Skip to main content
Log in

Mechanical Property Optimization of FDM PLA in Shear with Multiple Objectives

  • Published:
JOM Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This study presents the influences of key processing parameters on the resulting material properties of fused-deposition-modeled (FDM) polylactic acid (PLA) components tested in torsion. A reduced experimental matrix was produced through the use of a Taguchi L9 orthogonal array with three parameters at three levels each. The processing parameters included the layer thickness, infill density, and postprocessing heat-treatment time at 100°C. Testing of components at varying times is conducted to facilitate heat-treatment time testing range and show the effects of prolonged heating. The layer thickness and infill are tested across the entire useful range available for the FDM machine used. Shear stress–strain response curves are acquired and average ultimate shear strength, 0.2% yield strength, proportional limit, shear modulus, and fracture strain are calculated for each run. An analysis of results via regression analysis is used to determine influences levels of parameters of the mechanical properties. The layer thickness and infill density are shown to be of high importance when optimizing for strength, with heat-treatment implementation slightly improving the resulting properties. Ductility is mainly affected by infill and heat treatment, with layer thickness having only a slight effect on the fracture strain achieved. Recommendations are made based on results of a method to optimize for either strength or ductility and how to compromise between recommended settings when a balance between the two is desired. The ability to produce parts with mechanical properties at or near those of bulk PLA is shown.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. M. Bijarimi, S. Ahmad, and R. Rasid, Int. Conf. Agric. Chem. Environ. Sci. 1, 115 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  2. A.M. Clarinval and J. Halleux, Biodegradable Polymers for Industrial Applications, ed. R. Smith (Boca Raton: Taylor & Francis, 2005), pp. 3–31.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  3. M. Jamshidian, E.A. Tehrany, M. Imran, M. Jacquot, and S. Desobry, Comp. Rev. Food Sci. 9, 552 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. C.S. Lee, S.G. Kim, H.J. Kim, and S.H. Ahn, J. Mater. Process. Tech. 187–188, 627 (2007).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. S.K. Panda, S. Padhee, A.K. Sood, and S.S. Mahapatra, Intell. Inf. Manage. 1, 89 (2009).

    Google Scholar 

  6. J.W. Zhang and A.H. Peng, Adv. Mater. Res. 538–541, 444 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. G. Perego, G.D. Cella, and C. Bastioli, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 59, 37 (1996).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. M. Kowalczyk and E. Piorkowska, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 124, 4579 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  9. J. Torres, M. Cole, A. Owji, Z. DeMastry, and A.P. Gordon, Rapid Prototyping J. (in press).

  10. A.K. Sood, R.K. Ohdar, and S.S. Mahapatra, Mater. Des. 31, 287 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. J. Wootthikanokkhan, T. Cheachun, N. Sombatsompop, S. Thumsorn, N. Kaabbuathong, N. Wongta, J. Wong-On, S.I.N. Ayutthaya, and A. Kositchaiyong, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 129, 215 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Y. Srithep, P. Nealey, and L.-S. Turng, Polym. Eng. Sci. 53, 580 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. S.D. Park, M. Todo, K. Arakawa, and M. Koganemaru, Polymer 47, 1357 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. A.M. Harris and E.C. Lee, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 107, 2246 (2008).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. J.H. Lin, H.Y. Chung, K.D. Wu, S.P. Wen, C.T. Lu, and C.W. Lou, Adv. Mater. Res. 627, 751 (2012).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. A.P. Mathew, K. Oksman, and M. Sain, J. Appl. Polym. Sci. 97, 2014 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. A. Galeski, Prog. Polym. Sci. 28, 1643 (2003).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The participation of José Cotelo is made possible via the support of the Career Advancement Mentoring Program for Young Entrepreneur and Scholars (CAMP-YES), a National Science Foundation funded program at the University of Central Florida. Fabrication of test coupons was made possible due to the cooperation of the Center for Microgravity Research and Education at the University of Central Florida.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jonathan Torres.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Torres, J., Cotelo, J., Karl, J. et al. Mechanical Property Optimization of FDM PLA in Shear with Multiple Objectives. JOM 67, 1183–1193 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11837-015-1367-y

Keywords

Navigation