Abstract
In recent years, discussion around memory modification interventions has gained attention. However, discussion around the use of memory interventions in the criminal justice system has been mostly absent. In this paper we start by highlighting the importance memory has for human well-being and personal identity, as well as its role within the criminal forensic setting; in particular, for claiming and accepting legal responsibility, for moral learning, and for retribution. We provide examples of memory interventions that are currently available for medical purposes, but that in the future could be used in the forensic setting to modify criminal offenders’ memories. In this section we contrast the cases of (1) dampening and (2) enhancing memories of criminal offenders. We then present from a pragmatic approach some pressing ethical issues associated with these types of memory interventions. The paper ends up highlighting how these pragmatic considerations can help establish ethically justified criteria regarding the possibility of interventions aimed at modifying criminal offenders’ memories.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
We owe the latter point to one of our reviewers who brought this to our attention.
Greely (2008) has put forward similar criteria, but he argues that the intervention should “not cause major … substantial loss of remembered personal history.” In the case of memory modification, this is a criterion that, depending on the memory modification at stake, might be hard if not impossible to fulfil.
References
Balconi, M., and C. Ferrari. 2012. Emotional memory retrieval: rTMS stimulation on left DLPFC increases the positive memories. Brain Imaging and Behavior 6(3): 454–461.
Beauchamp, T.L., and J.F. Childress. 2001. Principles of biomedical ethics, 5th ed. New York: Oxford University Press.
Brasil-Neto, J.P. 2012. Learning, memory, and transcranial direct current stimulation. Frontiers in Psychiatry 3: 80. doi:10.3389/fpsyt.2012.00080.
Council of Europe. 2010. European convention on human rights. Strasbourg: Council of Europe. http://www.echr.coe.int/Documents/Convention_ENG.pdf.
Dufner, A. 2013. Should the late stage demented be punished for past crimes? Criminal Law and Philosophy 7(1): 137–150.
Editorial. 2013. Focus on memory. Nature Neuroscience 16(2): 111.
Erler, A. 2011. Does memory modification threaten our authenticity? Neuroethics 4(3): 235–249.
Farah, M.J., J. Illes, R. Cook-Deegan, H. Gardner, and E. Kandel. 2004. Neurocognitive enhancement: what can we do and what should we do? Nature Reviews Neuroscience 5(5): 421–425.
Farah, M.J. 2010. Neuroethics: An introduction with readings. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
Ferruci, R., F. Mameli, I. Guidi, et al. 2008. Transcranial direct current stimulation improves recognition memory in Alzheimer’s disease. Neurology 71(7): 493–498.
Frankfurt, H.G. 1971. Freedom of the will and the concept of a person. The Journal of Philosophy 68(1): 5–20.
Fregni, F., and A. Pascual-Leone. 2007. Technology insight: Noninvasive brain stimulation in neurology—perspectives on the therapeutic potential of rTMS and tDCS. Nature Clinical Practice Neurology 3(7): 383–393.
Gagnon, G., S. Blanchet, S. Grondin, and C. Schneider. 2010. Paired-pulse transcranial magnetic stimulation over the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex interferes with episodic encoding and retrieval for both verbal and non-verbal materials. Brain Research 1344: 148–158. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2010.04.041.
Gagnon, G., C. Schneider, S. Grondin, and S. Blanchet. 2011. Enhancement of episodic memory in young and healthy adults: A paired-pulse TMS study on encoding and retrieval performance. Neuroscience Letters 488(2): 138–142.
George, M.S., F. Padberg, T.E. Schlaepfer, et al. 2009. Controversy: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation or transcranial direct current stimulation shows efficacy in treating psychiatric diseases (depression, mania, schizophrenia, obsessive-compulsive disorder, panic, posttraumatic stress disorder). Brain Stimulation 2(1): 14–21.
Greely, H.T. 2008. Neuroscience and criminal justice: Not responsibility but treatment. Kansas Law Review 56: 1103–1138.
Greely, H., B. Sahakian, J. Harris, et al. 2008. Towards responsible use of cognitive-enhancing drugs by the healthy. Nature 456(7223): 872–872.
Handtke, V., W. Bretschneider, T. Wangmo, and B. Elger. 2012. Facing the challenges of an increasingly ageing prison population in Switzerland: In search of ethically acceptable solutions. Bioethica Forum 5(4): 134–141.
Herculano-Houzel, S. 2003. What does the public want to know about the brain? Nature Neuroscience 6(4): 325.
Human Rights Watch. 2012. Old behind bars: The aging prison population in the United States. New York: Human Rights Watch.
Javadi, A.H., and V. Walsch. 2012. Transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) of the left dorsolateral prefrontal cortex modulates declarative memory. Brain Stimulation 5(3): 231–241.
Kandel, E.R., and L.R. Squire. 2000. Neuroscience: Breaking down scientific barriers to the study of brain and mind. Science 290(5494): 1113–1120.
Karton, I., and T. Bachmann. 2011. Effect of prefrontal transcranial magnetic stimulation on spontaneous truth-telling. Behavioural Brain Research 225(1): 209–214.
Kolber, A. 2006. Therapeutic forgetting: The legal and ethical implications of memory dampening. Vanderbilt Law Review 59(5): 1561–1626.
Levy, N. 2007. Neuroethics. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Liao, S.M., and A. Sandberg. 2008. The normativity of memory modification. Neuroethics 1(2): 85–99.
Locke, J. 1975. On identity and diversity. In Personal identity, edited by J. Perry, 32–52. Berkeley: University of California Press.
Loftus, E.F. 2003. Make-believe memories. American Psychologist 58(11): 867–873.
Luber, B.C., P.S. Fisher, M. Appelbaum, M. Ploesser, and S.H. Lisanby. 2009. Non-invasive brain stimulation in the detection of deception: Scientific challenges and ethical consequences. Behavioral Sciences and the Law 27(2): 191–208.
Luna, F. 2009. Elucidating the concept of vulnerability: Layers not labels. International Journal of Feminist Approaches to Bioethics 2(1): 121–139.
Luria, A.R. 1987. The mind of a mnemonist: A little book about a vast memory. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Lynch, G. 2002. Memory enhancement: The search for mechanism-based drugs. Nature Neuroscience 5(11s): 1035–1038.
Merkel, R., G. Boer, J. Fegert, et al. 2007. Intervening in the brain: Changing psyche and society. Berlin: Springer.
Nuffield Council on Bioethics. 2013. Novel neurotechnologies: Intervening in the brain. London: Nuffield Council on Bioethics.
Office of the United Nations High Commissioner for Human Rights. 1977. Standard minimum rules for the treatment of prisoners. Geneva: United Nations.
Phelps, E.A. 2004. Human emotion and memory: interactions of the amygdala and hippocampal complex. Current Opinion in Neurobiology 14(2): 198–202.
Pitman, R.K., K.M. Sanders, R.M. Zusman, et al. 2001. Pilot study of secondary prevention of post-traumatic stress disorder with pro-pranolol. Biological Psychiatry 51(2): 189–192.
Popper, K.R., and J.C. Eccles. 1985. The self and its brain. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Porter, S., A.R. Birt, J.C. Yuille, and H.F. Herve. 2001. Memory for murder: A psychological perspective on dissociative amnesia in legal contexts. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry 24(1): 23–42.
President’s Council of Bioethics. 2003. Beyond therapy: Biotechnology and the pursuit of happiness. Washington, DC: President’s Council of Bioethics.
Rawls, J. 2009. A theory of justice. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
Reist, C., J.G. Duffy, L. Cahill, and K. Fujimoto. 2001. β–adrenergic blockade and emotional memory in PTSD. International Journal of Neuropsychopharmacology 4(4): 377–383.
Roache, R. 2008. Ethics, speculation, and values. Nanoethics 2(3): 317–327.
Rossi, S., M. Hallett, P.M. Rossini, et al. 2009. Safety, ethical considerations, and application guidelines for the use of transcranial magnetic stimulation in clinical practice and research. Clinical Neurophysiology 120(12): 2008–2039.
Schacter, D.L. 2001. The seven sins of memory: How the mind forgets and remembers. Boston: Houghton Mifflin.
Schechtman, M. 2007. The constitution of selves. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press.
Schmidt, S.R. 1994. Effects of humor on sentence memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition 20(4): 953–967.
Shaw, E. 2014. Direct brain interventions and responsibility enhancement. Criminal Law and Philosophy 8(1): 1–20.
Snead, O.C. 2011. Memory and punishment. Vanderbilt Law Review 64(4): 1195–1264.
Sparing, R., and F.M. Mottaghy. 2008. Noninvasive brain stimulation with transcranial or direct current stimulation (TMS/tDCS)—from insights into human memory to therapy of its dysfunction. Methods 44(4): 329–337.
Tulving, E. 1972. Episodic and semantic memory. In Organization of memory, edited by E. Tulving and W. Donaldson, 381–402. New York and London: Academic Press.
United Nations. 2013. Handbook on strategies to reduce overcrowding in prisons. New York: United Nations.
Vaiva, G., F. Ducrocq, K. Jezekiel, et al. 2003. Immediate treatment with propranolol decreases post-traumatic stress disorder two months after trauma. Biological Psychiatry 54(9): 947–949.
Vincent, N. 2011. Capacitarianism, responsibility and restored mental capacities. In Technologies on the stand: Legaland ethical questions in neuroscience and robotics, edited by B. van den Berg and L. Klaming, 41–62. The Netherlands: WLP.
Williams, W., W. Huw, A.J. Mewse, et al. 2010. Traumatic brain injury in a prison population: Prevalence and risk for re-offending. Brain Injury 24(10): 1184–1188.
Acknowledgements
We kindly thank comments from various commentators in different seminar presentations where earlier versions of this paper were presented, as well as the reviewers’ comments, which helped to improve this manuscript.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Cabrera, L.Y., Elger, B.S. Memory Interventions in the Criminal Justice System: Some Practical Ethical Considerations. Bioethical Inquiry 13, 95–103 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9680-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11673-015-9680-2