Skip to main content
Log in

Modelling trends and cycles in economic time series: historical perspective and future developments

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Cliometrica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper provides a retrospective on the modelling of trends and cycles in economic time series and considers where the research agenda currently stands and where future developments might lie. A brief survey of the early empirical research on trends and cycles is first provided before attention is focused on four papers published in 1961—our ‘annus mirabilis’ of trend and cycle modelling—which we argue have been ‘prime movers’ in various aspects of research in this area. The links from these papers to current research issues are then teased out before the likely future directions of research in both theoretical and applied aspects of the modelling of trends and cycles are considered.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. In 1905, Einstein published four journal articles plus a doctoral dissertation on the photoelectric effect, Brownian motion and the special theory of relativity. These so ‘revolutionized the basic principles of physics’ and ‘had [such] far-reaching consequences for a physical understanding of the world’ (Renn and Hoffmann 2005, p S437) that this year was called Einstein’s ‘annus mirabilis’ (wonderful year): see also Stachel (1988). In fact, 1666 has a prior claim to such an accolade, being the year in which Newton observed the apple falling from the tree and thus discovered gravitation. The first known usage of the phrase is as the title of a poem by the English poet John Dryden about the events of 1666. Although this year was beset by great calamities (for example, plague, which led to Newton leaving Cambridge and retreating to his family home near Grantham, where he observed the eponymous falling apple, and the Great Fire of London), Dryden chose to interpret the absence of greater disasters as a miraculous intervention by God, since ‘666’ is the Number of the Beast and so the year 1666 was expected to be particularly disastrous. Much closer to 1961, Annus Mirabilis was also the title of a 1967 poem by Philip Larkin, which began with the famous lines ‘Sexual intercourse began/In nineteen sixty-three/(which was rather late for me/…’!.

  2. Usefully, the data used by Klein and Kosobud (annual U.S. series from 1900 to 1953) were tabulated in their paper, thus enabling modern day researchers to re-analyse the series using current techniques of time series econometrics that were unavailable at the time they undertook their research: see Mills (2008).

  3. The original and unpublished Office of Naval Research report outlining ‘Holt’s method’ of EWMA forecasting has recently been reprinted as Holt (2004a): retrospectives of this technique are provided by Holt (2002, 2004b).

  4. That the penalised least squares approach, in various forms, anteceded the HP filter by several decades was well known to Leser and to Hodrick and Prescott, although the latter appear to be unaware of Leser’s paper. Pedregal and Young (2001) provide both historical and multidisciplinary perspective.

  5. These filters should not be confused with the Henderson–Musgrave trend filters used in the seasonal adjustment algorithms of many central statistical agencies: see Kenny and Durbin (1982) and, for more recent developments, Gray and Thomson (2002) and Quenneville et al. (2003).

  6. Loosely speaking, Kalman (1960) analysed the case of discrete observations, while he and Bucy dealt with the technically more difficult continuous case.

  7. For an accessible and detailed exposition of Kalman filtering, and which also contains material on its prehistory, see Pollock (2003a), who claims that Kalman’s algorithm was, in fact, anteceded by Plackett (1950).

  8. The formulation of the trend in (11) is called the ‘contemporaneous state’ model by Harvey and Koopman (2000), in contrast to the ‘future state’ model, in which μ t+1 = μ t  + ξ t . When the innovations are assumed to be uncorrelated, as we do here, the two specifications are essentially identical, but interesting differences appear when the innovations are allowed to be correlated. Harvey and Koopman (2000) and Harvey and De Rossi (2006) provide detailed discussion of the correlated innovations case.

  9. This result follows from the application of the Weiner–Kolmogorov theory of signal extraction, the classic exposition of which for stationary series is Whittle (1983), with Bell (1984) extending the theory to nonstationary signals: see Pollock (2006) for a recent and extensive discussion.

  10. We ignore ‘end-point’ problems caused by having only a finite sample of observations available. Pollock (2000, 2001) proposes an ingenious method which is able to bypass such problems.

