Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Measurement of liquid film thickness in air — water two phase flows in conventional and mini channels using image processing

  • Transport Phenomena
  • Published:
Korean Journal of Chemical Engineering Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The measurement and study of liquid films in the case of two phase flows is significant in many heat transfer and mass transfer applications, such as chemical process industries, micro reactors, coating processes and in boilers. The focus of the present study was to measure and characterize the thickness of the liquid films for various two phase flow regimes in conventional and in mini channels using a non-intrusive technique. Experiments were performed on tubes of diameters 0.6, 1.5, 2.6 and 3.4mm. The superficial velocities of gas and liquid are in the range of 0.01–50 and 0.01–3m/s, respectively. The flow patterns were recorded with a high speed camera. A method to determine the two phase flow velocity using image registration has been discussed. Morphological processing and gray scale analysis were used to determine the liquid film thickness and characterize the flow regimes. The flow patterns identified are bubbly, dispersed bubbly, slug, slug-annular, wavy-annular, stratified, and annular. The flow regimes were validated with flow maps available in the literature. The liquid film thickness was identified by distance transform technique in image processing. The magnitude of film thickness varied with liquid and gas flow velocities. The film thickness was represented in terms of capillary number. The variation in film thickness along the length of the flow regime has been discussed. A relation between the liquid film thicknesses measured using the non-intrusive image processing technique and capillary number for the conventional and mini tubes is proposed based on the analysis.

$$\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{h} {d} = 2.03Ca^{0.13} We^{0.52} for Bo > 1} \\ {\frac{h} {d} = 1.08Ca^{0.4} We^{0.35} for Bo < 1} \\ \end{array} $$

It is concluded from the proposed correlation that the variation in liquid film thickness is different for conventional and mini channels because of the effect of inertial dominance in conventional channels and viscous dominance in mini channels.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. J. A. Howard, P. A. Walsh and E. J. Walsh, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 54, 4752 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. C. A. Damianides and J.W. Westwater, in Proc. Second UK National Conf. on Heat Transfer, Mechanical Engineering Publications, London (1988).

    Google Scholar 

  3. J.W. Coleman and S. Garimella, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 42, 2881 (1999).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. S. G. Kandlikar and W. J. Grande, Heat Transfer Eng., 24, 3 (2003).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. M. Venkatesan, S.K. Das and A.R. Balakrishnan, Can. J. Chem. Eng., 35, 531 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  6. G.D. Harvel, K. Hori, K. Kawanishi and J. S. Chang, Nucl. Instrum. Methods Phys. Res. A, 371, 544 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. M. R. Rzasa, Metrology Meas. Systems XIV, 2, 291 (2007).

    Google Scholar 

  8. W.H. Ahmed and B. I. Ismail, Recent Patents Elect. Eng., 1, 1 (2008).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J.K. Keska and B. E. Williams, Exp. Thermal Fluid Sci., 19, 1 (1999).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Y. A. Hassan, T. K. Blanchat, C. H. Seeley and R. E. Canaan, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 18, 371 (1992).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. F. Fairbrother and A. E. Stubbs, J. Chem. Soc., 6, 527 (1935).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. G. Taylor, J. Fluid Mech., 10, 161 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  13. F. P. Bretherton, J. Fluid Mech., 10, 166 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Y. Han and N. Shikazono, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 31, 631 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J. C. Dallman, PhD Thesis, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, IL (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  16. X. Chen, T. Butler and J. P. Brill, Proceedings of the ASME Heat Transfer Division at the International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition, 336, 201 (1996).

    Google Scholar 

  17. R. L. Schmitt, W. H. Stevenson and H. C. Stevenson, Proceedings of the Inspections, International Congress of Applications of Measurement and Control Symposium, Lasers and Electro-Optics, 33 (1982).

  18. P.R Muduli and U.C. Pati, In Intelligent Computing, Networking, and Informatics, 1, 359 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. N. Dietrich., K. Loubiere, M. Jimenez, G. Hebrard and C. Gourdon, Chem. Eng. Sci., 1, 100 (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  20. C. Mauger, L. Mees, M. Michard and M. Lance, Int. J. Multiphase Flow, 58, 301 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. R. Banerjee and S. G. Kandlikar, J. Power Sources, 247, 9 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. S.U. Jung, H.W. Park and S. J. Lee, J. Synchrotron Radiation, 21, 1160 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. J. Y. Liang, Appl. Mech. Mater., 511, 550 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Y. Yamada, IEEE Conference on Asia-Pacific Synthetic Aperture Radar (2013).

    Google Scholar 

  25. K. Singh and R. Kapoor, Pattern Recognition Letters, 36, 10 (2014).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. T. Mayor, A. Pinto and J. Campos, Chem. Eng. Sci., 63, 3614 (2008).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. F. Guo, Y. Yang, B. Chen and L. Guo, Powder Technol., 1, 202 (2010).

    Google Scholar 

  28. I. Kritika, S. Shridharani, S. Arunkumar and M. Venkatesan, In IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research (ICCIC) (2013), DOI:10.1109/ICCIC.2013.6724169.

    Google Scholar 

  29. M. G. Eain, V. Egan and J. Punch, Int. J. Heat Fluid Flow, 44, 515 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Venkatesan, S. K. Das and A.R. Balakrishnan, Exp. Therm. Fluid Sci., 35, 531 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. School of Mechanical Engineering, SASTRA University, Thanjavur, India

    Arunkumar Seshadri, Swetha Mahadevan & Venkatesan Muniyandi

Authors
  1. Arunkumar Seshadri
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Swetha Mahadevan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Venkatesan Muniyandi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Venkatesan Muniyandi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Seshadri, A., Mahadevan, S. & Muniyandi, V. Measurement of liquid film thickness in air — water two phase flows in conventional and mini channels using image processing. Korean J. Chem. Eng. 32, 826–836 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0246-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11814-014-0246-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation