Skip to main content
Log in

The Nature and Extent of Conservation Policing: Law Enforcement Generalists or Conservation Specialists?

  • Published:
American Journal of Criminal Justice Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Little is known about law enforcement agencies with responsibility for fish, wildlife, and natural resource protection. Traditional conceptions of fish and wildlife police associate these officers almost entirely with fishing and hunting activities. The relative scarcity of academic literature regarding fish and wildlife police agencies results in a lack of understanding about their role in the criminal justice system in general. The current study seeks to contribute to the limited existing literature by examining conservation policing in Florida, a state not yet studied in this context, by analyzing some 2,910 field events. Findings indicate that officers devote a considerable portion of their attention to traditional law enforcement activities in addition to the type of enforcement customarily associated with fish and wildlife law enforcement.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Conservation officers are also known as fish and wildlife officers, wildlife management officers, game wardens, park rangers, natural resources police, etc. (See Falcone 2004)

  2. An augmented role does not suggest that traditional crime fighting tasks will exceed those of specialized activities traditionally associated with conservation forms of policing but that conservation officers may be involved in these tasks more than one might expect.

  3. In some instances, the reports were vague when describing the issuance of citations. For example, an entry might indicate that “citations were issued.” In these instances, when multiple citations were indicated but it was impossible to determine the exact number of the multiple citations, the researchers chose to use the most conservative interpretation of “citations” by recording this as two citations.

  4. Special duties most often involved some sort of fish & wildlife issue, but also included boating-related issues.

References

  • Bachman, R. (1992). Crime in nonmetropolitan America: A national accounting of trends, incidence rates, and idiosyncratic vulnerabilities. Rural Sociology, 57(4), 546–560.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berg, B. (2001). Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. Boston, MA: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. J. (2004). Force against and by game wardens in citizen encounters. Police Quarterly, 7, 489–508.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carter, T. J. (2006). Police use of discretion: a participant observation study of game wardens. Deviant Behavior, 27, 591–627.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charles, M. T. (1982). The Yellowstone ranger: The social control and socialization of federal law enforcement officers. Human Organization, 41, 216–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chavez, D. J., & Tynon, J. F. (2000). Triage law enforcement: Societal impacts on national forests in the west. Environmental Management, 26, 403–407.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cordell, H. K., Betz, C. J., & Green, G. T. (2002). Recreation and environment as cultural dimensions in contemporary American society. Leisure Sciences, 24, 13–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2003). Throwing the book verus cutting some slack: Factors influencing the use of discretion by game wardens in Kentucky. Deviant Behavior, 24, 129–152.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2005). Who poaches? Conservation officers’ perceptions of the social class of poachers. Sociological Imagination, 41, 105–118.

    Google Scholar 

  • Eliason, S. L. (2006). Factors influencing job satisfaction among state conservation officers. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 29, 6–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, D. (2004). America’s conservation police: agencies in transition. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 27, 56–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Falcone, D., Wells, E., & Weisheit, R. A. (2002). The small-town police department. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies and Management, 25, 371–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida Fish and Wildlife Conservation Commission (2006). FWC Division of Law Enforcement Field Operations: Weekly Report December 30, 2005 to January 5, 2006. http://myfwc.com/law/Weekly/2006/OPERATIONSWEEKLY01-06-06.pdf.

  • Forsyth, C. J. (1993). Chasing and catching “bad guys”: the game wardens prey. Deviant Behavior, 14, 209–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C. J. (1994). Bookers and peacemakers: Types of game wardens. Sociological Spectrum, 14, 47–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Forsyth, C., Gramling, R., & Wooddell, G. (1998). The game of poaching: Folk crimes in southwest Louisiana. Society & Natural Resources, 11, 25–38.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hickman, M. J., & Reaves, B. A. (2006). Local police departments, 2003. Law enforcement management and administrative statistics (LEMAS). Washington, D.C.: Bureau of Justice Statistics, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Howard, L., & Koehl, C. (1996, July). Bait ’n’ switch. Newsweek, 128(1), 6. Retrieved July 17, 2008, from Academic Search Premier database.

  • Hummel, R. L. (1983). Hunting and fishing—but not in sociology. The Rural Sociologist, 3, 255–258.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meadows, R., & Soden, D. L. (1988). National park ranger attitudes and perceptions regarding law enforcement issues. The Justice Professional, 3, 70–93.

    Google Scholar 

  • Muth, R. M. (1998). The persistence of poaching in advanced industrial society: Meanings and motivations—An introductory comment. Society and Natural Resources, 11, 5–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Muth, R. M., & Bowe, J. F. (1998). Illegal harvest of renewable natural resources in North America: Toward a typology of the motivations for poaching. Society and Natural Resources, 11, 9–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Marine Manufacturers Association. (2004). 2002 U.S. Recreational boat registration statistics. Chicago: IL: National Marine Manufacturers Association, Market Statistics Department.

    Google Scholar 

  • Neuman, W. L. (2003). Social Research Methods: Qualitative and Quantitative Approaches. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palmer, C. E., & Bryant, C. D. (1985). Keepers of the king’s deer. In C. D. Bryant, D. J. Shoemaker, J. K. Skipper, & W. E. Snizek (Eds.), The Rural Workforce (pp. 111–137). South Hadley, MA: Bergin and Garvey.

    Google Scholar 

  • Payne, B. K., Berg, B. L., & Sun, I. Y. (2005). Policing in small town America: Dogs, drunks, disorder and dysfunction. Journal of Criminal Justice, 33, 31–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, M. R. (1996). Crime, criminals and guns in “natural settings”: Exploring the basis for disarming federal rangers. American Journal of Police, XV, 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pendleton, M. R. (2000). Leisure, Crime and Cops: Exploring a paradox of our civility. Journal of Leisure Research, 32, 111–115.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ross, H. L. (1961). Traffic law violation: A folk crime. Social Problems, 9, 231–241.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sherblom, J. C., Keränen, L., & Withers, L. A. (2002). Tradition, tension, and transformation: A structuration analysis of game warden service in transition. Journal of Applied Communication Research, 30, 143–162.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tetreault, F. (1985). Exposing the exploiters. Illinois Department of Conservation: Outdoor Heights, 13, 17–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, G. (1982). Poaching: A new look at an old problem. Illinois Department of Conservation: Outdoor Heights, 10, 6–13.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thomas, J. K., Adams, C. E., & Wang, G. (1999). Law enforcement personnel needs of a state natural resource agency. Human Dimensions of Wildlife, 4, 1–19.

    Google Scholar 

  • U.S. Department of Interior, Fish and Wildlife Service, & U.S. Department of Commerce, U.S. Census Bureau. (2008). 2006 national survey of fishing, hunting, and wildlife-associated recreation-Florida.

  • Walsh, W. F., & Donovan, E. J. (1984). Job stress in game conservation officers. Journal of police science and administration, 12, 333–338.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisheit, R. A., & Wells, L. E. (1996). Rural crime and justice: Implications for theory and research. Crime and Delinquency, 42, 379–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Matthew S. Crow.

Additional information

The authors would like to acknowledge Richard Hughes and Ashley Meek for their research assistance and thank the editor and anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments on this article.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

O’Connor Shelley, T., Crow, M.S. The Nature and Extent of Conservation Policing: Law Enforcement Generalists or Conservation Specialists?. Am J Crim Just 34, 9–27 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-008-9057-8

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12103-008-9057-8

Keywords

Navigation