nach oben

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Erschienen in:

01.02.2011

The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards

verfasst von: Ralitza Nikolaeva, Marta Bicho

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 1/2011

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

Firms are uncertain about the value of corporate social responsibility (CSR) reporting, which may involve significant costs. What makes them embark on the initiative? This is the first study to explore the voluntary adoption by companies of the world’s most widespread framework of CSR reporting—the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). The GRI case is impressive because it achieved its status in mere 10 years. The inquiry focuses on the role of the firm’s institutional environment and identity communicators as drivers of the adoption of the GRI principles as a reputation management tool. The authors use a duration model to test hypotheses with data on 600 top global companies. The findings indicate that competitive and media pressures together with a company’s CSR media visibility and CSR publicity efforts are important determinants of GRI adoption. Also, as the GRI framework becomes more institutionalized, companies pick up more information from prior adopters.

Vorheriger Artikel How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review

Nächster Artikel Green marketing strategies: an examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Unilever has two subsidiaries, which are independently listed—one in the Netherlands and another one in the UK, which were included in the sample.

We counted companies as GRI adopters only if the mother company joined the GRI reports. If a foreign subsidiary reported, but the headquarters did not, then we did not count the company as an adopter.

Since the survey publishes only the top 100 brands, we cannot use actual scores or rankings as we do not have information on all of the firms in our sample.

We looked in Business Week’s and Fortune’s annual reports on the top global companies as well as in the Compustat database.

Because of the nature of the model we estimate described in the next section, the data was transformed into firm-year observations resulting in a total sample of 5,560 observations.

While Models 3 and 4 have lower BIC and AIC values, they are based on a different likelihood of the null model (due to differences in the sample). Consequently, the comparison criteria are valid only between Models 1 and 2, and Models 3 and 4.

The authors state: “Marketing’s current problems are rooted in organizational inertia, misaligned incentive systems, poorly designed value propositions, and outmoded ways of thinking about markets and customers. The culture of marketing, especially in consumer marketing, has become too corrupted and disfigured by short-term thinking and the loss of focus on the fundamental human values that require that companies and customers treat each other as allies and partners in value creation rather than as adversaries and potential victims” (Sheth and Sisodia 2006, p. 5). To this we add not only the company’s relationship with customers, but with all its constituencies.

Mitchell (2001) reports on a survey showing that only 18% of executives from other business functions consider marketing executives to be results oriented.

Another limitation related to the current sample is the inability to make any generalizations to medium and small enterprises. This has been noted as a deficiency to the spread of GRI as the adopters are mostly large corporations.

Adams, C. (2002). Internal organizational factors influencing corporate social and ethical reporting: Beyond current theorizing. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 15(2), 223–250.CrossRef

Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2006). Intra-industry imitation in corporate environmental reporting: An international perspective. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(3), 299–331.CrossRef

Aerts, W., Cormier, D., & Magnan, M. (2008). Corporate environmental disclosure, financial markets and the media: An international perspective. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 643–659.CrossRef

Allison, P. (1995). Survival analysis using the SAS system. Cary: SAS Institute.

Arora, S., & Cason, T. N. (1995). An experiment in voluntary environmental regulation: Participation in EPA’s 33/50 program. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 28(3), 271–286.CrossRef

Arora, S., & Gangopadhyay, S. (1995). Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 28(3), 289–309.CrossRef

Bansal, P. (2005). Evolving sustainability: A longitudinal study of corporate sustainable development. Strategic Management Journal, 26(3), 197–218.CrossRef

Bansal, P., & Clelland, I. (2004). Talking trash: Legitimacy, impression management and unsystematic risk in the context of the natural environment. Academy of Management Journal, 47(1), 93–103.CrossRef

Bansal, P., & Roth, K. (2000). Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness. Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717–736.CrossRef

Bebbington, J., Larrinaga, C., & Moneva, J. M. (2008). Corporate social reporting and reputation risk management. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 21(3), 337–361.CrossRef

Beets, S. (2005). Understanding the demand-side issues of international corruption. Journal of Business Ethics, 57(1), 65–81.CrossRef

Berman, J.E., Webb, T., Fraser, D.J., Harvey, P. J., Barsky, J., Haider, A., Dunn, K., Forde, S., Graham, A., Hilton, M., Tayara, S. & Williams, I. (2003). Race to the top: Attracting and enabling global sustainable business, Business Survey Report. World Bank Group (October).

