Abstract
Urbanization can affect the physical process of river growth, modify stream structure and further influence the functions of river system. Shanghai is one of the largest cities in the world, which is located in Changjiang (Yangtze) River Delta in China. Since the 1970s, the whole river system in Shanghai has been planned and managed by the Shanghai Water Authority. The primary management objectives in the last 30 years have been to enhance irrigation and flood-control. By using Horton-Strahler classification and Horton laws as a reference, a novel method of stream classification, in conjunction with the traditional and specially designed indicators, was applied to understanding the structure and functions of the river system in Shanghai. Correlation analysis was used to identify the interrelations among indicators. It was found that the impact of urbanization on the river system was significant although natural laws and physical characteristics marked a super-developed river system. There was an obvious correlation between the degree of urbanization and the abnormal values of some indicators. Urbanization impacts on river system such as branches engineered out, riverbank concreting and low diversity of river style were widely observed. Each indicator had distinct sensibility to urbanization so they could be used to describe different characteristics of urban river system. The function indicators were significantly related to structure indicators. Stream structure, described by fractal dimension and complexity of river system, was as important as water area ratio for maintaining river’s multi-function.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
ALLAN J D, 1995. Stream Ecology: Structure and Function of Running Water [M]. Oxford: Chapman & Hall, 25–70.
CARLOS E P, CASTILLO P A, 1996: On the fractal structure of networks and dividers within a watershed [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 187: 173–181.
CHEN Tie, 1998. The comprehensive treatment of river system in central Beijing City [J]. Beijing Irrigation, (4): 12–16. (in Chinese)
CHEN Yan-guang, LIU Ji-sheng, 2001. Fractal dimension of stream structure—Horton’s laws model rebuilt and its coefficient analysis [J]. Advances in Earth Science, 16 (2): 178–183. (in Chinese)
FENG Ping, FENG Yan, 1997. The fractal dimension calculation in analysis river regime [J]. Acta Geographica Sinica, 52(4): 325–330. (in Chinese)
GAO Hua-duan, YANG Shi-yi, 1994. Stream structure analysis in Wujiang Basin [J]. The Journal of Guizhou Agriculture College, (1):104–114. (in Chinese)
GRAVE A, DAVY P, 1997. Scaling relationships of channel networks at large scales: examples from two large-magnitude watersheds in Brittany [J]. France Technophysics, 269(1–2): 91–111.
GU Wei-zhu, 1984. The Basis of Hydrology [M]. Changsha: China Waterpower Press, 132–143. (in Chinese)
ISIDORI M, LAVORGNA M, NARDELLI A, et al., 2004. Integrated environmental assessment of Volturno River in South Italy [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 327: 123–134.
KIRCHNER J W (Translator: WANG X H), 1994. The necessity of Horton’s laws and the random distribution of river system [J]. World Geography, 13(4): 107–111. (in Chinese)
LA BARBERA P, ROSSO R, 1989. Fractal dimension of stream networks [J]. Water Resources Research, 25(4): 735–741.
LUO Wen-feng, 1998. Horton’s laws and the description of river branching [J]. The Progress of Water Science, 9(2): 118–123. (in Chinese)
National Bureau of Statistics of China. 2003: The percentage of urbanization will go on raising [R/OL]. http://www.stats.gov.cn/tjfx/zt fx/jwxlfxbg/200205300093.htm. Oct. 15, 2003. (in Chinese)
PUENTE C E, CASTILLO P A, 1996. On the fractal structure of networks and dividers within a watershed [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 187(1–2): 173–181.
ROSSO R, BACCHI B, LA BARBERA P, 1991. Fractal relation of mainstream length to catchment area in river networks [J]. Water Resources Research, 27(3): 381–387.
ROTH G, LA BARBERA P, GRECO M, 1996. On the description of the basin effective drain structure [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 187(1–2):119–135.
SEAR D A, NEWSON M D, 2003. Environmental change in river channels: a neglected element. Towards geomorphologic typologies, standards and monitoring [J]. The Science of the Total Environment, 310: 17–23.
SURIAN N, RINALDI M, 2003. Morphological response to river engineering and management in alluvial channel in Italy [J]. Geomorphology, 50: 307–326.
TARBOTON D G, 1996. Fractal river networks, Horton’s laws and Tokunaga cyclicity [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 187 (1–2): 105–117.
VELTRI M, VELTR P, MAIOLA M, 1996. On the fractal description of natural channel networks [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 187(1–2): 137–144.
WANG Fu-quan, 2002. The fractal description and self-organization of river system and its physical mechanism [J]. Progress in Water Science, 13(3): 368–376. (in Chinese)
WANG Song-nian, RUAN Ben-liang, 2001. Shanghai Water Resources Survey Report [M]. Shanghai: Shanghai Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese)
XU Xin, ZHANG Hu, 2001. River system treatment in the process of urban construction [J]. People’s Zhu River, (1): 11–12. (in Chinese)
ZANDBERGEN A, 1998. Urban watershed ecological risk assessment using GIS: a case study of the Burnette River watershed in British Columbia, Canada [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials, 61:163–173.
ZHOU Jia-wei, 1997. Stream structure analysis in Beipan river basin [J]. Guizhou Forest Technology, 25(1): 42–49. (in Chinese)
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40471019) and Shanghai Shu Guang Scholar Scheme (No. 03SG22)
Biography: YUAN Wen (1965—), female, a native of Changzhou of Jiangsu Province, Ph.D., professor, specialized in regional environmental change and urban hydrology. E-mail: wyuan@admin.ecnu.edu.cn
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Yuan, W., Philip, J. & Yang, K. Impact of urbanization on structure and function of river system. Chin. Geograph.Sc. 16, 102–108 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-006-0002-9
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-006-0002-9