Skip to main content
Log in

Heavy metal: a misused term?

  • Short Communication
  • Published:
Acta Geochimica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The use of the term “heavy metal” is regularly questioned by the scientific community. Here, we followed the evolution (1970–2020) in the number of published papers including this term in their title. Thus, we can evidence a continuous, albeit sometimes stabilizing, increase especially in environmental journals. After several other warning opinions, we propose that it should be replaced in the scientific literature by terms like “metal”, “metalloid”, “trace metal elements” or “potentially toxic element”.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Olivier Pourret.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of Interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pourret, O., Bollinger, JC. & Hursthouse, A. Heavy metal: a misused term?. Acta Geochim 40, 466–471 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-021-00468-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11631-021-00468-0

Keywords

Navigation