nach oben

Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science

Erschienen in:

26.06.2021 | Original Empirical Research

When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view

verfasst von: Robert Mai, Stefan Hoffmann, Ingo Balderjahn

Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science | Ausgabe 6/2021

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The organic market is characterized by remarkable disparities, and confusion persists about which motives drive organic consumption. To understand them, this research introduces the idea that the same consumer motives can exert different and potentially opposite impacts when organic consumption patterns unfold. The proposed multistage theory of differential effects distinguishes a participation stage, when consumers decide whether to purchase organic at all, and an expenditure stage, when consumers decide about how much of their budget to spend on organic products across purchases. An analysis of shopping patterns of approximately 14,000 households confirms the proposed differential influences: Other-oriented motives (care for others and the environment) support participation but impede sustained expenditures. Only self-oriented motives (hedonism) foster both participation and expenditures. The results pinpoint the need to rethink organic consumption as a stage-specific problem, which opens up new perspectives for managers about an old but persistent problem.

Vorheriger Artikel Separating customer heterogeneity, points pressure and rewarded behavior to assess a retail loyalty program

Nächster Artikel From franchisee experience to customer experience: their effects on franchisee performance

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Nur mit Berechtigung zugänglich

Akcura, E. (2015). Mandatory versus voluntary payment for green electricity. Ecological Economics, 116(August), 84–94.CrossRef

André, Q., Chandon, P., & Haws, K. (2019). Healthy through presence or absence, nature or science?: A framework for understanding front-of-package food claims. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 38(2), 172–191.CrossRef

Aschemann-Witzel, J., & Zielke, S. (2017). Can’t buy me green? A review of consumer perceptions of and behavior toward the price of organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 51(1), 211–251.CrossRef

Auger, P., & Devinney, T. M. (2007). Do what consumers say matter? The misalignment of preferences with unconstrained ethical intentions. Journal of Business Ethics, 76(4), 361–383.CrossRef

Auger, P., Burke, P., Devinney, T. M., & Louviere, J. J. (2003). What will consumers pay for social product features? Journal of Business Ethics, 42(3), 281–304.CrossRef

Auger, P., Devinney, T. M., Louviere, J. J., & Burke, P. F. (2008). Do social product features have value to consumers? International Journal of Research in Marketing, 25(3), 183–191.CrossRef

Babin, B. J., Darden, W. R., & Griffin, M. (1994). Work and/or fun: measuring hedonic and utilitarian shopping value. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(4), 644–656.CrossRef

Bagozzi, R. P. (2000). The poverty of economic explanations of consumption and an action theory alternative. Managerial and Decision Economics, 21(3–4), 95–109.CrossRef

Baker, S., Thompson, K. E., & Engelken, J. (2004). Mapping the values driving organic food choice: Germany vs the UK. European Journal of Marketing, 38(8), 995–1012.CrossRef

Balderjahn, I., Peyer, M., Seegebarth, B., Wiedmann, K.-P., & Weber, A. (2018). The many faces of sustainability-conscious consumers: a category-independent typology. Journal of Business Research, 91(October), 83–93.CrossRef

Bamberg, S. (2013). Changing environmentally harmful behaviors: a stage model of self-regulated behavioral change. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 34, 151–159.CrossRef

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: The exercise of control. Freeman.

Bandura, A. (1986). Social foundations of thought and action. Englewood Cliffs.

Baudry, J., Assmann, K. E., Touvier, M., Allès, B., Seconda, L., Latino-Martel, P., et al. (2018). Association of frequency of organic food consumption with cancer risk: findings from the NutriNet-Santé prospective cohort study. JAMA Internal Medicine, 12, 1597–1606.CrossRef

Berry, C., Burton, S., & Howlett, E. (2017). It’s only natural: the mediating impact of consumers’ attribute inferences on the relationships between product claims, perceived product healthfulness, and purchase intentions. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(5), 698–719.CrossRef

Bezawada, R., & Pauwels, K. (2013). What is special about marketing organic products? How organic assortment, price, and promotions drive retailer performance. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 31–51.CrossRef

