Abstract
The planted forest area and carbon sequestration have increased significantly in China, because of large-scale reforestation and afforestation in the past decades. In this study, we developed an age-based volume-to-biomass method to estimate the carbon storage by planted forests in China in the period of 1973–2003 based on the data from 1209 field plots and national forest inventories. The results show that the total carbon storage of planted forests was 0.7743 Pg C in 1999–2003, increased by 3.08 times since the early 1970s. The carbon density of planted forests varied from 10.6594 Mg/ha to 23.9760 Mg/ha and increased by 13.3166 Mg/ha from 1973–1976 to 1999–2003. Since the early 1970s, the planted forests in China have been always a carbon sink, and the annual rate of carbon sequestration was 0.0217 Pg C/yr. The carbon storage and densities of planted forests varied greatly in space and time. The carbon storage of Middle South China was in the lead in all regions, which accounted for 23%–36% of national carbon storage. While higher C densities (from 17.79 Mg/ha to 26.05 Mg/ha) were usually found in Northeast China. The planted forests in China potentially have a high carbon sequestration since a large part of them are becoming mature and afforestation continues to grow.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allan T, Lanly J P, 1991. Overview of status and trends of world forests. In: Howlett D et al. (eds.). Technical Workshop to Explore Options for Global Forestry Management. London: International Institute for Environment and Development, 17–39.
Brown S, Lugo A E, 1984. Biomass of tropical forests: A new estimate based on forest volumes. Science, 223(4642): 1290–1293. DOI: 10.1126/science.223.4642.1290
Brown S, Gillespie A J R, Lugo A E, 1989. Biomass estimation methods for tropical forests with applications to forest inventory data. Forest Science, 35(4): 881–902.
Brown S, Schroeder P, Birdsey R, 1997. Aboveground biomass distribution of US eastern hardwood forests and the use of large trees as an indicator of forest development. Forest Ecology and Management, 96(1–2): 37–47. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(97)00044-3
Brown S L, Schroeder P E, 1999a. Spatial patterns of aboveground production and mortality of wood biomass for eastern U.S. Forests Ecological Applications, 9(3): 968–980. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(1999)009[0968:SPOAPA]2.0.CO;2
Brown S L, Schroeder P Kern J F, 1999b. Spatial distribution of biomass in forests of the eastern USA. Forest Ecology and Management, 123(1): 81–90. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(99) 00017-1
CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1977. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1973–1976). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)
CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1982. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1977–1981). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)
CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1989. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1984–1988). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)
CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 1994. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1989–1993). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)
CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 2000. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1994–1998). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)
CMF (Chinese Ministry of Forestry), 2005. Forest Resource Statistics of China (1999–2003). Beijing: Chinese Forestry Publishers. (in Chinese)
Dixon R K, Brown S, Houghton T A et al., 1994. Carbon pools and flux of global forest ecosystems. Science, 263(5144): 185–190. DOI: 10.1126/science.263.5144.185
Erkki Tomppo, 2000. National forest inventory of Finland and its role estimating the carbon balance of forests. Biotechnology Agronomy Society and Environment, 4(4): 281–284.
