Skip to main content
Log in

Automobile bodies: Can aluminum be an economical alternative to steel?

  • Economics
  • Automotive Materials
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Although the use of aluminum in cars has been increasing for the past two decades, progress has been limited in developing aluminum auto bodies. In fact, most aluminum substitution has come in the form of castings and forgings in the transmission, wheels, etc. Car manufacturers have developed all-aluminum cars with two competing designs: conventional unibody and the spaceframe. However, aluminum is far from being a material of choice for auto bodies. The substitution of aluminum for steel is partly influenced by regulatory pressures to meet fuel efficiency standards by reducing vehicle weight, and to meet recycling standards. The key obstacles are the high cost of primary aluminum as compared to steel and added fabrication costs of aluminum panels. Both the aluminum and the automotive industries have attempted to make aluminum a cost-effective alternative to steel. This paper analyzes the cost of fabrication and assembly of four different aluminum car body designs, making comparisons with conventional steel designs at current aluminum prices and using current aluminum fabrication technology. It then attempts to determine if aluminum can be an alternative to steel at lower primary aluminum prices, and improved fabrication processes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M.N. Becker, “Aluminum: New Challenges in Downstream Activities,” JOM, 51 (11) (1999), pp. 26–38.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. J.P. Clark, Techno-Economic Issues in Materials Selection, ASM Handbook Vol. 20 Materials Selection and Design (Materials Park, OH: ASM, 1997), pp. 255–265.

    Google Scholar 

  3. H. Hoegh, “An Economic Analysis of Aluminum Sheet and Prospects for Aluminum in the Autobody” (B.S. Thesis, MIT, 2000).

  4. F. Katrak, D. Poltis, and J. Morton, “Steel vs. Aluminum vs. Polymers: The Battle for Automotive Body Applications in the 21st Century” (Paper presented at Metal Bulletin’s 12th Int. Conf., September 1997).

  5. A. Kelkar, “Analysis of Aluminum in Auto Body Designs and its Strategic Implications for the Aluminum Industry” (M.S. Thesis, MIT, 2001).

  6. A. Kelkar, R. Roth, and J.P. Clark, “Cost Implications of Learning in the Development of Aluminum Autobody Designs,” submitted to JOM.

  7. H. Marti, “The Cost Modeling of Automotive Body-In-White Assembly Using Relational Databases” (B.S. Thesis, MIT, 1997).

  8. F.W. Ostermann, Aluminum Materials Technology for the Automobile (German Press, 1987).

  9. B. Poggiali, “Production Cost Modeling: A Spread sheet Methodology” (Degree Thesis, MIT, 1985).

  10. C.F. Pratten, Economies of Scale in the Manufacturing Industry (Cambridge, U.K.: Cambridge University Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Editor’s Note: A hypertext-enhanced version of this article can be found at www.tms.org/pubs.journals/JOM/0108/Kelkar-0108.html

For more information, contact Richard Roth, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, E40-202, 77 Massachusetts Avenue, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139 USA; e-Mail rroth@mit.edu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Roth, R., Clark, J. & Kelkar, A. Automobile bodies: Can aluminum be an economical alternative to steel?. JOM 53, 28–32 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0131-7

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-001-0131-7

Keywords

Navigation