Abstract
Automated mineralogy as a function of electron microscopy has been developed over the course of several decades. This article considers phase identification, quantification, and association determinations using QEMSCAN®, which was originally developed at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation in Australia as QEM*SEM—Quantitative Evaluation of Minerals by Scanning Electron Microscopy.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
A.F. Reid and M.A. Zuiderwyk, “QEM*SEM: Automated Image Analysis and Stereological Applications to Mineral Processing and Ore Characterization,” Acta Stereologica, 2(1) (1983), pp. 205–208.
D.N. Sutherland, G. Wilkie, and C.R. Johnson, Mineralogy-Petrology Symposium (Sydney, NSW, Australia: The AuslMM Sydney Branch, 1989), pp. 81–84.
S. Pignolet-Brandom and K.A. Lapakko, Process Mineralogy IX, ed. W. Petruk et al. (Warrendale, PA: TMS, 1990), pp. 525–531.
W. Goodall, A. Benedictus, and A.M. Hagni, “Applications of a Holistic Methodology for Gold Ore Characterization using QEMSCAN® (Paper presented at Precious Metals Processing: Advances in Primary and Secondary Operations Symposium, Tucson, AZ, October 3–6, 2007).
O.N. Sikazwe, A.M. Hagni, and R.D. Hagni, “Refractory Copper Ore from Nchanga, Zambia: A Materials Characterization Study’ (Preprint #08-15, Society for Mining, Metallurgy, and Exploration, Inc., 2008).
A. Benedictus, P. Berendsen, and A.M. Hagni, “Quantitative Characterisation of Processed Phlogopite Ore from Silver City Dome District, Kansas, USA, by Automated Mineralogy” (accepted for publication, Elsevier, 2008).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Hagni, A.M. Phase identification, phase quantification, and phase association determinations utilizing automated mineralogy technology. JOM 60, 33–37 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0045-8
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-008-0045-8