Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Sustainability Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is growing demand among stakeholders across public and private institutions for spatially-explicit information regarding vulnerability to climate change at the local scale. However, the challenges associated with mapping the geography of climate change vulnerability are non-trivial, both conceptually and technically, suggesting the need for more critical evaluation of this practice. Here, we review climate change vulnerability mapping in the context of four key questions that are fundamental to assessment design. First, what are the goals of the assessment? A review of published assessments yields a range of objective statements that emphasize problem orientation or decision-making about adaptation actions. Second, how is the assessment of vulnerability framed? Assessments vary with respect to what values are assessed (vulnerability of what) and the underlying determinants of vulnerability that are considered (vulnerability to what). The selected frame ultimately influences perceptions of the primary driving forces of vulnerability as well as preferences regarding management alternatives. Third, what are the technical methods by which an assessment is conducted? The integration of vulnerability determinants into a common map remains an emergent and subjective practice associated with a number of methodological challenges. Fourth, who participates in the assessment and how will it be used to facilitate change? Assessments are often conducted under the auspices of benefiting stakeholders, yet many lack direct engagement with stakeholders. Each of these questions is reviewed in turn by drawing on an illustrative set of 45 vulnerability mapping studies appearing in the literature. A number of pathways for placing vulnerability mapping on a more robust footing are also identified.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta-Michlik L, Espaldon V (2008) Assessing vulnerability of selected farming communities in the Philippines based on a behavioural model of agent’s adaptation to global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 18:554–563

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Kelly PM (1999) Social vulnerability to climate change and the architecture of entitlements. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 4:253–266

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Vincent (2005) Uncertainty in adaptive capacity. C R Geosci 337:399–410

  • Adger WN, Brooks N, Bentham G, Agnew M, Eriksen S (2004) New indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity. Technical Report Number 7, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research. University of East Anglia, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Agrawala S, Mirza MMQ, Conde C, O’Brien K, Pulhin J, Pulwarty R, Smit B, Takahashi K (2007) Assessment of adaptation practices, options, constraints and capacity. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of working group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 717–743

    Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Dessai S, Goulden M, Hulme M, Lorenzoni I, Nelson DR, Næss LO, Wolf J, Wreford A (2009a) Are there social limits to adaptation? Clim Change 93:335–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adger WN, Eakin H, Winkels A (2009b) Nested and teleconnected vulnerabilities to environmental change. Front Ecol Environ 7:150–157

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Adhikari P (2006) Socio-economic indexes for areas: introduction, use and future directions. Australian Bureau of Statistics, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • AGO (Australian Greenhouse Office) (2006) Climate change impacts and risk management: a guide for business and government. Department of Environment and Heritage, Canberra

    Google Scholar 

  • Alessa LA, Klinskey AA, Busey R, Hinzman L, White D (2008) Freshwater vulnerabilities and resilience on the Seward Peninsula: integrating multiple dimensions of landscape change. Glob Environ Change 18:256–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Jeneid S, Bahnassy M, Nasr S, El Raey M (2008) Vulnerability assessment and adaptation to the impacts of sea level rise on the Kingdom of Bahrain. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13:97–104

    Google Scholar 

  • Alpar B (2009) Vulnerability of Turkish coasts to accelerated sea-level rise. Geomorph 107:58–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Asseng S, Dray A, Perez P, Su X (2010) Rainfall-human-spatial interactions in a salinity-prone agricultural region of the Western Australian wheat-belt. Ecol Model 221(5):812–824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Bäckstrand K (2003) Civic science for sustainability: reframing the role of experts, policy-makers and citizens in environmental governance. Glob Environ Politics 3(4):24–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) (2004) Disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J, Dessai S, Jones RN (2007) Vulnerability to climate variability and change in East Timor. Ambio 36(5):372–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnett J, Lambert S, Fry I (2008) The hazards of indicators: insights from the Environmental Vulnerability Index. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 98:102–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum S, Horton S, Choy DL, Gleeson B (2009) Climate change, health impacts and urban adaptability: case study of Gold Coast City. Research Monograph 11, Urban Program. Griffith University, Gold Coast

    Google Scholar 

  • Bayliss B, Brennan K, Eliot I, Finlayson M, Hall R, House T, Pidgeon B, Walden D, Waterman P (1997) Vulnerability assessment of predicted climate change and sea level rise in the Alligator Rivers Region, Northern Territory Australia. Supervising Scientist Report 123, Supervising Scientist, Canberra

  • Berry PM, Rounsevell MDA, Harrison PA, Audsley E (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of agricultural land use and species to climate change and the role of policy in facilitating adaptation. Environ Sci Pol 9:189–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bostram A, Anselin L, Farris J (2008) Visualizing seismic risk and uncertainty: a review of related research. Ann NY Acad Sci 1128:29–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bouden M, Moulin M, Gosselin P (2008) The geosimulation of West Nile virus propagation: a multi-agent and climate sensitive tool for risk management in public health. Int J Health Geogr 7:35. doi:10.1186/1476-072X-7-35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brooke C, Kinrade P (2006) Climate change impacts in Western Port. Report prepared for the Western Port Greenhouse Alliance by CSIRO Marine and Atmospheric Research and Marsden Jacob Associates, Melbourne

  • Brown VA (2005) Knowing: linking the knowledge cultures of sustainability and health. In: Brown VA, Grootjans J, Ritchie J, Townsend M, Verrinder G (eds) Sustainability and health: supporting global ecological integrity in public health. Earthscan, London; Allen and Unwin, Sydney

  • Brown I, Jude S, Koukoulas S, Nicholls R, Dickson M, Walkden M (2006) Dynamic simulation and visualisation of coastal erosion. Comp Environ Urban Syst 30:840–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bryan B, Harvey N, Belperio T (2001) Distributed process modeling for regional assessment of coastal vulnerability to sea-level rise. Environ Model Assess 6:57–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Buddemeier RW, Smith SV, Swaney DP (2008) Coastal typology: an integrative “neutral” technique for coastal zone characterization and analysis. Estuar Coast Shelf Sci 77:197–205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bulto PLO, Rodriguez AP, Valencia AR (2006) Assessment of human health vulnerability to climate variability and change in Cuba. Environ Health Perspect 114:1941–1949

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao C, Lam NS-N (1997) Understanding scale and resolution effects in remote sensing and GIS. In: Quattrochi DA, Goodchild MF (eds) Scale in remote sensing and GIS. CRC, Boca Raton, pp 57–72

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter TR, Jones RN, Lu X, Bhadwal S, Conde C, Mearns LO, O’Neill BC, Rounsevell MDA, Zurek MB (2007) New assessment methods and the characterisation of future conditions. In: Parry ML, Canziani OF, Palutikof JP, van der Linden PJ, Hanson CE (eds) Climate change 2007: impacts, adaptation and vulnerability. Contribution of Working Group II to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 133–171

    Google Scholar 

  • Cash D, Clark W (2001) From science to policy: assessing the assessment process. RWP01-045, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, John F Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge

  • Cash D, Moser SC (2000) Linking global and local scales: designing dynamic assessment and management processes. Glob Environ Change 10:109–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cash D, Clark W, Alcock F, Dickson N, Eckley N, Jäger J (2002) Salience, credibility, legitimacy and boundaries: linking research, assessment and decision making. RWP02-046, Faculty Research Working Paper Series, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Harvard University, Cambridge

  • Chambers R (2006) Participatory mapping and geographic information systems: whose map? Who is empowered and who disempowered? Who gains and who loses? Electron J Inf Syst Dev Ctries 25:1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark TW (2002) The policy process: a practical guide for natural resource professionals. Yale University Press, New Haven

    Google Scholar 

  • Clark WC, Majone G (1985) The critical appraisal of scientific inquiries with policy implications. Sci Technol Hum Values 10:6–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark GE, Moser SC, Ratick SJ, Dow K, Meyer WB, Emani S, Weigen J, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Schwarz HE (1998) Assessing the vulnerability of coastal communities to extreme storms: the case of Revere, MA, USA. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 3:59–82

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corbett J (2009) Good practices in participatory mapping. International Fund for Agricultural Development, Rome

    Google Scholar 

  • CRED (the Centre for Research on the Epidemiology of Disasters) (2009) EM-DAT online database Université Catholique de Louvain in Brussels, Belgium. Available from http://www.em-dat.net

  • Cutter SL (1996) Vulnerability to environmental hazards. Prog Hum Geogr 20:529–539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter Sl, Emrich C (2005) Are natural hazards and disaster losses in the US increasing? EOS 86(41):381–389

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Mitchell JT, Scott MS (2000) Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 90:713–737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cutter SL, Boruff BJ, Shirley WL (2003) Social vulnerability to environmental hazards. Soc Sci Q 84(2):242–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dahlstrom K, Salmons R (2005) Building economic and social information for examining the effects of climate change; generic socio-economic scenarios. Policy Studies Institute, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis I (2004) Progress in analysis of social vulnerability and capacity. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 128–144

