Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Protective Vests in Law Enforcement: a Pilot Survey of Public Perceptions

  • Published:
Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The primary purpose of this study was to begin an examination of the relationship between public perception and the number of attachments on external protective vests worn by law enforcement. A secondary purpose was to examine perceptual differences between non-law enforcement majors and law enforcement majors. Images of six vests that systematically varied in the amount of external attachments were rated across eight attributes: (1) approachability, (2) militarized appearance, (3) intimidation, (4) professional appearance, (5) organization, (6) confidence instilled in an officer, (7) confidence instilled in the public, and (8) recognizable as law enforcement. Vests with more external attachments were rated as more militarized and intimidating. However, participants also rated militarized appearance and intimidation as the least important attributes when considering external protective vests. Confidence instilled (by the images of vests) in an officer and confidence instilled in the public were the highest-rated attributes. These findings suggest that a militarized and intimidating appearance might not detract from the public’s overall acceptance of external protective vests in law enforcement. In addition, law enforcement majors and non-law enforcement majors differed significantly in their ratings of all eight attributes. This suggests that exposure to law enforcement education might affect public perceptions of external protective vests. It is possible that education of the public on the function (e.g., load distribution) of external protective vest attachments might offset negative perceptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balkin S, Houlden P (1983) Reducing fear of crime through occupational presence. Crim Justice Behav 10:13–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barker JF (2007) Comfort perceptions of police officers toward protective vests (doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global 304872557

  • Bartholow BD, Anderson CA, Carnagey NL, Benjamin AJ Jr (2005) Interactive effects of life experience and situational cues on aggression: the weapons priming effect in hunters and nonhunters. J Exp Soc Psychol 41:48–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell D (1982) Police uniforms, attitudes, and citizens. J Crim Just 10(1):45–55

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bieler S (2016) Police militarization in the USA: the state of the field. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 39(4):586–600. doi:10.1108/PIJPSM-03-2016-0042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlton SD, Carbone PD, Stierli M, Orr R (2014) The impact of occupational load carriage on the mobility of the tactical police officer. The Journal of Australian Strength and Conditioning 22(1):32–37

    Google Scholar 

  • Choi HJ, Mitchell KB, Garlie T, McNamara J, Hennessy E, Carson J (2016) Effects of body armor fit on marksmanship performance. Advances in Physical Ergonomics and Human Factors 489:341–354. doi:10.1007/978-3-319-41694-6_35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cizanckas V, Feist F (1975) A community’s response to police change. J Police Sci Adm 3:284–291

    Google Scholar 

  • Collins AM, Loftus EF (1975) A spreading activation theory of semantic processing. Psychol Rev 82:407–428

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Czarnecki F, Janowitz I (2003) Ergonomics and safety in law enforcement. Clinics in Occupational and Environmental Medicine 3(3):399–417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dempsey PC, Handcock PJ, Rehrer NJ (2013) Impact of police body armour and equipment on mobility. Appl Ergon 44(6):957–961. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2013.02.011

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Exec. Order No. 13688, 80 F.R. 3451 (2015).

  • Fachner G, Thorkildsen Z (2015) Ambushes of police: environment, incident dynamics, and the aftermath of surprise attacks against law enforcement. Office of Community Oriented Policing Services, Washington, D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gundersen D (1987) Credibility and the police uniform. J Police Sci Adm 15(3):192–195

    Google Scholar 

  • Horsfall I, Champion SM, Watson CH (2005) The development of a quantitative flexibility test for body armour and comparison with wearer trials. Appl Ergon 36(3):283–292. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2005.01.005

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson RR, Plecas D, Anderson S, Dolan H (2015) No hat or tie required: examining minor changes to the police uniform. Journal of Police and Criminal Psychology 30(3):158–165. doi:10.1007/s11896-014-9152-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Joseph N, Alex N (1972) The uniform: a sociological perspective. Am J Sociol 77:719–730 Retrieved from: http://www.jstor.org/stable/2776756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Konitzer, L. N., Fargo, M. V., Brininger, T. L., & Lim Reed, M. (2008). Association between back, neck, and upper extremity musculoskeletal pain and the individual body armor. J Hand Ther, 21(2), 143–148; quiz 149. doi: 10.1197/j.jht.2007.10.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • LaTourrette T (2010) The life-saving effectiveness of body armor for police officers. J Occup Environ Hyg 7(10):557–562. doi:10.1080/15459624.20 10.489798

