Abstract
This paper presents the year-round performance of a solar parabolic dish thermoelectric generator under different values of operating parameters such as ambient temperature, wind velocity, direct normal irradiation, and water inlet temperature to the heat sink. The solar thermoelectric generator (TEG) is examined for an Indian location of Tiruchirappalli. The electrical power output and TEG efficiency are maximum during the months of April and August, while they are minimum during the month of December. It is found that the monthly average hot-side temperature of the TEG varies from 556.53 K to 592.68 K and the cold-side temperature of the TEG varies from 413.21 K to 438.91 K. When the hot-side temperature reaches the optimum value, the conversion efficiency is reduced, although the power increases. A TEG model is useful to find the temperature of the junctions for different operating parameter values and predict the performance of the TEG at any time. A small standalone power-generating system using this technology is a promising option.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- A c :
-
Collector aperture area (m2)
- A r :
-
Area of receiver plate (m2)
- G :
-
Area/length of thermoelectric element (m)
- h c :
-
Convective heat transfer coefficient of air (W/m2 K)
- h w :
-
Convective heat transfer coefficient of water (W/m2 K)
- I b :
-
Direct normal irradiation (W/m2)
- I :
-
Produced current (A)
- K TEG :
-
Thermal conductivity of TEG (W/m K)
- Q c :
-
Cold-side heat transfer (W)
- Q h :
-
Hot-side heat transfer (W)
- Q s :
-
Heat supplied to receiver plate (W)
- T c :
-
TEG cold-side temperature (K)
- T f :
-
Mean fluid temperature (K)
- T h :
-
TEG hot-side temperature (K)
- T r :
-
Receiver plate temperature (K)
- α :
-
Seebeck coefficient (V/K)
- η o :
-
Optical efficiency
- σ :
-
Stefan–Boltzmann constant
- ρ :
-
Resistivity of thermoelectric module (Ω m)
- η TEG :
-
TEG conversion efficiency
- ε :
-
Emissivity of receiver plate
References
K. Atik, Energy Sources A 33, 760 (2011).
G.-Y. Huang, C.-T. Hsu, and D.-J. Yao, J. Electron. Mater. 43, 2337 (2014).
S. Shanmugam, M. Eswaramoorthy, and AR. Veerappan, Appl. Solar Energy 47, 31 (2011).
M. Eswaramoorthy and S. Shanmugam, Energy Source A 34, 959 (2012).
M. Eswaramoorthy and S. Shanmugam, Energy Source A 35, 487 (2013).
V. Siva Reddy, S.C. Kaushik, and S.K. Tyagi, J. Renew. Sustain. Energy 4, 043102, 1 (2012).
J.A. Duffie and W.A. Beckman, Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, chap. 1: Solar Radiation & chap. 2: Available Solar Radiation (New York, NY: Wiley, 2006), p. 1–138.
O. García-Valladares and N. Velázquez, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer. 52, 597 (2009).
W.A. McAdams, Heat Transmission, 3rd ed. (New York: McGraw-Hill, 1954), p. 249.
C.P. Kothandaraman and S. Subramanyan, 6th ed. (New Delhi: New Age Int.(p) Ltd., 2009), p. 21.
W.M. Kays and M.E. Crawford, Convective heat and mass transfer, chap. 8 Heat transfer: Laminar flow inside smooth tubes, 3rd ed. (New Delhi: McGraw-Hill,1980), p.117.
Fankai Meng, Lingen Chen, and Fengrui Sun, Energy 36, 3513 (2011).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Muthu, G., Shanmugam, S. & Veerappan, A. Numerical Modeling of Year-Round Performance of a Solar Parabolic Dish Thermoelectric Generator. J. Electron. Mater. 44, 2631–2637 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-3684-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11664-015-3684-x