Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Simulation and comparison of perturb and observe and incremental conductance MPPT algorithms for solar energy system connected to grid

  • Published:
Sadhana Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Solar energy is a clean, green and renewable source of energy. It is available in abundance in nature. Solar cells by photovoltaic action are able to convert the solar energy into electric current. The output power of solar cell depends upon factors such as solar irradiation (insolation), temperature and other climatic conditions. Present commercial efficiency of solar cells is not greater than 15% and therefore the available efficiency is to be exploited to the maximum possible value and the maximum power point tracking (MPPT) with the aid of power electronics to solar array can make this possible. There are many algorithms proposed to realize maximum power point tracking. These algorithms have their own merits and limitations. In this paper, an attempt is made to understand the basic functionality of the two most popular algorithms viz. Perturb and Observe (P & O) algorithm and Incremental conductance algorithm. These algorithms are compared by simulating a 100 kW solar power generating station connected to grid. MATLAB M-files are generated to understand MPPT and its dependency on insolation and temperature. MATLAB Simulink software is used to simulate the MPPT systems. Simulation results are presented to verify these assumptions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong S and Hurley W G 2004 Self-regulating maximum power point tracking for solar energy systems Universities Power Engineering Conference, 39th International IEEE September: 604–609

  • Azab M 2008 A New Maximum Power Point Tracking for Photovoltaic Systems World Academy of Science. Engineering and Technology Proceeding: 471–474

  • Bruendlinger Roland, Benoît Bletterie, Matthias Milde and Henk Oldenkamp 2007 Maximum Power Point Tracking Performance Under Partially Shaded PV Array Conditions OTTI PV- Symposium, Staffelstein, Germany: 141–144

  • Chaudhari Vikrant A 2005 Automatic Peak Power Tracker For Solar PV Modules Using DSpace Software Thesis Submitted in partial fulfillment of the Requirement for the award of the Degree of Master Of Technology Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology

  • Das Debashis and Pradhan Shishir Kumar 2005 Modeling and Simulation of Pv Array With Boost Converter: An Open Loop Study: a Thesis in Partial Fulfillment of Requirements for The Award of The Degree of Bachelor of Technology, National Institute of Technology. Rourkela 1–56

  • Enslin Johan H R, Wolf Mario S, Snyman Daniël B and Swiegers Wernher 1997 Integrated Photovoltaic Maximum Power Point Tracking Converter. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Electronics, 44(6): 769–773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Faranda Roberto and Leva Sonia 2008 Energy Comparison of Mppt Techniques For PV Systems WSEAS. Transactions on Power Systems, 6(3): 446–455

  • Hohm D P 2000 Comparative Study of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms Using an Experimental, Programmable, Maximum Power Point Tracking Test Bed Photovoltaic Specialists Conference. Conference Record of the Twenty-Eighth IEEE: 1699–1702

  • Kachhiya Kinal, Lokhande Makarand and Patel Mukesh 2011 MATLAB/Simulink Model of Solar PV Module and MPPT Algorithm National Conference on Recent Trends in Engineering & Technology 13-14 May B.V.M. Engineering College, V.V. Nagar, Gujarat, India

  • MacIsaac L and Knox A 2010 Improved Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithm for Photovoltaic Systems International Conference on Renewable Energies and Power Quality (ICREPQ’10) Granada (Spain), 239–244

  • Patel H and Agarwal V 2008 Maximum Power Point Tracking Scheme for PV Systems Operating Under Partially Shaded Conditions Industrial Electronics. IEEE Transactions on April, 55(4): 1689–1698

    Google Scholar 

  • Surya Kumari J and Sai Babu C. 2011 Comparison Of Maximum Power Point Tracking Algorithms for Photovoltaic System. Int. J. Advances in Eng. Technol. 133–148

  • Szczesny P M, Steigerwald R L and Bose B K 1985 Microcomputer Control of a Residential Photovoltaic Power Condictioning System Industry Applications. IEEE Transactions IA-21(5): 1182–1191

  • Tariq Abu, AsimMohammed and TariqMohd 2011 Simulink based modeling, simulation and Performance Evaluation of an MPPT for maximum power generation on resistive load 2nd International Conference on Environmental Science and Technology, IPCBEE vol. 6- IACSIT Press. Singapore 2: 397–401

    Google Scholar 

  • Tsai Huan-Liang, Tu Ci-Siang and Su Yi-Jie 2008 Development of Generalized Photovoltaic Model Using MATLAB/Simulink Proceedings of the World Congress on Engineering and Computer Science San Francisco, USA, pp 331–336

  • Xiao W 2011 Overview of maximum power point tracking technologies for photovoltaic power systems IECON 2011 - 37th Annual Conference on IEEE Industrial Electronics Society 7–10 November 2011: 3900–3905

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to SACHIN VRAJLAL RAJANI.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

RAJANI, S.V., PANDYA, V.J. Simulation and comparison of perturb and observe and incremental conductance MPPT algorithms for solar energy system connected to grid. Sadhana 40, 139–153 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0312-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-014-0312-z

Keywords

Navigation