245

    Google Scholar 

  • Bene JG, Beall HW, Côte A (1977) Trees, food and people. International Development Research Centre, Ottawa, 52 p

  • Benton TG (2007) Managing farming’s footprint on biodiversity. Science 315:341–342

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Berglund BE (2008) Satoyama, traditional farming landscape in Japan, compared to Scandinavia. Jpn Rev 20:53–68

    Google Scholar 

  • Berkes F, Colding J, Folke C (2000) Rediscovery of traditional ecological knowledge as adaptive management. Ecol Appl 10:1251–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brown RD, Yokohari M (2003) Ideological contribution of satoyamas. In: Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) Satoyama—the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 1–7

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown S (1997) Estimating biomass and biomass change of tropical forests: a primer. A Forest Resources Assessment publication, FAO Forestry Paper 134, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome

  • Chiba T (1973) Hageyama no bunka (The culture of Bald mountains). Gakuseisha, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins NM, Sayer JA, Whitmore TC (1991) The conservation atlas of tropical forests: Asia and the Pacific. IUCN, Gland, Diane Pub Co., 256 p

  • Connell JH (1978) Diversity in tropical rainforests and coral reefs. Science 199:1302–1310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Devy MS, Davidar P (2003) Pollination systems of trees in Kakachi, a mid-elevation wet evergreen forest in Western Ghats, India. Am J Bot 90(4):650–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Environmental Agency (1994) The new basic environmental plan. Environmental Agency of Japan, Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • FAO (2004) Assessing carbon stocks and modelling win–win scenarios of carbon sequestration through land-use changes. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations, Rome, 156 p

  • Fujimoto T (1998) Understanding organic agriculture today (Gendai Yuki-nogyo Kokoroe). Nihon Chiikishakai Kenkyujo, Tokyo, 125 p (in Japanese)

  • Fujimoto T, Miyazaki T, Tanaka K, Morita Y, Nakamura T, Sakamoto H, Tsubouchi Y, Hayashida T (2006) Evaluation of potential recreational benefits of satoyama forest (country side forest): using GIS and benefit transfer. J Rural Plan Assoc 25(2):99–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujioka M, Yoshida H (2001) The potential and problems of agricultural ecosystems for birds in Japan. Glob Environ Res 5:151–161

    Google Scholar 

  • Fukamachi K (2002) Conservation of satoyama beech forest based on the characteristics of the localities. Bull Tokyo Univ For No. 108, pp 77–167

  • Fukamachi K, Oku H, Nakashizuka T (2001) The change of a satoyama landscape and its causality in Kamiseya, Kyoto Prefecture, Japan between 1970 and 1995. Landsc Ecol 16:703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gadgil M (1983–1984) Eco-development of Western Ghats in Karnataka. Karnataka State of Environment Report 1983–1984, pp 138–148. http://ces.iisc.ernet.in/hpg/envis/mg/pdfs/mg057.pdf. Accessed 27 May 2009

  • Goto Y, Kominami Y, Miyama T, Tamai K, Kanazaw Y (2003) Aboveground biomass and net primary production of a broad-leaved secondary forest in the southern part of Kyoto Prefecture, Central Japan. Bull FFPRI 387:115–147

    Google Scholar 

  • Gunawardene NR, Daniels AED, Gunatilleke IAUN, Gunatilleke CVS, Karunakaran PV, Geetha Nayak K, Prasad S, Puyravaud P, Ramesh BR, Subramanian KA, Vasanthy G (2007) A brief overview of the Western Ghats–Sri Lanka biodiversity hotspot. Curr Sci 93(11):1567–1572

