Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus

  • Review Article
  • Published:
Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The role of water security in sustainable development and in the nexus of water, food, energy and climate interactions is examined from the starting point of the definition of water security offered by Grey and Sadoff. Much about the notion of security has to do with the presumption of scarcity in the resources required to meet human needs. The treatment of scarcity in mainstream economics is in turn examined, therefore, in relation to how each of us as individuals reconciles means with ends, a procedure at the core of the idea of sustainable development. According to the Grey-Sadoff definition, attaining water security amounts to achieving basic, single-sector water development as a precursor of more general, self-sustaining, multi-sectoral development. This is consistent with the way in which water is treated as “first among equals”, i.e. privileged, in thinking about what is key in achieving security around the nexus of water, food, energy and climate. Cities, of course, are locations where demands for these multiple resource-energy flows are increasingly being generated. The paper discusses two important facets of security, i.e., diversity of access to resources and services (such as sanitation) and resilience in the behavior of coupled human-built-natural systems. Eight quasi-operational principles, by which to gauge nexus security with respect to city buildings and infrastructure, are developed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beck M B. Cities as Forces for Good in the Environment: Sustainability in the Water Sector. Athens, Georgia: Warnell School of Forestry & Natural Resources, University of Georgia, 2011 (online as http://cfgnet.org/archives/587)

    Google Scholar 

  2. Cook C, Bakker K. Water security: debating an emerging paradigm. Global Environmental Change, 2012, 22(1): 94–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Liao K H. A theory on urban resilience to floods: a basis for alternative planning practices. Ecology and Society, 2012, 17(4): 48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. WCED. Our Common Future. Oxford: World Commission on Environment and Development, Oxford University Press, 1987

    Google Scholar 

  5. Grey D, Sadoff C W. Sink or swim? Water security for growth and development. Water Policy, 2007, 9(6): 545–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Elkington J. Cannibals with Forks: the Triple Bottom Line of 21st Century Business. Stony Creek, Connecticut: New Society Publishers, 1998

    Google Scholar 

  7. WEF. Water Security: the Water-Food-Energy-Climate Nexus. World Economic Forum (WEF) Water Initiative. Washington, DC: Island Press, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R. Global water crisis: a joined-up view from the city. Surveys and Perspectives Integrating ENvironment & Society, SAPIENS [Online], 2011, 4(1). Available online at http://sapiens.revues.org/1187 (accessed December 27, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  9. Hoff H. Understanding the Nexus. Background Paper for the Bonn2011 Conference: The Water, Energy and Food Security Nexus. Stockholm: Stockholm Environment Institute, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  10. Holling C S. Resilience and stability of ecological systems. Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics, 1973, 4(1): 1–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Holling C S. Engineering resilience versus ecological resilience. In: Schulze P, ed. Engineering within Ecological Constraints. Washington, DC: National Academy Press, 1996, 31–44

    Google Scholar 

  12. Beck M B, Villarroel Walker R. Nexus security: Governance, innovation, and the resilient city. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2013, 7(5): 640–657

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Leopold A. A Sand County Almanac. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1949

    Google Scholar 

  14. Fine B. Economics and scarcity: With Amartya Sen as a point of departure? In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 73–91

    Google Scholar 

  15. Samuel S, Robert J. Water can and ought to run freely: Reflections on the notion of ‘scarcity’ in economics. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 109–126

    Google Scholar 

  16. Thompson M. A bit of the other: Why scarcity isn’t all it’s cracked up to be. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 127–142

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rayner S. Preface. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, xvii–xx

    Google Scholar 

  18. Mehta L. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  19. Mehta L. Introduction. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 1–8

    Google Scholar 

  20. Stiglitz J. Economics of the Public Sector. 3rd ed. New York: Norton & Company, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  21. Meadows D H, Meadows D L, Randers J, Behrens WW. The Limits to Growth: a Report for the Club of Rome’s Project on the Predicament of Mankind. New York: Universe Books, 1972

    Google Scholar 

  22. Thompson M, Ellis R, Wildavsky A. Cultural Theory. Boulder, Colorado: West View, 1990

    Google Scholar 

  23. Thompson M. Sustainability is an essentially contested concept. Surveys And Perspectives Integrating ENvironment & Society, SAPIENS [Online], 2011, 4(1). Available online at http://sapiens.revues.org/1177 (accessed November 23, 2011)

    Google Scholar 

  24. Thompson M. Material flows and moral positions. Insight. 2011. Cities as Forces for Good (CFG) Network, available online at http://cfgnet.org/archives/531 (accessed May 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  25. Gyawali D, Dixit A. The construction and destruction of scarcity in development: Water and power experiences in Nepal. In: Mehta L, ed. The Limits to Scarcity. Contesting the Politics of Allocation. London: Earthscan, 2010, 233–251

    Google Scholar 

  26. Beck M B, Thompson M, Ney S, Gyawali D, Jeffrey P. On governance for re-engineering city infrastructure. Proceedings of the ICE — Engineering Sustainability, 2011, 164(2): 129–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ney S. Resolving Messy Policy Problems: Handling Conflict in Environmental, Transport, Health and Ageing Policy. London: Earthscan, 2009

    Google Scholar 

  28. GWP. Towards Water Security: a Framework for Action. Stockholm: Global Water Partnership, 2000

    Google Scholar 

  29. Rijsberman F R. Water scarcity: Fact or fiction? Agricultural Water Management, 2006, 80(1–3): 5–22

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Maslow A H. A theory of human motivation. Psychological Review, 1943, 50(4): 370–396

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Douglas M, Gasper D, Ney S, Thompson M. Human needs and wants. In: Rayner S, Malone E L, eds. Human Choice and Climate Change, vol 1. Columbus, Ohio: Battelle, 1998, 195–264

    Google Scholar 

  32. Kwame D S. Domestication of excreta: a cultural theory analysis of ecosan dry toilet schemes in peri-urban Accra, Ghana. Thesis for the Master Degree. Ås, Norway: Environment and Development Studies, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, 2007

    Google Scholar 

  33. Gyawali D. Water, sanitation and human settlements: crisis, opportunity or management? Water Nepal, 2004, 11(2): 7–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Whittington D, Sadoff C W, Allaire M. The economic value of moving toward a more water secure world. TEC Background Paper No 18. Stockholm: Technical Committee (TEC), Global Water Partnership, 2013

    Google Scholar 

  35. Fishman C. The Big Thirst: the Secret Life and Turbulent Future of Water. New York: Free Press, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  36. Pearce F. When the Rivers Run Dry: The Defining Crisis of the Twenty-First Century. Boston: Beacon, 2006

    Google Scholar 

  37. Specter M. The last drop. New Yorker (New York, N.Y.), 2006, Available online at http://www.newyorker.com/archive/2006/10/23/061023fa_fact1 (accessed May 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  38. Erisman J W, Larsen T A. Nitrogen economy of the 21st century. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 45–58

    Google Scholar 

  39. Erisman J W, Sutton M A, Galloway J, Klimont Z, Winiwarter W. How a century of ammonia synthesis changed the world. Nature Geoscience, 2008, 1(10): 636–639

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Cordell D. Peak phosphorus and the role of P recovery in achieving food security. In: Larsen T A, Udert K M, Lienert J, eds. Source Separation and Decentralization for Wastewater Management. London: IWA Publishing, 2013, 22–44