Fang J, Wang G, Liu G et al., 1998. Forest biomass of China: An estimate based on the biomass-volume relationship. Ecological Applications, 8(4): 1084–1091. DOI: 10.1890/10-51-0761(1998) 008[1084:FBOCAE]2.0.CO;2
Fang J Y, Chen A P, Peng C H et al., 2001. Changes in forest biomass carbon storage in China between 1949 and 1998. Science, 292(5525): 2320–2322. DOI: 10.1126/science.1058-629
Fang Jingyun, Liu Guohua, Xu Songling, 1996. Biomass and net production of forest vegetation in China. ACTA Ecologica Sinica, 16(5): 497–508. (in Chinese)
Goodale C L, Apps M J, Birdsey R A et al., 2002. Forest carbon sinks in the Northern Hemisphere. Ecological Applications, 12(3): 891–899. DOI: 10.1890/1051-0761(2002)012[0891: FCSITN]2.0.CO; 2
Helene A de Wit, Taru Palosuo, Gro Hylen et al., 2006. A carbon budget of forest biomass and soils in southeast Norway calculated using a widely applicable method. Forest Ecology and Management, 225(1–3): 15–26. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2005. 12.023
Houghton R A, Hackler J L, Lawrence K T, 1999. The US carbon budget: Contributions from land-use change. Science 285(5427): 574–578. DOI: 10.1126/science.285.5427.574
Kauppi P E, Mielikäinen K, Kuusela K, 1992. Biomass and carbon budget of European forests 1971–1990. Science, 256(5053): 70–74. DOI: 10.1126/science.256.5053.70
Lehtonena A, Makipaa R, Heikkinenb J et al., 2004. Biomass expansion factors (BEFs) for Scots pine, Norway spruce and birch according to stand age for boreal forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 188(1–3): 211–224. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco. 2003.07.008
Liu Guohua, Fu Bojie, Fang Jingyun, 2000. Carbon dynamics of Chinese forests and its contribution to global carbon balance. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 20(5): 733–740. (in Chinese)
Liu Jiyuan, 1996. A Macro Inventory of China’s Environments and Resources and Their Dynamics. Beijing: China Science and Technology Press. (in Chinese)
Luo Tianxiang, 1996. The Distribution Patterns and Modeling of Biomass and Net Primary Production in China Main Forests. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)
Neth Top, Nobuya Mizoue, Shigetaka Kai, 2004. Estimating forest biomass increment based on permanent sample plots in relation to woodfuel consumption: A case study in Kampong Thom Province, Cambodia. Journal of Forest Research, 9(2): 117–123. DOI: 10.1007/s10310-003-0064-9
Ni Jian, 2003. Net primary productivity in forests of China: Scaling-up of national inventory data and comparison with model predictions. Forest Ecology and Management, 176(1–3): 485–495. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00312-2
Ni Jian, Zhang Xinshi, Scurlockc J M O, 2001. Synthesis and analysis of biomass and net primary productivity in Chinese forests. Annals of Forest Science, 58: 351–384. DOI: 10.10-51/forest: 2001131
Pan Y, Luo T, Birdsey R et al., 2004. New estimates of carbon storage and sequestration in China’s forests: Effects of age-class and method on inventory-based carbon estimation. Climatic Change, 67(2–3): 211–236. DOI: 10.1007/s10584-004-2799-5
Schroeder P, Brown S, Mo J et al., 1997. Biomass estimation for temperate broadleaf forests of the United States using inventory data. Forest Science, 43(3): 424–434.
Schulze E D, Wirth C, Heimann M, 2000. Climate change: Managing forests after Kyoto. Science, 289(5487): 2058–2059. DOI: 10.1126/science.289.5487.2058
Shi Jun, 2005. Study on the effect of afforestation on carbon cycle in Chinese terrestrial ecosystem. Beijing: Chinese Academy of Sciences. (in Chinese)
Winjum Jack K, Paul E Schroeder, 1997. Forest plantations of the world: Their extent, ecological attributes, and carbon storage. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 84(1–2): 153–167. DOI: 10.1016/S0168-1923(96)02383-0
WRI (World Resources Institute), 1992. World Resources 1992–93. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Zhang P C, Shao G. F, Zhao G et al., 2000. China’s forest policy for the 21st century. Science, 288(5474): 2135–2136. DOI: 10.1126/science.288.5474.2135
Zhang X Q, Xu D, 2003. Potential carbon sequestration in China’s forests. Environmental Science & Policy, 6(5): 421–432. DOI: 10.1016/S1462-9011(03)00072-8
Zhao M, Zhou G, 2005. Estimation of biomass and net primary productivity of major planted forests in China based on forest inventory data. Forest Ecology and Management, 207(3): 295–313. DOI: 10.1016/j.foreco.2004.10.049
Zhou G, Wang Y, Jiang Y et al., 2002. Estimating biomass and net primary production from forest inventory data—A case study of China’s Larix forests. Forest Ecology and Management, 169(1–2): 149–157. DOI: 10.1016/S0378-1127(02)00-305-5
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40601079), National Key Project of Scientific and Technical Supporting Programs (No. 2006BAC08B03, 2008BAC34B06)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Xu, X., Li, K. Biomass carbon sequestration by planted forests in China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 20, 289–297 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0401-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-010-0401-9