Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A
Erschienen in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 8/2012

01.08.2012 | Symposium: Fatigue & Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Corrosion-Fatigue Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 5083-H131 Sensitized at 448 K (175 °C)

verfasst von: Ronald L. Holtz, Peter S. Pao, Robert A. Bayles, Thomas M. Longazel, Ramasis Goswami

Erschienen in: Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A | Ausgabe 8/2012

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

The fatigue crack growth behavior of aluminum alloy 5083-H131 has been systematically studied as a function of degree of sensitization for aging at 448 K (175 °C). Fatigue crack growth rates were measured at load ratios of 0.1 and 0.85, in vacuum, air, and a corrosive aqueous environment containing 1 pct NaCl with dilute inhibitor. Sensitization does not affect the fatigue crack growth behavior of Al 5083-H131 significantly in vacuum or air, at low- or high-load ratio. For high-load ratio, in the 1 pct NaCl+inhibitor solution, the threshold drops by nearly 50 pct during the first 200 hours of aging, then it degrades more slowly for longer aging times up to 2000 hours. The change in aging behavior at approximately 200 hours seems to be correlated with the transition from partial coverage of the grain boundaries by β Al3Mg2 phase, to continuous full β coverage. ASTM G-67 mass loss levels below approximately 30 mg/cm2 do not exhibit degraded corrosion-fatigue properties for R = 0.85, but degradation of the threshold is rapid for higher mass loss levels.
Vorheriger Artikel Constituent Particle Clustering and Pitting Corrosion
Nächster Artikel Effect of Temperature on the Loss of Ductility of S-135 Grade Drill Pipe Steel and Characterization of Corrosion Products in CO2 Containing Environments