    Google Scholar 

  • DCC (2009) Climate change risks to Australia’s coasts: a first pass national assessment. Department of Climate Change, Australia. ISBN 9781-1-921298-71-4; available at http://www.climatechange.gov.au

  • Demirkesen AC, Evrendilek F, Berberoglu S (2008) Quantifying coastal inundation vulnerability of Turkey to sea-level rise. Environ Monitor Assess 138:101–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dessai S, Hulme M, Lempert R, Pielke R Jr (2009) Do we need more precise and accurate predictions in order to adapt to a changing climate? EOS 90:111–112

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Diffenbaugh NS, Giorgi F, Raymond L, Bi X (2007) Indicators of 21st century socioclimatic exposure. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 104:20195–20198

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Döll P (2009) Vulnerability to the impact of climate change on renewable groundwater resources: a global-scale assessment. Environ Res Lett 4:035006. doi:10.1088/1748-9326/4/3/035006

  • Dransch D, Rotzoll H, Poser K (2010) The contribution of maps to the challenges of risk communication to the public. Int J Digit Earth 3(3):292–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duerden F (2004) Translating climate change impacts at the community level. Arctic 57(2):204–212

    Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Luers AL (2006) Assessing the vulnerability of social-environmental systems. Annu Rev Environ Resour 31:365–394

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eakin H, Winkels A, Sendzimir J (2009) Nested vulnerability: exploring cross-scale linkages and vulnerability teleconnections in Mexican and Vietnamese coffee systems. Environ Sci Policy 12:298–412

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebert A, Kerle N, Stein A (2009) Urban social vulnerability assessment with physical proxies and spatial metrics derived from air- and spaceborne imagery and GIS data. Nat Hazards 48:275–294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ebi KL, Burton I (2008) Identifying practical adaptation options: an approach to address climate change-related health risks. Environ Sci Policy 11(4):359–369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eigenbrod F, Armsworth PR, Anderson BJ, Heinemeyer A, Gillings S, Roy DB, Thomas CD, Gaston KJ (2010) The impact of proxy based methods on mapping the distribution of ecosystem services. J Appl Ecol 47(2):377–385

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elliot P, Wartenberg D (2004) Spatial epidemiology: current approaches and future challenges. Environ Health Perspect 112:998–1006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESPACE (2007) Planning in a changing climate: the strategy. The Environment Department, Hampshire County Council, Winchester

    Google Scholar 

  • Fekete A (2009) Validation of a social vulnerability index in context to river-floods in Germany. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:393–403

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finch C, Emrich CT, Cutter SL (2010) Disaster disparities and differential recovery in New Orleans. Popul Environ 31:179–202. doi:10.1007/s11111-009-0099-8

    Google Scholar 

  • Fraser EDG, Dougill AJ, Mabee WE, Reed M, McAlpine P (2006) Bottom up and top down: analysis of participatory processes for sustainability indicator identification as a pathway to community empowerment and sustainable environmental management. J Environ Manag 78:114–127

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frazier TG, Wood N, Yarnal B (2010) Stakeholder perspectives on land-use strategies for adapting to climate-change-enhanced coastal hazards: Sarasota, Florida. Appl Geogr 30(4):506–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2007) Adaptation planning for climate change: concepts, assessment approaches, and key lessons. Sustain Sci 2:265–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M (2008) Assessing adaptation to the health risks of climate change: what guidance can existing frameworks provide? Int J Environ Health Res 18(1):37–63

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Füssel H-M, Klein RJT (2006) Climate change vulnerability assessments: an evolution of conceptual thinking. Clim Change 75(3):301–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gaillard JC, Carmella ML, Pangilinan JD (2010) Participatory mapping for raising disaster risk awareness among the youth. J Conting Crisis Manag 18(3):131–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gall M, Borden KA, Cutter SL (2009) When do losses count? Six fallacies of natural hazards loss data. Bull Am Meteor Soc 90:799–809. doi:10.1175/2008BAMS2721.1

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallopín GC (2006) Linkages between vulnerability, resilience and adaptive capacity. Glob Environ Change 16:293–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gbetibouo GA, Ringler C (2009) Mapping South African farming sector vulnerability to climate change and variability. IFPRI Discussion Paper 00885, International Food Policy Research Institute, Washington, DC

  • Giorgi F (2008) Regionalization of climate change information for impact assessment and adaptation. WMO Bull 57(2):86–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Glass GE (2000) Update: spatial aspects of epidemiology: the interface with medical geography. Epidemiol Rev 22:136–139

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Godin B (2006) The linear model of innovation. Sci Technol Hum Values 31(6):639–667