    Google Scholar 

  41. Elser J, Bennett E. Phosphorus cycle: a broken biogeochemical cycle. Nature, 2011, 478(7367): 29–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Brown L R. The new geopolitics of food. Foreign Policy (May/June). 2011. Available online at http://www.foreignpolicy.com/articles/2011/04/25/the_new_geopolitics_of_food (accessed February 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  43. SIWI-IWMI. Water-More Nutrition Per Drop: Towards Sustainable Food Production and Consumption Patterns in a Rapidly Changing World. Policy Paper. Stockholm, Sweden: Stockholm International Water Institute (SIWI) and International Water Management Institute (IWMI), 2004

    Google Scholar 

  44. Dobbs R, Smit S, Remes J, Manyika J, Roxburgh C, Restrepo A. Urban world: mapping the economic power of cities. Report, McKinsey Global Institute. 2011. Available online at http://www.mckinsey.com/insights/mgi/research/urbanization/urban_world (accessed February 6, 2013)

    Google Scholar 

  45. Glaeser E. Triumph of the City. How Our Greatest Invention Makes Us Richer, Smarter, Greener, Healthier, and Happier. New York: Penguin, 2011

    Google Scholar 

  46. Barles S. Feeding the city: food consumption and flow of nitrogen, Paris, 1801-1914. Science of the Total Environment, 2007, 375(1–3): 48–58

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Barles S. Urban metabolism and river systems: an historical perspective — Paris and the Seine, 1790–1970. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences Discussions, 2007, 4(3): 1845–1878

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Barles S. Society, energy and materials: the contribution of urban metabolism studies to sustainable urban development issues. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 2010, 53(4): 439–455

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Wolman A. The metabolism of cities. Scientific American, 1965, 213(3): 179–190

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B. Understanding the metabolism of urban-rural ecosystems: a multi-sectoral systems analysis. Urban Ecosystems, 2012, 15(4): 809–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Villarroel Walker R, Beck M B, Hall JW. Water—and nutrient and energy — systems in urbanizing watersheds. Frontiers of Environmental Science & Engineering, 2012, 6(5): 596–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Beck M B, Jiang F, Shi F, Villarroel Walker R, Osidele O O, Lin Z, Demir I, Hall J W. Re-engineering cities as forces for good in the environment. Proceedings of the ICE-Engineering Sustainability, 2010, 163(1): 31–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Purnell P, Dawson D, Roelich K, Steinberger J, Busch J. Critical materials for low-carbon infrastructure: The analysis of local vs global properties. In: Dawson R J, Walsh C L, Kilsby C G, eds. Earth Systems Engineering 2012: a Technical Symposium on Systems Engineering for Sustainable Adaptation to Global Change. Newcastle upon Tyne, UK: Centre for Earth Systems Engineering Research, Newcastle University, 2012, 127–140

    Google Scholar 

  54. Villarroel Walker R. Sustainability beyond eco-efficiency: a multisectoral systems analysis of water, nutrients, and energy. Dissertation for the Doctoral Degree. Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia, 2010

    Google Scholar 

  55. McDonough W, Braungart M. Cradle to Cradle: Remaking the Way We Make Things. New York: North Point Press, 2002

    Google Scholar 

  56. Moddemeyer S. Understanding the nature of change: Building resilience into urban life. Water21, 2012, August: 14–18

  57. Peterson G, Allen C R, Holling C S. Ecological resilience, biodiversity, and scale. Ecosystems (New York, N.Y.), 1998, 1(1): 6–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  58. Thompson M. Man and nature as a single but complex system. In: Timmerman P, ed. Encyclopedia of Global Environmental Change, vol 5. Chichester, UK: Wiley, 2002, 384–393

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Warnell School of Forestry and Natural Resources, University of Georgia, Athens, GA, 30602-2152, USA

    Michael Bruce Beck & Rodrigo Villarroel Walker

Authors
  1. Michael Bruce Beck
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Rodrigo Villarroel Walker
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michael Bruce Beck.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Beck, M.B., Villarroel Walker, R. On water security, sustainability, and the water-food-energy-climate nexus. Front. Environ. Sci. Eng. 7, 626–639 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0548-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11783-013-0548-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation