Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Delhi, the capital of India, has experienced mild seismic shaking during several earthquakes in the past. The large variations of depth to bedrock and ground water table coupled with different soil types at different locations of Delhi necessitate a seismic microzonation study. Dynamic soil properties such as shear wave velocity, modulus reduction and damping characteristics of local soils are the basic and essential input parameters for conducting even a preliminary ground response analysis which is an essential input in microzonation studies. Shear wave velocity is not measured routinely due to its high cost and lack of the required expertise. Several researchers in the past developed correlations between shear wave velocity (V s ) and routinely measured N values. In the present study, shear wave velocity profiles measured in the field at more than 80 borehole locations to a depth of about 20 to 32m using Spectral Analysis of Surface Waves (SASW) are presented and correlations between shear wave velocity and N values are also presented for use by engineers and designers. Results of strain and stress controlled cyclic triaxial tests on remoulded samples of sand-silt mixtures in the high strain range are used for generating the modulus reduction and damping curves and are compared with the well-known curves in the literature. The results presented in this article can be used for microzonation studies as well as site specific ground response analyses at Delhi.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andrus R D, Piratheepan P, Ellis B, Zhang J and Juang H 2004 Comparing liquefaction evaluation methods using penetration-VS relationships; Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engg. 24 713–721.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM D3999-91 2003 Test method for the determination of the modulus and damping properties of soils using the cyclic triaxial apparatus; Annual book of ASTM standards, ASTM International, West Conhohocken, PA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Athanasopoulos G A 1995 Empirical correlations V so-NSPT for soils of Greece: A comparative study of reliability; Proc. of 7th Int. Conf. on Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engg., Computation Mechanics Publications, Southampton, Boston, 19–25.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boominathan A 2004 Seismic site characterization for nuclear structures and power plants; Curr. Sci. 87 1384–1397.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown L T, Boore D M and Stokoe K H-II 2002 Comparison of shear wave slowness profiles at 10 strong motion sites from noninvasive SASW measurements and measurements made in boreholes; Bull. Seismol. Soc. Am. 92 3116–3133.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • BS: 1377 1990 Methods of testing soils for civil engineering purpose; British Standards Institution, London, UK.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chan C K 1985 Instruction manual, CKC E/P cyclic loading triaxial system user’s manual; Soil Engg. Equipment Company, San Francisco, CA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chien L K, Lin M C and Oh Y N 2000 Shear wave velocity and SPT-N values of in-situ reclaimed soil in west Taiwan; Geotech. Engg. J., Southeast Asian Geotech. Engg. Soc. 31 63–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dennis R, Hiltunen S M and Woods R D 1988 SASW and cross-hole test results compared; Earthquake Engg. Soil Dyn. II — Recent advances in ground motion evaluation, GSP 20, Proc. of an ASCE Geotech. Engg. Div. Speciality Conf., Park City, Utah, 279–289.

  • Elgamal A-W, Yang Z, Lai T, Kutter B L and Wilson D W 2005 Dynamic response of saturated dense sand in laminated centrifuge container; J. Geotech. Geoenv. Engg., ASCE 131 598–609.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Elgamal A-W, Zeghal M, Parra E, Gunturi R, Tang H T and Stepp J C 1996 Identification and modelling of earthquake ground response I. Site amplification; Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engg. 15 499–522.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Erten D and Maher M H 1995 Cyclic undrained behavior of silty sand; Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engg.. 14 115–123.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frydman S, Zeitlen J G and Alpan I 1973 The membrane effect in triaxail testing of granular soils; J. Test. Eval., ASTM 1 37–41.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fumal T E and Tinsley J C 1985 Mapping shear wave velocities of near surface geological materials; Predicting areal limits of earthquake induced landsliding; In evaluation of earthquake hazards in the Los Angeles region - An earth science perspective (ed.) Ziony T. I, USGS Paper 1360 127–150.

  • Hvorslev M J 1949 Subsurface exploration and sampling of soils for civil engineering purposes; Waterways Experiment Station, Vicksburg, Missisippi, p. 521.

  • Iganacio S S, Jose M R, Shao K Y, Stokoe K H and Rix G J 1987 Analytical evaluation of variables affecting surface wave testing of pavements; Transp. Res. Rec. 1136 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Imai T 1977 P- and S-wave velocities of the ground in Japan; Proc. 9th Int. Conf. Soil Mech. and Foundn. Engg., Tokyo, 257–260.

  • Imai T and Tonouchi K 1982 Correlation of N-value with S-wave velocity; Proc. 2nd Euro. Symp. on Penetration Testing 67–72.

  • IS 1892 (1979) Code of practice for subsurface investigation for foundations; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 1893: Part 1 (2002) Criteria for earthquake resistant design of structures — Part 1: General provisions and buildings; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • IS 2131: 1981 Indian Standard Method for Standard Penetration Test for soils; Bureau of Indian Standards, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jafari M K, Shafiee A and Razmkhah A 2002 Dynamic properties of fine grained soils in south of Tehran; Soil Dyn. Earthquake Engg. 4 25–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joh S-H 1992 tUser’s Guide to WinSASW, a program for data reduction and analysis of SASW measurements; University of Texas at Austin.

  • Kayabali K 1996 Soil liquefaction evaluation using shear wave velocity; Engg. Geol. 44(1) 121–127.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kokusho T 1980 Cyclic triaxial test of dynamic soil properties for wide strain range; Soils and Foundn. 20 45–60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ladd R S 1978 Preparing test specimens using under compaction; Geotech. Test. J., ASTM 1 16–23.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee S H H 1990 Regression models of shear wave velocities; J. Chinese Institute of Engineers 13 515–532.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J K 1993 Fundamentals of soil behaviour; Wiley Inter Science, 2nd edn., p. 380.

  • Nazarian S and Stokoe K H-II 1984 In situ shear wave velocities from spectral analysis of surface waves; Proc. 8th World Conf. Earthquake Engg. Proc. 8th World Conf. Earthquake Engg., San Francisco, San Francisco, California, III, 31–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohsaki Y and Iwasaki R 1973 Dynamic shear moduli and Poisson’s ratio of soil deposits; Soils and Foundn. 13 61–73.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y and Goto N 1978 Empirical shear wave velocity equations in terms of characteristic soil indexes; Earthquake Engg. Struct. Dyn. 6 167–187.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ohta Y, Goto N, Kagami H and Shiono K 1972 Shear wave velocity measurement during a standard penetration test; Earthquake Engg. Struct. Dyn. 6 43–50.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Parvez I A, Vaccari F and Panza G F 2004 Site-specific microzonation study in Delhi metropolitan city 2-D modeling of SH and P-SV waves; Pure Appl. Geophys. 161 1165–1184.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pitilakis K D, Anastasiadis A and Raptakis D 1992 Field and laboratory determination of dynamic properties of natural soil deposits; Proc. 10th World Conf. Earthquake Engg., Rotherdam, 1275–1280.

  • Polito C P and Martin-II J R 2000 Effects of non plastic fines on the liquefaction resistance of sands; J. Geotech. Geoenv. Engg., ASCE 127 408–415.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao H Ch and Ramana G V 2004 Correlation between shear wave velocity and N value for Yamuna sand of Delhi; Proc. Int. Conf. Geotech. Engg., UAE 262–268.

  • Raptakis D G, Anastasiadis S A J, Pitilakis K D and Lontzetidis K S 1995 Shear wave velocities and damping of Greek natural soils; Proc. 10th European Conf. Earthquake Engg., Vienna, 477–482.

  • Rix G J, Stokoe K H-II and Roesset J M 1991 Experimental study of factors affecting the spectral analysis of surface waves method; Research Report 1123-5, Center for Transp. Res., the University of Austin Texas.

  • Rollins K M, Diehl N B and Weaver T J 1998a Implications of V s-BPT (N 1)60 correlations for liquefaction assessment in gravels; GSP 75, ASCE 506–517.

