Abstract
A comparison of the efficiency of three different synthetic routes viz. sol-gel method involving templating, mechanochemical synthesis and combustion synthesis for the production of nanostructured TiO2, is reported. In the sol-gel method, nanocrystalline TiO2 is produced when titanium tetraisopropoxide is templated onto dodecylamine which forms the liquid crystalline hexagonal structure and the template is then extracted using 1:1 solution of ethanol-hydrochloric acid mixture. Mechanochemical synthesis of nanocrystalline TiO2 involved mechanical milling of stoichiometric amounts of titanium and cupric oxide in a planetary ball mill using stainless steel vial with wear resistant stainless steel balls. Nanocrystalline TiO2 is produced by the combustion reaction involving titanyl nitrate and fuels like glycine and citric acid. Nanostructured TiO2 with an average particle size of ∼ 14 nm is produced by the sol-gel method whereas the mechanochemical reaction between titanium and cupric oxide resulted in the formation of nanocrystalline TiO2 with an average particle size of ∼20 nm after 12 h of milling. On the other hand, combustion synthesis resulted in the formation of nanocrystalline TiO2 with an average particle size of less than ∼50 nm. The microstructures of nanocrystalline TiO2 produced by the above three methods are analysed.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Antonelli D M 1999 Microporous & Mesoporous Mater. 33 209
Anuradha T V and Ranganathan S 1999 Nanostruct. Mater. 12 1063
Aruna S T and Patil K C 1996 J. Mater. Syn. Process 4 175
Chase M W Jr, Davies C A, Downey Jr, Frurip D J, McDonald R A and Syverud A N 1985 J. Physical & Chemical Reference Data, Supplement #1, 14, JANAF Thermochemical Tables, Third Edition, Parts I & II
El-Eskandarany M S 1995 Mater. Trans. JIM 36 182
Lerouse F, Dewar P J, Intissar M, Ovurard G and Nasar L F 2002 J. Mater. Chem. 12 3245
Mimani T and Patil K C 2001 Mater. Phys. Mech. 4 134
Mingliang M, Xinkuan L, Shengqi X, Donglang C and Jingen Z 2001 J. Mater. Process. Technol. 116 124
Mulas G, Monagheddu M, Doppiu S, Cocco G, Maglia F and Anselmi Tamburini U 2001 Solid State Ionics 141 649
Murty B S and Ranganathan S 1998 Inter. Mater. Rev. 43 101
Patil K C 1993 Bull. Mater. Sci. 16 533
Patil K C, Aruna S T and Mimani T 2002 Curr. Opinion Solid State & Mater. Sci. 6 507
Prakash A S, Khadar A M A, Patil K C and Hegde M S 2002 J. Mater. Syn. Process 10 135
Schaffer G B and McCormick P G 1989a Scr. Metall. 23 835
Schaffer G B and McCormick P G 1989b Appl. Phys. Lett. 55 45
Schaffer G B and McCormick P G 1990 Metall. Trans. A21 2789
Suryanarayana C 2001 Prog. Mater. Sci. 46 1
Ulagappan N and Rao C N R 1996 Chem. Commun. 1047
Wang H W, Kuo C H, Lin H C, Kuo I T and Cheng C F 2006 J. Am. Ceram. Soc. 89 3388
Wang Y, Zhang S and Wu X 2004 Nanotechnology 15 1162
Ying J Y, Mehnert C P and Wong M S 1999 Angew Chem. Int. Ed. 38 56
Yoshitake H, Sugihara T and Tatsumi T 2002 Chem. Mater. 14 1023
Zhang H and Banfield J F 1998 J. Mater. Chem. 8 2073
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Anuradha, T.V., Ranganathan, S. Nanocrystalline TiO2 by three different synthetic approaches: A comparison. Bull Mater Sci 30, 263–269 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-007-0046-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12034-007-0046-1