Bhattacharya, C. B., & Sen, S. (2003). Consumer-company identification: A framework for understanding consumers’ relationships with companies. Journal of Marketing, 67(2), 76–88.CrossRef

Boone, A. L., & Mulherin, J. H. (2008). Do auctions induce a winner’s curse? New evidence from the corporate takeover market. Journal of Financial Economics, 89, 1–19.CrossRef

Brammer, S., & Pavelin, S. (2006). Voluntary environmental disclosures by large UK companies. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 33(7/8), 1168–1188.CrossRef

Branco, M. C., & Rodrigues, L. L. (2008). Social responsibility disclosure: A study of proxies for the public visibility of Portuguese banks. The British Accounting Review, 40(2), 161–181.CrossRef

Brown, T. J., Dacin, P. A., Pratt, M. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2006). Identity, intended image, construed image, and reputation: An interdisciplinary framework and suggested terminology. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 99–106.CrossRef

Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Lessidrenska, T. (2009a). The rise of the global reporting initiative: A case of institutional entrepreneurship. Environmental Politics, 18(2), 182–200.CrossRef

Brown, H. S., de Jong, M., & Levy, D. L. (2009b). Building institutions based on information disclosure: Lessons from GRI’s sustainability reporting. Journal of Cleaner Production, 17(6), 571–580.CrossRef

Business Week. (1999). The Global 1000. July 12 issue. (Last retrieved on December 17, 2009) [At: http://www.businessweek.com/1999/99_28/g1000_content.htm].

Campbell, J. L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32, 946–967.

Campbell, F. E., Herman, R. A., & Noble, D. (2006). Contradictions in “reputation management”. Journal of Communication Management, 10, 191–196.CrossRef

Cardador, M. T., & Pratt, M. G. (2006). Identification management and its bases: Bridging management and marketing perspectives through a focus on affiliation dimensions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 174–184.CrossRef

Carroll, G. R., & Hannan, M. T. (1989). Density delay and the evolution of organizational populations: A model and five empirical tests. Administrative Science Quarterly, 34(3), 411–430.CrossRef

Carroll, A. B., & Shabana, K. M. (2010). The business case for corporate social responsibility: A review of concepts, research and practice. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 85–105.CrossRef

Carter, S. M. (2006). The interaction of top management group, stakeholder, and situational factors on certain corporate reputation management activities. Journal of Management Studies, 43(5), 1145–1176.CrossRef

CERES. (1997). CERES global reporting initiative concept paper. Un-published working-paper. Boston MA: Coalition of Environmental Responsible Economics, CERES (September).

Chu, S., & Keh, H. (2006). Brand value creation: Analysis of the Interbrand-Business Week brand value rankings. Marketing Letters, 17(4), 323–331.CrossRef

Clarkson, P. M., Li, Y., Richardson, G. D., & Vasvari, F. P. (2008). Revisiting the relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: An empirical analysis. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 33, 302–327.CrossRef

Connelly, B. L., Ketchen, D. J., & Slater, S. F. (2010). Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, forthcoming. doi:10.1007/s11747-010-0199-0.

DeCanio, S. J., & Watkins, W. E. (1998). Investment in energy efficiency: Do the characteristics of firms matter? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 80(1), 95–107.CrossRef

Deephouse, D. L. (2000). Media reputation as a strategic resource: An integration of mass communication and resource-based theories. Journal of Management, 26(6), 1091–1112.CrossRef

Deephouse, D. L., & Heugens, P. P. M. A. R. (2009). Linking social issues to organizational impact: The role of infomediaries and the infomediary process. Journal of Business Ethics, 86(4), 541–553.CrossRef

DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: Institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.CrossRef

Dow Jones Sustainability Indexes: The First Decade: 1999–2009. (Last retrieved on March 19, 2010) [At: http://www.sustainability-index.com].