Blanken, I., van de Ven, N., & Zeelenberg, M. (2015). A meta-analytic review of moral licensing. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(4), 540–558.CrossRef

Brouhle, K., & Khanna, M. (2012). Determinants of participation versus consumption in the Nordic swan eco-labeled market. Ecological Economics, 73(January), 142–151.CrossRef

Brown, J. J., & Wildt, A. R. (1992). Consideration set measurement. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 20(3), 235–243.CrossRef

Campbell, M. C., & Winterich, K. P. (2018). A framework for the consumer psychology of morality in the marketplace. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 28(2), 167–179.CrossRef

Carrigan, M., & Attalla, A. (2001). The myth of the ethical consumer–do ethics matter in purchase behaviour? Journal of Consumer Marketing, 18(7), 560–578.CrossRef

Carrington, M. J., Neville, B. A., & Whitwell, G. J. (2010). Why ethical consumers don’t walk their talk: towards a framework for understanding the gap between the ethical purchase intentions and actual buying behaviour of ethically minded consumers. Journal of Business Ethics, 97(1), 139–158.CrossRef

Chang, C. T., & Chu, X. Y. M. (2020). The give and take of cause-related marketing: purchasing cause-related products licenses consumer indulgence. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 48(2), 203–221.CrossRef

Christopher, R. M., & Machado, F. S. (2019). Consumer response to design variations in pay-what-you-want pricing. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(5), 879–898.CrossRef

Cragg, J. G. (1971). Some statistical models for limited dependent variables with application to the demand for durable goods. Econometrica, 39(5), 829–844.CrossRef

De Pelsmacker, P., & Janssens, W. (2007). A model for fair trade buying behaviour: the role of perceived quantity and quality of information and of product-specific attitudes. Journal of Business Ethics, 75(4), 361–380.CrossRef

Delmas, M. A., Gergaud, O., & Lim, J. (2016). Does organic wine taste better? An analysis of experts’ ratings. Journal of Wine Economics, 11(3), 329–354.CrossRef

Dolan, P., & Galizzi, M. M. (2015). Like ripples on a pond: behavioral spillovers and their implications for research and policy. Journal of Economic Psychology, 47(April), 1–16.CrossRef

Evans, L., Maio, G. R., Corner, A., Hodgetts, C. J., Ahmed, S., & Hahn, U. (2013). Self-interest and pro-environmental behavior. Nature Climate Change, 3(2), 122–125.CrossRef

Farjam, M., Nikolaychuk, O., & Bravo, G. (2019). Experimental evidence of an environmental attitude-behavior gap in high-cost situations. Ecological Economics, 166, 106434. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2019.106434.CrossRef

Freestone, O. M., & McGoldrick, P. J. (2008). Motivations of the ethical consumer. Journal of Business Ethics, 79(4), 445–467.CrossRef

Ghisetti, C., Marzucchi, A., & Montresor, S. (2015). The open eco-innovation mode. An empirical investigation of eleven European countries. Research Policy, 44(5), 1080–1093.CrossRef

Gleim, M. R., Smith, J. S., Andrews, D., & Cronin Jr., J. J. (2013). Against the green: a multi-method examination of the barriers to green consumption. Journal of Retailing, 89(1), 44–61.CrossRef

Gollwitzer, P. M., & Sheeran, P. (2006). Implementation intentions and goal achievement: a meta-analysis of effects and processes. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 38, 69–119.CrossRef

Green, T., & Peloza, J. (2014). Finding the right shade of green: the effect of advertising appeal type on environmentally friendly consumption. Journal of Advertising, 43(2), 128–141.CrossRef

Gruber, V., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2014). How techniques of neutralization legitimize norm-and attitude-inconsistent consumer behavior. Journal of Business Ethics, 121(1), 29–45.CrossRef

Grunert, S. C., & Juhl, H. J. (1995). Values, environmental attitudes, and buying of organic foods. Journal of Economic Psychology, 16(1), 39–62.CrossRef