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lawrence SG, Watson M (1991) Getting others to help: the effectiveness of professional uniforms in charitable fund raising. J Appl Commun Res 19:170–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewinski WJ, Dysterheft JL, Dicks ND, Pettitt RW (2015) The influence of officer equipment and protection on short sprinting performance. Appl Ergon 47:65–71. doi:10.1016/j.apergo.2014.08.017

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Majumdar D, Srivastava KK, Purkayastha SS, Pichan G, Selvamurthy W (1997) Physiological effects of wearing heavy body armour on male soldiers. Int J Ind Ergon 20(2):155–161. doi:10.1016/S0169-8141(96)00057-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mauro R (1984) The constable’s new clothes: effects of uniforms on perceptions and problems of police officers. J Appl Soc Psychol 14:42–56. doi:10.1111/j.1559-1816.1984.tb02219.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Messinger S, Warner D, Knight C, Scott G, Rector M, Barron T et al (2013) The distribution of emergency police dispatch call incident types and priority levels within the police priority dispatch system. Annals of Emergency Dispatch & Response 1(2):12–17 Retrieved from https://www.aedrjournal.org/pdf/Issue2/Messinger-AEDR-2-2013p12-17.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Nickels E (2008) Good guys wear black: uniform color and citizen impressions of police. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management 31(1):77–92. doi:10.1108/13639510810852585

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peleg K, Rivkind A, Aharonson-Daniel L, Israeli TG (2006) Does body armor protect from firearm injuries? J Am Coll Surg 202(4):643–648. doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2005.12.019

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Shaw L (1973) The role of clothing in the criminal justice system. J Police Sci Adm 1:414–420

    Google Scholar 

  • Singer M, Singer AE (1985) The effect of police uniform on interpersonal perception. J Psychol 119:157–161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor B, Kubu B, Kappleman K, Gunaratne H, Ballard N, Martinez M, Fischer C (2009) The BJA/PERF Body Armor National Survey: protecting the nation’s law enforcement officers (phase 2 final report). Police Executive Research Forum, Washington DC, Maryland Retrieved from: http://www.policeforum.org/assets/docs/Free_Online_Documents/Police_Equipment/the%20bja-perf%20body%20armor%20national%20survey%202009.pdf

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, N. A. S., Peoples, G. E., & Petersen, S. R. (2016). Load carriage, human performance, and employment standards. Applied Physiology, Nutrition, & Metabolism, 41, 131-147. Doi: dx.doi.org/10.1139/apnm-2015-0486

  • Tenzel J, Cizanckas V (1973) The uniform experiment. J Police Sci Adm 1(4):421–424

    Google Scholar 

  • Tenzel J, Storms L, Sweetwood H (1976) Symbols and behavior: an experiment in altering the police role. J Police Sci Adm 4(1):21–27

    Google Scholar 

  • Tinsley PN, Plecas D, Anderson GS (2003, November) Studying public perceptions of police grooming standards. The Police Chief 70:42–45

    Google Scholar 

  • Volpp JM. Lennon SJ (1988) Perceived police authority as a function of uniform hat and sex. Percept Mot Skills 67(3):815–824. doi:10.2466/pms.1988.67.3.815

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Force Science® Institute Ltd., Mankato, MN, 56001, USA

    J. O’Neill, S. A. Swenson, D. A. O’Neill & W. J. Lewinski

  2. Psychology Department, Minnesota State University Mankato, Mankato, MN, 56001, USA

    S. A. Swenson & E. Stark

Authors
  1. J. O’Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. S. A. Swenson
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. E. Stark
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. D. A. O’Neill
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. W. J. Lewinski
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. O’Neill.

Ethics declarations

Funding

No funding was provided.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Approval

This study was approved by an institutional review board.

Informed Consent

All participants provided informed consent to participate.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

O’Neill, J., Swenson, S.A., Stark, E. et al. Protective Vests in Law Enforcement: a Pilot Survey of Public Perceptions. J Police Crim Psych 33, 100–108 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9237-x

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11896-017-9237-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation