nach oben

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Erschienen in:

01.06.2009 | Original Empirical Research

A meta-analysis of humor in advertising

verfasst von: Martin Eisend

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 2/2009

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

This meta-analysis combines 369 correlations on the effects of humor in advertising and thus quantifies, updates, and expands previous literature reviews on the effects of humor in advertising. In line with previous reviews, the meta-analytic correlations demonstrate that humor in advertising significantly enhances A_AD, attention, and positive affect. Contrary to the assumptions of previous reviews, there is no evidence that humor impacts positive or negative cognitions, and liking of the advertiser. The meta-analytic findings clarify some ambiguous prior conclusions: humor significantly reduces source credibility, enhances positive affect, A_BR and purchase intention. The decline from lower order to higher order communication effects is particularly strong, with the effect size of the impact of humor on A_AD being twice as large as the effect size for A_BR. This impact of humor in advertising has been rather stable over the past decades. A moderator analysis reveals, however, that the findings of academic humor research are somewhat biased. As for the underlying theory, the positive and linear relationship between the funniness of the ad and brand attitudes supports an affective mechanism underlying the impact of humor in advertising.

Vorheriger Artikel Getting a second chance: the role of imagery in the influence of inaction regret on behavioral intent

Nächster Artikel Stochastic modelling and industrial networks—complementary views of organisational buyer behavior

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Aaker, D., Day, G., & Hagerty, M. R. (1986). Warmth in advertising: Measurement, impact and sequence effects. Journal of Consumer Research, 12, 365–381.CrossRef

Alden, D. L., Hoyer, W. D., & Lee, C. (1993). Identifying global and culture specific dimensions of humor in advertising: A multinational analysis. Journal of Marketing, 57, 64–75.CrossRef

*Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000a). The effects of incongruity, surprise and positive moderators on perceived humor in television advertising. Journal of Advertising, 24(2), 1–15.

*Alden, D. L., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2000b). Extending a contrast resolution model of humor in television advertising: The role of surprise. Humor: International Journal of Humor Research, 13(2), 193–217.CrossRef

Beard, F. K. (2005). One hundred years of humor in American advertising. Journal of Macromarketing, 25(1), 54–65.CrossRef

Belch, G. E., & Belch, M. E. (1984). An investigation of the effects of repetition on cognitive and affective reactions to humorous and serious television commercials. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 4–10). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

*Berg, E. M., & Lippman, L. G. (2001). Does humor in radio advertising affect recognition of novel product brand names? Journal of General Psychology, 128(2), 194–205.CrossRef

Berlyne, D. E. (1972). Humor and its kin. In J. H. Goldstein, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), Psychology of humor (pp. 43–60). New York: Academic.

Bommer, W. H., Johnson, J. L., Rich, G. A., Podsakoff, P. M., & MacKenzie, S. B. (1995). On the interchangeability of objective and subjective measures of employee performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 48(3), 587–605.CrossRef

*Brooker, G. (1981). A comparison of the persuasive effects of mild humor and mild fear appeals. Journal of Advertising, 10(4), 29–40.

Brown, S. P., & Stayman, D. M. (1992). Antecedents and consequences of attitude toward the ad: A meta-analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 34–51.CrossRef

Bryant, J., Brown, D., Silberberg, A. R., & Elliott, S. M. (1981). Effects of humorous illustrations in college textbooks. Human Communication Research, 8(1), 43–57.CrossRef

*Cantor, J., & Venus, P. (1980). The effect of humor on recall of a radio advertisement. Journal of Broadcasting, 24(1), 13–22.

*Chattopadhyay, A., & Basu, K. (1990). Humor in advertising: The moderating role of prior brand evaluation. Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 466–476.CrossRef

*Chung, H., & Zhao, X. (2003a). Effects of humor ad: Moderating role of product familiarity. In Proceedings of the American Academy of Advertising Conference (pp. 11). Denver, CO: American Academy of Advertising.

*Chung, H., & Zhao, X. (2003b). Humor effect on memory and attitude: Moderating role of product involvement. International Journal of Advertising, 22(1), 117–145.