Grunert, K. G., Hieke, S., & Wills, J. (2014). Sustainability labels on food products: consumer motivation, understanding and use. Food Policy, 44, 177–189.CrossRef

Hassan, L. M., Shiu, E., & Shaw, D. (2016). Who says there is an intention–behaviour gap? Assessing the empirical evidence of an intention–behaviour gap in ethical consumption. Journal of Business Ethics, 136(2), 219–236.CrossRef

Hauser, J. R. (2014). Consideration-set heuristics. Journal of Business Research, 67(8), 1688–1699.CrossRef

Hediger, C., Farsi, M., & Weber, S. (2018). Turn it up and open the window: on the rebound effects in residential heating. Ecological Economics, 149(July), 21–39.CrossRef

Hoffmann, S., Balderjahn, I., Seegebarth, B., Mai, R., & Peyer, M. (2018). Under which conditions are consumers ready to boycott or buycott? The roles of hedonism and simplicity. Ecological Economics, 147(May), 167–178.CrossRef

Huang, M. H., & Rust, R. T. (2011). Sustainability and consumption. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 40–54.CrossRef

Hult, G. T. M. (2011). Market-focused sustainability: market orientation plus! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 1–6.CrossRef

Hutter, K., & Hoffmann, S. (2013). Carrotmob and anti-consumption: same motives but different willingness to make sacrifices? Journal of Macromarketing, 33(3), 217–231.CrossRef

Joerß, T., Akbar, P., Mai, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2017). Conceptualizing sustainability from a consumer perspective. uwf UmweltWirtschaftsForum, 25(1–2), 15–23.CrossRef

Johe, M. H., & Bhullar, N. (2016). To buy or not to buy: the roles of self-identity, attitudes, perceived behavioral control and norms in organic consumerism. Ecological Economics, 128(August), 99–105.CrossRef

Juhl, H. J., Fenger, M. H., & Thøgersen, J. (2017). Will the consistent organic food consumer step forward? An empirical analysis. Journal of Consumer Research, 44(3), 519–535.CrossRef

Kareklas, I., Carlson, J. R., & Muehling, D. D. (2014). “I eat organic for my benefit and yours”: egoistic and altruistic considerations for purchasing organic food and their implications for advertising strategists. Journal of Advertising, 43(1), 18–32.CrossRef

Karmarkar, U. R., & Bollinger, B. (2015). BYOB: how bringing your own shopping bags leads to treating yourself and the environment. Journal of Marketing, 79(4), 1–15.CrossRef

Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, C. N., & Zeriti, A. (2016). Eco-friendly product development strategy: antecedents, outcomes, and contingent effects. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 44(6), 660–684.CrossRef

Klein, J. G., Smith, N. C., & John, A. (2004). Why we boycott: consumer motivations for boycott participation. Journal of Marketing, 68(3), 92–109.CrossRef

Kollmuss, A., & Agyeman, J. (2002). Mind the gap: why do people act environmentally and what are the barriers to pro-environmental behavior? Environmental Education Research, 8(3), 239–260.CrossRef

Kotler, P. (2011). Reinventing marketing to manage the environmental imperative. Journal of Marketing, 75(4), 132–135.CrossRef

Kouchaki, M., & Jami, A. (2018). Everything we do, you do: the licensing effect of prosocial marketing messages on consumer behavior. Management Science, 64(1), 102–111.CrossRef

Lasarov, W., Mai, R., García-de-Frutos, N., Ortega Egea, J. M., & Hoffmann, S. (2019). Counter-arguing as barriers to environmentally motivated consumption reduction: a multi-country study. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 36(2), 281–305.CrossRef

Lee, W. C. J., Shimizu, M., Kniffin, K. M., & Wansink, B. (2013). You taste what you see: do organic labels bias taste perceptions? Food Quality and Preference, 29(1), 33–39.CrossRef

Leonidou, C. N., Katsikeas, C. S., & Morgan, N. A. (2013). “Greening” the marketing mix: do firms do it and does it pay off? Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 151–170.CrossRef

Lin, Y. C., & Chang, C. C. A. (2012). Double standard: the role of environmental consciousness in green product usage. Journal of Marketing, 76(5), 125–134.CrossRef

Loebnitz, N., Schuitema, G., & Grunert, K. G. (2015). Who buys oddly shaped food and why? Impacts of food shape abnormality and organic labeling on purchase intentions. Psychology & Marketing, 32(4), 408–421.CrossRef

Luchs, M. G., Naylor, R. W., Irwin, J. R., & Raghunathan, R. (2010). The sustainability liability: potential negative effects of ethicality on product preference. Journal of Marketing, 74(5), 18–31.CrossRef

Mai, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2012). Taste lovers versus nutrition fact seekers: how health consciousness and self-efficacy determine the way consumers choose food products. Journal of Consumer Behaviour, 11(4), 316–328.CrossRef

Mai, R., Hoffmann, S., Lasarov, W., & Buhs, A. (2019). Ethical products=less strong: how explicit and implicit reliance on the lay theory affects consumption behaviors. Journal of Business Ethics, 158(3), 659–677.CrossRef

Mainieri, T., Barnett, E. G., Valdero, T. R., Unipan, J. B., & Oskamp, S. (1997). Green buying: the influence of environmental concern on consumer behavior. The Journal of Social Psychology, 137(2), 189–204.CrossRef

Martínez-Espiñeira, R. (2006). A box-cox double-hurdle model of wildlife valuation: The citizen's perspective. Ecological Economics, 58(1), 192–208.

Mazar, N., & Zhong, C. B. (2010). Do green products make us better people? Psychological Science, 21(4), 494–498.CrossRef

Newell, B. R., McDonald, R. I., Brewer, M., & Hayes, B. K. (2014). The psychology of environmental decisions. Annual Review of Environment and Resources, 39, 443–467.CrossRef

Newman, G. E., Gorlin, M., & Dhar, R. (2014). When going green backfires: how firm intentions shape the evaluation of socially beneficial product enhancements. Journal of Consumer Research, 41(3), 823–839.CrossRef

Ngobo, P. V. (2011). What drives household choice of organic products in grocery stores? Journal of Retailing, 87(1), 90–100.CrossRef

Olsen, M. C., Slotegraaf, R. J., & Chandukala, S. R. (2014). Green claims and message frames: how green new products change brand attitude. Journal of Marketing, 78(5), 119–137.CrossRef

Olson, E. L. (2013). It’s not easy being green: the effects of attribute tradeoffs on green product preference and choice. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(2), 171–184.CrossRef

Panzone, L., Hilton, D., Sale, L., & Cohen, D. (2016). Socio-demographics, implicit attitudes, explicit attitudes, and sustainable consumption in supermarket shopping. Journal of Economic Psychology, 55, 77–95.CrossRef

Peloza, J., White, K., & Shang, J. (2013). Good and guilt-free: the role of self-accountability in influencing preferences for products with ethical attributes. Journal of Marketing, 77(1), 104–119.CrossRef

Phipps, M., Ozanne, L. K., Luchs, M. G., Subrahmanyan, S., Kapitan, S., Catlin, J. R., Gau, R., Naylor, R. W., Rose, R. L., Simpson, B., & Weaver, T. (2013). Understanding the inherent complexity of sustainable consumption: a social cognitive framework. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1227–1234.CrossRef

Pino, G., Peluso, A. M., & Guido, G. (2012). Determinants of regular and occasional consumers’ intentions to buy organic food. Journal of Consumer Affairs, 46(1), 157–169.CrossRef

Prochaska, J. O., & DiClemente, C. C. (1983). Stages and processes of self-change of smoking: toward an integrative model of change. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 51(3), 390–395.CrossRef

Prochaska, J. O., DiClemente, C. C., & Norcross, J. C. (1993). In search of how people change: Applications to addictive behaviors. Addictions Nursing Network, 5(1), 2–16.CrossRef

Prochaska, J. O., Redding, C. A., & Evers, K. E. (2015). The transtheoretical model and stages of change. In Glanz, K, Rimer, B. K., & Viswanath, K. (eds.). Health Behavior: Theory, Research, and Practice, 97-121.

Prothero, A., Dobscha, S., Freund, J., Kilbourne, W. E., Luchs, M. G., Ozanne, L. K., & Thøgersen, J. (2011). Sustainable consumption: opportunities for consumer research and public policy. Journal of Public Policy & Marketing, 30(1), 31–38.CrossRef

Rana, J., & Paul, J. (2017). Consumer behavior and purchase intention for organic food: a review and research agenda. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 38, 157–165.CrossRef

Rude, J., Surry, Y., & Kron, R. (2014). A generalized double-hurdle model of Swedish gambling expenditures. Applied Economics, 46(34), 4151–4163.CrossRef

Schamp, C., Heitmann, M., & Katzenstein, R. (2019). Consideration of ethical attributes along the consumer decision-making journey. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 47(2), 328–348.CrossRef

Schifferstein, H. N. J., & Oude Ophuis, P. A. M. (1998). Health-related determinants of organic food consumption in the Netherlands. Food Quality and Preference, 9(3), 119–133.CrossRef

Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21(4), 327–339.CrossRef

Schwartz, S. H. (2012). An overview of the Schwartz theory of basic values. Online readings in Psychology and Culture, 2(1), 1–20.CrossRef

Sheeran, P., Trafimow, D., & Armitage, C. J. (2003). Predicting behaviour from perceived behavioural control: tests of the accuracy assumption of the theory of planned behaviour. British Journal of Social Psychology, 42(3), 393–410.CrossRef

Sheth, J. N., Sethia, N. K., & Srinivas, S. (2011). Mindful consumption: a customer-centric approach to sustainability. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 39(1), 21–39.CrossRef

Song, R., Moon, S., Chen, H. A., & Houston, M. B. (2018). When marketing strategy meets culture: the role of culture in product evaluations. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 46(3), 384–402.CrossRef

Soper, K. (2008). Alternative hedonism, cultural theory and the role of aesthetic revisioning. Cultural Studies, 22(5), 567–587.CrossRef

Sridhar, K., Bezawada, R., & Trivedi, M. (2012). Investigating the drivers of consumer cross-category learning for new products using multiple data sets. Marketing Science, 31(4), 668–688.CrossRef

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., & Kalof, L. (1993). Value orientations, gender, and environmental concern. Environment and Behavior, 25(3), 322–348.CrossRef

Tapia-Fonllem, C., Corral-Verdugo, V., Fraijo-Sing, B., & Durón-Ramos, M. F. (2013). Assessing sustainable behavior and its correlates: a measure of pro-ecological, frugal, altruistic and equitable actions. Sustainability, 5(2), 711–723.CrossRef

Tezer, A., & Bodur, H. O. (2020). The greenconsumption effect: how using green products improves consumption experience. Journal of Consumer Research, 47(1), 25–39.CrossRef

Thøgersen, J. (1999). Spillover processes in the development of a sustainable consumption pattern. Journal of Economic Psychology, 20(1), 53–81.CrossRef

Thøgersen, J. (2011). Green shopping: for selfish reasons or the common good? American Behavioral Scientist, 55(8), 1052–1076.CrossRef

Tobin, J. (1958). Estimation of relationships for limited dependent variables. Econometrica, 26(1), 24–36.CrossRef

Trudel, R., & Cotte, J. (2009). Does it pay to be good? MIT Sloan Management Review, 50(2), 61–68.

van der Wal, A. J., van Horen, F., & Grinstein, A. (2018). Temporal myopia in sustainable behavior under uncertainty. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 35(3), 378–393.CrossRef

van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2011). Willingness to pay for organic products: differences between virtue and vice foods. International Journal of Research in Marketing, 28(3), 167–180.CrossRef

van Doorn, J., & Verhoef, P. C. (2015). Drivers of and barriers to organic purchase behavior. Journal of Retailing, 91(3), 436–450.CrossRef