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goodchild MF (2007) Citizens as sensors: the world of volunteered geography. GeoJournal 69:211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gravelle G, Mimura N (2008) Vulnerability assessment of sea-level rise in Viti Levu, Fiji Islands. Sustain Sci 3:171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Green M, Flowerdew R (1996) New evidence on the modifiable areal unit problem. In: Longley P, Batty M (eds) Spatial analysis: modelling in a GIS environment. Wiley, Hoboken, pp 41–54

    Google Scholar 

  • Green R, Bates LK, Smyth A (2007) Impediments to recovery in New Orleans’ upper and lower ninth ward: one year after Hurricane Katrina. Disasters 31:311–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grumbine RE (1994) What is ecosystem-based management? Conserv Biol 8:27–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hahn MB, Riederer AM, Foster SO (2009) The livelihood vulnerability index: a pragmatic approach to assessing risks from climate variability and change—a case study from Mozambique. Glob Environ Change 19:74–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hajer H (2003) Policy without polity? Policy analysis and the institutional void. Policy Sci 36:175–195

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BS, Walbridge S, Selkoe KA, Kappel CV, Micheli F, D’Agrosa C, Bruno JF, Casey KS, Ebert C, Fox HE, Fujita R, Heinemann D, Lenihan HS, Madin EMP, Perry MT, Selig ER, Spalding M, Steneck R, Watson R (2008) A Global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Halpern BS, Kappel CV, Selkoe KA, Micheli F, Ebert CM, Kostgis C, Crain CM, Martone RG, Shearer C, Teck SJ (2009) Mapping cumulative human impacts to California Current marine ecosystems. Conserv Lett 2(3):138–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hammar-Klose ES, Pendleton EA, Thieler ER, Williams SJ (2003) Coastal vulnerability assessment of Cape Cod National Seashore to sea-level rise. Open-File Report 02-233, US Geological Survey, Woods Hole

  • Hansen J, Holm L, Frewer L, Robinson P, Sandøe P (2003) Beyond the knowledge deficit: recent research into lay and expert attitudes to food risks. Appetite 41:111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hebb A, Mortsch L (2007) Floods: mapping vulnerability in the Upper Thames watershed under a changing climate. Report XI, Canadian Foundation for Climate and Atmospheric Sciences, Ontario

  • Herrick C, Sarewitz D (2000) Ex post evaluation: a more effective role for scientific assessments in environmental policy. Sci Technol Hum Values 25:309–331

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilhorst D, Bankoff G (2004) Introduction: mapping vulnerability. In: Bankoff G, Frerks G, Hilhorst D (eds) Mapping vulnerability: disasters, development and people. Earthscan, London, pp 1–9

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinkel J (2011) Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science–policy interface. Glob Environ Change 21:198–208. doi:10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2010.08.002

  • Hulme M, Dessai S (2008) Ventures should not overstate their aims just to secure funding. Nature 453:979

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • HVRI (Hazards and Vulnerability Research Institute) (2009). The spatial hazard events and losses database for the United States, Version 7.0 [Online Database]. University of South Carolina Columbia, SC. Available from http://www.sheldus.org

  • IPCC CZMS (1992) A common methodology for assessing vulnerability to sea level rise, 2nd revision. In: IPCC CZMS, global climate change and the rising challenge of the sea. Report of the Coastal Zone Management Subgroup, Response Strategies Working Group of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, Ministry of Transport, Public Works and Water Management, The Hague, Appendix C

  • Jäger J (1998) Current thinking on using scientific findings in environmental policy making. Environ Model Assess 3:143–153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janssen MA, Schoon ML, Ke W, Börner K (2006) Scholarly networks on resilience, vulnerability and adaptation within the human dimensions of global environmental change. Glob Environ Change 16:240–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RN, Preston BL (2011) Adaptation and risk management. WIREs Clim Change. doi:10.1002/wcc.97

  • Kaiser J (2000) Ecologists hope to avoid the mistakes of previous assessment. Science 289:1677

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Karim MF, Mimura N (2008) Impacts of climate change and sea-level rise on cyclonic storm surge floods in Bangladesh. Glob Environ Change 18:490–500

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kellstedt PM, Zahran S, Vedlitz A (2008) Personal efficacy, the information environment, and attitudes toward global warming and climate change in the United States. Risk Anal 28:113–126

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly PM, Adger WN (2000) Theory and practice in assessing vulnerability to climate change and facilitating adaptation. Clim Change 47:325–352

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keogh DU, Bell KL, Park JN, Cobon DH (2004) Formative evaluation to benchmark and improve climate-based decision support for graziers in Western Queensland. Aust J Exp Agr 44:233–246