Du, S., Bhattacharya, C. B. & Sen, S. (2010). Maximizing business returns to corporate social responsibility (CSR): The role of CSR communication. International Journal of Management Reviews, 12(1), 8–19.CrossRef

Eccles, R. G., & Krzus, M. P. (2010). One report — integrated reporting for a sustainable society. Hoboken: John Wiley & Sons.

Elkington, J. (1994). Win–win–win business strategies for sustainable development. California Management Review, 36(2), 90–100.

Elkington, J. (1998). Partnerships from cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of 21st century business. Environmental Quality Management, 8(1), 37–51.

Geroski, P., & Mazzucato, M. (2001). Modelling the dynamics of industry populations. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 19(7), 1003–1022.CrossRef

Gleason, K. C., Malgwi, C. A., Mathur, I., & Owhoso, V. (2005). Impact of perceived national corruption on the returns to US multinationals in transactions with foreign governments. The Review of Accounting and Finance, 4(2), 26–58.CrossRef

Gray, R., Javad, M., Power, D. M., & Sinclair, C. D. (2001). Social and environmental disclosure and corporate characteristics: A research note and extension. Journal of Business Finance and Accounting, 28(3/4), 327–357.CrossRef

Grewal, R. & Dharwadkar, R. (2002). The role of the institutional environment in marketing channels. Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 82–97.

Grunig, J. E. (1989). Symmetrical presuppositions as a framework for public relations theory. In C. Botan & V. T. Hazleton (Eds.), Public relations theory (pp. 17–44). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.

Hallahan, K. (2001). Strategic media planning: Toward an integrated public relations media model. In R. L. Heath (Ed.), Handbook of public relations (pp. 461–470). Thousand Oaks: Sage.

Handelman, J. M., & Arnold, S. J. (1999). The role of marketing actions with a social dimension: Appeals to the institutional environment. The Journal of Marketing, 63(3), 33–48.CrossRef

Hedberg, C.-J., & von Malmborg, F. (2003). The global reporting initiative and corporate sustainability reporting in Swedish companies. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 10(3), 153–164.CrossRef

Helsen, K., & Schmittlein, D. C. (1993). Analyzing duration times in marketing: Evidence for the effectiveness of hazard rate models. Marketing Science, 12(4), 395–414.CrossRef

Holder-Webb, L., Cohen, J. R., Nath, L., & Wood, D. (2009). The supply of corporate social responsibility disclosures among U.S. firms. Journal of Business Ethics, 84(4), 497–527.CrossRef

Hotchkiss, C. (1998). The sleeping dog stirs: New signs of life in efforts to end corruption in international business. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 17(1), 108–115.

Hoti, S., McAleer, M., & Pauwels, L. (2005). Modelling risk spillovers in environmental finance. In Kachitvichyanakul, V., Purintrapiban, U., & Uthayopas, P. (Eds.) Proceedings of the 2005 International Conference on Simulation and Modelling (pp. 498–505).

Humphreys, A. (2010). Megamarketing: The creation of markets as a social process. Journal of Marketing, 74(2), 1–19.CrossRef

Hyman, M. R., & Mathur, I. (2005). Retrospective and prospective views on the marketing/finance interface. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 33(4), 390–400.CrossRef

Jenkins, S. P. (1995). Easy estimation methods for discrete-time duration models. Oxford Bulletin Economics Statists, 57, 129–138.

Kennedy, M. T. (2008). Getting counted: Markets, media, and reality. American Sociological Review, 73(2), 270–295.CrossRef

Khanna, M., & Damon, L. A. (1999). EPA’s voluntary 33/50 program: Impact on toxic releases and economic performance of firms. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 37(1), 1–25.CrossRef

King, B. G., & Whetten, D. A. (2008). Rethinking the relationship between reputation and legitimacy: A social actor conceptualization. Corporate Reputation Review, 11(3), 192–207.CrossRef

Kolk, A. (2005). Environmental reporting by multinationals from the triad: Convergence or divergence? Management International Review, 45, 145–166.

Kolk, A. (2008). Sustainability, accountability and corporate governance: Exploring multinationals’ reporting practices. Business Strategy and the Environment, 17(1), 1–15.CrossRef

Kotha, S., Rajgopal, S., & Rindova, V. (2001). Reputation building and performance: An empirical analysis of the top-50 pure internet firms. European Management Journal, 19(6), 571–586.CrossRef

Levy, D. L., Brown, H. S., & de Jong, M. (2010). The contested politics of corporate governance: The case of the global reporting initiative. Business & Society, 49(1), 88–115.CrossRef

Lieberman, M., & Asaba, S. (2006). Why do firms imitate each other? Academy of Management Review, 31(2), 366–385.

López, M. V., García, A., & Rodríguez, L. (2007). Sustainable development and corporate performance: A study based on the Dow Jones sustainability index. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(3), 285–300.CrossRef

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2006). Corporate social responsibility, customer satisfaction, and market value. Journal of Marketing, 70(3), 1–18.CrossRef

Luo, X., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2009). The debate over doing good: Corporate social performance, strategic marketing levers, and firm-idiosyncratic risk. Journal of Marketing, 73(3), 198–213.CrossRef

Madden, T., Fehle, F., & Fournier, S. (2006). Brands matter: An empirical demonstration of the creation of shareholder value through branding. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 34(2), 224–235.CrossRef

Maignan, I., Ferrell, O. C., & Hult, G. T. M. (1999). Corporate citizenship: Cultural antecedents and business benefits. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 27(4), 455–469.CrossRef

Manetti, G., & Becatti, L. (2009). Assurance services for sustainability reports: Standards and empirical evidence. Journal of Business Ethics, 87, 289–298.CrossRef

Margolis, J. D., & Walsh, J. P. (2003). Misery loves companies: Rethinking social initiatives by business. Administrative Science Quarterly, 48, 268–305.CrossRef

Menon, A., & Menon, A. (1997). Enviropreneurial marketing strategy: The emergence of corporate environmentalism as market strategy. Journal of Marketing, 61(1), 51–67.CrossRef

Mitchell, A. (2001). Right side up: Building brands in the age of the organized consumer. London: Harper Collins Business.

Moneva, J. M., & Ortas, E. (2008). Are stock markets influenced by sustainability matter? Evidence from European companies. International Journal of Sustainable Economy, 1(1), 1–16.CrossRef

Mori, Y., & Welch, E. (2008). The ISO 14001 environmental management standard in Japan: Results from a national survey of facilities in four industries. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 51(3), 421–445.CrossRef

Perrini, F. (2005). Building a European portrait of corporate social responsibility reporting. European Management Journal, 23(6), 611–627.CrossRef

Reynolds, M. A., & Yuthas, K. (2008). Moral discourse and corporate social responsibility reporting. Journal of Business Ethics, 78, 47–64.CrossRef

Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. Academy of Management Journal, 48, 1033–1049.

Rindova, V. P., Pollock, T. G., & Hayward, M. L. A. (2006). Celebrity firms: The social construction of market popularity. Academy of Management Review, 31(1), 50–21.

Rodriguez, P., Donald, S. S., Amy, H., & Lorraine, E. (2006). Three lenses on the multinational enterprise: Politics, corruption, and corporate social responsibility. Journal of International Business Studies, 37(6), 733–746.CrossRef

Rosenkopf, L., & Abrahamson, E. (1999). Modeling reputational and informational influences in threshold models of bandwagon innovation diffusion. Computational and Mathematical Organization Theory, 5(4), 361–384.CrossRef

Scott, S. G., & Lane, V. R. (2000). A stakeholder approach to organizational identity. Academy of Management Review, 25(1), 43–62.CrossRef

Sen, S., & Bhattacharya, C. B. (2001). Does doing good always lead to doing better? Consumer reactions to corporate social responsibility. Journal of Marketing Research, 38(2), 225–243.CrossRef

Sheth, J. N., & Sisodia, R. S. (2006). Does marketing need reform? Armonk: M.E. Sharpe.

Srinivasan, R., Lilien, G. L., & Rangaswamy, A. (2002). Technological opportunism and radical technology adoption: An application to e-business? Journal of Marketing, 66(3), 47–60.CrossRef

Srivastava, R. K., Shervani, T. A., & Fahey, L. (1998). Market-based assets and shareholder value: A framework for analysis. Journal of Marketing, 62(1), 2–18.CrossRef

Strang, D., & Macy, M. W. (2001). In search of excellence: Fads, success stories, and adaptive emulation. The American Journal of Sociology, 107(1), 147–182.CrossRef

Strang, D., & Soule, S. (1998). Diffusion in organizations and social movements: From hybrid corn to poison pills. Annual Review of Sociology, 24(1), 265–290.CrossRef

Suchman, M. C. (1995). Managing legitimacy: Strategic and institutional approaches. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 571–610.CrossRef

Sung, Y., & Tinkham, S. F. (2005). Brand personality structures in the United States and Korea: Common and culture-specific factors. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 15(4), 334–350.CrossRef

Sweeney, L., & Coughlan, J. (2008). Do different industries report Corporate Social Responsibility differently? An investigation though the lens of stakeholder theory. Journal of Marketing Communications, 14(2), 113–124.CrossRef

Vaaland, T. I., Heide, M., & Grønhaug, K. (2008). Corporate social responsibility. Investigating theory and research in the marketing context. European Journal of Marketing, 42(9/10), 927–953.CrossRef

Van den Bulte, C., & Lilien, G. L. (2001). Medical innovation revisited: Social contagion versus marketing effort. The American Journal of Sociology, 106(5), 1409–1435.CrossRef

Vann, J. W., & White, G. B. (2004). Sustainability reporting in the accounting curriculum. Journal of Business & Economics Research, 2(12), 17–30.

Verhoef, P. C., & Leeflang, P. S. H. (2009). Understanding the marketing department’s influence within the firm. Journal of Marketing, 73(2), 14–37.CrossRef

Videras, J., & Alberini, A. (2000). The appeal of voluntary environmental programs: Which firms participate and why? Contemporary Economic Policy, 18(4), 449–460.CrossRef

Weiss, A. M., Anderson, E., & MacInnis, D. J. (1999). Reputation management as a motivation for sales structure decisions. Journal of Marketing, 63(4), 74–89.CrossRef

White, J. C., Varadarajan, P. R., & Dacin, P. A. (2003). Market situation interpretation and response: The role of cognitive style, organizational culture, and information use. Journal of Marketing, 67(3), 63–79.CrossRef

Willis, A. (2003). The role of the global reporting initiative’s sustainability reporting guidelines in the social screening of investments. Journal of Business Ethics, 43, 233–237.CrossRef

Wind, J. Y. (2009). Rethinking marketing: Peter Drucker’s challenge. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 37(1), 28–34.CrossRef

Wu, F., Mahajan, V., & Balasubramanian, S. (2003). An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on business performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 31(4), 425–447.CrossRef

Zhang, B. J., & Swanson, D. (2006). Analysis of news media's representation of corporate social responsibility (CSR). Public Relations Quarterly, 51(2), 13–18.

Titel: The role of institutional and reputational factors in the voluntary adoption of corporate social responsibility reporting standards
verfasst von: Ralitza Nikolaeva
Marta Bicho
Publikationsdatum: 01.02.2011
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 1/2011
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-010-0214-5

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 1/2011

Sustainability and consumption

Toward a “theoretical toolbox” for sustainability research in marketing

Green marketing strategies: an examination of stakeholders and the opportunities they present

Market-oriented sustainability: a conceptual framework and propositions

Sustainable marketing, equity, and economic growth: a resource-advantage, economic freedom approach

How can corporate social responsibility activities create value for stakeholders? A systematic review