Skip to main content
Log in

A novel particle swarm optimizer without velocity: Simplex-PSO

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University of Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simplex particle swarm optimization (simplex-PSO) derived from the Nelder-Mead simplex method was proposed to optimize the high dimensionality functions. In simplex-PSO, the velocity term was abandoned and its reference objectives were the best particle and the centroid of all particles except the best particle. The convergence theorems of linear time-varying discrete system proved that simplex-PSO is of consistent asymptotic convergence. In order to reduce the probability of trapping into a local optimal value, an extremum mutation was introduced into simplex-PSO and simplex-PSO-t (simplex-PSO with turbulence) was devised. Several experiments were carried out to verify the validity of simplex-PSO and simplex-PSO-t, and the experimental results confirmed the conclusions: (1) simplex-PSO-t can optimize high-dimension functions with 200-dimensionality; (2) compared PSO with chaos PSO (CPSO), the best optimum index increases by a factor of 1×102–1×104.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. CLERC M. Stagnation analysis in particle swarm optimizer [R]. Colchester: Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  2. CLERC M, KENNEDY M. The particle swarm-explosion, stability, and convergence in multidimensional complex space [J]. IEEE Transaction on Evolutionary Computation, 2002, 6(1): 58–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. LANGDON W B. Kernel methods for PSOs [R]. Colchester: Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  4. ROBERTO B, MAURO B, SRINIVAS P. Do not be afraid of local minima [R]. Trento: Department of Information and Communication Technology, University of Trento, 2005.

    Google Scholar 

  5. AUGER A, HANSEN N. A restart CMA evolution strategy with increasing population size [C]// CORNE D, MICHALEWICZ Z, MCKAY B, FOGEL D. Proceeding of the 2005 IEEE Congress on Evolutionary Computation. Edinburgh: IEEE Press, 2005: 1769–1775.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  6. E Gang-qiang, XUN Shi-yu. Particle swarm optimization based on dynamic population size [J]. Information and Control, 2008, 37(1): 18–27. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  7. LI Ting, LAI Xu-zhi, WU Min. A novel two-swarm based particle swarm optimization algorithm for optimal power flow problem [J]. Journal of Central South University: Science and Technology, 2007, 38(1): 133–137. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  8. LIU Hong-bo, WANG Xiu-kun, TAN Guo-zhen. Convergence analysis of particle swarm optimization and improvement of chaotic [J]. Control and Decision, 2006, 21(6): 636–640. (in Chinese)

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  9. LANGDON W B, RICCARDO P. Evolving problems to learn about particle swarm and other optimizers [C]// EDINBURGH. Proceedings of the 2005 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference for ACM SIGEVO (GECCO2005). New York: ACM Press, 2005: 81–88.

    Google Scholar 

  10. LIU Bo, WANG Ling, JIN Yi-hui, TANG Fang, HUANG De-xian. Improved particles swarm optimization combined with chaos [J]. Chaos, Solitons and Fractals, 2005, 25(5): 1261–1271.

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. LEE H P, LIANG Y C. An improved GA and a novel PSO-GA-based hybrid algorithm [J]. Information Processing Letters, 2005, 93(5): 255–261.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. GUANG Qiang-li, ZHAO Feng-qiang. Parallel hybrid PSO-GA algorithm and its application to layout design [J]. Structural and Multidisciplinary Optimization, 2006, 33(5): 749–758.

    Google Scholar 

  13. GEORGE A D, HAFTKA R T. Parallel asynchronous particle swarm optimization [J]. International Journal for Numerical Method in Engineering, 2006, 67(5): 578–595.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  14. SCHUFFE J F, REINBOLT J A. Parallel global optimization with particle swarm algorithm [J]. International Journal of Numerical Methods in Engineering, 2004, 61(13): 2296–2315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. KENNEDY J, EBERHART R C. Bare bones particle swarms [J]. Evolution Computation, 2003, 12(6): 258–265.

    Google Scholar 

  16. CHRISTOPHER K, KEVIN D. The Kalman swarm: A new approach to particle motion in swarm optimization [C]// SAHNI S. Proceedings of the third IASTED International Conference Advances in Computer Science and Technology. Calgary: ACTA Press, 2007: 606–614.

    Google Scholar 

  17. HU Wang, LI Zhi-shu. A simpler and more effective particle swarm optimization [J]. Journal of Software, 2007, 18(4): 861–868. (in Chinese)

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  18. NELDER J A, MEAD R. A simplex method for function minimum [J]. Computer Journal, 1965, 7(2): 308–313.

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. HELIO J C, CARLILE C L. A GA-simplex hybrid algorithm for global minimization of molecular potential energy functions [J]. Annals of Operation Research, 2005, 38(1): 189–202.

    Google Scholar 

  20. WANG Fang, QIU Yu-hui. A novel particle swarm algorithm using simplex method [J]. Information and Control, 2005, 34(1): 9–14. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  21. XIAO Yang. Analysis of dynamical systems [M]. Beijing City: Beifang Jiaotong University Press, 2002: 64–73. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  22. YEN J, LIAO J C, BOGJU G. A hybrid approach to modeling metabolic systems using a genetic algorithm and simplex method [J]. Parallel Computing, 2002, 28(2): 173–191.

    Google Scholar 

  23. MAHFOUF M, LINKENS D A. Adaptive weighted swarm optimization for multiobjective optimal design of alloy steels [R]. Colchester: Department of Computer Science, University of Essex, 2006.

    Google Scholar 

  24. CHEN Wei, SHI Shang-jang. The development of information guided evolution algorithm for global optimization [J]. Journal of Global Optimization, 2006, 36(4): 517–535.

    Article  MATH  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  25. JASON T, NOR R M. Hybridizing adaptive and non-adaptive mutation for cooperative exploration of complex multimodal search space [C]// SAHNI S. Proceedings of the third IASTED International Conference Advances in Computer Science and Technology. Calgary: ACTA Press, 2007: 476–498.

    Google Scholar 

  26. ZHANG Guo-li, LU Hai-yan. Hybrid real-coded genetic algorithm with quasic-simplex technology [J]. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 2006, 6(10): 246–256.

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  27. DEB K, ANAND A, JOSHI D. A computationally efficient evolutionary algorithm for real-parameter evolution [J]. Evolutionary Computation, 2005, 13(4): 371–395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. DEB K, SINDHYA K, OKABE T. Self-adaptive simulated binary crossover for real-parameter optimization [C]// Proceedings of the 2007 Genetic and Evolutionary Computation Conference for ACM SIGEVO (GECCO-2007). New York: ACM Press, 2007: 414–419.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Guan-zheng Tan  (谭冠政).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(50275150) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China; Project(20070533131) supported by Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Xiao, Hf., Tan, Gz. A novel particle swarm optimizer without velocity: Simplex-PSO. J. Cent. South Univ. Technol. 17, 349–356 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0052-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-010-0052-0

Key words

Navigation