References

  • Banerjee A, Dolado J, Galbraith JW, Hendry DF (1993) Co-integration, error-correction, and the econometric analysis of non-stationary data. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Baxter M, King RG (1999) Measuring business cycles: approximate bandpass filters for economic time series. Rev Econ Stat 81:575–593. doi:10.1162/003465399558454

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bec F, Rahbek A (2004) Vector equilibrium correction models with non-linear discontinuous adjustments. Econom J 7:628–651. doi:10.1111/j.1368-423X.2004.00147.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell WR (1984) Signal extraction for nonstationary time series. Ann Stat 12:646–664. doi:10.1214/aos/1176346512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell WR, Martin DEK (2004) Computation of asymmetric signal extraction filters and mean squared error for ARIMA component models. J Time Ser Anal 25:603–625. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9892.2004.01920.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge WH (1920) British exports and the barometer. Econ J 30:13–25. doi:10.2307/2223191

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beveridge WH (1921) Weather and harvest cycles. Econ J 31:429–452. doi:10.2307/2223074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burns AF, Mitchell WC (1946) Measuring business cycles. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerkholt O (2005) Frisch’s econometric laboratory and the rise of Trgve Haavelmo’s probability approach. Econom Theory 21:491–533. doi:10.1017/S0266466605050309

    Google Scholar 

  • Bjerkholt O (2007) Writing “The Probability Approach” with nowhere to go: Haavelmo in the United States, 1939–1944. Econom Theory 23:775–837. doi:10.1017/S026646660707034X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan KH, Hayya JC, Ord JK (1977) A note on trend removal methods: the case of polynomial regression versus variate differencing. Econometrica 45:737–744. doi:10.2307/1911686

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen X, Mills TC (2008) Evaluating growth cycle synchronisation in the EU. Econ Model (in press)

  • Christ CF (1985) Early progress in estimating quantitative economic relationships in America. Am Econ Rev 75:39–52

    Google Scholar 

  • Christiano L, Fitzgerald T (2003) The band pass filter. Int Econ Rev 44:435–465. doi:10.1111/1468-2354.t01-1-00076

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cox DR (1961) Prediction by exponentially weighted moving averages and related methods. J R Stat Soc Ser B Methodol 23:414–422

    Google Scholar 

  • Crafts NFR, Mills TC (1996) Trend growth in British industrial output, 1700–1913: a reappraisal. Explor Econ Hist 33:277–295. doi:10.1006/exeh.1996.0016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dickey DA, Fuller WA (1979) Distribution of the estimators for autoregressive series with a unit root. J Am Stat Assoc 74:427–431. doi:10.2307/2286348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Duncan DB, Horn SD (1972) Linear dynamic recursive estimation from the viewpoint of regression analysis. J Am Stat Assoc 67:815–821. doi:10.2307/2284643

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Durbin J, Koopman SJ (2001) Time series analysis by state space methods. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Granger CWJ (1987) Cointegration and error correction: representation, estimation and testing. Econometrica 55:251–276. doi:10.2307/1913236

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engle RF, Watson MW (1987) The Kalman filter: applications to forecasting and rational-expectations models. In: Bewley TF (ed) Advances in econometrics: fifth world congress, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 245–283

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein R (1987) A history of econometrics. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Farebrother RW (2006) Early explorations in econometrics. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 88–116

    Google Scholar 

  • Fisher I (1925) Our unstable dollar and the so-called business cycle. J Am Stat Assoc 20:179–202

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox KA (1989) Agricultural economists in the econometric revolution: institutional background, literature and leading figures. Oxf Econ Pap 41:53–70

    Google Scholar 

  • Frickey E (1934) The problem of secular trend. Rev Econ Stat 16:199–206. doi:10.2307/1927322

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frisch R (1933) Propagation problems and impulse problems in dynamic economics’. In: Economic essays in honour of Gustav Cassel. George Allen & Unwin, London, pp 171–205

  • Frisch R (1939) A note on errors in time series. Q J Econ 53:639–640. doi:10.2307/1883286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilbert CL, Qin D (2006) The first fifty years of modern econometrics. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 117–155

    Google Scholar 

  • Godolphin EJ, Johnson SE (2003) Decomposition of time series dynamic linear models. J Time Ser Anal 24:513–527. doi:10.1111/1467-9892.00319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Godolphin EJ, Triantafyllopoulos K (2006) Decomposition of time series models in state-space form. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:2232–2246. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2004.12.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gómez V (2001) The use of Butterworth filters for trend and cycle estimation in economic time series. J Bus Econ Stat 19:365–373. doi:10.1198/073500101681019909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gonzalo J, Pitarakis J-Y (2006) Threshold effects in multivariate error correction models. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 578–609

    Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ (1981) Some properties of time series data and their use in econometric model specification. J Econom 16:121–130. doi:10.1016/0304-4076(81)90079-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Granger CWJ, Inoue T, Morin N (1997) Nonlinear stochastic trends. J Econom 81:65–92. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(97)00034-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gray AG, Thomson P (2002) On a family of moving-average filters for the ends of series. J Forecast 21:145–149. doi:10.1002/for.817

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo T (1942) Statistical testing of business-cycle theories. Rev Econ Stat 25:13–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo T (1944) The probability approach in econometrics. Econometrica 12(Suppl.):1–115

    Google Scholar 

  • Haavelmo T (2007) The nature and logic of econometric inference: the 1942 Hillside lecture. Econom Theory 23:838–851. doi:10.1017/S0266466607070351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Haldrup N, Jansson M (2006) Improving size and power in unit root testing. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 252–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1987) Applications of the Kalman filter in econometrics. In: Bewley TF (ed) Advances in econometrics: fifth world congress, vol 1. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 285–313

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1989) Forecasting, structural time series models and the Kalman filter. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC (1993) Time series models, 2nd edn. Harvester Wheatsheaf, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC, De Rossi P (2006) Signal extraction. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 970–1000

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC, Koopman SJ (2000) Signal extraction and the formulation of unobserved components models. Econometrics J 1:1–24

    Google Scholar 

  • Harvey AC, Trimbur TM (2003) General model-based filters for extracting cycles and trends in economic time series. Rev Econ Stat 85:244–255

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hendry DF, Morgan MS (1995) The foundations of econometric analysis. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Hecq A, Palm FC, Urbain JP (2006) Common cyclical features analysis in VAR models with cointegration. J Econom 132:117–141. doi:10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.01.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hodrick RJ, Prescott EC (1997) Postwar U.S. business cycles: an empirical investigation. J Money Credit Bank 29:1–16. doi:10.2307/2953682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt CC (2002) Learning how to plan production, inventories, and work force. Oper Res 50:96–99. doi:10.1287/opre.50.1.96.17779

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt CC (2004a) Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages. Int J Forecast 20:5–10. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Holt CC (2004b) Author’s retrospective on “Forecasting seasonals and trends by exponentially weighted moving averages”. Int J Forecast 20:11–13. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2003.09.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hooker RH (1901) Correlation of the marriage rate with trade. J R Stat Soc Ser A 64:485–503

    Google Scholar 

  • Hualde J, Velasco C (2008) Distribution-free tests of fractional cointegration. Econom Theory 24:216–255. doi:10.1017/S0266466608080109

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (1995) Likelihood-based inference in cointegrated vector autoregressive models. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (2006) Cointegration: an overview. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 540–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Johansen S (2008) A representation theory for a class of vector autoregressive models for fractional processes. Econom Theory 24:651–676. doi:10.1017/S0266466608080274

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman RE (1960) A new approach to linear filtering and prediction theory. J Basic Eng Trans ASME Ser D 82:35–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Kalman RE, Bucy RE (1961) New results in linear filtering and prediction theory. J Basic Eng Trans ASME Ser D 83:95–108

    Google Scholar 

  • Kapetanios G, Shin Y, Snell A (2006) Testing for cointegration in nonlinear smooth transition error correction models. Econom Theory 22:279–303. doi:10.1017/S0266466606060129

    Google Scholar 

  • Kasparis I (2008) Detection of functional form misspecification in cointegrating relations. Econom Theory 24:1373–1403. doi:10.1017/S0266466608080547

    Google Scholar 

  • Kendall MG, Stuart A, Ord JK (1983) The advanced theory of statistics, volume 3: design and analysis, and time series. Charles Griffin, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenny PB, Durbin J (1982) Local trend estimation and seasonal adjustment of economic and social time series. J R Stat Soc Ser A 145:1–41. doi:10.2307/2981420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keynes JM (1939) Professor Tinbergen’s method. J Econom 49:558–568

    Google Scholar 

  • King RG, Plosser CI, Stock JH, Watson MW (1991) Stochastic trends and economic fluctuations. Am Econ Rev 81:819–840

    Google Scholar 

  • Kitchen J (1923) Cycles and trends in economic factors. Rev Econ Stat 5:10–16. doi:10.2307/1927031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein JL (1997) Statistical visions in time. A history of time series analysis, 1662–1938. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press

