Skip to main content
Log in

Creating commitment and loyalty behavior among retailers: what are the roles of service quality and satisfaction?

  • Original Empirical Research
  • Published:
Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of weakening brand image/loyalty, little differentiation, and intense price competition, manufacturers are now increasingly pressed to ensure retailers’ shelf space and/or salesperson attention. This research contributes to the literature by empirically examining an underrepresented body of literature in the B2B context—retailer loyalty. Specifically, this study fills a gap by investigating retailer evaluations of the technical and relational dimensions of a manufacturer’s order fulfillment service quality as predictors of retailer satisfaction, affective versus calculative commitment, and ultimately loyalty behavior. Results suggest that both technical and relational order fulfillment service quality influence satisfaction, which in turn positively affects both affective and calculative commitment. By separating the affective and calculative dimensions, loyalty behavior is associated directly only with affective commitment. Further examination reveals that relational order fulfillment service quality has a direct impact on affective commitment. When the sample was split based on “share of wallet,” results suggest that satisfaction impacts both affective and calculative commitment, regardless of “share of wallet.” For “high share” retailers, the positive relationship of calculative to affective commitment creates an indirect route (through affective commitment) by which calculative commitment affects behavioral loyalty.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. We reviewed literature from 1997 through 2007 in the “mainstream” marketing journals: Journal of Marketing, Journal of Marketing Research, Journal of Consumer Research, the Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, and the Journal of Retailing.

  2. Although not specifically “loyalty” studies, we found exceptions to this in the marketing literature outside the limits of the review included in Table 1. These exceptions include De Ruyter et al. (2001) and Wetzels et al. (1998).

References

  • Anderson, E. W., Fornell, C., & Lehmann, D. R. (1994). Customer satisfaction, market share, and profitability: Findings from Sweden. Journal of Marketing, 58(3), 53–67. doi:10.2307/1252310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, E. W., & Mittal, V. (2000). Strengthening the satisfaction-profit chain. Journal of Service Research, 3(2), 107–120. doi:10.1177/109467050032001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson, J. C., & Gerbing, D. W. (1988). Structural equation modeling in practice: A review of the two-step approach. Psychological Bulletin, 103(3), 53–66. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.103.3.411.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bagozzi, R. P., & Yi, Y. (1998). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 16(1), 74–94. doi:10.1007/BF02723327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bienstock, C. C., Mentzer, J. T., & Bird, M. M. (1997). Measuring physical distribution service quality. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 25(1), 31–44. doi:10.1007/BF02894507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, R. N., & Myers, M. B. (2003). Price-based global segmentation for services. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 108–129. doi:10.1509/jmkg.67.3.108.18655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, M., Knight, G., Jr, J. C., Tomas, G., Hult, M., & Keillor, B. (2005). Removing the contextual lens: A multinational, multi-Setting comparison of service evaluation models. Journal of Retailing, 81(3), 215–230.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruhn, M., & Grund, M. A. (2000). Theory, development, and implementation of national customer satisfaction indices: The Swiss Index of Customer Satisfaction (SWICS). Total Quality Management, 11(7), S1017–S1028. doi:10.1080/09544120050135542.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cannon, J. P., & Homburg, C. (2001). Buyer-supplier relationships and customer firm costs. Journal of Marketing, 65(1), 29–43. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.1.29.18136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Caruana, A. (2002). Service loyalty: The effects of service quality and the mediating role of customer satisfaction. European Journal of Marketing, 36(7/8), 811–829. doi:10.1108/03090560210430818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaudhuri, A., & Holbrook, M. B. (2001). The chain of effects from brand trust and brand affect to brand performance: The role of brand loyalty. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 81–93. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.2.81.18255.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandrashekaran, M., Rotte, K., Tax, S. S., & Grewal, R. (2007). Satisfaction strength and customer loyalty. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 44(1), 153–163. doi:10.1509/jmkr.44.1.153.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiou, J.-S., & Droge, C. (2006). Service quality, trust, specific asset investment, and expertise: Direct and indirect effects in a satisfaction-loyalty framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(4), 613–627. doi:10.1177/0092070306286934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dabholkar, P. A., Thorpe, D. I., & Rentz, J. O. (1996). A measure of service quality for retail stores: Scale development and validation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 24(1), 3–16. doi:10.1007/BF02893933.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Ruyter, D., Ko, L. M., & Lemmink, J. (2001). Antecedents of commitment and trust in customer-supplier relationships in high technology markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 30(2), 271–286. doi:10.1016/S0019-8501(99) 00091-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dick, A. S., & Basu, K. (1994). Customer loyalty: Toward an integrated conceptual framework. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 22(2), 99–113. doi:10.1177/0092070394222001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doney, P. M., & Cannon, J. P. (1997). An examination of the nature of trust in buyer-seller relationships. Journal of Marketing, 61(2), 35–52. doi:10.2307/1251829.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. doi:10.2307/3151312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ganesh, J., Arnold, M. J., & Reynolds, K. E. (2000). Understanding the customer base of service providers: An examination of the differences between switchers and stayers. Journal of Marketing, 64, 65–87. doi:10.1509/jmkg.64.3.65.18028.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garbarino, E., & Johnson, M. (1999). The different roles of satisfaction, trust, and commitment in customer relationships. Journal of Marketing, 63(2), 70–87. doi:10.2307/1251946.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing, D. W., & Anderson, J. C. (1992). An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 25(2), 186–192. doi:10.2307/3172650.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geyskens, I., Jan-benedict, E. M. S., Scheer, L. K., & Kumar, N. (1996). The effects of trust and interdependence on relationship commitment: A trans-atlantic study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 13(4), 303–317. doi:10.1016/S0167-8116(96) 00006-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grewal, D., & Levy, M. (2007). Retailing research: Past, present, and future. Journal of Retailing, 83(4), 447–464. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2007.09.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grönroos, C. (1984). A service quality model and its marketing implications. European Journal of Marketing, 18(4), 36–44. doi:10.1108/EUM0000000004784.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gustafsson, A., Johnson, M. D., & Roos, I. (2005). The effects of customer satisfaction, relationship commitment dimensions, and triggers on customer retention. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 210–218. doi:10.1509/jmkg.2005.69.4.210.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gwinner, K., Gremler, D., & Bitner, M. J. (1998). Relational benefits in service industries: The customer’s perspective. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 26, 101–114. doi:10.1177/0092070398262002.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harvey, J. (1998). Service quality: A tutorial. Journal of Operations Management, 16(5), 583–597. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(97)00026-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, K., Money, B. R., & Sharma, S. (2002). An exploration of the moderating role of buyer corporate culture in industrial buyer-seller relationships. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 229–239.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hewett, K., Money, B. R., & Sharma, S. (2006). National culture and industrial buyer-seller relationships in the United States and Latin America. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(3), 386–402. doi:10.1177/0092070305285370.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homburg, C., & Furst, A. (2005). How organizational complaint handling drives customer loyalty: An analysis of the mechanistic and organic approach. Journal of Marketing, 69(3), 95–114. doi:10.1509/jmkg.69.3.95.66367.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jancic, Z., & Zabkar, V. (2002). Impersonal vs. personal exchanges in marketing relationships. Journal of Marketing Management, 18(7/8), 657–671. doi:10.1362/0267257022780705.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jap, S. D., & Ganesan, S. (2000). Control mechanisms and the relationship life cycle: Implications for safeguarding specific investments and developing commitment. JMR, Journal of Marketing Research, 37, 227–245.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, M. D., Gustaffson, A., Andreassen, T. W., Lervik, L., & Cha, J. (2001). The evolution and future of national customer satisfaction index models. Journal of Economic Psychology, 22(2), 217–245. doi:10.1016/S0167-4870(01) 00030-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, T. O., & Earl Sasser, W., Jr. (1995). Why satisfied customers defect. Harvard Business Review, 73(6), 88–104.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kim, K., & Frazier, G. L. (1997). Measurement of distributor commitment in industrial channels of distribution. Journal of Business Research, 40(2), 139–154. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(96) 00284-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, N., Hibbard, J. D., & Stern, L. W. (1994). An empirical assessment of the nature and consequences of marketing channel intermediary commitment. Report No. 94–115. Cambridge, MA: Marketing Science Institute.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar, V., Bohling, T. R., & Ladda, R. N. (2003). Antecedents and consequences of the relationship intention: Implications for transaction and relationship marketing. Industrial Marketing Management, 32(8), 667–677. doi:10.1016/j.indmarman.2003.06.007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lam, S. Y., Shankar, V., Erramilli, M. K., & Murthy, B. (2004). Customer value, satisfaction, loyalty, and switching costs: An illustration from a business-to-business services context. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 32(3), 293–311. doi:10.1177/0092070304263330.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maignan, I., Ferrel, O. C., & Tomas Hult, G. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469. doi:10.1177/0092070399274005.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., Flint, D. J., & Hult, T. M. (2001). Logistics service quality as a segment-customized process. Journal of Marketing, 65(2), 82–104. doi:10.1509/jmkg.65.4.82.18390.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., & Flint, D. J. (1997). Validity in logistics research. Journal of Business Logistics, 18(1), 199–216.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mentzer, J. T., Gomes, R., & Krapfel, R. E., Jr. (1989). Physical distribution service: A fundamental marketing concept? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 17(1), 53–62. doi:10.1007/BF02726354.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1997). Satisfaction: A behavioral perspective on the customer. Boston: McGraw-Hill.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, R. L. (1999). Whence customer loyalty? Journal of Marketing, 63, 33–44.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olsen, S. O. (2002). Comparative evaluation and the relationship between quality, satisfaction, and repurchase loyalty. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 240–250.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmatier, R. W., Scheer, L. K., Steenkamp, J.-B. E. M. (2007). Journal of Marketing Research, 44(2), 185–199.

    Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., & Grewal, D. (2000). Serving customer and consumers effectively in the twenty-first century: A conceptual framework and overview. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28(1), 9–17. doi:10.1177/0092070300281001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parasuraman, A., Zeithaml, V. A., & Berry, L. L. (1988). SERVQUAL: A multiple item scale for measuring customer perceptions of service quality. Journal of Retailing, 63(1), 12–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff, P. M., MacKenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y., & Podsakoff, N. P. (2003). Common method biases in behavioral research: A critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. The Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(5), 879–903. doi:10.1037/0021-9010.88.5.879.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reichheld, F. F. (1996). The loyalty effect. Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Runyan, R., & Droge, C. (2008). A categorization of small retailer research: What does it portend for future research? Journal of Retailing, 84(1), 77–94. doi:10.1016/j.jretai.2008.01.003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Russell-Bennett, R., McColl-Kennedy, J. R., & Coote, L. V. (2007). Involvement, satisfaction, and brand loyalty in a small business services setting. Journal of Business Research, 60(12), 1253–1260. doi:10.1016/j.jbusres.2007.05.001.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Selnes, F., & Gonhaug, K. (2000). Effects of reliability and benevolence in business marketing. Journal of Business Research, 49(3), 259–271. doi:10.1016/S0148-2963(99) 00017-X.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stank, T. P., Goldsby, T. J., & Vickery, S. K. (1999). Effect of service supplier performance on satisfaction and loyalty of store managers in the fast food industry. Journal of Operations Management, 17(4), 429–448. doi:10.1016/S0272-6963(98) 00052-7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stank, T. P., Goldsby, T. J., Vickery, S. K., & Savitskie, K. (2003). Logistics service performance: Estimating its influence on market share. Journal of Business Logistics, 24(1), 27–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sujan, H. (1988). Communicating effectively to consumers through salespeople: A look at competent salespeople. Advances in Consumer Research. Association for Consumer Research (U. S.), 15(1), 372–274.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomason, L., Lincoln, K., & Aconis, A. (2006). Retailization: Brand survival in the age of retail power. UK: Kogan Page, Ltd.

    Google Scholar 

  • Verhoef, P., Franses, P. H., & Hoekstra, J. C. (2002). The effect of relational constructs on customer referrals and number of services purchased from a multiservice provider: Does age of relationship matter? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 30(3), 202–215.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wetzels, M., De Ruyter, K., & van Birgelen, M. (1998). Marketing service relationships: The role of commitment. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 13(4/5), 406–423. doi:10.1108/08858629810226708.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Beth Davis-Sramek.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Davis-Sramek, B., Droge, C., Mentzer, J.T. et al. Creating commitment and loyalty behavior among retailers: what are the roles of service quality and satisfaction?. J. of the Acad. Mark. Sci. 37, 440–454 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0148-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-009-0148-y

Keywords

Navigation