nach oben

International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM)

Erschienen in:

31.07.2020 | Original Paper

Educational experiences with Generation Z

verfasst von: Marcela Hernandez-de-Menendez, Carlos A. Escobar Díaz, Ruben Morales-Menendez

Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) | Ausgabe 3/2020

Einloggen

Aktivieren Sie unsere intelligente Suche, um passende Fachinhalte oder Patente zu finden.

search-config

KI-gestützte Suche

Aus

Abstract

The development of the “knowledge society” implies social transformation in which citizens need not only knowledge but also new skills and competencies, some unpredictable, to face new situations. Students of Generation Z are authentic digital natives who are a hyper cognitive generation with different student profiles than before. They are creating pressures for change, and there is a growing competition of universities for global human talent and demand for qualified graduates to do jobs that do not yet exist. Even the very development of technology, which is available to many, has motivated world-class universities to develop innovative programs and new ideas to accelerate and improve the teaching and learning process for knowledge and competencies. One of the most important actions to achieve this is the investment in technological resources to offer new ways of teaching and learning. Technology adds value to the teaching and learning experience, which students exploit widely to improve or accelerate the academic process, but technology can certainly also promote or develop additional skills and competencies. In this research, we present a review of educational technology with examples of current applications performed by different educational institutions. Also, students of Generation Z relationship and preferences regarding educational technologies are presented. Besides, emerging technologies that are being exploited by this Generation Z of students in Higher Education Institutions are identified and analyzed. This research presents the experiences of several successful and innovative cases regarding teaching students of Generation Z.

Vorheriger Artikel The effectiveness of computer-based simulations for numerical methods in engineering

Nächster Artikel Process selection charts based on economy and environment: subtractive or additive manufacturing to produce structural components of aircraft

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 102.000 Bücher
über 537 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Technik"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Technik" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 390 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Automobil + Motoren
Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Elektrotechnik + Elektronik
Energie + Nachhaltigkeit
Maschinenbau + Werkstoffe

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Online-Abonnement

Mit Springer Professional "Wirtschaft" erhalten Sie Zugriff auf:

über 67.000 Bücher
über 340 Zeitschriften

aus folgenden Fachgebieten:

Bauwesen + Immobilien
Business IT + Informatik
Finance + Banking
Management + Führung
Marketing + Vertrieb
Versicherung + Risiko

Jetzt Wissensvorsprung sichern!

Jetzt informieren

Economist Intelligence Unit: The Future of Higher Education: How Technology Will Shape Learning, pp. 1–32. The sponsor is “the New Media Consortium”.http://graphics.eiu.com/upload/the%20future%20of%20universities.pdf (2008)

Bolstad, R., Buntting, C.: Digital technologies and future-oriented science education, pp. 1–37. https://www.nzcer.org.nz/system/files/Digital%20technologies%20and%20future%20science%20education.pdf (2013)

Western University of Health Science.: Anatomage. https://www.westernu.edu/virtualrealitylearningcenter/ (2019). Accessed 25 June 2019

Ford, S., Minshall, T.: Invited review article: where and how 3D printing is used in teaching and education. Addit Manuf 25, 131–150 (2019)

EduTools Tec. EduTools. https://edutoolstec.itesm.mx/ (2019). Accessed 1 Nov 2019

Tecnologico de Monterrey. Mostla. https://mostla.tec.mx/ (2018). Accessed 27 May 2019

Observatory of Educational Innovation. A First in Latin America: Tec de Monterrey Uses Collaborative Virtual Reality to Teach a Class. https://observatory.tec.mx/edu-news/a-first-in-latin-america-tec-de-monterrey-uses-collaborative-virtual-reality-to-teach-a-class?rq=tec21 (2018). Accessed 21 Feb 2019

Luévano, E., López, E., Castro, J.E.: Use of telepresence and holographic projection mobile device for college degree level. Procedia Comput. Sci. 75, 339–347 (2015)CrossRef

Observatory of Educational Innovation: Augmented and Virtual Reality. EduTrends, pp. 1–36. https://observatorio.tec.mx/edu-trends-realidad-virtual-y-realidad-aumentada (2018)

10.

Kirkwood, A., Price, L.: Technology-Enabled Learning Implementation Handbook, pp. 1–104. The sponsor is “Commonwealth of learning”. http://oasis.col.org/bitstream/handle/11599/2363/2016_TELI-Handbook.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y (2016)

11.

Dolot, A.: The characteristics of Generation Z. E-Mentor (2018). https://doi.org/10.15219/em74.1351CrossRef

12.

Mannheim, K:. The problem of generations. In: Kecskemeti, P. (ed.) Essays on the Sociology of Knowledge Collect Work, pp. 276–322. Routledge, New York (1952)

13.

