Skip to main content
Log in

Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Earth Science in China Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Bago River is an important river in Myanmar. Although shorter than other rivers, it has its own river system, and people along the river rely heavily on it for their daily lives. The upper part of the watershed has changed rapidly from closed forest to open forest land in the 1990s. Since the recent degradation of the forest environment, annual flooding has become worse during the rainy season in Bago City. This paper aims at determining soil conservation prioritization of watershed based on soil loss due to erosion and morphometric analysis in the Bago Watershed by integrating remote sensing and geographic information system (GIS) techniques. In this study, soil erosion of the Bago watershed was determined using the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Such factormaps as rainfall, soil erodibility, slope length gradient, and crop management were compiled as input parameters for the modeling; and the soil loss from 26 sub-watersheds were estimated. Then, the soil erosion maps of the Bago watershed for 2005 were developed. The resulting Soil Loss Tolerance Map could be utilized in developing watershed management planning, forestry management planning, etc.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrew A, Millward A L, Janet E, et al (1999). Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena, 38: 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Angima S D, Stott D E, Neill M K O, et al (2003). Soil erosion prediction using RUSLE for central Kenyan highland conditions. Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment, 97: 295–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aung H T (2003). Myanmar: The Processes and Patterns. National Centre for Human Resource Development, published, Ministry of Education, Myanmar

  • Aye KMM (1999). Climate of Eastern and Western Bago Division. Dissertation for the M A Degree. Myanmar: University of Yangon, 24–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Aye N (2004). Developing Hydrologic Flood Control Model for Chindwin Watershed Conservation Planning and Management. Dissertation for the M A Degree. Myanmar: Yangon Institute of Technology, 92–93

    Google Scholar 

  • Biswas S, Sudhakar S, Desai V R (1999). Prioritization of sub-watersheds based on morphometric analysis of drainage basin-remote sensing and GIS approach. J of Ind Soc of Rem Sens, 27(3): 155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cholrley R J, Dunn A J, Beckinsale R P (1964). The history of the study of landforms. Landon: Methuen, 678–678

    Google Scholar 

  • Cohen M J, Shepherd K D, Walsh M G (2005). Empirical reformulation of the universal soil loss equation for erosion risk assessment in a tropical watershed. Geoderma, 124: 235–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eagleson P S (1970). Dynamic Hydrology. New York: McGraw-Hill, 462–462

    Google Scholar 

  • Harden C P (2006). Human impacts on headwater fluvial systems in the northern and central Andes. Geomorphology, 7: 249–263

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harmel R D, Richardson C W, King K W (2006). Runoff and soil loss relationships for the Texas Blackland Prairies ecoregion. Journal of Hydrology, 31: 471–483

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Horton R E (1945). Erosional development of streams and their drainage basins: Hydrophysical approach to quantitative morphology, Bull. America: Geol Soc, 56: 275–370

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hudson N W (1981). Soil Conservation. New York: Cornell University Press, 312–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Hudson (2004). Soil erosion modeling using the revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE) in a drainage basin in eastern Mexico, Environmental GIS: GRG 360G. http://www.utexas.edu/depts/grg/hudson/grg360g/EGIS/labs_04/Lab9/lab9_soil_erosion_NEW_spr04.htm

  • Lufafa A, Tenywa M M, Isabirye M, et al (2003). Prediction of soil erosion in a Lake Victoria basin catchment using a GIS-based Universal Soil Loss model. Agricultural Systems, 76: 883–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCaullagh P (1979). Modern Concepts in Geomorphology. London: Oxford University Press, 11–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Miller V C (1953). Quantitative geomorphological study of drainage basin characteristics in Clinch Mountain area, Tennessee. Dept Geol Columbia University. ONR Project Teach. Report NR389-042, No.3, 189–200

  • Millward A A, Mersey J E (1999). Adapting the RUSLE to model soil erosion potential in a mountainous tropical watershed. Catena, 38: 109–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R P C, Morgan D D V, Finney H J (1984). A predictive model for assessment of erosion, risk. J Agricultural Engineering Research, 30: 245–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R P C (1986). Soil Erosion and Conservation. London: Longman group UK Ltd, London, 1–107

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan R P C (1995). Soil Erosion and Conservation. 2nd ed. Essex: Longman Group, UK Ltd, London, 1–191

    Google Scholar 

  • Özhan S, Balc A N, Özyuvaci N, et al (2005). Cover and management factors for the Universal Soil Loss Equation for forest ecosystems in the Marmara region, Turkey. Journal of forest ecology & management, 214: 118–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Renard K G, Foster G R, Weesies G A, et al (1997). Predicting Soil Erosion by Water: A Guide to Conservation Planning With the Revised Universal Soil Loss Equation (RUSLE). U.S. Department of Agriculture, Agriculture Handbook No.703

  • Schwab G O, Fangmeier D D, Elliot W J, et al (1993). Soil and Water Conservation Engineering. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley & Sons, Inc. 131–138

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumm S A (1965). Quaternary Palaeohydrology. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 789–794

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh R K, Saha S K, Kumar S (2005). Soil conservation prioritization of watershed based on erosional soil loss and morphometric analysis using Satellite Remote Sensing & GIS-A case study. Indian Institute of Remote Sensing (NRSA), Dehradun: Map India 2005

    Google Scholar 

  • Sonneveld B G J S, Nearing M A (2003). A nonparametric/parametric analysis of the Universal Soil Loss Equation. Catena, 52: 9–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A N (1964). Quantitative geomorphology of drainage basin and channel networks. Handbook of applied hydrology, New York: McGraw Hill, section 4–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A N (1964). Quantitative Geomorphology drainage basins and channel networks Handbook of Applied Hydrology, McGraw-Hill Publishing Co., 4: 39–76

    Google Scholar 

  • Strahler A N (1975). Quantitative Analysis of Erosional Landforms, Physical Geography. 4th ed. New York: John Wiley, 454–470

    Google Scholar 

  • Wischmeier W H, Smith D D (1978). Predicting Rainfall Runoff Losses, A Guide to Conservation Planning US Department of Agriculture. Agriculture Handbook, No. 537

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kay Thwe Hlaing.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hlaing, K.T., Haruyama, S. & Aye, M.M. Using GIS-based distributed soil loss modeling and morphometric analysis to prioritize watershed for soil conservation in Bago river basin of Lower Myanmar. Front. Earth Sci. China 2, 465–478 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-008-0048-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-008-0048-3

Keywords

Navigation