    Google Scholar 

  • Klein LR, Kosobud RF (1961) Some econometrics of growth: great ratios in economics. Q J Econ 75:173–198. doi:10.2307/1884198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koopman SJ, Harvey AC, Doornik JA, Shephard N (2006) STAMP 7: structural time series analysis and predictor. Timberlake Consultants Ltd, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1947) Measurement without theory. Rev Econ Stat 29:161–172. doi:10.2307/1928627

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koot RS, Walker DA (1972) A reconsideration of the ‘Great Ratios’ of economics. Decis Sci 3(3):115–123. doi:10.1111/j.1540-5915.1972.tb00551.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuznets S (1929) Random events and cyclical oscillations. J Am Stat Assoc 24:248–275

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leser CEV (1961) A simple method of trend construction. J R Statist Soc Ser B Methodol 23:91–107

    Google Scholar 

  • McConnell MM, Quiros GP (2000) Output fluctuations in the United States: what has changed since the early 1980s. Am Econ Rev 90:1464–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills TC (2002) Long term trends and business cycles. The international library of critical writings in economics no. 149. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills TC (2003) Modelling trends and cycles in economic time series. Palgrave Macmillan, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Mills TC (2008) Revisiting Klein & Kosobud’s great ratios, mimeo

  • Mills TC, Patterson K (2006) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, volume 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell WC (1913) Business cycles and their causes, volume 3. California University Memoirs, Berkeley

  • Mitchell WC (1927) Business cycles: the problem and its setting. National Bureau of Economic Research, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan MS (1990) The history of econometric ideas. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth JS (1960) Optimal properties of exponentially weighted forecasts. J Am Stat Assoc 55:299–306. doi:10.2307/2281742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Kang H (1981) Spurious periodicity in inappropriately detrended time series. Econometrica 49:741–751. doi:10.2307/1911520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Kang H (1984) Pitfalls in the use of time as an explanatory variable in regression. J Bus Econ Stat 2:73–82. doi:10.2307/1391356

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson CR, Plosser CI (1982) Trends and random walks in macroeconomic time series: some evidence and implications. J Monet Econ 10:139–162. doi:10.1016/0304-3932(82)90012-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nielsen HB, Rahbek A (2007) The likelihood ratio test for cointegration rank in the I(2) model. Econom Theory 23:615–637. doi:10.1017/S0266466607070272

    Google Scholar 

  • Pagan AR (1975) A note on the extraction of components from time series. Econometrica 43:163–168. doi:10.2307/1913421

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pedregal DJ, Young PC (2001) Some comments on the use and abuse of the Hodrick-Prescott filter. Rev Econ Cycles 2. http://www.uned.es/imaec2000/issue2.htm

  • Perron P (2006) Dealing with structural breaks. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, volume 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 278–352

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (1998) New tools for understanding spurious regressions. Econometrica 66:1299–1326. doi:10.2307/2999618

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (2001a) Trending time series and macroeconomic activity: some present and future challenges. J Econom 100:21–27. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00048-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (2001b) New unit root asymptotics in the presence of deterministic trends. J Econom 101:323–353

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (2003) Laws and limits of econometrics. Econ J 113:C26–C52. doi:10.1111/1468-0297.00114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips PCB (2005) Challenges of trending time series econometrics. Math Comput Simul 68:401–416. doi:10.1016/j.matcom.2005.02.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierce DA (1979) Signal extraction error in nonstationary time series. Ann Stat 7:1303–1320. doi:10.1214/aos/1176344848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plackett RL (1950) Some theorems in least squares. Biometrika 37:149–157

    Google Scholar 

  • Pollock DSG (2000) Trend estimation and de-trending via rational square wave filters. J Econom 99:317–334. doi:10.1016/S0304-4076(00)00028-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock DSG (2001) Filters for short non-stationary sequences. J Forecast 20:341–355. doi:10.1002/for.791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock DSG (2003a) Recursive estimation in econometrics. Comput Stat Data Anal 44:37–75. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00150-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock DSG (2003b) Sharp filters and short sequences. J Stat Inference Plann 113:663–683. doi:10.1016/S0378-3758(02)00077-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock DSG (2003c) Recursive estimation in econometrics. J Comput Stat Data Anal 44:37–75. doi:10.1016/S0167-9473(03)00150-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pollock DSG (2006) Econometric methods of signal extraction. Comput Stat Data Anal 50:2268–2292. doi:10.1016/j.csda.2005.07.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proietti T (2005) Forecasting and signal extraction with misspecified models. J Forecast 24:539–556. doi:10.1002/for.970