Howe, N., Strauss, W.: Generations: The History of America’s Future, 1584 to 2069. William Morrow & Company, New York (1991)

14.

Cilliers, E.J.: The challenge of teaching Generation Z. PEOPLE Int. J. Soc. Sci. 3, 188–198 (2017)

15.

Korteling, J.E., Hof, T., Hart, M.H.E., Wijn, R.: Next Generation Learning: Generation Characteristics and Trends, TNO, pp. 1–40. https://www.narcis.nl/publication/RecordID/oai:tudelft.nl:uuid%3A2e99b8fd-754f-4c2d-be13-0b14b1ae21ca (2019)

16.

Barnes and Noble College: Getting to Know Gen Z. Exploring Middle and High Schoolers’ Expectations for Higher Education, pp. 1–11 (n.d.)

17.

Talmon, G.A.: Generation Z: What’s Next? Med. Sci. Educ. 29, 9–11. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40670-019-00796-0 (2019)CrossRef

18.

Linnes, C.: iGeneration and their acceptance of technology. Int. J. Manag. Inf. Syst. 21, 11–26 (2017)

19.

Moore, K., Jones, C., Frazier, R.S.: Engineering education For Generation Z. Am. J. Eng. Educ. 8, 111–126 (2017)

20.

Koulopoulos, T., Keldsen, D.: The Gen Z Effect: The Six Forces Shaping the Future of Business. Bibliomotion, Inc., Brookline (2014)

21.

Seemiller, C., Grace, G.: Generation Z goes to college. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco (2016)

22.

Puiu, S.: Generation Z—an educational and managerial perspective. Rev. Tinerilor Econ. 14, 62–72 (2017)

23.

Anealka, H.: Education 4.0 made simple: ideas for teaching. Int. J. Educ. Lit. Stud. 6, 92 (2018)CrossRef

24.

Fisher, G.: Engaging Generation Z: a study on facebook group implementation in language courses and in multiple contexts. University of New England, Armidale (2018)

25.

Eckleberry-Hunt, J., Lick, D., Hunt, R.: Is medical education ready for Generation Z? J. Grad. Med. Educ. 10, 378–381 (2018)CrossRef

26.

Selingo, J.J.: The new generation of students. How colleges can recruit, teach and serve Gen Z. Chron. High. Educ. 1–48 (2018)

27.

Tolbert, E.: The Impact of Computer-Aided Instruction on Student Achievement. Gardner-Webb University, Boiling Springs (2015)

28.

Chicca, J., Shellenbarger, T.: Connecting with Generation Z: approaches in nursing education. Teach. Learn. Nurs. 13, 180–184 (2018)CrossRef

29.

Sziebig, G.: Achieving Total Immersion: Technology Trends Behind Augmented Reality—A Survey. In: Proceedings of 9th International Conference on Simulation, Modelling and Optimization, pp. 458–463 (2009)

30.

Rios, H., Hincapié, M., Caponio, A., Mercado, E., Mendívil, E.G.: Augmented reality: An advantageous option for complex training and maintenance operations in aeronautic related processes. In: Shumaker, R. (ed.) Virtual and Mixed Reality—New Trends. Springer, Berlin (2011)

31.

Salinas, P., González-Mendívil, E., Quintero, E., Ríos, H., Ramírez, H., Morales, S.: The development of a didactic prototype for the learning of mathematics through augmented reality. Procedia Comput. Sci. 25, 62–70 (2013)CrossRef

32.

Martín-Gutiérrez, J., Mora, C.E., Añorbe-Díaz, B., González-Marrero, A.: Virtual technologies trends in education. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13, 469–486 (2017)CrossRef

33.

Figueroa, C.J., Siller, C.H, Rodríguez González, C.A., Madrigal, A.G.: Rapid Prototyping for Complex Biomedical and Aerospace Components with Internal Features. In: XIX Congress International Anual de la SOMIM, Pachuca, Hidalgo, México, pp. 873–882 (2013)

34.

3DP: Guidelines and Case-studies on the Use of 3D Printing in VET Education, pp. 1–37. https://3d-p.eu/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/IO1_Guidelines-and-case-studies-on-the-use-of-3D-printing-in-VET-education.pdf (2017)

35.

Chien, Y.H.: Developing a pre-engineering curriculum for 3D printing skills for high school technology education. Eurasia J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 13, 2941–2958 (2017)CrossRef

36.

Belmonte L.L.: Tecnologías de Telepresencia para Humanizar la Educación a Distancia. Obs Innovación Educ. (2017)

37.

Mendívil, E.G., Belmonte, L.L., de Lara Díaz L.E., Milián, H.Q.: Profesor AVATAR: Telepresence Model. In: IACEE World Conference on Continuing Engineering Education, Monterrey, IACEE, pp. 1–9 (2018)

38.

