Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Inter-County Migration Patterns in the United States

  • Published:
Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The dynamic nature of internal migration flows has altered population redistribution and changed composition in the United States for more than a century. Socioeconomic push and pull factors have influenced people’s migration decisions during various internal migration waves in the United States. The main objective of this paper is to identify how effective internal migration flows have been in transforming the population distribution of the United States since the mid-1990s. We also examine the characteristics of the counties that gained or lost population during the last two decades. We analyze migration data from the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) from 1994–95 to 2006–07 to achieve these objectives. The results show that migration was very effective in redistributing population from rural to urban areas. Although suburbanization was a major characteristic of urban growth, our study indicates that suburbanization was not as effective as rural-to-urban migration. The South continued to be the major population magnet in the United States. Counties with large black and Hispanic populations had a negative migration effect. During the last two decades, increase in the Hispanic population and economic inequality in American neighborhoods have also influenced migration patterns in the United States.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ambinakudige, S., Parisi, D., & Grice, S. (2012). An analysis of differential migration pattern in the Black Belt and the New South. Southeastern Geographer, 52(2), 146–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beale, C. (1975). The revival of population growth in non-metropolitan America. Washington, DC: Economic Research Service, USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beale, C. (1977). The recent shift of United States population to non-metropolitan areas 1970–75. International Regional Science Review, 2, 113–22.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bell, M., Blake, M., Boyle, P., Duke-Williams, O., Rees, P., Stillwell, J., & Hugo, G. (2002). Cross-national comparison of internal migration: issues and measures. Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A - Statistics in Society, 165(3), 435–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bernard, A., Bell, M., & Charles-Edwards, E. (2014). Life-course transitions and the age profile of internal migration. Population and Development Review, 40(2), 231–39.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell, R., & Garkovich, L. (1984). Turnaround migration as an episode of collective behavior. Rural Sociological Society, 49, 89–105.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cebula, R. J. (1979). The determinants of human migration. Lexington: Lexington Books.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chi, G., & Voss, P. (2005). Migration decision-making: a hierarchical regression approach. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 35, 11–22.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coates, D., & Gindling, T. H. (2013). Is Hispanic population dispersion into rural counties contributing to local economic growth? Contemporary Economic Policy, 31(4), 649–668.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cooke, T. J. (2011). It is not just the economy: declining migration and the rise of secular rootedness. Population, Space and Place, 17(3), 193–203.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crowder, K., Pais, J., & South, S. (2012). Neighborhood diversity, metropolitan constraints, and household migration. American Sociological Review, 77(3), 325–353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Damgaard, C., & Weiner, J. (2000). Describing inequality in plant size or fecundity. Ecology, 81, 1139–1142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DaVanzo, J. (1981). Repeat migration, information costs, and location-specific capital. Population and Environment, 4(1), 45–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Engels, R. A., & Healy, M. K. (1981). Measuring interstate migration flows: an origin–destination network based on internal revenue service records. Environment & Planning A, 13(11), 1345–1360.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etzo, I. (2008). Internal migration: a review of the literature. MPRA Paper No. 8783. University of Cagliari.

  • Flippen, C. A. (2013). Relative deprivation and internal migration in the United States: a comparison of black and white men. American Journal of Sociology, 118(5), 1161–1198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franklin, R. S., & Plane, D. A. (2006). Pandora’s box: the potential and peril of migration data from the American community survey. International Regional Science Review, 29(3), 231–246.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W. (2005). Immigration and domestic migration in U.S Metro areas: 2000 and 1990 census findings by education and race. Research report 05–572. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Population Studies Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • Frey, W., & Speare, A. (1988). Regional and metropolitan growth and decline in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuguitt, G. (1985). The nonmetropolitan population turnaround. Annual Review of Sociology, 11, 259–280.

  • Fuguitt, G., & Beale, C. (1996). Recent trends in Metropolitan- Nonmetropolitan migration: toward a new turnaround? Growth and Change, 27, 156–174.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fulton, J., Fuguitt, G., & Gibson, R. (1997). Recent changes in metropolitan and non metropolitan migration streams. Rural Sociology, 62(3), 363–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galle, O. R., & Williams, M. W. (1972). Metropolitan migration efficiency. Demography, 9(4), 655–664.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gober, P. (1993). Americans on the move. Population Bulletin, 48(3), 1–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Gross, E. (2014). Internal revenue service area-to-area migration data: strengths, limitations, and current trends. Internal Revenue Service. http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-soi/05gross.pdf. Accessed 9 June, 2014.