Churchill Jr., G. A., Ford, N. M., Walker, S. W., & Walker Jr., O. C. (1985). The determinants of salesperson performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing Research, 22, 103–118.CrossRef

*Cline, T. W. (1997). The role of expectancy and relevancy in humorous ad executions: An individual difference perspective. Dissertation, University of Cincinnati.

*Cline, T. W., Altsech, M. B., & Kellaris, J. J. (2003). When does humor enhance or inhibit ad responses? Journal of Advertising, 32(3), 1–45.

*Cline, T. W., & Kellaris, J. J. (1999). The joint impact of humor and argument strength in a print advertising context: A case for weaker arguments. Psychology & Marketing, 16(1), 69–86.CrossRef

Cline, T. W., & Kellaris, J. J. (2007). The influence of humor strength and humor-message relatedness on ad memorability. Journal of Advertising, 36(1), 55–67.CrossRef

Cohen, J. (1977). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. New York: Academic.

*Conway, M., & Dubé, L. (2002). Humor in persuasion on threatening topics: Effectiveness is a function of audience sex role orientation. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 28(7), 863–873.

Dalton, D. R., Daily, C. M., Certo, S. T., & Roengpitya, R. (2003). Meta-analyses of financial performance and equity: Fusion or confusion? Academy of Management Journal, 46(1), 13–26.CrossRef

De Pelsmacker, P., & Geuens, M. (1996). The communication effects of warmth, eroticism and humour in alcohol advertisements. Journal of Marketing Communications, 2, 247–262.CrossRef

*De Pelsmacker, P. & Geuens, M. (1998). The advertising effectiveness of different levels of intensity of humor and warmth and the moderating role of affect intensity. In Proceedings of the Academy of Marketing Science (pp. 11–16). Norfolk, VA: Academy of Marketing Science.

Duncan, C. P. (1979). Humor in advertising: A behavioral perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 7(4), 285–306.CrossRef

*Duncan, C. P., & Nelson, J. E. (1985). Effects of humor in a radio advertising experiment. Journal of Advertising, 14(2), 33–40, 64.

Duncan, C. P., Nelson, J. E., & Frontczak, N. T. (1984). The effects of humor on advertising comprehension. In T. C. Kinnear (Ed.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 432–437). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Eisend, M. (2006). Two-sided advertising: A meta-analysis. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 23(2), 187–198.CrossRef

Elliot, R., Eccles, S., & Hodgson, M. (1993). Re-coding gender representations: Women, cleaning products, and advertising’s ‘new man’. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 10(3), 311–324.CrossRef

Farley, J. U., Lehmann, D. R., & Mann, L. H. (1998). Designing the next study for maximum impact. Journal of Marketing Research, 35, 496–501.CrossRef

Flaherty, K., Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (2004). The impact of perceived humor, product type and humor style in radio advertising. Journal of Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 26(1), 25–36.

Furnham, A., Gunter, B., & Walsh, D. (1998). Effects of programme context on memory of humorous television commercials. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 12(6), 555–567.CrossRef

Furnham, A., & Mori, T. (2003). The effect of programme context on memory for humorous television advertisements in Japan. Psychologia, 46(1), 53–66.CrossRef

*Gelb, B. D., & Pickett, C. M. (1983). Attitude-toward-the-ad: Links to humor and to advertising effectiveness. Journal of Advertising, 12(2), 34–42.

*Gelb, B. D., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1986). Humor and advertising effectiveness after repeated exposures to a radio commercial. Journal of Advertising, 15(2), 15–20, 34.

Geuens, M., & De Pelsmacker, P. (2002). The role of humor in the persuasion of individuals varying in need for cognition. In S. M. Broniarczyk, & K. Nakamoto (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 50–56). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.

Godkewitsch, M. (1976). Physiological and verbal indices of arousal in rated humour. In A. J. Chapman, & H. C. Foot (Eds.), Humour and laughter: Theory, research and application (pp. 117–138). London: Wiley.

Grewal, D., Kavanoor, S., Fern, E. F., Costley, C., & Barnes, J. (1997). Comparative versus noncomparative advertising: A meta-analysis. Journal of Marketing, 61, 1–15.CrossRef

Gulas, C. S., & Weinberger, M. G. (2006). Humor in advertising. A comprehensive analysis. Armonk, NY: Sharpe.

Hedges, L. V. (1994). Fixed effect models. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis pp. 285–299. New York: Sage.

Hedges, L. V., & Olkin, I. (1985). Statistical methods for meta-analysis. Orlando, FL: Academic.

Hofstede, G. H. (2001). Culture’s consequences: Comparing values, behaviors, institutions, and organizations across nations. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

House, R. J., Hanges, P. J., Javidan, M., Dorfman, P. W., & Gupta, V. (2004). Culture, leadership, and organizations. The GLOBE study of 62 societies. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.

Hunter, J. E., & Schmidt, F. L. (2004). Methods of meta-analysis. Correcting error and bias in research findings, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Kayande, U., & Bhargava, M. (1994). An examination of temporal patterns in meta-analysis. Marketing Letters, 3(2), 141–151.CrossRef

*Krishnan, H. S., & Chakravarti, D. (2003). A process analysis of the effects of humorous advertising executions on brand claims memory. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 13(3), 230–245.CrossRef

Lammers, H. B. (1991). Moderating influence of self-monitoring and gender on responses to humorous advertising. The Journal of Social Psychology, 131(1), 57–69.

Lammers, H. B., Liebowitz, L., Seymour, G. E., & Hennessey, J. E. (1983). Humor and cognitive response to advertising stimuli: A trace consolidation approach. Journal of Business Research, 11(2), 173–185.CrossRef

Lee, Y. H. (1997). The immediate and delayed effects of advertising: The role of information incongruency. Dissertation, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill.

*Lee, M. J., & Ferguson, M. A. (2002). Effects of anti-tobacco advertisements based on risk-taking tendencies: Realistic fear vs. vulgar humor. Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79(4), 945–963.

Lee, Y. H., & Mason, C. (1999). Responses to information incongruency in advertising: The role of expectancy, relevancy, and humor. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 156–169.CrossRef

Lehmann, D. R., & Reibstein, D. J. (2006). Marketing metrics and financial performance. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

MacKenzie, S. B., & Lutz, R. J. (1989). An empirical examination of the structural antecedents of attitude toward the ad in an advertising pretesting context. Journal of Marketing, 53, 48–56.CrossRef

Madden, T. J. (1982). Humor in advertising: Applications of a hierarchy of effects paradigm. Dissertation, University of Massachusetts.

Madden, T. J., & Dillon, W. R. (1982). Causal analysis and latent class models: An application to a communication hierarchy of effects model. Journal of Marketing Research, 19, 472–490.CrossRef

*Madden, T. J., & Weinberger, M. G. (1982). The effects of humor on attention in magazine advertising. Journal of Advertising, 11(3), 8–14.

Madden, T. J., & Weinberger, M. G. (1984). Humor in advertising: A practitioner view. Journal of Advertising Research, 24, 23–29.

Mak, W., & Carpenter, B. (2007). Humor comprehension in older adults. Journal of the International Neuropsychological Society, 13(4), 606–614.CrossRef

McGhee, P. E. (1986). Humor across the life span: Sources of developmental change and individual differences. In L. Nahemow, K. A. McCluskey-Fawcett, & P. E. McGhee (Eds.), Humor and aging (pp. 27–51). New York: Academic.

*Michaels, S. L. (1997). Cognitive and affective responses to humorous advertisements. Dissertation, Wayne State University.

*Mukherjee, A., & Dube, L. (2001). The use of humor in threat-related advertising: an experimental processing perspective. In A. Gröppel-Klein, & F.R. Esch (Eds.), European advances in consumer research (p. 335). Valdosta, GA: Association for Consumer Research.

*Mullinax, S. L. (1984). The use of humor to prevent wearout in advertising. Dissertation, Lamar University.