Varadarajan, R. (2017). Innovating for sustainability: a framework for sustainable innovations and a model of sustainable innovations orientation. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 45(1), 14–36.CrossRef

Vermeir, I., & Verbeke, W. (2008). Sustainable food consumption among young adults in Belgium: theory of planned behaviour and the role of confidence and values. Ecological Economics, 64(3), 542–553.CrossRef

Vermeir, I., Weijters, B., De Houwer, J., Geuens, M., Slabbinck, H., Spruyt, A., et al. (2020). Environmentally sustainable food consumption: a review and research agenda from a goal-directed perspective. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 1603.CrossRef

Wang, W., Krishna, A., & McFerran, B. (2017). Turning off the lights: consumers’ environmental efforts depend on visible efforts of firms. Journal of Marketing Research, 54(3), 478–494.CrossRef

Webster, F. E., & Lusch, R. F. (2013). Elevating marketing: marketing is dead! Long live marketing! Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 41(4), 389–399.CrossRef

White, K., & Peloza, J. (2009). Self-benefit versus other-benefit marketing appeals: their effectiveness in generating charitable support. Journal of Marketing, 73(4), 109–124.CrossRef

White, K., & Simpson, B. (2013). When do (and don’t) normative appeals influence sustainable consumer behaviors? Journal of Marketing, 77(2), 78–95.CrossRef

White, K., Habib, R., & Hardisty, D. J. (2019). How to SHIFT consumer behaviors to be more sustainable: a literature review and guiding framework. Journal of Marketing, 83(3), 22–49.CrossRef

Willer, H., & Lernoud, J. (2019). The world of organic agriculture. Statistics and emerging trends 2019 (pp. 1-336). Research Institute of Organic Agriculture FiBL and IFOAM Organics International.

Wongprawmas, R., Pappalardo, G., Canavari, M., & Pecorino, B. (2016). Willingness-to-pay for multiple units of eco-friendly wheat-derived products: results from open-ended choice experiments. Journal of Food Products Marketing, 22(6), 658–682.CrossRef

Xiao, J. J., Newman, B. M., Prochaska, J. M., Leon, B., Bassett, R., & Johnson, J. L. (2004a). Applying the transtheoretical model of change to debt reducing behavior. Financial Counseling and Planning, 15(2), 89–100.

Xiao, J. J., O'Neill, B., Prochaska, J. M., Kerbel, C. M., Brennan, P., & Bristow, B. J. (2004b). A consumer education programme based on the transtheoretical model of change. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 28(1), 55–65.CrossRef

Yadav, R. (2016). Altruistic or egoistic: which value promotes organic food consumption among young consumers? A study in the context of a developing nation. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 33, 92–97.CrossRef

Yan, L., Keh, H. T., & Chen, J. (2020). Assimilating and differentiating: the curvilinear effect of social class on green consumption. Journal of Consumer Research, forthcoming.

Yim, M. Y. C., Yoo, S. C., Sauer, P. L., & Seo, J. H. (2014). Hedonic shopping motivation and co-shopper influence on utilitarian grocery shopping in superstores. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 42(5), 528–544.CrossRef

Titel: When drivers become inhibitors of organic consumption: the need for a multistage view
verfasst von: Robert Mai
Stefan Hoffmann
Ingo Balderjahn
Publikationsdatum: 26.06.2021
Verlag: Springer US
Erschienen in: Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science / Ausgabe 6/2021
Print ISSN: 0092-0703
Elektronische ISSN: 1552-7824
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-021-00787-x

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 6/2021

Self-oriented competitiveness in salespeople: sales management implications

Separating customer heterogeneity, points pressure and rewarded behavior to assess a retail loyalty program

From franchisee experience to customer experience: their effects on franchisee performance

Correction to: Relating entertainment features in screenplays to movie performance: an empirical investigation

Correction to: Operationalizing salesperson performance with secondary data: aligning practice, scholarship, and theory

Space between products on display: the impact of interspace on consumer estimation of product size