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kienberger S, Lang S, Zeil P (2009) Spatial vulnerability units–expert-based spatial modelling of socio-economic vulnerability in the Salzach catchment, Austria. Nat Hazards Earth Syst Sci 9:767–778

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kinrade P, Justus M, Grey S, Preston BL, Benedyka S, Skinner Z (2008a) Impacts of climate change on settlements in the Western Port region. Climate change risks and adaptation. Prepared for the Western Port Greenhouse Alliance by Marsden Jacob Associates, Broadleaf Capital International, and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, Melbourne

  • Kinrade P, Preston BL, Macadam I, Fisher T, Whiteoak K, Wiedemann N, Mirams S (2008b) Impacts of climate change on settlements in the Western Port region. People, property and places. Prepared for the Western Port Greenhouse Alliance by Marsden Jacob Associates and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, Melbourne

  • Kistemann T, Dangendorf F, Schweikart J (2002) New perspectives in the use of geographical information systems (GIS) in environmental health sciences. Int J Hyg Envrion Health 205:169–181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein RJT, Nicholls RJ, Mimura N (1999) Coastal adaptation to climate change: can the IPCC guidelines be applied? Mitig Adapt Strateg Global Change 4:239–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kleinosky LR, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2007) Vulnerability of Hampton Roads, Virginia to storm-surge flooding and sea-level rise. Nat Hazards 40(1):43–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krivoruchko K, Crawford CAG (2003) Assessing the uncertainty resulting from geoprocessing operations. GIS and Modeling Workshop Sept 25–26, Redlands

  • Kropp JP, Block A, Reusswig F (2006) Semiquantiative assessment of regional climate vulnerability: the North-Rhine Westphalia study. Clim Change 76:265–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharples C, Mount R, Pedersen T, Lacey, M, Newton J, Jaskierniak D, Wallace L (2009) The Australian coastal smartline geomorphic and stability map version 1: project report. Prepared for Geoscience Australia and the Department of Climate Change by the School of Geography and Environmental Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart

  • Laska S, Morrow BH (2007) Social vulnerabilities and Hurricane Katrina: an unnatural disaster in New Orleans. J Mar Technol Soc J 40:16–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee T, Quinn MS, Duke D (2006) Citizen, science, highways, and wildlife: using a web-based GIS to engage citizens in collecting wildlife information. Ecol Soc 11(1):11. (online) http://www.ecologyandsociety.org/vol11/iss1/art11/

  • Lim B, Spanger-Siegfried E, Burton I, Malone EL, Huq S (eds) (2005) Adaptation policy frameworks for climate change. United Nations Development Program and the Global Environment Facility, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lipkus IM, Hollands JG (1999) The visual communication of risk. J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr 25:149–163

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Fritz S, van Wesenbeeck CFA, Fuchs M, You L, Obersteiner M, Yang H (2008) A spatially explicit assessment of current and future hotspots of hunger in Sub-Saharan Africa in the context of global change. Glob Planet Change 64:222–235

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luers AL, Lobell DB, Sklar LS, Addams CL, Matson P (2003) A method for quantifying vulnerability, applied to the agricultural system of the Yaqui Valley, Mexico. Glob Environ Change 13:255–267

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lynch AH, Tryhorn L, Abramson R (2008) Working at the boundary: facilitating interdisciplinarity in climate change adaptation research. Bull Am Meteor Soc Feb 2008:169–179. doi:10.1175/BAMS-89-2-169

  • Mastrandrea MD, Heller NE, Root TL, Schneider SH (2010) Bridging the gap: linking climate-impacts research with adaptation planning and management. Clim Change 100:87–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCall M (2003) Seeking good governance in participatory-GIS: a review of processes and governance dimensions in applying GIS to participatory spatial planning. Habitat Int 27:549–573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Midgley G, Reynolds M (2004) Systems/operational research and sustainable development: towards a new agenda. Sustain Dev 12:56–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moser SC (2009) Making a difference on the ground: the challenge of demonstrating the effectiveness of decision support. Clim Change 95:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Næss LO, Norland IT, Lafferty WM, Aall C (2006) Data and processes linking vulnerability assessment to adaptation decision-making on climate change in Norway. Glob Environ Change 16:221–233