Murphy, J. H., Cunningham, I. C. M., & Wilcox, G. (1979). The impact of program environment on recall of humorous television commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 8(2), 17–21.

Nelson, J. E., Duncan, C. P., & Frontczak, N. T. (1985). The distraction hypothesis and radio advertising. Journal of Marketing, 49, 60–71.CrossRef

*Perry, S. D., Jenzowsky, S. A., King, C. M., Yi, H., Hester, J. B., & Gartenschlaeger, J. (1997). Using humorous programs as a vehicle for humorous commercials. Journal of Communication, 47(1), 21–39.CrossRef

Petty, R. E., & Wegener, D. T. (1999). The elaboration likelihood model: Current status and controversies. In S. Chaiken, & Y. Trope (Eds.), Dual process theories in social psychology (pp. 41–72). New York: Guildford.

Prilluk, R., & Till, B. D. (2004). The role of contingency awareness, involvement, and need for cognition in attitude formation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 329–344.CrossRef

Rosenthal, R. (1979). The ‘file drawer problem’ and tolerance for null results. Psychological Bulletin, 86(3), 638–641.CrossRef

Rosenthal, M. C. (1994). The fugitive literature. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 85–94). New York: Sage.

Rossiter, J. R., Percy, L., & Donovan, R. J. (1991). A better advertising planning grid. Journal of Advertising Research, 31, 11–21.

*Scott, C., Klein, D. M., & Bryant, J. (1990). Consumer response to humor in advertising: A series of field studies using behavioral observation. Journal of Consumer Research, 16, 498–501.CrossRef

Shadish, W. R., & Haddock, C. K. (1994). Combining estimates of effect sizes. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 261–281). New York: Sage.

*Shifman, R. B. (1994). Take my brand...please: Attitudinal effects of functional relationships among type of humorous appeal, context, and seriousness of salient product attributes in print advertisements. Dissertation, Temple University.

*Skinner, D., Mackoy, R., & Osland, G. (2000). Does need for cognition moderate the effectiveness of ironic humor in advertising? Or what does it take to get the message? In Proceedings of the AMA summer marketing educator’s conference (pp. 139–140). Chicago, IL: American Marketing Association.

Smith, S. M. (1993). Does humor in advertising enhance systematic processing? In L. McAlister, & M. L. Rothschild (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 155–158). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

*Speck, P. S. (1987). On humor and humor in advertising. Dissertation, Texas Tech University.

Speck, P. S. (1991). The humorous message taxonomy: A framework for the study of humorous ads. Current Issues and Research in Advertising, 14(1), 1–44.

*Spotts, H. E., Weinberger, M. G., & Parasons, A. L. (1997). Assessing the use and impact of humor on advertising effectiveness: A contingency approach. Journal of Advertising, 26(3), 17–32.

Stanton, J. L., & Burke, J. (1998). Comparing the effectiveness of executional elements in TV advertising: 15- versus 30-second commercials. Journal of Advertising Research, 38(6), 7–14.

Sternthal, B., & Craig, S. (1973). Humor in advertising. Journal of Marketing, 37, 12–18.CrossRef

*Stewart, D. W., & Furse, D. H. (1986). Effective television advertising: A study of 1000 commercials. Massachusetts: D.C. Heath and Company.

Stock, W. A. (1994). Systematic coding for research synthesis. In H. Cooper, & L. V. Hedges (Eds.), The handbook of research synthesis (pp. 125–138). New York: Sage.

Suls, J. M. (1972). A two-stage model for the appreciation of jokes and cartoons. In P. E. Goldstein, & J. H. McGhee (Eds.), The psychology of humour: Theoretical perspectives and empirical issues (pp. 81–100). New York: Academic.

Sultan, F., Farley, J. U., & Lehmann, D. R. (1990). A meta-analysis of applications of diffusion models. Journal of Marketing Research, 27, 70–77.CrossRef

*Sutherland, J. C. & Middleton, L. A. (1983). The effect of humor on advertising credibility and recall. In D. W. Jugenheimer, K. S. Lawrence (Eds.), Proceedings of the 1983 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising (pp. 17–21). American Academy of Advertising.

