Skip to main content
Fachgebiete
Automobil + Motoren Bauwesen + Immobilien Business IT + Informatik Elektrotechnik + Elektronik Energie + Nachhaltigkeit Finance + Banking Management + Führung Marketing + Vertrieb Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe Versicherung + Risiko
DE
EN
Bücher
Zeitschriften
Themenseiten
Organisationspsychologie Projektmanagement Marketing Smart Manufacturing
Weitere Formate
Podcasts Webinare Technik Webinare Wirtschaft Kongresse Veranstaltungskalender Awards
Jetzt Einzelzugang starten
Zugang für Unternehmen
Referenzkunden
SLX-Digitalkonferenz: Zukunftswerkstatt 2024

Mehr Umsatz mit Top-Kontakten

Am 7. Mai erfahren Sie, wie Vertriebsteams Leadgenerierung, Leadnurturing und Leadstrategien effizient steuern können.
Erweiterte Suche
Anmelden
nach oben
Production Engineering
Erschienen in: Production Engineering 4-5/2009

01.12.2009 | Assembly

A multi-dimensional measure for determining the complexity of manual assembly operations

verfasst von: Michael F. Zaeh, Mathey Wiesbeck, Sonja Stork, Anna Schubö

Erschienen in: Production Engineering | Ausgabe 4-5/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config
loading …

Abstract

A key to solving the discrepancies of deterministic and static assembly sequences at manual work places is seen in situation-oriented and cognitive methodologies in assembly. These provide means for efficient and ergonomically feasible worker guidance. An accurate and detailed technique of adjusting the instructional content is seen as a prerequisite. In this context the authors present factors for a multi-dimensional measurement of the degree of detail and complexity of manual assembly tasks. It extends the concept and application of common systems of predetermined times. It includes dimensions of actual human performance and attention allocation, as well as learning effects based on the product and its reference levels. It is assumed that identifying global attributes that contribute to assembly difficulty will provide means for predicting assembly complexity more effectively.
Vorheriger Artikel Analysis of cutting force during milling with regards to the dependency on the penetration angle

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 102.000 Bücher
  • über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Finance + Banking
  • Management + Führung
  • Marketing + Vertrieb
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
  • Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

  • über 67.000 Bücher
  • über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

  • Automobil + Motoren
  • Bauwesen + Immobilien
  • Business IT + Informatik
  • Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
  • Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
  • Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe




 