  • Heaton, T., & Fuguitt, G. V. (1980). Dimensions of population redistribution in the United States. Social Science Quarterly, 61(3–4), 508–523.

    Google Scholar 

  • Henrie, C. J., & Plane, D. A. (2008). Exodus from the California core: using demographic effectiveness and migration impact measures to examine population redistribution within the western United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 27(1), 43–64.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. M., & Beale, C. (1994). The recent revival of widespread population growth in nonmetropolitan areas of the United States. Rural Sociology, 59(4), 655–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson, K. M., & Beale, C. (2002). Nonmetro recreation counties: their identification and rapid growth. Rural America, 17(4), 12–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kennan, J., & Walker, J. (2003). The effect of expected income on individual migration decisions. Econometrica, 79(1), 211–251.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kontuly, T., Vogelsang, R., Schon, K. P., & Maretzke, S. (1997). Political unification and regional consequences if German east–west migration. International Journal of Population Geography, 3(1), 31–47.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kulu, H., & Milewski, N. (2007). Family change and migration in the life course: an introduction. Demographic Research, 117(19), 567–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lee, E. S. (1966). A theory of migration. Demography, 3(1), 47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., & Brown, D. L. (2011). Rural America in an urban society: changing spatial and social boundaries. Annual Review of Sociology, 37, 565–592.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., Taquino, M. C., & Beaulieu, B. (2008). Race and the micro-scale spatial concentration of poverty. Cambridge Journal of Regions, Economy and Society, 10(1), 51–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lichter, D. T., Parisi, D., & Taquino, M. C. (2012). The geography of exclusion: race, segregation, and concentrated poverty. Social Problems, 59, 364–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lomax, N., Stillwell, J., Norman, O., & Rees, P. (2014). Internal migration in the United Kingdom: analysis of an estimated inter-district time series, 2001–2011. Applied Spatial Analysis and Policy, 7(1), 25–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Long, L. (1988). Migration and residential mobility in the United States. New York: Russell Sage.

    Google Scholar 

  • Manson, G., & Groop, R. (1996). Ebbs and flows in recent U.S interstate migration. Professional Geographer, 48(2), 156–166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Manson, G., & Groop, R. (2000). U.S inter county migration in the 1990s: people and income move down the urban hierarchy. Professional Geographer, 52(3), 493–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, K., & Morrison, P. A. (1977). The changing demographic and economic structure of nonmetropolitan areas in the United States. International Regional Science Review, 2(2), 123–142.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D. (1999). Natural amenities drive rural population change. Agricultural economic report no. (AER-781) 27 pp, October 1999. Washington, DC: Food and Rural Economics Division, Economic Research Service, USDA.

    Google Scholar 

  • McGranahan, D., & Beale, C. L. (2002). Understanding rural population loss. Rural America, 17(4), 2–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • McHugh, K. E., & Gober, P. (1992). Short term dynamics of the U. S interstate migration system 1980–1988. Growth and Change, 23(4), 428–445.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mincer, J. (1978). Family migration decisions. Journal of Political Economy, 86(5), 749–773.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Molloy, R., Smith, C. L., & Wozniak, A. (2011). Internal Migration in the United States. NBER Working Paper No. 17307. August 2011. JEL No. J1, J61, R2.

  • Morrill, R. (1978). Population redistribution, 1965–75. Growth and Change, 9(2), 35–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbold, K. B. (1997). Race and primary return and onward interstate migration. Professional Geographer, 49(1), 1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nord, M., & Cromartie, J. (2000). Migration in the nonmetropolitan South. Southern Rural Sociology, 16, 175–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Office of Management and Budget. (2008). Revised definitions of metropolitan statistical areas, new definitions of micropolitan statistical areas and combined statistical areas, and guidance on uses of the statistical definitions of these areas. OMB Bulletin No. 03–04. Washington, DC: Office of Management and Budget.