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
E.L. Huskins, B. Cao, K.T. Ramesh: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, vol. 527, pp. 1292-98.CrossRef
2.
R.A. Sielski: Ships and Offshore Structures, 2008, vol. 3, pp. 57-65.CrossRef
3.
W.G. Babcock and E.J. Czyryca: AMPTIAC Quart., 2003, vol. 7, no. 3, pp. 31-36.
4.
G.C. Blaze: Alcoa Green Letter: The 5000 Series Alloys Suitable for Welded Structural Applications, Aluminum Corporation of America, New Kensington, PA, 1972.
5.
E.H. Dix, W.A. Anderson, and M.B. Shumaker: Corrosion, 1959, vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 19-26.
6.
J.L. Searles, P.I. Gouma, and R.G. Buchheit: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 2859-67.CrossRef
7.
R.H. Jones, D.R. Bauer, M.J. Danielson, and J.S. Vetrano: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2001, vol. 32A, pp. 1699-1711.CrossRef
8.
F.S. Bovard: Corrosion in Marine and Saltwater Environments II, Eds. D.A. Shifler, T. Tsuru, P.M. Natishan, and S. Ito, vols. 2004–2014, Electrochemical Society, Pennington, NJ, 2005, pp. 232–243.
9.
C.R. Wong, G.P. Mercier, and J.J. Deloach: SeaFrame, 2007, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 18-20.
10.
N. Birbilis and R.G. Buchheit: J. Electrochem. Soc., 2005, vol. 152, pp. B140-51.CrossRef
11.
R.H. Jones: J. Met., 2003, vol. 55, no. 2, pp. 42–46.
12.
M. Fellerkniepmeier, K. Detert, and L. Thomas: Z. Metallkunde, 1964, vol. 55, pp. 83-87.
13.
P.N.T. Unwin and R.B. Nicholson: Acta Metall., 1969, vol. 17, pp. 1379-93.CrossRef
14.
L.I. Kaygorodova, B.N. Balandin, and N.N. Buynov: Phys. Met. Metall., 1985, vol. 59, pp. 126-30.
15.
T. Sato and A. Kamio: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1991, vol. A146, pp. 161-80.
16.
H. Inagaki: Z. Metallkunde, 2005, vol. 96, pp. 45-53.
17.
A.J. Davenport, Y. Yuan, R. Ambat, B.J. Connolly, M. Strangwood, A. Afseth, and G. Scamans: Mater. Sci. Forum, 2006, vols. 519-521, pp. 641-46.CrossRef
18.
M.F. Komarova, N.N. Buinov, and L.I. Kaganovi: Phys. Met. Metall., 1973, vol. 36, pp. 358-64.
19.
S. Osaki: Technology Reports of the Yamaguchi University, 1974, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 347-48.
20.
J.R. Pickens, J.R. Gordon, and J.A.S. Green: Metall. Trans. A, 1983, vol. 14A, pp. 925-30.
21.
M. Popovic and E. Romhanji: J. Mater. Process. Technol., 2002, vols. 125–126, pp. 275–80.
22.
R.H. Jones, J.S. Vetrano, and C.F. Windisch: Corrosion, 2004, vol. 60, pp. 1144-54.CrossRef
23.
I.N.A. Oguocha, O.J. Adigun, and S. Yannacopoulos: J. Mater. Sci., 2008, vol. 43, pp. 4208-14.CrossRef
24.
25.
J. Gao and D.J. Quesnel: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 356-64.CrossRef
26.
C.B. Crane and R. Gangloff: DoD Corrosion Conf. Proc., NACE International, Houston, TX, Paper 20175, 2011, in press.
27.
J.K. Brosi and J.J. Lewandowski: Scripta Mater., 2010, vol. 63, pp. 799-802.CrossRef
28.
C. Menzemer and T.S. Srivatsan: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1999, vol. A271, pp. 188-95.
29.
K. Van Kranenburg, T. Riemslag, J. Zuidema, S. Benedictus-de Vries, and F. Veer: Mater. Sci., 2001, vol. 37, pp. 970-74.CrossRef
30.
F. Ford: Corrosion, 1979, vol. 35, pp. 281-87.
31.
J.K. Donald: Fracture Mechanics Characterization of Aluminum Alloys for Marine Structural Applications, SSC-448, Ship Structure Committee, Washington, DC, 2007.
32.
P.S. Pao, R. Goswami, R.A. Bayles, T.M. Longazel, and R.L. Holtz: Fatigue of Materials—Advances and Emergences of Understanding, Eds. T.S. Srivatsan and M.A. Imam, Wiley, Hoboken, NJ, 2010, pp. 85–92.
33.
J.S. Montgomery and E.S. Chin: AMPTIAC Quart., 2004, vol. 8, no. 4, pp. 15-20.
34.
R.L. Holtz, P.S. Pao, R.A. Bayles, T.M. Longazel, and R. Goswami: DoD Corrosion Conference Proceedings, NACE International, Houston, TX, Paper 20421, 2011, in press.
35.
R. Goswami, G. Spanos, P.S. Pao, and R.L. Holtz: Metall. Mater. Trans. A, 2011, vol. 42A, pp. 348-55.CrossRef
36.
R. Goswami, G. Spanos, P.S. Pao, and R.L. Holtz: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 2010, vol. 527, pp. 1089-95.CrossRef
