Skip to main content
Log in

Estimation of the soil strength parameters in Tertiary volcanic regolith (NE Turkey) using analytical hierarchy process

  • Published:
Journal of Earth System Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Costly and time consuming testing techniques and the difficulties in providing undisturbed samples for these tests have led researchers to estimate strength parameters of soils with simple index tests. However, the paper focuses on estimation of strength parameters of soils as a function of the index properties. Analytical hierarchy process and multiple regression analysis based methodology were performed on datasets obtained from soil tests on 41 samples in Tertiary volcanic regolith. While the hierarchy model focused on determining the most important index properties affecting on strength parameters, regression analysis established meaningful relationships between strength parameters and index properties. The negative polynomial correlations between the friction angle and plasticity properties, and the positive exponential relations between the cohesion and plasticity properties were determined. These relations are characterized by a regression coefficient of 0.80. However, Terzaghi bearing capacity formulas were used to test the model. It is important to see whether there is any statistically significant relation between the calculated and the observed bearing capacity values for model testing. Based on the model, the positive linear correlation characterized by the regression coefficient of 0.86 were determined between bearing capacity values obtained by direct and indirect methods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Arslan M, Kadir S, Abdioğlu E and Kolayli H 2006 Origin and formation of kaolin minerals in saprolite of Tertiary alkaline volcanic rocks Eastern Pontides (NE Turkey); Clay Minerals 41 597–617.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 1991a Annual Book of ASTM Standards; ASTM Publication, Sect. 4, Vol. 04.08, Philadelphia.

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 1991b Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D4318 Standard Test Methods for Liquid Limit, Plastic Limit and Plasticity Index of Soils; ASTM Publication, 18p.

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 1991c Annual Book of ASTM Standards, D4718-87 (Reapproved 2001) Standard Practice for Correction of Unit Weight and Water Content for Soils Containing Oversize Particles, ASTM Publication, 3p.

  • ASTM (American Society for Testing and Materials) 2007 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Standard Test Method for Unconsolidated-Undrained Triaxial Compression Test on Cohesive Soils; ASTM Publication, 7p.

  • Chang C, Mark D, Zoback A and Abbas K B 2006 Empirical relations between rock strength and physical properties in sedimentary rocks; J. Petrol. Sci. Eng. 51 223–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cook T, Falchi P and Mariano R 1984 An urban allocation model combining time series and analytic hierarchical methods; Manag. Sci. 30(2) 198–208.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das B 2007 Principles of Foundation Engineering; 6th edn, Cengage Publisher, New York, 256p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis J C 1986 Statistics and Data Analysis in Geology; John Wiley Press, USA, 644p.

    Google Scholar 

  • De P K and Furdas B 1973 Discussion of correlation between Atterberg plasticity limits and residual shear strength of soils; Geotechnique 23 600–601.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dee N and Drobny N 1972 Environmental assessment for effective water quality management planning, Project completion rep. to U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Columbus, Ohio, 24p.

  • Deere D U and Patton F D 1971 Slope stability analysis in residual soils; Proceedings of the 4th Panamerican Conference on Soil Mechanics (San Juan PR), pp. 144–145.

  • Eastman J R, Jin W, Kyem P A K and Toledano J 1995 Raster procedures for multi-criteria/multi-objective decisions; Photogram. Eng. Remote Sens. 61 539–547.

    Google Scholar 

  • Escario V and Juca N 1989 Shear strength and deformation of partly saturated soils; Proceedings of the 12th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (Rio de Janerio) 2 243–246.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fener M, Kahraman S, Bay Y and Gunaydin O 2005 Correlations between P-wave velocity and Atterberg limits of cohesive soils; Canadian Geotech. J. 42(2) 673–677.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freedman D 2005 Statistical models: Theory and practice; Cambridge University Press, 245p.

  • Gan J K M and Fredlund D G 1988 Multistage direct shear testing of unsaturated soils; Am. Soc. Test. Mater. Geotech. Test. J. 11(2) 132–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibson R E 1953 Experimental determination of true cohesion and true angle of internal friction in clays; Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Zurich, pp. 1–126.

  • Holtz R D and Kovacs W D 1985 An Introduction to Geotechnical Engineering; Prentice-Hall, USA.

    Google Scholar 

  • IAEG (International Association of Engineering Geology) 1976 Engineering geological maps: A guide to their preparation; The Unesco Press, Paris, pp. 1–79.

  • Kenney T C 1959 Discussion of Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering Division; ASCE 85-SM3 67–79.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kenney T C 1967 The influence of mineral composition on the residual strength of natural soils; Proceedings of Oslo Conference on Shear Strength Properties of Natural Soils and Rocks 1 123–129.

    Google Scholar 

  • Khallili N and Khabbaz M H 1998 A unique relationship for the determination of the shear strength of unsaturated soils; Geotechnique 48(5) 681–687.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kurtuluş C, Sertçelik F, Canbay M and Sertçelik I 2009 Estimation of Atterberg limits and bulk mass density of Derince expansive soil from P-wave velocity measurements; 5th Congress of Balkan Geophysical Society, Belgrade, Serbia.

  • Lee J, Salgado R and Paik K 2003 Estimation of load capacity of pipe piles in sand based on CPT Results; J. Geotech. Geoenviron. Eng. 129(5) 391–403.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leonards G A 1962 Foundation Engineering; Mc Graw Hill Book Company, New York, 1136p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leopold L B, Clarke F E, Hanshaw B B and Balsley J R 1971 A procedure for evaluating environment impact, Circular 645, U.S. Geological Survey, 13p.

  • Linkov I, Varghese A, Jamil S, Seager T P, Kiker G and Bridges T 2004 Multi-criteria decision analysis: A framework for structuring remedial decisions at contaminated sites; In: Comparative Risk Assessment and Environmental Decision Making (eds) Linkov I and Ramadan A, Kluwer Publishers, pp. 15–54.

  • Luna R and Jadi H 2000 Determination of dynamic soil properties using geophysical methods; The First International Conference on the Application of Geophysical and NDT Methodologies to Transportation Facilities and Infrastructure; St. Louis.

  • Mc Bean E and Zukovs G 1983 A decision making analysis methodology for pollution control strategy formulation; Canadian Water Resour. J. 8(2) 64–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miao L, Liu S and Lai Y 2002 Research of soil-water characteristics and shear strength feature of Nanyag expansive soil; Eng. Geol. 65 261–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell J K 1976 Fundamentals of Soil Behavior; John Wiley, New York, 422p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Oberg A and Sallfors G 1997 Determination of shear strength parameters of unsaturated silts and sands based on the water retention curve; Geotech. Test. J. 20 40–48.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Odum E P, Bramlett G A, Ike A, Champlin J R, Zieman J C and Shugart H H 1976 Totality indices for evaluating environmental impact of highway alternatives; Transportation Research Rec. 561 56–57.

    Google Scholar 

  • Poulos S J 1989 Liquefaction related phenomena; In: Advanced Dam Engineering for Design Construction and Rehabilitation Van Nostrand Reinhold (ed.) Jansen R B, pp. 292–320.

  • Saaty T L 1980 The analytic hierarchy process; McGraw-Hill, New York.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saaty T and Millet I 2000 On the relativity of relative measures accommodating both rank preservation and rank reversals in the AHP; European J. Operational Res. 121 205–212.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sawangsuriya A and Fratta D 2006 Discussion of correlations between P-wave velocity and Atterberg limits of cohesive soils; Canadian Geotech. J. 43 653–655.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skempton A W 1953 The Colloidal activity of clays; Proc. 3rd Int. Conf. Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering (London) 1 47–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • Skempton A W 1985 Residual strength of clays in landslides folded strata and the laboratory; Geotechnique 35 3–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Terzaghi K 1943 Theoretical Soil Mechanics; John Wiley and Sons, New York.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Van Der Merve D H 1964 The prediction of heave from the plasticity index and the percentage clay friction; South African Institute Civil Engineering 6 103–107.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voight B 1973 Correlation between Atterberg plasticity limits and residual strength of natural soils; Geotechnique 23 265–267.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesley L D 2003 Residual strength of clays and correlation using Atterberg limits; Geotechnique 53(7) 669–672.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Whitlatch E E 1976 Systematic approaches to environmental impact assessment: An evaluation; Water Resour. Bull. 12(1) 123–137.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wilbourn K, Vembu K and Vipulanandan C 2007 Index properties and strength of artificial soil using the Harvard miniature method; Final Report, Department of Environmental and Civil Engineering, University of Houston, USA.

  • Zadeh L and Tanaka K 1975 Fuzzy Sets and their Applications to Cognitive and Decision Processes; Academic Press, New York, 234p.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zieman J C 1971 Optimum Pathway Matrix Analysis Approach to Environment Decision Making Process; Institute of Ecology, University of Georgia, Athens, Ga.12.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hakan Ersoy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ersoy, H., Karsli, M.B., Çellek, S. et al. Estimation of the soil strength parameters in Tertiary volcanic regolith (NE Turkey) using analytical hierarchy process. J Earth Syst Sci 122, 1545–1555 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0366-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12040-013-0366-z

Keywords

Navigation