Kanna, S., von Rosenberg, W., Goverdovsky, V., Constantinides, A.G., Mandic, D.P.: Bringing wearable sensors into the classroom: a participatory approach. IEEE Signal Process. Mag. 35, 110–130 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1109/msp.2018.2806418CrossRef

39.

Zavala Yoé, R., Ramírez, Mendoza R.: EEG acquisition and analysis to improve stochastic processes and signal processing understanding in engineering students: refining active learning dynamics via interactive approach in teaching. Int. J. Interact. Des. Manuf. 13, 1353–1365 (2019)CrossRef

40.

Sandall, B.: Wearable technology and schools: Where are we and where do we go from here? J. Curric. Teach. Learn. Leadersh. Educ. 1, 1–11 (2016)

41.

Macias, M., Vallejo, A., Ramirez, D.: Remote and Real Time Laboratories Network for Engineering Education. In: 11th LACCEI Latin American and Caribbean Conference for Engineering and Technology, pp. 1–10 (2013)

42.

Salazar, E., Macías, M.: Virtual 3D Controllable Machine Models for Implementation of Automations Laboratories. 39th IEEE Frontiers Education Conference, IEEE Xplore, pp. 1–5 (2009)

43.

Babich, A., Mavrommatis, K.: Virtual laboratory concept for engineering education. In: International Conference on Engineering Education and Research “Progress Through Partnership”, pp. 1043–1050 (2004)

44.

Hatherly, P.A.: The virtual laboratory and interactive screen experiments. In: Sassi, E., Vicentini, M. (eds.) Connecting Research in Physics Education with Teacher Education, pp. 1–7. The International Commission on Physics Education, Cambridge (2016)

45.

El-Sabagh, H.: The Impact of a Web-Based Virtual Lab on the Development of Students’ Conceptual Understanding and Science Process Skills. Dresden University of Technology, Dresden (2011)

46.

Universa Blockchain: Blockchain in Education. https://medium.com/universablockchain/blockchain-in-education-49ad413b9e12 (2019)

47.

Grech, A., Camilleri, A.: Blockchain for Education. JCR Sci Policy Report, Ina Dos Santos, A EUR 28778 EN (2017)

48.

Velissarios, J., Herzig, J., Unal, D.: Believe it or Not. Blockchain’s Potential Starts with Security, pp. 1–20. https://www.pli.edu/programs/blockchain-legal-regulatory-developments/chb?book=BK10819 (2019)

49.

Jenkinson, J.: Measuring the effectiveness of educational technology: What are we attempting to measure? Electron. J. e-Learn. 7, 273–280 (2009). https://doi.org/10.2307/1164231CrossRef

50.

Rivera, R., Tarín, C. Learning and teaching technology options. Directorate-General for Parliamentary Research Services (European Parliament), pp. 1–134. https://doi.org/10.2861/6894 (2015)

51.

Doucette, D.: Meeting the Educational Demands of Generation Z. EdTech Focus High Educ. https://edtechmagazine.com/higher/article/2018/10/meeting-educational-demands-generation-z (2018)

52.

Pearson: Meeting the Expectations of Gen Z in Higher Ed, pp. 1–2 https://www.pearson.com/us/content/dam/one-dot-com/one-dot-com/us/en/files/PSONA5646-8150_TIDL_GenZ_Infographic_Print_FINAL.pdf (2018)

53.

Singh, A.: Challenges of issues of Generation Z. IOSR J. Bus. Manag. 16, 59–63 (2014)CrossRef

Titel: Educational experiences with Generation Z
verfasst von: Marcela Hernandez-de-Menendez
Carlos A. Escobar Díaz
Ruben Morales-Menendez
Publikationsdatum: 31.07.2020
Verlag: Springer Paris
Erschienen in: International Journal on Interactive Design and Manufacturing (IJIDeM) / Ausgabe 3/2020
Print ISSN: 1955-2513
Elektronische ISSN: 1955-2505
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12008-020-00674-9

Springer Professional

Abstract

Bitte loggen Sie sich ein, um Zugang zu Ihrer Lizenz zu erhalten.

Sie haben noch keine Lizenz? Dann Informieren Sie sich jetzt über unsere Produkte:

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft+Technik"

Springer Professional "Technik"

Springer Professional "Wirtschaft"

Weitere Artikel der Ausgabe 3/2020

Numerical analysis of thermal problem in dry friction clutches based on the interactive design approach

Project-based learning of advanced CAD/CAE tools in engineering education

Multicriteria decision optimization for the design and manufacture of structural aircraft parts

Effective integration of Cobots and additive manufacturing for reconfigurable assembly solutions of biomedical products

The effectiveness of computer-based simulations for numerical methods in engineering

Engineering education for smart 4.0 technology: a review