Skip to main content
Log in

Application of land-use change model in guiding regional planning: A case study in Hun-Taizi River Watershed, Northeast China

  • Published:
Chinese Geographical Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper firstly investigated the land-use and land-cover change (LUCC) in the Hun-Taizi River watershed, Northeast China from 1988 to 2004 based on remotely sensed images and geographic information systems (GIS) technology. Then, using the famous land-use change model of Conversion of Land Use and its Effects at Small regional extent (CLUE-S), this paper simulated the land use changes under historical trend (HT), urban planning (UP) and ecological protection (EP) scenarios considering urban planning and ecological protection over the next 20 years. The simulated results under UP scenario in 2020 were compared with the planning map to assess the feasibility of using land-use change model to guide regional planning. Results show that forest land, dry farmland, paddy, and shrub land were the main land-use categories. Paddy and dry farmland being converted to urban area and rural settlement characterized the land-use change from 1988 to 2004. The main land-use categories changed over time. Landscape-pattern fragmentation will be worse under HT and UP scenarios, but better in EP scenario. The comparing results of simulated map with planning map in 2020 show that land-use change model is powerful tool to guide regional planning. Land-use scenarios can support regional planning and policy-making through analyzing future consequences scientifically.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Brookes C J, 2001. A genetic algorithm for designing optimal patch configurations in GIS. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 15(6): 539–559. doi: 10.1080/ 136588101316907227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Castella J C, Verburg P H, 2007. Combination of process-oriented and pattern oriented models of land-use change in a mountain area of Vietnam. Ecological Modelling, 202(3): 410–420. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolmodel.2006.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Congalton R G, 1991. A review of assessing the accuracy of classifications of remotely sensed data. Remote Sensing of Environment, 37(1): 35–46. doi: 10.1016/0034-4257(91)90048-B

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Costanza R, Ruth M, 1998. Using dynamic modeling to scope environmental problems and build consensus. Environmental Management, 22(2): 183–195. doi: 10.1007/s002679900095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ehlers M, Jadkowski M A, Howard R R et al., 1990. Application of SPOT data for regional growth analysis and local planning. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 56(2): 175–180.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forman R T T, 1995. Land Mosaic: The Ecology of Landscape and Region. New York: Cambridge University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Geist H J, Lambin E F, 2002. Proximate causes and underlying driving forces of tropical deforestation. Bioscience, 52(2): 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harris P M, Ventura S J, 1995. The integration of geographic data with remotely sensed imagery to improve classification in an urban area. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 61(8): 993–998.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hietel E, Waldhardt R, Otte A, 2004. Analyzing land-cover changes in relation to environmental variables in Hesse, Germany. Landscape Ecology, 19(5): 473–489. doi: 10.1023/B: LAND.0000036138.82213.80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Koomen E, Stillwell J, 2007. Modelling land-use change. In: Koomen E et al. (eds.). Modeling Land-use Change: Progress and Applications. Dordrecht, Netherlands: Springer. doi: 10.1007/s00168-007-0155-1

    Google Scholar 

  • Lambin E F, Turner B L, Geist H J et al., 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change-Human and Policy Dimensions, 11(4): 261–269. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780(01)00007-3

    Google Scholar 

  • Leitäo A B, Miller J, Ahern J et al., 2006. Measuring Landscapes: A Planner’s Handbook. Washington DC: Island Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesschen J P, Kok K, Verburg P H et al., 2007. Identification of vulnerable areas for gully erosion under different scenarios of land abandonment in Southeast Spain. Catena, 71(1): 110–121.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liaoning Statistical Bureau, 1988. 1988 Liaoning Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaoning Statistical Bureau, 1997. 1997 Liaoning Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Liaoning Statistical Bureau, 2004. 2004 Liaoning Statistical Yearbook. Beijing: China Statistics Press. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin Y P, Hong N M, Wu P J et al., 2007. Modeling and assessing land-use and hydrological processes to future land-use and climate change scenarios in watershed land-use planning. Environmental Geology, 53(3): 623–634. doi: 10.1007/s00254-007-0677-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu Miao, Hu YuanMan, Chang Yu et al., 2009. Analysis of temporal predicting abilities for the CLUE-S land use model. Acta Ecologica Sinica, 29(11): 6110–6119. (in Chinese).

    Google Scholar 

  • Lovett G M, Jones C G, Turner M G et al., 2005. Ecosystem Function in Heterogeneous Landscapes. NewYork: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Lu Rucheng, Huang Xianjin, Zuo Tian-hui et al., 2009. Land use scenarios simulation based on CLUE-S and Markov Composite Model-A case study of Taihu Lake Rim in Jiangsu Province. Scientia Geographica Sinica, 29(4): 577–581. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mcgarigal K, Marks B J, 1995. Fragstats: Spatial pattern analysis program for quantifying landscape structure. Gen. Tech. Re PNW-GTR-351. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Pacific Northwest Research Station, Portland, OR, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Overmars K P, Verburg P H, Veldkamp T, 2007. Comparison of a deductive and an inductive approach to specify land suitability in a spatially explicit land use model. Land Use Policy, 24(3): 584–599.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pontius J, 2000. Quantification error versus location error in comparison of categorical maps. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 66(8): 1011–1016.

    Google Scholar 

  • Treitz P M, Howard P, Gong P, 1992. Application of satellite and GIS technologies for land-cover and land-use mapping at the rural-urban fringe: A case study. Photogrammetric Engineering and Remote Sensing, 58(4): 439–448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Turner M G, Gardner R H, O’Neill R V, 2001. Landscape Ecology in Theory and Practice: Pattern and Process. New York: Springer-Verlag.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Fresco L O, 1996a. CLUE: A conceptual model to study the conversion of land use and its effects. Ecological Modelling, 85(2): 253–270. doi: 10.1016/0304-3800(94)00151-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Fresco L O, 1996b. CLUE-CR: An integrated multi-scale model to simulate land use change scenarios in Costa Rica. Ecological Modelling, 91(1): 231–248. doi: 10.1016/ 0304-3800(95)00158-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Veldkamp A, Vogel C, Xu J C, 2001. The causes of land-use and land-cover change: Moving beyond the myths. Global Environmental Change, 11(4): 261–269. doi: 10.1016/S0959-3780 (01)00007-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Overmars K P, Huigen M G A et al., 2006. Analysis of the effects of land use change on protected areas in the Philippines. Applied Geography, 26(2): 153–173. doi: 10.1016/j. apgeog.2005.11.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Schot P, Dijst M et al., 2004. Land use change modelling: Current practice and research priorities. GeoJournal, 61(4): 309–324. doi: 10.1007/s10708-004-4946-y

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Soepboer W, Limpiada R et al., 2002. Land use change modelling at the regional scale: The CLUE-S model. Environmental Management, 30(3): 391–405. doi: 10.1007/s00267-002-2630-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verburg P H, Veldkamp A, 2004. Projecting land use transitions at forest fringes in the Philippines at two spatial scales. Landscape Ecology, 19(1): 77–98. doi: 10.1023/B:LAND.0000018370. 57457.58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu Xia, Liu Haipeng, Gao Qiong, 2008. Dynamic simulation on the optimal patterns of land use change for the farming-pastoral zone in North China. Progress in Geography, 27(3): 80–85. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  • Yeh A G O, Li X, 1999. Economic development and agricultural land loss in the Pearl River Delta, China. Habitat International, 23(3): 373–390. doi: 10.1016/S0197-3975(99)00013-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang Yongmin, Zhao Shidong, Zhang Kebin, 2003. Simulation of changes in spatial pattern of land use in Horqin desert and its outer area. Journal of Beijing Forestry University, 25(3): 68–73. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miao Liu.

Additional information

Foundation item: Under the auspices of National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 40801069), Special Research Program for Public-welfare Forestry of China (No. 200804001)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Liu, M., Hu, Y., Zhang, W. et al. Application of land-use change model in guiding regional planning: A case study in Hun-Taizi River Watershed, Northeast China. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 21, 609–618 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0497-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-011-0497-6

Keywords

Navigation