    Google Scholar 

  • Partridge, M. D., Rickman, D. S., Olfert, M. R., & Ali, K. (2012). Dwindling US internal migration: evidence of spatial equilibrium or structural shifts in local labor markets? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 42(1), 375–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. (2002). Population growth in the 1990s: patterns within the United States. Population Research and Policy Review, 21(1–2), 55–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Perry, M. (2003). State-State migration flows: 1995–2000. U.S. Department of Commerce, Economics and Statistics Administration, U.S. Census Bureau.

  • Plane, D. A. (1984). The wax and wane of migration patterns in the US interstate population exchange. Economic Geography, 60, 294–312.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plane, D. A., & Mulligan, G. (1997). Measuring spatial focusing in a migration system. Demography, 34, 251–262.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Plane, D. A., & Rogerson, P. (1994). The geographical analysis of population with applications to planning and business. New York: Wiley.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravuri, E. (2008). Straddling the great divide: migration and population change in the Great Plains and Rocky Mountains. The Online Journal of Rural Research and Policy, 1–14.

  • Rayer, S., & Brown, D. L. (2001). Geographic diversity of inter-county migration in the United States, 1980–1995. Population Research and Policy Review, 20, 229–252.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rees, P., Bell, M., Duke-Williams, O., & Blake, M. (2000). Problems and solutions in the measurement of migration intensities: Australia and Britain compared. Population Studies, 54(2), 207–222.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schachter, J. (2003). Migration by race and hispanic origin: 1995 to 2000. Washington, DC: U.S Census Bureau.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shryock, H. S. (1964). Population mobility within the United States. Chicago: University of Chicago, Community and Family Study Center.

    Google Scholar 

  • South, S., Crowder, K., & Pais, J. (2011). Metropolitan structure and neighborhood attainment: exploring inter metropolitan variation in racial residential segregation. Demography, 48(4), 1263–1292.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O. (2006). Inequality and migration: a behavioral link. Economics Letters, 91(1), 146–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stark, O., & Wang, Y. Q. (2000). A theory of migration as a response to relative deprivation. German Economic Review, 1(2), 131–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J., Bell, M., Blake, M., Duke-Williams, O., & Rees, P. (2000). Net migration and migration effectiveness: a comparison between Australia and the United Kingdom. 1976–96 part 1: total migration patterns. Journal of Population Research, 17(1), 17–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stillwell, J., van Wissen, L., van der Gaag, N., & Rees, P. H. (2003). In search of a generally applicable explanatory model of interregional migration. in 13th European Colloquium on Theoretical and Quantitative Geography. Lucca.

  • Ulrich-Schad, J. D., Henly, M., & Safford, T. G. (2013). The role of community assessments, place, and the great recession in the migration intensions of rural Americas. Rural Sociology, 78(3), 371–398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA, (2007). Measuring rurality: Urban influence codes. http://webarchives.cdlib.org/sw1wp9v27r/http://www.ers.usda.gov/Briefing/Rurality/UrbanInf/. Accessed on: Nov 1, 2014.

  • Vias, A. C. (2010). The influence of booms and busts of the U.S. economy on the interstate migration system. Growth and Change, 41(1), 115–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wardwell, J. M. (1980). Toward a theory of urban–rural migration in the developed world. In D. L. Brown & J. M. Wardwell (Eds.), New directions in Urban–rural migration. New York: Academic.

    Google Scholar 

  • Xu, Z. (2014). Spatial and longitudinal patterns in county age-specific net migration in the United States 1950–2010. The Professional Geographer, 66(4), 641–652.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zuiches, J. J. (1981). Residential preferences in the United States. In A. H. Hawley & S. M. Mazie (Eds.), Nonmetropolitan America in transition (pp. 72–115). Chapel Hill: The University of North Carolina Press.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Geosciences, Mississippi State University, 355 Lee Blvd. 108, Hilbun Hall, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA

    Shrinidhi Ambinakudige

  2. National Strategic Planning and Analysis Research Center, Mississippi State University, 355 Lee Blvd. 108, Hilbun Hall, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA

    Shrinidhi Ambinakudige & Domenico Parisi

Authors
  1. Shrinidhi Ambinakudige
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Domenico Parisi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shrinidhi Ambinakudige.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ambinakudige, S., Parisi, D. A Spatiotemporal Analysis of Inter-County Migration Patterns in the United States. Appl. Spatial Analysis 10, 121–137 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9171-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-015-9171-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation