Skip to main content
Log in

Magnesium for automotive applications: Primary production cost assessment

  • Feature
  • Economics
  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Production technologies must be cost effective for primary magnesium to become an economically viable alternative material for wide spread automotive applications. In this article, the prices at which magnesium becomes competitive with aluminum and steel are examined, including magnesium production cost estimates for current and future scenarios using electrolytic and thermal processes. The economic viability of the industry for automotive applications is also examined in the context of magnesium market price, taking into consideration the dynamics of its supply and demand as well.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. D.A. Kramer, U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook-2002 (Washington, D.C.: USGA, 2000). Also available at minerals.er.usgs.gov/minerals/.

    Google Scholar 

  2. L. Riopelle, personal communication, Hydro Magnesium, Livonia. MI (8 November 2002).

  3. K. Johnson, Advanced Materials & Processes, (2002), pp. 62–65.

  4. F.H. Froes, JOM, 50 (11) (1998), p. 54.

    Google Scholar 

  5. United States Geological Survey, Mineral Commodity Summaries-2003 (Washington, D.C.: USGA, 2003). Also available at minerals.er.usgs.gov/minerals/.

    Google Scholar 

  6. R. Porro, SAE Paper No. 980084 (Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1998).

  7. P. Reppe et al., SAE Paper No. 980470 (Warrendale, PA: SAE, 1998).

  8. The Ten Year Outlook for Magnesium, CRU Ref No:2498/8 (London: CRU International Ltd. (CRU), 2000).

  9. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), FY2001: Progress Report for Automotive Lightweighting Materials (Washington, D.C.: Office of Advanced Automotive Technologies, 2002).

  10. U. Pal et al., (Paper presented to U.S. DOE, Department of Manufacturing Engineering, Boston University, MA, September 2002).

  11. H.I. Kaplan, Magnesium Supply and Demand 2001 (Washington, D.C.: International Magnesium Association, 2002).

    Google Scholar 

  12. R.L. Edgar, The Magnesium Industry—Past, Present and Future (Washington, D.C.: International Magnesium Association, 2003).

    Google Scholar 

  13. R.J. Urbance et al., JOM, 54 (8) (2002), pp. 25–33.

    Google Scholar 

  14. The Ten Year Outlook for Magnesium, CRU Ref No. 2602 (London: CRU International Ltd. (CRU), 2000).

  15. Metal Statistics 2002 (New York: American Metal Market, 2002).

  16. D.A. Kramer, U.S. Geological Survey Minerals Yearbook—2003 (Washington, D.C.: USGA, 2003). Also available at minerals.er.usgs.gov/minerals/.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Sujit Das is with Oak Ridge National Laboratory.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Das, S. Magnesium for automotive applications: Primary production cost assessment. JOM 55, 22–26 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-003-0204-x

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-003-0204-x

Keywords

Navigation