    Google Scholar 

  • Hatase Y, Oe E, Oguri H, Matsue M, Utsugi E, Imoto I (2005) Relationship between forest floor vegetation and forest management at the Michinoku Lakewood National Government Park in the Fagetea Crenatae Region, Tohoku District. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 69(5):571–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Ichikawa K, Okubo N, Okubo S, Takeuchi K (2006) Transition of the satoyama landscape in the urban fringe of the Tokyo metropolitan area from 1880 to 2001. Landsc Urban Plan 78:398–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Iida S, Nakashizuka T (1995) Forest fragmentation and its effect on species diversity in suburban coppice forests in Japan. For Ecol Manag 73:197–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • IPCC (2007) Climate change 2007: mitigation of climate change. In: Metz B, Davidson OR, Bosch PR, Dave R, Meyer LA (eds) Contribution of working group III to the fourth assessment report of the intergovernmental panel on climate change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 851 p

  • IUCN 2008 (2008) IUCN red list of threatened species. http://www.iucnredlist.org. Accessed 21 May 2009

  • Iwamoto J (2002) The development of Japanese forestry. In: Iwai Y (ed) Forestry and the forest industry in Japan. UBC Press, Vancouver, pp 3–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Iwatsuki K (2003) Japan’s sacred mountains. In: Lee C (ed) UNESCO-MAB proceedings of the international workshop on the importance of sacred natural sites for biodiversity conservation. UNESCO, Paris, pp 89–90

    Google Scholar 

  • Kambu A (2008) The need to conserve the vanishing satoyama heritage. In: Furuta N, Iwatsuki K, Nishida H, Kawamichi M (eds) Conserving nature: a Japanese perspective. Biodiversity Network, Japan, pp 12–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Kameyama A (ed) (1996) Vegetation management of coppice—ecosystem and management technology. Soft Science Inc., Tokyo (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanninen M, Murdiyarso D, Seymour S, Angelsen A, Wunder S, German L (2007) Do trees grow on money? The implications of deforestation research for policies to promote REDD. Center for International Forestry Research (CIFOR), Bogor, 61 p

  • Kato M (2001) ‘Satoyama’ and biodiversity conservation: ‘satoyama’ as important insect habitats. Glob Environ Res 5:135–149

    Google Scholar 

  • Kikuchi T (1986) Development of new Padi fields. Kokin Publishing Co. Ltd, Japan (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kirby KR, Potvin C (2007) Variation in carbon storage among tree species: implications for the management of a small-scale carbon sink project. For Ecol Manag 246:208–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kobori H, Primack RB (2003) Participatory conservation approaches for satoyama, the traditional forest and agricultural landscape of Japan. Ambio 32(4):307–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Kremen C, Williams NM, Thorp RW (2002) Crop pollination from native bees at risk from agricultural intensification. Proc Natl Acad Sci 99:16812–16816

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Krishna MS (1968) Physiographic characteristics of peninsular ranges. In: Proceedings of the 21 international geographical congress, India, pp 88–95

  • Kumar BM (1999) Agroforestry in the Indian tropics. Indian J Agrofor 1(1):47–62

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM (2005) Land use in Kerala: changing scenarios and shifting paradigms. J Trop Agric 43:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM (2006a) Carbon sequestration potential of tropical homegardens. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer, Netherlands, pp 185–204

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM (2006b) Agroforestry: the new old paradigm for Asian food security. J Trop Agric 44:1–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM (2008a) Homegarden-based indigenous fruit tree production in peninsular India. In: Akinnifesi FK, Leakey RRB, Ajayi OC, Sileshi G, Tchoundjeu Z, Matakala P, Kwesiga FR (eds) Indigenous fruit trees in the tropics: domestication. Utilization and commercialization. CAB International Publishing, Wallingford, pp 84–99

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM (2008b) Standing stock of thorny bamboo [Bambusa bambos (L.) Voss] in the homegardens of Palakkad and Malappuam districts in Kerala. J Trop Agric 46(1–2):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Nair PKR (2004) The enigma of tropical homegardens. Agrofor Syst 61:135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) (2006) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Advances in agroforestry, vol 3. Springer, Dordrecht, 380 p

  • Kumar BM, George SJ, Chinnamani S (1994) Diversity, structure and standing stock of wood in the homegardens of Kerala in peninsular India. Agrofor Syst 25:243–262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar BM, Sudheesh KG, Rajesh G (2005) Standing stock of thorny bamboo [Bambusa bambos (L.) Voss] in the homegardens of Thrissur, Kerala. J Trop Agric 43:61–66

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuramoto N, Sonoda Y (2003) Conserving biological diversity. In: Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) Satoyama—the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 81–89

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan W (1906) Malabar manual, vol 2, 2nd edn. Asian Educational Services, Madras, 772 p

  • Mander Ü, Helming K, Wiggering H (2007) Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. In: Mander Ü, Wiggering H, Helming K (eds) Multifunctional land use: meeting future demands for landscape goods and services. Springer, Heidelberg, pp 1–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Mateer S (1883) Native life in Travancore. W.H. Allen & Co, London, p 450

    Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being. Multiscale assessments: findings of the sub-global assessments working group, vol 4. Island Press, Washington DC, 388 p

  • MOE (2000) The threatened wildlife of Japan. Red data book, 2nd edn. Ministry of Environment, Government of Japan, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  • Montagnini F, Nair PKR (2004) Carbon sequestration: an underexploited environmental benefit of agroforestry systems. Agrofor Syst 61:281–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morimoto J, Yoshida H (2005) Dynamic changes of native Rhododendron colonies in the urban fringe of Kyoto city in Japan: detecting the long-term dynamism for conservation of secondary nature. Landsc Urban Plan 70:195–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moriyama H (1998) Satoyama as a reservoir of fauna and flora. Landsc Stud 61:281–283 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Muraleedharan PK, Sasidharan N, Kumar BM, Sreenivasan MA, Seethalakshmi KK (2005) Non-Wood forest products in the Western Ghats of Kerala, India: floristic attributes, extraction, regeneration and prospects for sustainable use. J Trop For Sci 17:243–257

    Google Scholar 

  • Myers N, Mittermeier RA, da Fonseca GAB, Kent J (2000) Biodiversity hotspots for conservation priorities. Nature 403:853–857

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR (2008) Agroecosystem management in the 21st century: it is time for a paradigm shift. J Trop Agric 46:1–12

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM (2006) Introduction. In: Kumar BM, Nair PKR (eds) Tropical homegardens: a time-tested example of sustainable agroforestry. Springer Science, The Netherlands, pp 1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Nair PKR, Kumar BM, Nair VD (2009) Agroforestry as a strategy for carbon sequestration. J Plant Nutr Soil Sci 172(1):10–23

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nakagawa S (2003) Nationwide partnerships for satoyama conservation. In: Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) Satoyama—the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 111–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima M (1996) Sustainability of rice terraces. J Jpn Geogr 105:547–568 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Nakajima T, Furuya K (2004) A study on the satoyama image survived toward survived open spaces expected by participants for civic satoyama management activity in northern part of Chiba Prefecture. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 67(5):653–658

    Google Scholar 

  • Natuhara Y, Imai C, Takahashi M (1999) Pattern of land mosaics affecting butterfly assemblage at Mt Ikoma, Osaka, Japan. Ecol Res 14:105–118

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ogura J (1992) History of humans and landscape decoded from pictures. Yuzankaku, Tokyo, pp 14–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Okada I (1999) Restoration and management of coppices in Japan. Ecol Restor 17(1–2):31–38

    Google Scholar 

  • Otte A, Simmering D, Wolters V (2007) Biodiversity at the landscape level: recent concepts and perspectives for multifunctional land use. Landsc Ecol 22:639–642

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pascal JP (1988) Wet evergreen forests of the Western Ghats of India: ecology, structure, floristic composition and succession. French Institute, Pondicherry, 345 p

  • Pawar NJ, Shaikh IJ (1995) Nitrate pollution of ground waters from shallow basaltic aquifers, Deccan Trap Hydrologic Province, India. Environ Geol 25:197–204