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren
Literatur
1.
Wiendahl HP, ElMaraghy HA, Nyhuis P, Zäh MF, Wiendahl HH, Duffie N, Brieke M (2007) Changeable manufacturing–classification, design and operation. Ann CIRP 56(2):783–809CrossRef
2.
Zäh MF, Beetz M, Shea K, Reinhart G, Bender K, Lau C, Ostgathe M, Vogl W, Wiesbeck M, Engelhard M, Ertelt C, Ruehr T, Friedrich M, Herle S (2009) The cognitive factory. In: ElMaraghy HA (ed) Changeable and reconfigurable manufacturing systems. London, Springer
3.
ElMaraghy WH, Urbanic RJ (2004) Assessment of manufacturing operational complexity. Ann CIRP 53(1):401–406CrossRef
4.
Jensen PL, Alting L (2006) Human factors in the management of production. Ann CIRP 55(1):457–460CrossRef
5.
Reinhart G, Patron C (2003) Integrating augmented reality in the assembly domain–fundamentals, benefits and applications. Ann CIRP 52(1):5–8CrossRef
6.
Zaeh M, Prasch M (2007) Systematic workplace and assembly redesign for aging workforces. J Prod Eng 1(1):57–64CrossRef
7.
Kjellberg A, Abestam L (1997) Human factor framework for analysis of an assembly work. Ann CIRP 46(1):377–380CrossRef
8.
Zäh M, Wiesbeck M, Wallhoff F, Stork S, Engstler F, Bannat A, Schubö A, Friesdorf F (2007) Kognitive Assistenzsysteme in der manuellen Montage. Wt Werkstattstechnik online, 97(9):644–650
9.
Dopping-Hepenstal LL (1981) Head-up displays: the integrity of flight information. IEE Proc-F Commun Radar Signal Process 128(7):440–442
10.
Yeh M, Wickens CD (2000) Attention and trust biases in the design of augmented reality displays. Technical report. Chicago, Aviation research lab of the University of Illinois
11.
Zaeh MF, Wiesbeck M, Stork S, Schubö A (2009) Factors for a task-induced complexity measure for manual assembly operations. 3rd international conference on changeable, agile, reconfigurable and virtual production (CARV 2009), Munich, Germany, 2009
12.
Picker C (2007) Prospektive Zeitbestimmung für nicht wertschöpfende Montagetätigkeiten, Aachen, Shaker
13.
Hinckley M (1993) A global conformance quality model—a new strategic tool for minimizing defects caused by variation, error and complexity. Stanford University, Stanford
14.
Beiter KA, Cheldelin B, Ishii K (2000) Assembly quality method: a tool in aid of product strategy, design and process improvements.In: ASME design engineering technical conference, Baltimore
15.
Shibata H, Cheldelin B, Ishii K (2003) Assembly quality method: integrating design for assembly cost-effectiveness (DAC) to improve defect prediction. In: ASME design engineering technical conference, Chicago
16.
Kim YH (1999) A system complexity approach for the integration of product development and production system design. Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge
17.
Kief L (2002) Eine Methode zur Ermittlung statistisch abgesicherter Montagezeiten im Produktentwicklungsprozess. Verlag Praxiswissen, Dortmund
18.
Westkämper E, Sautter K, Meyer R (1998) Eine Empirische Untersuchung zum Methodeneinsatz in Produzierenden Unternehmen. Fachtagung “Mehr Erfolg durch professionellen Methodeneinsatz”. Fraunhofer IRB, Darmstadt
19.
Papenfuß R, Theis K-D (1988) Die WORK-FACTOR-Verfahren. Angewandte Arbeitswissenschaft 117:3–18
20.
Boothroyd G, Alting L (1992) Design for assembly and disassembly. Ann CIRP 41(2):625–636CrossRef
21.
Miyakawa S, Ohashi T (1986) The Hitachi assembly evaluation method (AEM). In: International conference on product design for assembly, Newport, Rhode Island
22.
Bokranz R, Landau K (2006) Produktivitätsmanagement von Arbeitssystemen. Schäffer-Poeschel, Stuttgart
23.
Wickens CD (2002) Multiple resources and performance prediction. Theor Issues Ergon Sci 32:159–177CrossRef
24.
Stoessel C, Wiesbeck M, Stork S, Zaeh MF, Schuboe A (2008) Towards optimal worker assistance: investigating cognitive processes in manual assembly. In: Mitsuishi M, Ueda K, Kimura F (Eds.) The 41st CIRP conference on manufacturing systems. Springer, Tokyo, Japan
25.
Stork S, Stobel C, Müller H, Wiesbeck M, Schubö A (2007) A neuroergonomic approach for the investigation of cognitive processes in interactive assembly environments.In: 16th IEEE international symposium on robot and human interactive communication 2007 (IEEE RO-MAN 2007)
26.
Norman DA, Bobrow DG (1975) On data-limited and resource-limited processing. Cogn Psychol 74:4–64
27.
Müller HJ, Krummenacher J (2002) Aufmerksamkeit. In: Müsseler J, Prinz W (eds) Allgemeine Psychologie. Elsevier, Heidelberg
28.
Jayaram S, Connacher H, Lyons K (1997) Virtual assembly using virtual reality techniques. Comput Aided Des 29(88):575–584CrossRef
29.
Gupta R, Whitney D, Zeltzer D (1997) Prototyping and design for assembly analysis using multimodal virtual environments. Comput Aided Des 29(88):585–597CrossRef
30.
Carpenter ID, Dewer RG, Richie JM, Simmons JEL (1996) Enhancing a virtual environment for manual assembly. In: 12th international conference on CAD/CAM robotics and factories of the future
31.
Homem de Mello LS, Sanderson AC (1991) Representations of mechanical assembly sequences. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 7(2):211–227CrossRef
32.
Sanderson AC, Zhang H, Homem de Mello LS (1989) Assembly sequence planning. Manuscript prepared for AI Magazine: special issue on assembly planning, Vol 33
33.
Lee S (1992) Backward assembly planning with assembly cost analysis. In: Proceedings of 1992 IEEE international conference on robotics and automation. Nice
34.
Homem de Mello LS, Sanderson AC (1991) A correct and complete algorithm for the generation of mechanical assembly sequences. IEEE Trans Rob Autom 7(2):228–240CrossRef
35.
Gu T, Xu Z, Yang Z (2008) Symbolic OBDD representations for mechanical assembly sequences. Comput Aided Des 40(4):411–421CrossRef
36.
Iyer N, Jayanti S, Lou K, Kalyanaraman Y, Ramani K (2005) Three-dimensional shape searching: state-of-the-art review and future trends. Comput Aided Des 37(5):509–530CrossRef
37.
Dmitriy B, Cheuk Yiu I, William CR, Joshua S (2005) Benchmarking CAD search techniques. In: Proceedings of the 2005 ACM Symp on solid and physical modeling. Cambridge, Massachusetts
38.
Stork S, Stössel C, Schubö A (2008) The influence of instruction mode on reaching movements during manual assembly. USAB 2008—Usability—HCI for education and work, lecture notes in computer science LNCS, Austria, Graz
39.
Stork S, Stössel C, Schubö A (2008) Optimizing Human–Machine Interaction in Manual Assembly. In: Proceedings of 17th IEEE international conference on robot and human interactive communication (RO-MAN)
Metadaten
Titel
A multi-dimensional measure for determining the complexity of manual assembly operations
verfasst von
Michael F. Zaeh
Mathey Wiesbeck
Sonja Stork
Anna Schubö
Publikationsdatum
01.12.2009
Verlag
Springer-Verlag
Erschienen in
Production Engineering / Ausgabe 4-5/2009
Print ISSN: 0944-6524
Elektronische ISSN: 1863-7353
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11740-009-0171-3

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 4-5/2009

Production Engineering 4-5/2009 Zur Ausgabe

Computer Aided Engineering

Model based strategies for an optimised ribbing design of large forming tools

Machine Tool

Design process for adaptronic machine tools

Machine Tool

Interactive analysis of the structural mechanic behaviour of machine tools

Production Process

Aluminum tailored heat treated blanks

Production Process

The stemadi concept: situation-oriented and user-friendly provision of guidelines at the machine

Machine Tool

Analysis of cutting force during milling with regards to the dependency on the penetration angle

Premium Partner

    Marktübersichten

    Die im Laufe eines Jahres in der „adhäsion“ veröffentlichten Marktübersichten helfen Anwendern verschiedenster Branchen, sich einen gezielten Überblick über Lieferantenangebote zu verschaffen. 

    Zur Marktübersicht
    Bildnachweise