37.
ASTM E647-05, Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates, 2005.
38.
D.O. Sprowls, M.B. Shumaker, J.D. Walsh, and J.W. Coursen: “Evaluation of Stress Corrosion Cracking Susceptibility using Fracture Mechanics Techniques,” Final Report, Contract Number NAS 8-21487, May 1973, Alcoa Laboratories, Pittsburgh, PA.
39.
M. Liu, P. Schmutz, S. Zanna, A. Seyeux, H. Ardelean, G. Song, A. Atrens, and P. Marcus: Corros. Sci., 2010, vol. 52, pp. 562-78.CrossRef
40.
Z. Xing, S. Yujui, and T. Mingjing: Int. J. Fatigue, 1991, vol. 13, pp. 69-72.CrossRef
41.
C.J. van der Wekken and M. Jassen: J. Electrochem. Soc., 1991, vol. 138, pp. 2891-96.CrossRef
42.
S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 245-47.
43.
Z.M. Gasem and R.P. Gangloff: Chemistry and Electrochemistry of Corrosion and Stress Corrosion Cracking: A Symposium Honoring the Contributions of R.W. Steahle, Ed. R.H. Jones, TMS, Warrendale, PA, 2001, pp. 501–21.
44.
J.S. Warner, S. Kim, and R.P. Gangloff: Int. J. Fatigue, 2009, vol. 31, pp. 1952-65.CrossRef
45.
R.H. Jones, V.Y. Gertsman, J.S. Vetrano, and C.F. Windisch: Scripta Mater., 2004, vol. 50, pp.1355-59.CrossRef
46.
ASTM E 1681-03, “Standard Test Method for Determining Threshold Stress Intensity Factor for Environment-Assisted Cracking of Metallic Materials,” 2003.
47.
F.S. Bovard: Alcoa Center, PA, Private communication, 2010.
48.
S. Suresh: Fatigue of Materials, 1st ed., Cambridge University Press, New York, NY, 1991, pp. 380-82.
49.
L. Hagn: Mater. Sci. Eng. A, 1988, vol. A103, pp.193-205.
50.
R.P. Wei: Fatigue Fract. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2002, vol. 25, pp. 845-54.CrossRef
51.
I.P. Gnyp and V.I. Pokhmursky: Mater. Sci., 1994, vol. 30, pp. 621-35.CrossRef
52.
R.P. Wei and G.W. Simmons: Int. J. Fract., 1981, vol. 17, pp. 235-47.CrossRef
53.
K. Sadananda and A.K. Vasudevan: Int. J. Fatigue, 2004, vol. 26, pp. 39-47.CrossRef
54.
K. Sadananda, A.K. Vasudevan, and R.L. Holtz: Int. J. Fatigue, 2001, vol. 23, pp. S277-86.CrossRef
55.
K. Sadananda, A.K. Vasudevan, and I.W. Kang: Acta Mater., 2003, vol. 51, pp. 3399-3414.CrossRef
56.
K. Sadananda and A.K. Vasudevan: Int. J. Fatigue, 2005, vol. 27, pp. 1255-66.CrossRef
57.
K. Sadananda and A.K. Vasudevan: Fatigue Frac. Eng. Mater. Struct., 2003, vol. 26, pp. 835-45.CrossRef
58.
ASTM G-67-04, “Standard Test Method for Determining the Susceptibility to Intergranular Corrosion of 5XXX Series Aluminum Alloys by Mass Loss After Exposure to Nitric Acid (NAMLT Test),” 2004.
Metadaten
Titel
Corrosion-Fatigue Behavior of Aluminum Alloy 5083-H131 Sensitized at 448 K (175 °C)
verfasst von
Ronald L. Holtz
Peter S. Pao
Robert A. Bayles
Thomas M. Longazel
Ramasis Goswami
Publikationsdatum
01.08.2012
Verlag
Springer US
Erschienen in
Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A / Ausgabe 8/2012
Print ISSN: 1073-5623
Elektronische ISSN: 1543-1940
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-011-0866-x

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 8/2012

Metallurgical and Materials Transactions A 8/2012 Zur Ausgabe

Symposium: Physical and Mechanical Metallurgy of Shape Memory Alloys for Actuator Applications

Computer-Aided Development and Simulation Tools for Shape-Memory Actuators

Symposium: Bulk Metallic Glasses VIII

Synthesis of Plastic Mg-Based Bulk-Metallic-Glass Matrix Composites by Bridgman Solidification

OriginalPaper

High-Temperature Behavior of a High-Velocity Oxy-Fuel Sprayed Cr3C2-NiCr Coating

Communication

Effect of Sn Grain Orientation on the Cu6Sn5 Formation in a Sn-Based Solder Under Current Stressing

Symposium: Fatigue & Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Three-Orthogonal-Direction Stress Mapping around a Fatigue-Crack Tip Using Neutron Diffraction

Symposium: Fatigue & Corrosion Damage in Metallic Materials

Fatigue Strength and Crack Initiation Mechanism of Very-High-Cycle Fatigue for Low Alloy Steels

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise