Skip to main content
Log in

Relations Between Moso Bamboo Surface Properties Pretreated by Kraft Cooking and Dilute Acid with Enzymatic Digestibility

  • Published:
Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Lignocellulosics pretreatment is intended to dismantle biomass’ natural recalcitrance. Chemical and morphological changes of lignocellulosic materials would occur through varying pretreatment processes. In order to figure out why the acid-pretreated and Kraft-cooked bamboo residues showed very different enzymatic digestibility, the surface properties of pretreated bamboo residues were characterized in this work. It was found that analyzed surface properties were considered to be associating with each corresponding enzymatic digestibility of the pretreated samples. The zeta potentials of pretreated bamboo residues have a negative correlation with enzymatic efficiency. Kraft-cooked substrates were found to posse a less hydrophobic nature and demonstrated higher enzymatic conversion than substrates that were dilute sulfuric acid pretreated. The surface accessibility analysis (BET and Direct Red staining) revealed that the higher enzymatic efficiency of Kraft-cooked materials was mostly due to the larger cellulosic surface area than that in acid-pretreated materials. The results re-affirm that different pretreatments create a variety of surface characteristics, leading to the idea that pretreatment and enzymatic hydrolysis can be favorably turned to maximize carbohydrate recovery from bamboo residues.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Batalha, L. A. R., Han, Q., Jameel, H., Chang, H. M., Colodette, J. L., & Gomes, F. J. B. (2015). Production of fermentable sugars from sugarcane bagasse by enzymatic hydrolysis after autohydrolysis and mechanical refining. Bioresource Technology, 180, 97–105.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Li, P., Zhou, G., Du, H., Lu, D., Mo, L., Xu, X., Shi, Y., & Zhou, Y. (2015). Current and potential carbon stocks in moso bamboo forests in China. Journal of Environmental Management, 156, 89–96.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. McKendry, P. (2002). Energy production from biomass (part 1): overview of biomass. Bioresource Technology, 83, 37–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Narron, R. H., Kim, H., Chang, H. M., Jameel, H., & Park, S. (2016). Biomass pretreatments capable of enabling lignin valorization in a biorefinery process. Current Opinion in Biotechnology, 38, 39–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gierer, J. (1980). Chemical aspects of kraft pulping. Wood Science and Technology, 14, 241–266.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Huang, C., Chu, Q., Xie, Y., Li, X., Jin, Y., Min, D., & Yong, Q. (2015). Effect of kraft pulping pretreatment on the chemical composition, enzymatic digestibility, and sugar release of moso bamboo residues. BioResources, 10, 240–255.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Piccolo, C., Wiman, M., Bezzo, F., & Lidén, G. (2010). Enzyme adsorption on SO 2 catalyzed steam-pretreated wheat and spruce material. Enzyme and Microbial Technology, 46, 159–169.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Chandra, R., Ewanick, S., Hsieh, C., & Saddler, J. N. (2008). The characterization of pretreated lignocellulosic substrates prior to enzymatic hydrolysis, part 1: a modified Simons’ staining technique. Biotechnology Progress, 24, 1178–1185.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rollin, J. A., Zhu, Z., Sathitsuksanoh, N., & Zhang, Y. H. P. (2011). Increasing cellulose accessibility is more important than removing lignin: a comparison of cellulose solvent-based lignocellulose fractionation and soaking in aqueous ammonia. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 108, 22–30.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chundawat, S. P., Venkatesh, B., & Dale, B. E. (2007). Effect of particle size based separation of milled corn stover on AFEX pretreatment and enzymatic digestibility. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 96, 219–231.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Sluiter, A., Hames, B., Ruiz, R., Scarlata, C., Sluiter, J., Templeton, D., & Crocker, D. (2011). Determination of structural carbohydrates and lignin in biomass, laboratory analytical procedure (LAP), technical report NREL/TP-510-42618, National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL). U.S: Dept. of Energy Golden, CO..

    Google Scholar 

  12. Segal, L. G. J. M. A., Creely, J. J., Martin Jr., A. E., & Conrad, C. M. (1959). An empirical method for estimating the degree of crystallinity of native cellulose using the X-ray diffractometer. Textile Research Journal, 29, 786–794.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Gessner, A., Waicz, R., Lieske, A., Paulke, B. R., Mäder, K., & Müller, R. H. (2000). Nanoparticles with decreasing surface hydrophobicities: influence on plasma protein adsorption. International Journal of Pharmaceutics, 196, 245–249.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Yu, H., You, Y., Lei, F., Liu, Z., Zhang, W., & Jiang, J. (2015). Comparative study of alkaline hydrogen peroxide and organosolv pretreatments of sugarcane bagasse to improve the overall sugar yield. Bioresource Technology, 187, 161–166.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Huang, C., He, J., Li, X., Min, D., & Yong, Q. (2015). Facilitating the enzymatic saccharification of pulped bamboo residues by degrading the remained xylan and lignin–carbohydrates complexes. Bioresource Technology, 192, 471–477.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chum, H. L., Johnson, D. K., Black, S. K., & Overend, R. P. (1990). Pretreatment-catalyst effects and the combined severity parameter. Applied Biochemistry and Biotechnology, 24, 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Biswas, D., Misbahuddin, M., Roy, U., Francis, R. C., & Bose, S. K. (2011). Effect of additives on fiber yield improvement for kraft pulping of kadam (Anthocephalus chinensis). Bioresource Technology, 102, 1284–1288.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kabel, M. A., Bos, G., Zeevalking, J., Voragen, A. G., & Schols, H. A. (2007). Effect of pretreatment severity on xylan solubility and enzymatic breakdown of the remaining cellulose from wheat straw. Bioresource Technology, 98, 2034–2042.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Huang, C., He, J., Wang, Y., Min, D., & Yong, Q. (2015). Associating cooking additives with sodium hydroxide to pretreat bamboo residues for improving the enzymatic saccharification and monosaccharides production. Bioresource Technology, 193, 142–149.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Li, J., & Gellerstedt, G. (2008). Improved lignin properties and reactivity by modifications in the autohydrolysis process of aspen wood. Industrial Crops and Products, 27, 175–181.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Yu, Z., Gwak, K. S., Treasure, T., Jameel, H., Chang, H. M., & Park, S. (2014). Effect of lignin chemistry on the enzymatic hydrolysis of woody biomass. ChemSusChem, 7, 1942–1950.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Xing, Y., Bu, L., Zheng, T., Liu, S., & Jiang, J. (2016). Enhancement of high-solids enzymatic hydrolysis of corncob residues by bisulfite pretreatment for biorefinery. Bioresource Technology, 221, 461–468.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Sjöström, J. (1990). Fractionation and characterization of organic substances dissolved in water during groundwood pulping of spruce. Nordic Pulp and Paper Research Journal (Sweden), 5, 9–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sun, S., Huang, Y., Sun, R., & Tu, M. (2016). The strong association of condensed phenolic moieties in isolated lignins with their inhibition of enzymatic hydrolysis. Green Chemistry, 18, 4276–4286.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Lou, H., Zhu, J. Y., Lan, T. Q., Lai, H., & Qiu, X. (2013). pH-induced lignin surface modification to reduce nonspecific cellulase binding and enhance enzymatic saccharification of lignocelluloses. ChemSusChem, 6, 919–927.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang, Y. H. P., & Lynd, L. R. (2004). Toward an aggregated understanding of enzymatic hydrolysis of cellulose: noncomplexed cellulase systems. Biotechnology and Bioengineering, 88, 797–824.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kim, T. H., Kim, J. S., Sunwoo, C., & Lee, Y. Y. (2003). Pretreatment of corn stover by aqueous ammonia. Bioresource Technology, 90, 39–47.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Mansfield, S. D., Mooney, C., & Saddler, J. N. (1999). Substrate and enzyme characteristics that limit cellulose hydrolysis. Biotechnology Progress, 15, 804–816.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Wiman, M., Dienes, D., Hansen, M. A., van der Meulen, T., Zacchi, G., & Lidén, G. (2012). Cellulose accessibility determines the rate of enzymatic hydrolysis of steam-pretreated spruce. Bioresource Technology, 126, 208–215.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Park, S., Venditti, R. A., Jameel, H., & Pawlak, J. J. (2006). Changes in pore size distribution during the drying of cellulose fibers as measured by differential scanning calorimetry. Carbohydrate Polymers, 66, 97–103.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The research was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (31570561), the Priority Academic Program Development of Jiangsu Higher Education Institution (PAPD), and Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province for youth (BK20150874). Finally, the authors want to thank Robert Narron (North Carolina State University) for language consultation during the revision process.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Qiang Yong.

Electronic Supplementary Material

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

He, J., Huang, C., Lai, C. et al. Relations Between Moso Bamboo Surface Properties Pretreated by Kraft Cooking and Dilute Acid with Enzymatic Digestibility. Appl Biochem Biotechnol 183, 1526–1538 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-017-2520-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12010-017-2520-6

Keywords

Navigation