*Sutherland, J. C., & Sethu, S. (1987). The effect of humor on television advertising credibility and recall. In F. G. Feasley (Ed.), Proceedings of the 1997 Conference of the American Academy of Advertising pp. R3–R8. Columbia, SC: American Academy of Advertising.

Szymanski, D. M., Bharadwaj, S. G., & Varadarajan, R. P. (1993). An analysis of the market share-profitability relationship. Journal of Marketing, 57, 1–18.

Szymanski, D. M., Troy, L. C., & Bharadwaj, S. G. (1995). Order of entry and business performance: An empirical synthesis and reexamination. Journal of Marketing, 59, 17–33.CrossRef

Tellis, G. J. (1988). The price elasticity of selective demand: A meta-analysis of econometric models of sales. Journal of Marketing Research, 25, 331–341.CrossRef

Toncar, M. F. (2001). The use of humor in television advertising: Revisiting the US–UK comparison. International Journal of Advertising, 20(4), 521–539.

Unger, L. S. (1995). Observations: A cross-cultural study on the affect-based model of humor in advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(1), 66–71.

van Raaij, W. F. (1993). Postmodern consumption. Journal of Economic Psychology, 14, 541–563.CrossRef

Vaughn, R. (1980). How advertising works: A planning model. Journal of Advertising Research, 20, 27–33.

Vaughn, R. (1986). How advertising works: A planning model revisited. Journal of Advertising Research, 26, 57–66.

*Weinberger, M. G., & Campbell, L. (1991). The use and impact of humor in radio advertising. Journal of Advertising Research, 30(6), 44–52.

Weinberger, M. G., Campbell, L., & Brody, B. (1994). Effective radio advertising. New York: Lexington Books.

Weinberger, M. G., & Gulas, C. S. (1992). The impact of humor in advertising: A review. Journal of Advertising, 21(4), 35–59.

Weinberger, M. G., Spotts, H., Campbell, L., & Parsons, A. L. (1995). The use and effect of humor in different advertising media. Journal of Advertising Research, 35(3), 44–56.

Woltman, E., Josephine, L. C. M., Mukherjee, A., & Hoyer, W. D. (2004). Humor in television advertising: A moment-to-moment analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 31, 592–598.CrossRef

*Wu, B. T. W., Crocker, K. E., & Rogers, M. (1989). Humor and comparatives in ads for high- and low-involvement products. Journalism Quarterly, 66, 653–661, 780.

Zhang, Y. (1992). Audience involvement and persuasion in humorous advertising. Dissertation, University of Houston.

*Zhang, Y. (1996a). The effect of humor in advertising: An individual-difference perspective. Psychology & Marketing, 13(6), 531–546.CrossRef

*Zhang, Y. (1996b). Responses to humorous advertising: The moderating effect of need for cognition. Journal of Advertising, 25(1), 15–32.

Zhang, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (1991). Humor in television advertising: The effects of repetition and social setting. In R. H. Holman, & M. R. Solomon (Eds.), Advances in consumer research (pp. 813–818). Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research.

Zhang, Y., & Zinkhan, G. M. (2006). Responses to humorous ads. Does audience involvement matter? Journal of Advertising, 35(4), 113–127.CrossRef

Zillmann, D., Williams, B. R., Bryant, J., Boynton, K. R., & Wolf, M. A. (1980). Acquisition of information from educational television as a function of differently paced humorous inserts. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(2), 170–180.CrossRef

Titel: A meta-analysis of humor in advertising
verfasst von: Martin Eisend
Publikationsdatum: 01.06.2009
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 2/2009
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-008-0096-y

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 2/2009

Market-based capabilities and financial performance of firms: insights into marketing’s contribution to firm value

Does advertising create sustained firm value? The capitalization of brand intangible

The effect of superstitious beliefs on performance expectations

Evaluation of subsidiary marketing performance: combining process and outcome performance metrics

Revealed reader preference for marketing journals

Getting a second chance: the role of imagery in the influence of inaction regret on behavioral intent