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nakicenovic N, Alcamo J, Davis G, de Vries B, Fenhann J, Gaffin S, Gregory K, Grübler A, Jung TY, Kram T, La Rovere EL, Michaelis L, Mori S, Morita T, Pepper W, Pitcher H, Price L, Riahi K, Roehrl A, Rogner H-H, Sankovski S, Schlesinger M, Shukla P, Smith S, Swart R, van Rooijen S, Victor N, Dadi Z (2000) IPCC special report on emissions scenarios. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • NAST (National Assessment Synthesis Team) (2001) Climate change impacts on the United States: the potential consequences of climate variability and change. National assessment synthesis team, US global change research program. Cambridge University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholls RJ, Wong PP, Burkett V, Woodroffe C, Hay J (2008) Climate change and coastal vulnerability assessment: scenarios for integrated assessment. Sustain Sci 3:89–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2007a) Successful response starts with a map: improving geospatial support for disaster management. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • NRC (National Research Council) (2007b) Analysis of global change assessments: lessons learned. The National Academies Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • O’Brien KL, Leichenko R, Kelkar U, Venema H, Aandahl G, Tompkins H, Javed A, Bhadwal S, Barg S, Nygaard L, West J (2004) Mapping multiple stressors: climate change and economic globalisation in India. Glob Environ Change 14:303–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Openshaw S (1984) The modifiable areal unit problem. CATMOG 38. GeoBooks, Norwich

    Google Scholar 

  • Oreskes N (2004) Science and public policy: what’s proof got to do with it? Environ Sci Policy 7:369–383

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • OST (Office of Science, Technology) (2002) Foresight futures 2020: revised scenarios and guidance. Department of Trade and Industry, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Oyekale AS, Bolaji MB, Olowa OW (2009) The effects of climate change on cocoa production and vulnerability assessment in Nigeria. Agric J 4:77–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Parrott R, Hopfer S, Ghetian C, Lengerich E (2007) Mapping as a visual health communication tool: promises and dilemmas. Health Commun 22:13–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Patiño L, Gauthier DA (2009) Integrating local perspectives into climate change decision making in rural areas of the Canadian prairies. Int J Clim Change Strateg Manag 1(2):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patt A, Klein RJT, de la Vega-Leinert A (2004) Taking the uncertainty in climate-change vulnerability assessment seriously. C R Geoscience 337:411–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peduzzi P, Dao H, Herold C (2005) Mapping disastrous natural hazards using GIS. Nat Hazard 35:265–289

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peppler R (2009) Old Indian ways of knowing the weather: weather predictions for the winters of 1950–51 and 1951–52. Fourth Syumposium on Policy and Socioeconomic Research, 89th American Meteorological Society Annual Meeting, Phoenix, Arizona, 10–16 January 2009. Available at http://ams.confex.com/ams/pdfpapers/143684.pdf

  • Poumadere M, Mays C, Le Mer S, Blong R (2005) The 2003 heat wave in France: dangerous climate change here and now. Risk Anal 25:1483–1494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL, Jones RN (2008) Screening climatic and non-climatic risks to Australian catchments. Geogr Res 46:258–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL, Kay RC (2010) Managing climate risk in human settlements. In: Jubb I, Holper P, Cai W (eds) Greenhouse 2009. CSIRO, Melbourne, pp 185–196

    Google Scholar 

  • Preston BL, Stafford-Smith M (2009) Framing vulnerability and adaptive capacity assessment. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship Working Paper, CSIRO, Aspendale and Canberra

  • Preston BL, Brooke C, Measham TG, Smith T, Gorddard R (2009) Igniting change in local government: lessons learned from a bushfire vulnerability assessment. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 14:251–283

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pruszak Z, Zawadzka E (2008) Potential implications of sea-level rise for Poland. J Coast Res 24:410–422

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan J, Oudwater N, Pender J, Martin A (2001) GIS and participatory approaches in natural resources research. Natural Resources Institute, University of Greenwich, Charltam

    Google Scholar 

  • Reid CE, O’Neill MS, Gronlund CJ, Brines SJ, Brown DG, Diez-Roux AV, Schwartz J (2009) Mapping community determinants of heat vulnerability. Environ Health Perspect 117(11):1730–1736

    Google Scholar 

  • Reidlinger D, Berkes F (2001) Contributions of traditional knowledge to understanding climate change in the Canadian Arctic. Polar Rec 37:315–328

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robertson HA, McGee TH (2003) Applying local knowledge: the contribution of oral history to wetland rehabilitation at Kanyapella Basin, Australia. J Environ Manage 69:275–287

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schröter D, Acosta-Michlik L, Arnell AW, Araujo MB, Badeck F, Bakker M, Bondeau A, Bugmann H, Carter T, de la Vega-Leinert AC, Erhard M, Espiñeira GZ, Ewert F, Fritsch U, Friedlingstein P, Glendining M, Gracia CA, Hickler T, House J, Hulme M, Kankaanpää S, Klein RJT, Krukenberg B, Lavorel S, Leemans R, Lindner M, Liski J, Metzger MJ, Meyer J, Mitchell T, Mohren F, Morales P, Moreno JM, Reginster I, Reidsma P, Rounsevell M, Pla E, Pluimers J, Prentice IC, Pussinen A, Sánchez A, Sabaté A, Sitch S, Smith B, Smith J, Smith P, Sykes MT, Thonicke K, Thuiller W, Tuck G, van der Werf G, Vayreda J, Wattenback M, Wilson DW, Woodward FI, Zaehle S, Zierl B, Zudin S, Cramer W (2004) ATEAM final report 2004. Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Potsdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharma U, Patwardhan A (2008) Methodology for identifying vulnerability hotspots to tropical cyclone hazard in India. Mitig Adapt Strateg Glob Change 13:703–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw J, Taylor RB, Forbes DL, Ruz M-H, Solomon S (1998) Sensitivity of the coasts of Canada to sea-level rise. Bull Geol Survey Can 505:1–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Shaw A, Sheppard S, Burch S, Flanders D, Wiek A, Carmichael J, Robinson J, Cohen S (2009) Making local futures tangible—synthesizing, downscaling, and visualizing climate change scenarios for participatory capacity building. Glob Environ Change 19(4):447–463

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheppard SRJ (2005) Landscape visualisation and climate change: the potential for influencing perceptions and behaviour. Environ Sci Policy 8:637–654

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sietchiping R (2006) Applying an index of adaptive capacity to climate change in northwestern Victoria, Australia. Appl GIS 2:16.1–16.28

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Simpson DM, Human RJ (2008) Large-scale vulnerability assessments for natural hazards. Nat Hazards 47:143–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Slocombe DS (1993) Implementing ecosystem-based management. Bioscience 43:612–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smit B, Wandel J (2006) Adaptation, adaptive capacity and vulnerability. Glob Environ Change 16:282–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Smith TF, Brooke C, Measham TG, Preston BL, Gorddard R, Withycombe G, Beveridge B, Morrison C (2009) Case studies of adaptive capacity. Prepared for the Sydney Coastal Councils Group by the University of the Sunshine Coast and the CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, Sippy Downs and Canberra

  • SOPAC (South Pacific Applied Geoscience Commission) (2005) Building resilience in SIDS. The environmental vulnerability index. SOPAC and the United Nations Environment Programme, Suva and Nairobi

    Google Scholar 

  • Stokes DE (1997) Pasteur’s quadrant—basic science and technological innovation. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Stott PA, Stone DA, Allen MR (2004) Human contribution to the European heatwave of 2003. Nature 432:610–614

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Sullivan C, Meigh J (2005) Targeting attention on local vulnerabilities using an integrated index approach: the example of the climate vulnerability index. Water Sci Technol 51:69–78

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Thorton PK, Jones PG, Owiyo T, Kruska RL, Herrero M, Orindi V, Bhadwal S, Kristjanson P, Notenbaert A, Bekele N, Omolo A (2008) Climate change and poverty in Africa: mapping hotspots of vulnerability. AfJARE 2, March: 24–44

  • Thow A, de Blois M (2008) Climate change and human vulnerability: mapping emerging trends and risk hotspots for humanitarian actors. Report to the UN Office for Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs by Maplecroft, Bath

  • Tighe M, Pollino CA, Cuddy SM, Whitfield S (2007) A Bayesian approach to assessing regional climate change pressures on natural resource conditions in the central west of NSW, Australia. International Congress on Modelling and Simulation (MODSIM2007), December 10–13, Christchurch

  • Torresan S, Critto A, Valle MD (2008) Assessing coastal vulnerability to climate change: comparing segmentation at global and regional scales. Sustain Sci 3:45–65

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tran LT, O’Neill RV, Smith ER (2010) Spatial pattern of environmental vulnerability in the Mid-Atlantic region, USA. Appl Geogr 30:191–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Trench B (2008) Towards and analytical framework of science communication models. In: Cheng D, Claessens M, Gascoigne T, Metcalfe J, Schiele B, Shi S (eds) Communicating science in social contexts. New models, new practices. Springer, New York, pp 119–135

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II, Kasperson RE, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Kasperson JX, Lueers A, Martello ML, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A (2003a) A framework for vulnerability analysis in sustainability science. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8074–8079

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Turner BL II, Matson PA, McCarthy JJ, Corell RW, Christensen L, Eckley N, Hovelsrud-Broda G, Kasperson JX, Kasperson RE, Luers A, Martello ML, Mathiesen S, Naylor R, Polsky C, Pulsipher A, Schiller A, Selin H, Tyler N (2003b) Illustrating the coupled human–environment system for vulnerability analysis: three case studies. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 100:8080–8085

