Skip to main content
Log in

Risk-based water quality decision-making under small data using Bayesian network

  • Published:
Journal of Central South University Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A knowledge-based network for Section Yidong Bridge, Dongyang River, one tributary of Qiantang River, Zhejiang Province, China, is established in order to model water quality in areas under small data. Then, based on normal transformation of variables with routine monitoring data and normal assumption of variables without routine monitoring data, a conditional linear Gaussian Bayesian network is constructed. A “two-constraint selection” procedure is proposed to estimate potential parameter values under small data. Among all potential parameter values, the ones that are most probable are selected as the “representatives”. Finally, the risks of pollutant concentration exceeding national water quality standards are calculated and pollution reduction decisions for decision-making reference are proposed. The final results show that conditional linear Gaussian Bayesian network and “two-constraint selection” procedure are very useful in evaluating risks when there is limited data and can help managers to make sound decisions under small data.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. GANOULIS J G. Engineering risk analysis of water pollution [M]. Beijing: Tsinghua University Press, 2005: 1–10. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  2. WOTTON C L, LENCE B J. Water quality management of ammonia under uncertainty [C]// DOMENICA M F. Integrated Water Resources Planning for the 21st Century. Cambridge: American Society of Civil Engineers, 1995: 456–459.

    Google Scholar 

  3. VERNULA V R S, MUJUMDAR P P, GHOSH S. Risk evaluation in water quality management of a river system [J]. J. Water Resources Planning & Management, 2004, 130: 411–423.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. CHEN C F. MA Hwong-wen, RECKHOW K H. Assessment of water quality management with a systematic qualitative uncertainty analysis [J]. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 374: 13–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. NIE X H HUANG G H, WANG D, LI H L. Robust optimisation for inexact water quality management under uncertainty [J]. Civil Engineering and Environmental Systems, 2008, 25(2): 167–184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. RECKHOW K. Water quality prediction and probability network models [J]. Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1999, 56(7): 1150–1158.

    Google Scholar 

  7. PORTIELJE R, HVITED-JACOBSEN T, SCHAARUP-JENSEN K. Risk analysis using stochastic reliability methods applied to two cases of deterministic water quality models [J]. Water Resource, 2000, 34 (1): 153–170.

    Google Scholar 

  8. MCINTYRE N R, WAGENER T, WHEATER H S, CHAPRA S C. Risk-based modelling of surface water quality: A case study of the Charles River, Massachusetts [J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2003, 27(1/2/3/4): 225–247.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. XUE Lian-qing, WANG Jiao, HUANG Shuo, WU Chun-lin. Stochastic modelling of river water quality and risk analysis [C]// The 2nd Conference on Environmental Science and Information Application Technology. Wuhan: Institute of Electrical and Electronics Engineers, 2010: 186–190.

    Google Scholar 

  10. HU Guo-hua, XIA J. Grey-stochastic risk method for risk analysis [J]. Journal of Hydraulic Engineering, 2001 (4): 1–6. (in Chinese)

  11. HE Li, ZENG Guang-ming. Study on Grey water quality in water environment [J]. Chongqing Environmental Science, 2002, 24(1): 55–57. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  12. DARWICHE A. Modelling and reasoning with Bayesian networks [M]. New York: Cambridge UP, 2009: 20–32.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. CHARNIAK E. Bayesian networks without tears [J]. AI Magazine, 1991, 12 (4): 50–63.

    Google Scholar 

  14. HECKERMAN D, MAMDANI A, WELLMAN M P. Real world applications of Bayesian networks [J]. Communications of the ACM, 1995, 38(3): 24–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. JENSEN F V. An introduction to Bayesian networks [M]. London: UCL Press, 1996: 12–15.

    Google Scholar 

  16. NIEDERMAYER D. An introduction to Bayesian networks and their contemporary applications [C]// HOLMES D E, JAIN L C. Innovations in Bayesian Networks. Berlin: Springer, 1998: 1–12.

    Google Scholar 

  17. ZENG Yi-hui, E Jia-qiang, ZHU Hao, GONG Jin-ke. Fault diagnosis on cooling system of ship diesel engine based on Bayes network classifier [J]. Journal of Central South University of Technology: Science and Technology, 2010, 41(4): 1379–1384. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  18. BORSUK M, STOW C A, RECKHOW C H. A Bayesian network of eutrophication models for synthesis, prediction, and uncertainty analysis [J]. Ecological Modelling, 2004, 173: 219–239.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. SAID A. The implementation of a Bayesian network for watershed management decision [J]. Water Resources Management, 2006, 20: 591–605.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. HENRIKSEN H J, BARLEB H. C. Reflections on the use of Bayesian belief networks for adaptive management [J]. Journal of Environmental Management, 2007, 88(4): 1025–1036.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. POLLINO C, WOODBERRY O, NICHOLSON A, KORB K, HART B T. Parameterization and evaluation of a Bayesian network for use in an ecological risk assessment [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2007, 22: 1140–1152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. FARMANI R, HENRIKSON H C, SAVIC D. An evolutionary Bayesian belief network methodology for optimum management of groundwater contamination [J]. Environmental Modelling & Software, 2009, 24: 203–310.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. COWELL R G, LAURITZEN P, SPIEGELHALTER S L. Probabilistic networks and expert systems [M]. New York: Springer Press, 1999: 25–37.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Water Resources Department of Zhejiang Province. Partition plan of water function regions and water environmental function regions in Zhejiang Province [R]. 2005. (in Chinese)

  25. XIA Qing ZHONG Yan-qing, LIU Xian-bing Water quality benchmarks and quality standards [M]. Beijing: China Standards Publishing House, 2004: 1–13. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  26. XU Yue-ping., ZHANG Qing-qing, NIU Shao-feng, LOU Zhang-hua. Water quality analysis and assessment of the main stream of Dongyang river [J]. Shanghai Environmental Science, 2009, 28(5): 190–195. (in Chinese)

    Google Scholar 

  27. SAKIA R M. The box-cox transformation technique: A review [J]. The Statistician, 1992, 41: 169–178.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. SHACHTER R D, KENLEY C R. Gaussian influence diagrams [J]. Management Science, 1989, 35(5): 527–550.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yue-ping Xu  (许月萍).

Additional information

Foundation item: Project(50809058) supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, Qq., Xu, Yp., Tian, Y. et al. Risk-based water quality decision-making under small data using Bayesian network. J. Cent. South Univ. 19, 3215–3224 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1398-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-012-1398-2

Key k]words

Navigation