  • Rollins K M, Evans M D, Diehl N B and Daily W D 1998b Shear modulus and damping relationships for gravels; J. Geotech. Geoenv. Engg., ASCE 124 396–405.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salinero S I, Roesset J M, Shao K Y, Stokoe K H-II and Rix G J 1987 Analytical evaluation of variables affecting surface wave testing of pavements; Transp. Res. Record 1136 86–95.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed H B and Idriss I M 1970 Soil moduli and damping factors for dynamic response analyses; Rep. No. EERC-70/10, Earthquake Engg. Research Center, Univ. of California at Berkeley, Berkeley, California.

    Google Scholar 

  • Seed H B, Idriss I M and Arango I 1983 Evaluation of liquefaction potential using field performance data; J. Geotech. Engg., ASCE 109 458–482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Silver M L 1977 Laboratory triaxial testing procedures to determine the cyclic strength of soils; NUREG-0031, National Technical Information Service, Springfield. Va.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam T G, Govindaraju L and Sridharan A 2004a Dynamic properties and liquefaction potential of soils; Curr. Sci. 87 1370–1378.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sitharam T G, Govindaraju L and Srinivasa Murthy B R 2004b Evaluation of liquefaction potential and dynamic properties of silty sand using cyclic triaxial testing; Geotech. Testing J., ASTM 27 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Srivastava L S and Somayajulu J G 1966 The seismicity of area around Delhi; Proc. 3rd Symp. Earthquake Engg., Roorkee, 417–422.

  • Stokoe K H-II, Nazarian S, Rix G J, Sanchez-Salinero I, Sheu J-C and Mok Y-J 1988 In situ seismic testing of hard to sample soils by surface wave method; Earthquake Engg. Soil Dyn. II — Recent advances in ground motion evaluation, GSP 20, ASCE, Proc. Geotech. Engg. Div., Speciality Conf., Park City, Utah, 264–278.

  • Stokoe K H-II, Danendeli M B, Andrus R D and Brown L T 1999 Dynamic soil properties: Laboratory, field and correlation studies; Proc. 2nd Int. Conf. Earthquake Geotech. Engg., Lisboa, Portugal, 811–846.

  • Sun J I, Golesorkhi R and Seed H B 1988 Dynamic moduli and damping ratios for cohesive soils; Report No. EERC 88-15, University of California, Berkeley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sykora D W and Koester J P 1988 Correlations between dynamic shear resistance and standard penetration resistance in soils; Earthquake Engg. Soil Dyn. II — Recent Advances in Ground Motion Evaluation, GSP 20, ASCE, Proc. Geotech. Engrg. Div., Speciality Conf., Park City, Utah, 389–404.

  • Sykora D W and Stokoe K H-II 1983 Correlations of in situ measurements in sands of shear wave velocity, soil characteristics, and site conditions; Report GR 83-33, Civil Engg. Dept., Univ. Texas at Austin, 484 pp.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tatsuoka F, Iwasaki T and Fukushima S H 1979 Stress conditions and stress histories affecting shear modulus and damping of sand under cyclic loading; Soils and Foundn. 19 29–43.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tuli R 1994 Shear behaviour in constitutive modelling of Delhi silt; M. Tech Thesis, IIT Delhi, New Delhi.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vucetic M and Dobry R 1991 Effect of soil plasticity on cyclic response; J. Geotech. Engg., ASCE 117 89–107.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Civil Engineering Group, Birla Institute of Technology and Science Pilani, Pilani, 333 031, India

    C. Hanumantharao

  2. Civil Engineering Department, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi, 110 016, India

    G. V. Ramana

Authors
  1. C. Hanumantharao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. G. V. Ramana
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Hanumantharao.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hanumantharao, C., Ramana, G.V. Dynamic soil properties for microzonation of Delhi, India. J Earth Syst Sci 117 (Suppl 2), 719–730 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-008-0066-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation