Skip to main content
Log in

The Bridge of Benevolence: Hutcheson and Mencius

  • Published:
Dao Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The Scottish sentimentalist Francis Hutcheson and the Chinese Confucianist Mencius give benevolence (ren) a key place in their respective moral theories, as the first and foundational virtue. Leaving aside differences in style and method, my purpose in this essay is to underline this similarity by focusing on four common features: first, benevolence springs from compassion, an innate and universal feeling shared by all human beings; second, its objects are not only human beings but also animals; third, it is sensitive to proximity; and finally, it has to be constantly cultivated in order to become a character trait. I will conclude with some brief remarks as to how this understanding of benevolence as rooted in feeling rather than reason, and in personal rather than impersonal relationships, helps to illuminate part of the discussion in moral philosophy today.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Bishop, John. 1996. “Moral Motivation and the Development of Francis Hutcheson’s Philosophy.” Journal of the History of Ideas 57(2): 277-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carrasco, María A. 2011. “Hutcheson, Smith, and Utilitarianism.” The Review of Metaphysics 64(3): 515-553.

    Google Scholar 

  • Confucius. 1869. The Life and Teachings of Confucius. Translated by James Legge. The Chinese Classics, vol. 1. London: N. Truebner and Co.

  • Garrett, Aaron. 2007. “Francis Hutcheson and the Origin of Animal Rights.” Journal of the History of Philosophy 45(2): 243-265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Griswold, Charles. 1999. Adam Smith and the Virtues of the Enlightenment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutcheson, Francis. 2002. An Essay on the Nature and Conduct of the Passions and Affections: With Illustrations on the Moral Sense. Edited by Aaron Garrett. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Original edition, 1728.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2004. An Inquiry into the Original of our Ideas of Beauty and Virtue. Edited by Wolfgang Leidhold. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Original edition, 1725.

    Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2007. A Short Introduction to Moral Philosophy. Edited by Luigi Turco. Indianapolis: Liberty Fund. Original edition, 1742.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hutton, Eric L. 2002. “Moral Connoiseurship in Mengzi.” In Essays on the Moral Philosophy of Mengzi. Ed. by Liu Xiusheng and Philip J. Ivanhoe. Cambridge: Hackett Publishing Company.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, Myeong-seok. 2010. “What Cèyĭn zhī xīn (Compassion/Familial Affection) Really Is.” Dao 9: 407-425.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jaeger, Werner. 1934. Aristotle. Oxford: Oxford Clarendon Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lau, D.C. 1970. “Introduction”, in Mencius. Translated and edited by D.C. Lau. New York: Penguin Books.

  • Legge, James. 1875. The Life and Works of Mencius. Translated and edited by James Legge. The Chinese Classics, vol. 2. London: N. Truebner and Co.

  • Li, Chenyang. 2008. “The Confucian Concept of Ren and the Feminist Ethics of Care: A Comparative Study.” In Confucian Political Ethics. Ed. by Daniel Bell. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Liu, Xiusheng. 2003. Mencius, Hume and the Foundation of Ethics. Hampshire: Ashgate.

    Google Scholar 

  • MacIntyre, Alasdair. 2006. Whose Justice? Which Rationality? Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mencius. 2003. Mencius. Revised edition, translated by D. C. Lau. Hong Kong: Chinese University Press.

  • Nieli, Russell. 1986. “Spheres of Intimacy and the Adam Smith Problem.” Journal of the History of Ideas 47 (4): 611-624.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nosco, Peter. 2008. “Confucian Perspectives on Civil Society and Government.” In Confucian Political Ethics. Ed. by Daniel Bell. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shun, Kwong-loi. 1997. Mencius and Early Chinese Thought. California: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slote, Michael. 2009. “Comments on Bryan Van Norden’s Virtue Ethics and Consequentialism in Early Chinese Philosophy.” Dao 8: 289-295.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • _____. 2010. “The Mandate of Empathy.” Dao: A Journal of Comparative Philosophy 9(3): 303-307.

  • Twiss, Sumner B. 1998. “Discussing Confucianism and Human Rights.” In Confucianism and Human Rights. Ed. by William Theodore De Bary and Tu Weiming. New York: Columbia University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verwilghen, Albert Felix. 1967. Mencius: The Man and His Ideas. New York: St. John’s University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, Qingjie, ed. 2010. “Confusicanism and Virtue Ethics” (Special Issue Section). Dao 9(3).

  • Wong, David. 1991. “Is there a Distinction between Reason and Emotion in Mencius?” Philosophy East and West 41(1): 31-44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiao, Yang. 2010. “Ethical Thought in China.” In The Routledge Companion to Ethics. Ed. by John Skorupski. London: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Yu, Jiyuan. 2007. The Ethics of Confucius and Aristotle: Mirrors of Virtue. New York and London: Routledge.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alejandra Mancilla.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mancilla, A. The Bridge of Benevolence: Hutcheson and Mencius. Dao 12, 57–72 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9313-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11712-012-9313-y

Keywords

Navigation