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proietti T (2008) Band spectral estimation for signal extraction. Econ Model 25:54–69. doi:10.1016/j.econmod.2007.04.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin D (1993) The formation of econometrics: a historical perspective. Oxford University Press, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Qin D (1996) Bayesian econometrics: the first twenty years. Econom Theory 12:500–516

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Qin D, Gilbert CL (2001) The error term in the history of econometrics. Econom Theory 17:424–450. doi:10.1017/S0266466601172063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quenneville B, Ladiray D, Lefrançois B (2003) A note on Musgrave asymmetrical trend-cycle filters. Int J Forecast 19:727–734. doi:10.1016/S0169-2070(02)00080-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renn J, Hoffmann D (2005) 1905—A miraculous year. J Phys At Mol Opt Phys 38:S437–S448. doi:10.1088/0953-4075/38/9/001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saikkonen P (2008) Stability of regime switching error correction models under linear cointegration. Econom Theory 24:294–318. doi:10.1017/S0266466608080122

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schleicher C (2007) Codependence in cointegrated autoregressive models. J Appl Econ 22:137–159. doi:10.1002/jae.930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schweppe F (1965) Evaluation of likelihood functions for Gaussian signals. IEEE Trans Inf Theory 11:61–70. doi:10.1109/TIT.1965.1053737

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slutsky EE (1927) ‘The summation of random causes as the source of cyclic processes’. In: The Conjuncture Institute (ed.) The problems of economic conditions, vol 3, 1 edn, 34–64 (English summary, 156–161)

  • Slutsky EE (1937) The summation of random causes as the source of cyclic processes. Econometrica 5:105–146. doi:10.2307/1907241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spanos A (2006) Econometrics in retrospect and prospect. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 3–58

    Google Scholar 

  • Stachel JJ (1988) Einstein’s miraculous year—five papers that changed the face of physics. Princeton University Press, Princeton

    Google Scholar 

  • Stigler GJ (1954) The early history of empirical studies of consumer behaviour. J Polit Econ 62:95–113. doi:10.1086/257495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiao GC, Xu D (1993) Robustness of maximum likelihood estimates for multi-step predictions: the exponential smoothing case. Biometrika 80:623–641. doi:10.1093/biomet/80.3.623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1937) An econometric approach to business cycle problems. Hermann & Cie, Paris

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1939a) Statistical testing of business-cycle theories, volume 1: a method and its application to investment activity. League of Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1939b) Statistical testing of business-cycle theories, volume 1i: business cycles in the United States of America. League of Nations, Geneva

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1942) Critical remarks on some business-cycle theories. Econometrica 10:129–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tinbergen J (1951) Business cycles in the United Kingdom 1870–1914. North-Holland, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahid F (2006) Common cycles. In: Mills TC, Patterson K (eds) Palgrave handbook of econometrics: econometric theory, vol 1. Macmillan Palgrave, Basingstoke, pp 610–630

    Google Scholar 

  • Vahid F, Engle RF (1993) Common trends and common cycles. J Appl Econ 8:341–360

    Google Scholar 

  • Vining R (1949) Methodological issues in quantitative economics. Rev Econ Stat 31:77–94. doi:10.2307/1927853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whittle P (1983) Prediction and regulation by linear least-square methods. 2nd Revised edition. Blackwell, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  • Yule GU (1926) Why do we sometimes get nonsense correlations between time-series?—A study in sampling and the nature of time series. J R Stat Soc Ser A 89:1–64. doi:10.2307/2341482

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yule GU (1927) On a method of investigating periodicities in disturbed series, with special reference to Wolfer’s sunspot numbers. Philos Trans R Soc Lond Ser A 226:267–298. doi:10.1098/rsta.1927.0007

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Terence C. Mills.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mills, T.C. Modelling trends and cycles in economic time series: historical perspective and future developments. Cliometrica 3, 221–244 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-008-0031-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11698-008-0031-y

Keywords

JEL Classification

Navigation