Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic assessment on regional eco-environmental quality using AHP-statistics model —A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An indicator system closely connected with eco-environment, in which indicator involves in such fields as society, economy, resources, environment and ecology, is first proposed for eco-environmental quality assessment. Then, a hierarchical model with four levels is established by virtue of these indicators and attributes. In the model, weights of indicators and attributes are determined by combining Delphi method with the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) and a statistic method is used to eliminate the influences arising from the differences in dimension and magnitude of indicators. On these grounds, an AHP-statistics model is provided for regional eco-environmental quality assessment. As a case, such AHP-statistics model is utilized in the dynamic analysis of regional eco-environmental assessment in Chaohu Lake basin. Study results show that natural environmental quality in the watershed was in the declining state while social environmental quality was in a markedly improved situation from 1996, and the synthetic eco-environmental quality was gradually and slowly improved under the common influences of both natural and social environmental factors. Example of application testified the capacities of above methodology to evaluate the real and dynamic state of regional eco-environmental quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Chen Chentung, 2000. Extension of the TOPSIS for group decision-making under fuzzy environment. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 114(1): 1–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ernest F, Kirti P, 1998. Aggregating individual judgments and priorities with the Analytic Hierarchy Process. European Journal of Operational Research, 108(2): 165–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hsu Hismei, Chen Chentung, 1996. Aggregation of fuzzy opinions under group decision-making. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 79(3): 279–285.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuo Naewen, Chiu Yuting, 2006. The assessment of agritourism policy based on SEA combination with HIA. Land Use Policy, 23(4): 560–570.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laura W, Thomas K, Claudia R B, 2006. Virtual land use and agricultural trade: Estimating environmental and socio-economic impacts. Ecological Economics, 57(4): 679–697.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee Hueyming, 1996. Group decision making using fuzzy sets theory for evaluating the rate of aggregative risk in software development. Fuzzy Sets and Systems, 80(3): 261–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Ruzhong, 2006a. Multi-agent blind model and its application to regional eco-environmental quality assessment. Chinese Geographical Science, 16(3): 249–254. DOI: 10.1007/s11769-006-0249-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Ruzhong, 2006b. Regional eco-environmental quality assessment based on fuzzy matter-element analysis. Journal of Hefei University of Technology (Natural Science), 29(5): 597–601. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Li Xiangmei, Min Min, Tan Chuanfeng, 2005. The functional assessment of agricultural ecosystems in Hubei Province, China. Ecological Modelling, 187(2–3): 352–360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ma Suting, Tang Jie, Yang Yuwu, 2002. The quantitative assessment and database building on fragile eco-environment. Research of Environmental Sciences, 15(4): 46–49. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mario Enea, Giuseppe Salemi, 2001. Fuzzy approach to the environmental impact evaluation. Ecological Modelling, 135: 131–147.

    Google Scholar 

  • Olcer A I, Odabasi A Y, 2005. A new fuzzy multiple attributive group decision making methodology and its application to propulsion/manoeuvring system selection problem. European Journal of Operational Research, 166(1): 93–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rainer W, 2000. Development of environmental indicator systems: experiences from Germany. Environmental Management, 25(6): 613–623.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rita C V, Andrea G, 2006. Integrated indicators in environmental planning: Methodological considerations and applications. Ecological Indicators, 6(1): 228–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Robert A Z, John F B, Kim J L et al., 2006. Using multiple indicators to evaluate the ecological integrity of a coastal plain stream system. Ecological Indicators, 6(4): 644–663.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T L, 1980. The Analytic Hierarchy Process. New York: McGraw-Hill Book Companies.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tian Jin, Xiang Jingtian, Li Baohui et al., 2001. Forecast and Control of Non-linear Systems about Economics, Environment and Others. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang Haiyan, 2002. Assessment and prediction of overall environmental quality of Zhuzhou City, Hunan Province, China. Journal of Environmental Management, 66(1): 329–340.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Huajun, Liu Nianfeng, He Jun et al., 2006. Comprehensive assessment of ecology environment by matter element analysis. Journal of Huazhong University of Science and Technology (Urban Science Edition), 23(1): 52–55. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu Kaiya, Hu Shuheng, Sun Shiqun, 2005. Application of fuzzy optimization model in ecological security pre-warning. Chinese Geographical Science, 15(1): 29–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu Kaiya, Li Ruzhong, Sun Shiqun et al., 2004. Unascertained measure model for regional eco-environmental quality evaluation and its application. Research of Environmental Sciences, 17(2): 22–25. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yan, Yang Zhifeng, Yu Xiangyi, 2006. Measurement and evaluation of interactions in complex urban ecosystem. Ecological Modelling, 196(1–2): 77–89.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zheng Xinqi, Wang Aiping, 2000. Study on the intergrated assessment of regional ecological environmental quality based on RS& GIS for Shandong Province. Acta Scientiae Circumstantiae, 20(4): 489–493. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Zhu Qingfang, Wu Hanguang, 2001. Indicator Systems in Society. Beijing: China Social Science Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Li Ruzhong.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of Tackling Key Program for Science and Technology of Anhui Province (No. 07010302165) and Natural Science Foundation of Anhui Province (No. 050450303)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, R. Dynamic assessment on regional eco-environmental quality using AHP-statistics model —A case study of Chaohu Lake Basin. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 17, 341–348 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-007-0341-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-007-0341-1

Keywords

Navigation