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Peichl M, Thevathasan NV, Gordon AM, Huss J, Abohassan RA (2006) Carbon sequestration potentials in temperate tree-based intercropping systems, southern Ontario, Canada. Agrofor Syst 66:243–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pichamuthu CS, Radhakrishna BP (1968) Introduction to mountains of the Indian peninsula. In: Proceedings of the 21 international geographical congress, India, pp 82–87

  • Primack RB, Kobori H, Mori S (2000) Dragonfly pond restoration promotes conservation awareness in Japan. Conserv Biol 14:1553–1554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Purandara BK, Varadarajan N, Kumar CP (2004) Application of chemical mass balance to water quality data of Malaprabha river. J Spatial Hydrol 4(2):1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Puyravaud J-P, Davidar P, Pascal J-P, Ramesh BR (2003) Analysis of threatened endemic trees of the Western Ghats of India sheds new light on the Red Data Book of Indian Plants. Biodivers Conserv 12:2091–2106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ramakrishnan PS, Saxena KG, Chandrasekhara UM (eds) (1998) Conserving the sacred: for biodiversity management. UNESCO and Oxford & IBH Publ., New Delhi, 480 p

  • Ramesh BR, Pascal J-P (1997) Atlas of endemics of the Western Ghats (India). Distribution of Tree Species in the Evergreen and Semi-Evergreen Forest. French Institute of Pondicherry, Pondicherry, India

  • Roshetko M, Delaney M, Hairiah K, Purnomosidhi P (2002) Carbon stocks in Indonesian homegarden systems: can smallholder systems be targeted for increased carbon storage? Am J Altern Agric 17:125–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell AE (2002) Relationships between crop-species diversity and soil characteristics in southwest Indian agroecosystems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 92:235–249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saha SK (2008) Carbon sequestration potential of tropical homegardens and related land-use systems in Kerala, India. University of Florida Ph.D. dissertation, School of Forest Resources and Conservation, Gainesville, FL

  • Saha SK, Nair PKR, Nair VD, Kumar BM (2009) Soil carbon stock in relation to plant diversity of homegardens in Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 76(1):53–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Senior K (2005) Rescue efforts for the satoyama. Front Ecol Environ 3(2):68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharrow SH, Ismail S (2004) Carbon and nitrogen storage in agroforests, tree plantations, and pastures in western Oregon, USA. Agrofor Syst 60:123–130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shanavas A, Kumar BM (2003) Fuelwood characteristics of tree species in the homegardens of Kerala, India. Agrofor Syst 58:11–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shidei T (2000) Satoyama no koto (Miscellaneous notes of farm forest). Bull Kansai Organ Nat Conserv 22(1):71–77 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Sutherland WJ, Armstrong-Brown S, Armsworth PR, Brereton T, Brickland J, Campbell CD, Chamberlain DE, Cooke AI, Dulvy NK, Dusic NR, Fitton M, Freckleton RP, Godfray HCJ, Grout N, Harvey HJ, Hedley HJ, Hedley C, Hopkins JJ, Kift NB, Kirby J, Kunin WE, MacDonald DW, Marker B, Naura M, Neale AR, Oliver T, Osborn D, Pullin AS, Shardlow MEA, Showler DA, Smith PL, Smithers RJ, Solandt J-L, Spencer J, Spray CJ, Thomas CD, Thompson J, Webb SE, Yalden DW, Watkinson AR (2006) The identification of 100 ecological questions of high policy relevance in the UK. J Appl Ecol 43:617–627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swamy SL, Puri S (2005) Biomass production and C-sequestration of Gmelina arborea in plantation and agroforestry system in India. Agrofor Syst 64:181–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Takeda M, Amano T, Katoh K, Higuchi H (2006) The habitat requirement of the Genji-firefly Luciola cruciata (Coleoptera: Lampyridae), a representative endemic species of Japanese rural landscapes. Biol Conserv 15:191–203

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K (2001) Nature conservation strategies for the satoyama and satochi habitats for secondary nature in Japan. Glob Environ Res 5(2):193–198

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K (2003) Satoyama landscapes as managed nature. In: Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) Satoyama—the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 9–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) (2003) Satoyama—the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, 229 p

  • Takimoto A, Nair PKR, Nair VD (2008) Carbon stock and sequestration potential of traditional and improved agroforestry systems in the West African Sahel. Agric Ecosyst Environ 125:159–166

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Terada T, Yokohari M, Tanaka N (2007) Evaluation of maintenance scenarios of coppiced woods remaining on plateaus to enhance biomass energy utilization. J Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 70(5):673–676 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Totman C (1989) The green archipelago: forestry in preindustrial Japan. University of California Press, Berkeley, 297 p

  • Trisnawati I, Nakamura K (2008) Abundance, diversity and distribution of above-ground arthropods collected by window traps from satoyama in Kanazawa, Japan: an order level analysis. Far East Entomol 181:1–23

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsunekawa A (2003) Transition of satoyama landscapes in Japan. In: Takeuchi K, Brown RD, Washitani I, Tsunekawa A, Yokohari M (eds) Satoyama: the traditional rural landscape of Japan. Springer, Tokyo, pp 41–51

    Google Scholar 

  • United Nations University (UNU) (2008) Satoyama is a heritage to be passed to future generations. Sub-global Assessment of Satoyama and Satoumi in Japan (Japan SGA). UNU-IAS pamphlet. United Nations University Institute of Advanced Studies, Yokohama, Japan

  • Vandermeer J (1989) The ecology of intercropping. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, p 249

    Google Scholar 

  • Vencatesan J, Daniels RJR (2008) Western Ghats: biodiversity, people and conservation. Rupa & Co, New Delhi, p 180

    Google Scholar 

  • Wakamatsu K, Kubo S, Matsuoka M, Hasegawa K, Sugiura M (2005) Japan engineering geomorphologic classification map. University of Tokyo Press, Japan

    Google Scholar 

  • Warriar MRR (1995) Wayanad in the middle ages. In: Johny KP (ed) Discover Wayanad—the green paradise. District Tourism Promotion Council, Kalpetta, pp 68–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Washitani I (2001) Traditional sustainable ecosystem ‘SATOYAMA’ and biodiversity crisis in Japan: conservation ecological perspective. Glob Environ Res 5:119–133

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamada S, Okubo S, Kitagawa Y, Takeuchi K (2007) Restoration of weed communities in abandoned rice paddy fields in the Tama Hills, central Japan. Agric Ecosyst Environ 119:88–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yamamoto S (2001) Studies on the effect of changes in rural landscape structure on secondary forest plants in Japanese rural areas. Bull NIAES 20:1–105 (Jp-E)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yamasaki H, Aoki K, Hattori T, Takeda Y (2000) Increase of species diversity due to management of vegetation in satoyama (rural forests). Jpn Inst Landsc Arch 63(5):481–484 (in Japanese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yokohari M, Terada T, Tanaka N (2006) Restoring the maintenance of Satoyamas by utilizing harvested organic materials as a biomass resource. In: Lafortezza R, Sanesi G (eds) Patterns and processes in forest landscapes: consequences of human management. Landscape Ecology, IUFRO8.01.03, pp 327–332

Download references

Acknowledgments

This paper, written during the tenure a visiting professorship awarded to BMK by the Integrated Research System for Sustainability Science, University of Tokyo, Japan, was presented at the Ecosystem Service Assessment Series seminar of the United Nations University-Institute of Advanced Studies at Yokohama, Japan, on 19 January 2009 and in the Second World Congress on Agroforestry 2009 at Nairobi, Kenya. Dr. Kaoru Ichikawa assisted in translating the Japanese language literature referenced in this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to B. Mohan Kumar.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kumar, B.M., Takeuchi, K. Agroforestry in the Western Ghats of peninsular India and the satoyama landscapes of Japan: a comparison of two sustainable land use systems. Sustain Sci 4, 215–232 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-009-0086-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-009-0086-0

Keywords

Navigation