Skip to main content
Log in

Composite time-consistent multi-period risk measure and its application in optimal portfolio selection

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
TOP Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Through the composition of two real-valued functions, we propose a new class of multi-period risk measure which is time consistent. The new multi-period risk measure is monotonous and convex when the two real-valued functions satisfy monotonicity and convexity. Based on this generic framework, we construct a specific class of time-consistent multi-period risk measure by considering the lower partial moment between the realized wealth and the target wealth at individual periods. With the new multi-period risk measure as the objective function, we formulate a multi-period portfolio selection model by considering transaction costs at individual investment periods. Furthermore, this stochastic programming model is transformed into a deterministic programming problem using the scenario tree technology. Finally, we show through empirical tests and comparisons the rationality, practicality and efficiency of our new multi-period risk measure and the corresponding portfolio selection model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. http://finance.yahoo.com/.

References

  • Acerbi C (2002) Spectral measures of risk: a coherent representation of subjective risk aversion. J Bank Finance 26:1505–1518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Acerbi C, Tasche D (2002) On the coherence of expected shortfall. J Bank Finance 26:1487–1503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 9:203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Artzner P, Delbaen F, Eber JM, Heath D (1999) Coherent measures of risk. Math Finance 4:203–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bawa VS (1975) Optimal rules for ordering uncertain prospects. J Finance Econ 2:95–C121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boda K, Filar JA (2006) Time consistent dynamic risk measures. Math Methods Oper Res 63:169–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZP, Li G, Guo JE (2013) Optimal investment policy in the time consistent mean–variance formulation. Insur Math Econ 52:145–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZP, Wang Y (2008) Two-sided coherent risk measures and their application in realistic portfolio optimization. J Bank Finance 32:2667–2673

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen ZP, Yang L (2011) Nonlinearly weighted convex risk measure and its application. J Bank Finance 35:1777–1793

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheridito P, Delbaen F, Kupper M (2006) Dynamic monetary risk measures for bounded discrete-time processes. Electr J Probab 11:57–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheridito P, Kupper M (2011) Composition of time-consistent dynamic monetary risk measures in discrete time. Int J Theor Appl Finance 14:137–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Detlefsen K, Scandolo G (2005) Conditional and dynamic convex risk measures. Finance Stoch 9:539–561

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Epstein LG, Zin SE (1989) Substitution, risk aversion, and the temporal behavior of consumption and asset returns: a theoretical framework. Econometrica 57:937–969

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fishburn PC (1977) Mean-risk analysis with risk associated with below-target returns. Am Econ Rev 67:116–126

    Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H, Penner I (2006) Convex risk measures and the dynamics of their penalty functions. Stat Decis 24:61–96

    Google Scholar 

  • Föllmer H, Schied A (2004) Stochastic finance: an introduction in discrete time, 2nd edn. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Gaivoronski A, Pflug GC (2004) Value-at-risk in portfolio optimization: properties and computational approach. J Risk 7:1–31

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Geman H, Ohana S (2008) Time-consistency in managing a commodity portfolio: a dynamic risk measure approach. J Bank Finance 32:1991–2005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jobert L, Rogers LCG (2008) Valuations and dynamic convex risk measures. Math Finance 18:1–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kall P, Wallace S (1994) Stochastic programming. Wiley, Chichester

    Google Scholar 

  • Koopmans TC (1960) Stationary ordinal utility and impatience. Econometrica 28:287–309

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacevic R, Pflug GC (2009) Time consistency and information monotonicity of multiperiod acceptability functionals. Radon Ser Comput Appl Math 8:347–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Kreps MK, Porteus EL (1978) Temporal resolution of uncertainty and dynamic choice theory. Econometrica 46:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li D, Ng WL (2000) Optimal dynamic portfolio selection: multi-period mean-variance formulation. Math Finance 10:387–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Matthias U (2000) Lower partial moments as measures of perceived risk: an experimental study. J Econ Psychol 21(3):253–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan JP (1995) Risk metrics-technical document, 3rd edn. Guaranty Trust, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Pflug GC, Römisch W (2007) Modeling, measuring and managing risk. World Scientific, Singapore

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Riedel F (2004) Dynamic coherent risk measures. Stoch Process Appl 112:185–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rockafellar RT, Uryasev S (2000) Optimization of conditional value-at-risk. J Risk 2:493–517

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roorda B, Schumacher JM, Engwerda JC (2005) Coherent acceptability measures in multiperiod models. Math Finance 15:589–612

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruszczyński A (2010) Risk-averse dynamic programming for markov decision processes. Math Program 125:235–261

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A, Dentcheva D, Ruszczyński A (2009) Lectures on stochastic programming: modeling and theory. SIAM, Philadelphia

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A (2009) On a time consistency concept in risk averse multistage stochastic programming. Oper Res Lett 37:143–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shapiro A, Ahmed S (2004) On a class of minimax stochastic programs. SIAM J Optim 14:1237–1249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang T (1999) A class of dynamic risk measure. Working paper, University of British Columbia. http://web.cenet.org.cn/upfile/57263

  • Wang J, Forsyth PA (2011) Continuous time mean variance asset allocation: a time-consistent strategy. Eur J Oper Res 209:184–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu DB, Chen ZP, Yang L (2012) Scenario tree generation approaches using K-means and LP moment matching methods. J Comput Appl Math 236:4561–4579

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors are grateful to two anonymous reviewers and the editor-in-chief for their constructive comments, which have helped us to improve the paper significantly. This research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant Numbers 70971109, 71371152 and 11571270).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Zhiping Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Chen, Z., Liu, J., Li, G. et al. Composite time-consistent multi-period risk measure and its application in optimal portfolio selection. TOP 24, 515–540 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-015-0407-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11750-015-0407-7

Keywords

Mathematics Subject Classification

Navigation