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • UCD (University of Colorado at Denver) (2004) Natural hazards risk assessment for the state of Colorado. Prepared by the University of Colorado at Denver and Health Sciences Center in support of the Colorado State Hazard Mitigation Plan, Division of Emergency Management, State of Colorado, Boulder

  • UKCIP (UK Climate Impacts Programme) (2000) Socio-economic scenarios for climate change impact assessment: a guide to their use in the UK Climate Impacts Programme. UKCIP, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • UN National Assessment Synthesis Team (2001) The potential consequences of climate variability and change. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

  • Vandentorren S, Bretin P, Zeghnoun A, Mandereau-Bruno L, Croisier A, Cochet C, Ribéron J, Siberan I, Declerq B, Ledrans M (2006) August 2003 heat wave in France: risk factors for death of elderly people living at home. Eur J Public Health 16:583–591

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Vescovi L, Rebetz M, Rong F (2005) Assessing public health risk due to extremely high temperature events: climate and social parameters. Clim Res 30:71–78

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vincent K (2004) Creating an index of social vulnerability to climate change for Africa. Working Paper 56, Tyndall Centre for Climate Change Research, University of East Anglia, Norwich

  • Vörösmarty CJ, Green P, Salisbury J, Lammers RB (2000) Global water resources: vulnerability from climate change and population growth. Science 289:284–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Weinstein ND, Sandman PM (1993) Some criteria for evaluating risk messages. Risk Anal 13:103–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • White GF (1974) Natural hazards. Oxford University Press, Oxford and New York

    Google Scholar 

  • White N, Sutherst RW, Hall N, Whish-Wilson P (2003) The vulnerability of the Australian beef industry to impacts of the cattle tick (Boophilus microplus) under climate change. Clim Change 61:157–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wickham JD, O’Neill RV, Jones KB (2000) A geography of ecosystem vulnerability. Land Ecol 15:495–504

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbanks TJ, Kates RW (1999) Global change in local places: how scale matters. Clim Change 43:601–628

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Willows R, Connell R (2003) Climate adaptation: risk, uncertainty, and decision-making. UKCIP Technical Report, UK Climate Impacts Programme, Oxford

  • Wooldrige S, Done T (2004) Learning to predict large-scale coral bleaching from past events: a Bayesian approach using remotely sensed data, in situ data, and environmental proxies. Coral Reefs 23:96–108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wrona FJ, Cash KJ (1996) The ecosystem approach to environmental assessment: moving from theory to practice. J Aquat Ecosyst Health 5:89–97

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu S-Y, Yarnal B, Fisher A (2002) Vulnerability of coastal communities to sea-level rise: a case study of Cape May County, New Jersey, USA. Clim Res 22:255–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (1991) Knowledge in context. Sci Technol Hum Values 16(1):111–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wynne B (2006) Public engagement as a means of restoring public trust in science—hitting the notes but missing the music? Commun Genet 9(3):211–220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yohe G, Malone E, Brenkert A, Schlesinger M, Mejia H, Lee D (2006) Global distributions of vulnerability to climate change. Integ Assess J 6(3):35–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Yusuf AA, Francisco H (2009) Climate change vulnerability mapping for Southeast Asia. Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia, Singapore

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidler RB (1997) Climate change vulnerability and response strategies for the coastal zone of Poland. Climatic Change 36:151–173

    Google Scholar 

  • Zerger A, Smith DI (2003) Impediments to using GIS for real-time disaster decision support. Comput Environ Urban Syst 27:123–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Environmental Sciences Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, PO Box 2008, MS-6038, One Bethel Valley Road, Oak Ridge, TN, 37831-6253, USA

    Benjamin L. Preston

  2. CSIRO Climate Adaptation Flagship, PMB1, 107–121 Station Street, Aspendale, VIC, 3195, Australia

    Emma J. Yuen

  3. IMS Consulting, St Nicholas House, 31–34 High Street, Bristol, BS1 2AW, UK

    Richard M. Westaway

Authors
  1. Benjamin L. Preston
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Emma J. Yuen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Richard M. Westaway
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Benjamin L. Preston.

Additional information

Edited by Hans-Martin Füssel, Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research, Germany.

Appendix

Appendix

See Table 5.

Table 5 Spatial climate change vulnerability assessments reviewed in the current study
Full size table

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Preston, B.L., Yuen, E.J. & Westaway, R.M. Putting vulnerability to climate change on the map: a review of approaches, benefits, and risks. Sustain Sci 6, 177–202 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0129-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-011-0129-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation